Loading…
Loading…
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 1,626–1,650 of 3,086 · Page 66 of 124
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/121945/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite company submitted that a proper vakalatnama
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppeared
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 1,626–1,650 of 3,086 · Page 66 of 124
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/121945/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite company submitted that a proper vakalatnama
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppeared
Complaint No. NCR144/07/130889/2025 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant appeared in person. For the opposite party, Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite party requested time to upload and file its objection regarding the complaint
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121917/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite company submitted that the pro
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121890/2024 · for the respondent
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121818/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. On the request of the learned advocate f
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121616/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. On the request of the learned advocate f
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121605/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. On the request of the learned advocate f
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121603/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. On the request of the learned advocate f
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121600/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. On the request of the learned advocate f
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121593/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. On the request of the learned advocate f
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121586/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. Learned advocate for the respondent company ha
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121580/2024 · for the respondent
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121579/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for Shri Manendra Kumar. Learned advocate for the respondent company h
12 Sep 2025
12 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/07/121788/2024 · for the complainant
12 Sep 2025
12 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/07/121788/2024 · for the complainant
Hon'ble Chairman, UP RERA / Presiding Officer, Bench-0 Respectfully submitted that the hearing of complaints before the Hon'ble Bench-0 at the RERA Regional Office, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar, is fixed for 43-06-2025. Due to a technical problem with the portal on that date, it is proposed that the complaints lis
12 Sep 2025
12 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81402/2021 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant's learned advocate Shri Neeraj Bhagat appeared. For the opposite party, the proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for Advocate Shri [?] Kumar. Today the complainant's learned advocate informed that a settlem
12 Sep 2025
12 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/110671/2023 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Shiv Tyagi appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri Manendra[?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. On behalf of the complainant, the learned advocate
12 Sep 2025
12 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/06/95165/2022 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's petition was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant was absent. On behalf of the respondent, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. Notice be issued to the complainant to appear. The respondent's learned advocate has re
12 Sep 2025
12 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/04/92322/2022 · for the complainant
11 Sep 2025
11 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/11/124693/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
10 Sep 2025
10 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/77994/2021 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant was absent. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. Notice is to be issued for the complainant's appearance. The complainant is directed to ensure, within 03 weeks, upload on t
10 Sep 2025
10 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/118411/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When the matter was called, Shri Manish Arora, learned advocate, appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri Punit Jain, proxy advocate for Shri Manendra Kumar, appeared. The complainant's learned advocate has requested 02
10 Sep 2025
10 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/69225/2021 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant was absent. On behalf of the opposite party, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for learned advocate Mr. Manendra Kumar. Notice is to be issued to the complainant to appear. The complainant
8 Sep 2025
8 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/63763/2020 · Bench 3 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
8 Sep 2025
8 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/108313/2023 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
Accordingly, the office clerk is directed to again permit the complainant to enter the co-allottee's name on the RERA portal, and the complainant is directed to ensure that, within the next 2 weeks after obtaining permission to make the amendment, he makes the amendment at the appropriate place in Form-M on the complai
Complaint No. NCR144/07/130889/2025 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant appeared in person. For the opposite party, Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite party requested time to upload and file its objection regarding the complaint
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121917/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite company submitted that the pro
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121890/2024 · for the respondent
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121818/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. On the request of the learned advocate f
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121616/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. On the request of the learned advocate f
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121605/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. On the request of the learned advocate f
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121603/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. On the request of the learned advocate f
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121600/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. On the request of the learned advocate f
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121593/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. On the request of the learned advocate f
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121586/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. Learned advocate for the respondent company ha
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121580/2024 · for the respondent
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121579/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for Shri Manendra Kumar. Learned advocate for the respondent company h
12 Sep 2025
12 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/07/121788/2024 · for the complainant
12 Sep 2025
12 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/07/121788/2024 · for the complainant
Hon'ble Chairman, UP RERA / Presiding Officer, Bench-0 Respectfully submitted that the hearing of complaints before the Hon'ble Bench-0 at the RERA Regional Office, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar, is fixed for 43-06-2025. Due to a technical problem with the portal on that date, it is proposed that the complaints lis
12 Sep 2025
12 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/81402/2021 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant's learned advocate Shri Neeraj Bhagat appeared. For the opposite party, the proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for Advocate Shri [?] Kumar. Today the complainant's learned advocate informed that a settlem
12 Sep 2025
12 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/110671/2023 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Shiv Tyagi appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri Manendra[?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. On behalf of the complainant, the learned advocate
12 Sep 2025
12 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/06/95165/2022 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's petition was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant was absent. On behalf of the respondent, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. Notice be issued to the complainant to appear. The respondent's learned advocate has re
12 Sep 2025
12 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/04/92322/2022 · for the complainant
11 Sep 2025
11 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/11/124693/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
10 Sep 2025
10 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/77994/2021 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant was absent. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. Notice is to be issued for the complainant's appearance. The complainant is directed to ensure, within 03 weeks, upload on t
10 Sep 2025
10 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/118411/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When the matter was called, Shri Manish Arora, learned advocate, appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri Punit Jain, proxy advocate for Shri Manendra Kumar, appeared. The complainant's learned advocate has requested 02
10 Sep 2025
10 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/69225/2021 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant was absent. On behalf of the opposite party, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for learned advocate Mr. Manendra Kumar. Notice is to be issued to the complainant to appear. The complainant
8 Sep 2025
8 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/63763/2020 · Bench 3 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
8 Sep 2025
8 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/108313/2023 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
Accordingly, the office clerk is directed to again permit the complainant to enter the co-allottee's name on the RERA portal, and the complainant is directed to ensure that, within the next 2 weeks after obtaining permission to make the amendment, he makes the amendment at the appropriate place in Form-M on the complai