2026:BHC-AUG:37428-DB 941 fca 78-18 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 941 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 78 OF 2018 WITH FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 79 OF 2018 NARSING BHAGWANDAS BANG VERSUS SMITA NARSING BANG ... Mr. Kshitij Surve, Advocate for Respondent …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 19/08/2026 PER COURT : 1. None for the appellant. 2. By order dated 22.07.2026, passed in both these appeals, we had made it clear that in the event the private paper book was not filed by the appellant, both the appeals would be dismissed. 3. Today, none appeared for the appellant in either of these appeals and the private paper books have also not been filed. In the circumstances, it appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting these appeals. Accordingly, both the appeals stand dismissed for want of steps. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|1

2026:BHC-AUG:37428-DB 941 fca 78-18 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 941 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 78 OF 2018 WITH FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 79 OF 2018 NARSING BHAGWANDAS BANG VERSUS SMITA NARSING BANG ... Mr. Kshitij Surve, Advocate for Respondent …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 19/08/2026 PER COURT : 1. None for the appellant. 2. By order dated 22.07.2026, passed in both these appeals, we had made it clear that in the event the private paper book was not filed by the appellant, both the appeals would be dismissed. 3. Today, none appeared for the appellant in either of these appeals and the private paper books have also not been filed. In the circumstances, it appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting these appeals. Accordingly, both the appeals stand dismissed for want of steps. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|1