Loading…
Loading…
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 1,601–1,625 of 3,086 · Page 65 of 124
26 Sep 2025
26 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/118265/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
26 Sep 2025
26 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 1,601–1,625 of 3,086 · Page 65 of 124
26 Sep 2025
26 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/118265/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
26 Sep 2025
26 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/118263/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
26 Sep 2025
26 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/118258/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
22 Sep 2025
22 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/12/125578/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
22 Sep 2025
22 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/12/125535/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
22 Sep 2025
22 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/131539/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
19 Sep 2025
19 Sep 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/12/1202/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
19 Sep 2025
19 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/04/92781/2022 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
19 Sep 2025
19 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/116952/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When the matter was called, Shri Dhiresh Pandey, learned advocate, appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar and his proxy advocate, Shri Punit Jain, appeared. According to the statements of the learned advocate
18 Sep 2025
18 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/04/128408/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddha Nagar Hearing Bench-3 43— Complaint No.:—NCRI44/04/I28408/2025 Reena Sharma Versus ATS Realty Private Limited Date: 8 / 09 / 2025 The complainant's case was presented under [unreadable] through video conferencing. On being called, Mr. Ashwan
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/06/96276/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/123213/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, the proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for Advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The learned advocate of the opposite company has request
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122723/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has reques
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122715/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has reques
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122674/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has r
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122673/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122663/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122659/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122646/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122633/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared through proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain. The learned advocate for the opposite com
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122631/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Ate Kumar [?] appeared through proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain. The learned advocate for the opposite co
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122621/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared through proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain. The learned advocate for the opposite com
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122614/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared through proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain. The learned advocate for the complainant
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122511/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The opposite company's learned advocate requested 04 weeks' time to upload a prop
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122276/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The opposite company's learned advocate requested 04 weeks' time to upload a
Complaint No. NCR144/03/118263/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
26 Sep 2025
26 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/118258/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
22 Sep 2025
22 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/12/125578/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
22 Sep 2025
22 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/12/125535/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
22 Sep 2025
22 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/131539/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
19 Sep 2025
19 Sep 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/12/1202/2019 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
19 Sep 2025
19 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/04/92781/2022 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
19 Sep 2025
19 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/116952/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When the matter was called, Shri Dhiresh Pandey, learned advocate, appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar and his proxy advocate, Shri Punit Jain, appeared. According to the statements of the learned advocate
18 Sep 2025
18 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/04/128408/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddha Nagar Hearing Bench-3 43— Complaint No.:—NCRI44/04/I28408/2025 Reena Sharma Versus ATS Realty Private Limited Date: 8 / 09 / 2025 The complainant's case was presented under [unreadable] through video conferencing. On being called, Mr. Ashwan
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/06/96276/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/123213/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, the proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for Advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The learned advocate of the opposite company has request
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122723/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has reques
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122715/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has reques
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122674/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned Advocate for the opposite company has r
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122673/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122663/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122659/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122646/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?]. The learned advocate for the opposit
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122633/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared through proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain. The learned advocate for the opposite com
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122631/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Ate Kumar [?] appeared through proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain. The learned advocate for the opposite co
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122621/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared through proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain. The learned advocate for the opposite com
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122614/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared through proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain. The learned advocate for the complainant
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122511/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The opposite company's learned advocate requested 04 weeks' time to upload a prop
17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/122276/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The opposite company's learned advocate requested 04 weeks' time to upload a