Law on Tips. A free Indian legal platform. Bringing you the latest judgments, legislative updates, and in-depth legal analysis from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and Tribunals.
© 2026 Law on Tips Media Pvt Ltd.
Subscribe Get the latest legal news delivered to your inbox daily.
+
Refine CourtAll courts Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (40,857) Supreme Court of India (12,705) Madras High Court (2,258) Karnataka High Court (1,440) Punjab & Haryana High Court (1,387) Calcutta High Court (1,307) Orissa High Court (1,156) Bombay High Court (1,131) Patna High Court (1,103) Chhattisgarh High Court (1,028) Himachal Pradesh High Court (939) Delhi High Court (840) Allahabad High Court (641) Jharkhand High Court (641) Andhra Pradesh High Court (610) Gauhati High Court (511) Rajasthan High Court (435) Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court (336) Uttarakhand High Court (284) Telangana High Court (193) Gujarat High Court (189) Manipur High Court (104) Central Administrative Tribunal (74) Meghalaya High Court (63) Tripura High Court (51) Kerala High Court (7)
2 judgments SortNewest first Oldest first Privy Council · 1945
AIR 1945 PC 118
Classic distinction between common intention (pre-arranged plan and meeting of minds) and similar intention; same or similar intention cannot be equated with common intention under Section 34. | Joint liability and prior concert principles applied to Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (corresponding to Section 34 IPC).
+
Refine CourtAll courts Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (40,857) Supreme Court of India (12,705) Madras High Court (2,258) Karnataka High Court (1,440) Punjab & Haryana High Court (1,387) Calcutta High Court (1,307) Orissa High Court (1,156) Bombay High Court (1,131) Patna High Court (1,103) Chhattisgarh High Court (1,028) Himachal Pradesh High Court (939) Delhi High Court (840) Allahabad High Court (641) Jharkhand High Court (641) Andhra Pradesh High Court (610) Gauhati High Court (511) Rajasthan High Court (435) Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court (336) Uttarakhand High Court (284) Telangana High Court (193) Gujarat High Court (189) Manipur High Court (104) Central Administrative Tribunal (74) Meghalaya High Court (63) Tripura High Court (51) Kerala High Court (7)
2 judgments SortNewest first Oldest first Privy Council · 1945
AIR 1945 PC 118
Classic distinction between common intention (pre-arranged plan and meeting of minds) and similar intention; same or similar intention cannot be equated with common intention under Section 34. | Joint liability and prior concert principles applied to Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (corresponding to Section 34 IPC).
Madhya Pradesh High Court (5)
Privy Council (5)
Sikkim High Court (5)
GST Appellate Tribunal (3)
Court of Appeal in Chancery (1)
Court of Appeal of England and Wales (1)
High Court of Calcutta (1)
House of Lords (1)
National Company Law Tribunal (1)
ActAny Act The Constitution of India (118) The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (38) The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (36) The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (23) The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (19) The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (17) The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (16) The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (16) The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. (14) The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (13) The Indian Contract Act, 1872 (11) The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (8) The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (6) The Companies Act, 2013 (5) The Delhi High Court Act, 1966 (2) The Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 (1) The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 (1) The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (1) The Punjab Excise Act, 1914 (1)
Section or Article
Judge
Search tips Citations work in any format: (1978) 1 SCC 248 , AIR 1973 SC 1461 . Name a provision: 302 IPC , Section 41A CrPC , Article 21 . Quotes for a phrase: "rarest of rare" . OR for alternatives, a minus sign to exclude: bail -anticipatory .Small spelling mistakes in case names are forgiven. Privy Council · 1924
AIR 1925 PC 1
They also serve who only stand and wait; physical presence and participation in furtherance of pre-arranged common intention renders all co-accused equally liable under Section 34.
Madhya Pradesh High Court (5)
Privy Council (5)
Sikkim High Court (5)
GST Appellate Tribunal (3)
Court of Appeal in Chancery (1)
Court of Appeal of England and Wales (1)
High Court of Calcutta (1)
House of Lords (1)
National Company Law Tribunal (1)
ActAny Act The Constitution of India (118) The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (38) The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (36) The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (23) The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (19) The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (17) The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (16) The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (16) The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. (14) The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (13) The Indian Contract Act, 1872 (11) The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (8) The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (6) The Companies Act, 2013 (5) The Delhi High Court Act, 1966 (2) The Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 (1) The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 (1) The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (1) The Punjab Excise Act, 1914 (1)
Section or Article
Judge
Search tips Citations work in any format: (1978) 1 SCC 248 , AIR 1973 SC 1461 . Name a provision: 302 IPC , Section 41A CrPC , Article 21 . Quotes for a phrase: "rarest of rare" . OR for alternatives, a minus sign to exclude: bail -anticipatory .Small spelling mistakes in case names are forgiven. Privy Council · 1924
AIR 1925 PC 1
They also serve who only stand and wait; physical presence and participation in furtherance of pre-arranged common intention renders all co-accused equally liable under Section 34.