17 Oct 2025
17 Oct 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
H. Nageshwara Satyanarayana v. Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
Complaint No. NCR144/03/72438/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent
Loading…
Loading…
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 1,551–1,575 of 3,086 · Page 63 of 124
17 Oct 2025
17 Oct 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/72438/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent
17 Oct 2025
17 Oct 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 1,551–1,575 of 3,086 · Page 63 of 124
17 Oct 2025
17 Oct 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/72438/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent
17 Oct 2025
17 Oct 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/68964/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 47.40.2025 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. Upon call, complainant absent. Learned counsel Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Heard and the file was perused. Calculation sheet has been filed by the respondent. The complainant is directed that
16 Oct 2025
16 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/04/118679/2024 · Bench 2 · for the complainant
16 Oct 2025
16 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/129613/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/125013/2024 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/130775/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121253/2024 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121251/2024 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121249/2024 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/127219/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/125923/2025 · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/125922/2025 · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/116824/2024 · Bench 2 · for the complainant
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Mr. Gaurav de [?] appeared on behalf of the opposite party. It was informed by the learned advocate for the opposite party company that proceedin
14 Oct 2025
14 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/132127/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
14 Oct 2025
14 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/90805/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
The applicant / builder's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, on behalf of the applicant / builder, the proxy advocate of learned advocate Shri [aa] Kumar, Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. On behalf of the opposite party / allottee, learned advocate Shri Manas Rai appeared. The a
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/06/110184/2023 · for the complainant
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/06/110178/2023 · for the complainant
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/06/110172/2023 · for the complainant
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/06/110167/2023 · for the complainant
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/06/110143/2023 · for the complainant
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/98172/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/112385/2023 · for the respondent
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/131006/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/130393/2025 · Bench 2 · for the complainant
The complainant's suit was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, learned counsel Mr. Punit Jain appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel Mr. Ayush Kumar Singh appeared on behalf of the respondent. A request was made by the learned counsel for the respondent company to grant time to up
10 Oct 2025
10 Oct 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/06/96102/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 40.40.2025 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was presented. When called, learned advocate Shri Atul Kumar appeared for the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for the opposite party. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. The complainant state
Complaint No. NCR144/01/68964/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 47.40.2025 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. Upon call, complainant absent. Learned counsel Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Heard and the file was perused. Calculation sheet has been filed by the respondent. The complainant is directed that
16 Oct 2025
16 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/04/118679/2024 · Bench 2 · for the complainant
16 Oct 2025
16 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/129613/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/125013/2024 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/130775/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121253/2024 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121251/2024 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121249/2024 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/127219/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/125923/2025 · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/125922/2025 · for the respondent
15 Oct 2025
15 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/116824/2024 · Bench 2 · for the complainant
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Mr. Gaurav de [?] appeared on behalf of the opposite party. It was informed by the learned advocate for the opposite party company that proceedin
14 Oct 2025
14 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/132127/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
14 Oct 2025
14 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/90805/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
The applicant / builder's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, on behalf of the applicant / builder, the proxy advocate of learned advocate Shri [aa] Kumar, Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. On behalf of the opposite party / allottee, learned advocate Shri Manas Rai appeared. The a
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/06/110184/2023 · for the complainant
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/06/110178/2023 · for the complainant
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/06/110172/2023 · for the complainant
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/06/110167/2023 · for the complainant
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/06/110143/2023 · for the complainant
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/98172/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/112385/2023 · for the respondent
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/131006/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
13 Oct 2025
13 Oct 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/130393/2025 · Bench 2 · for the complainant
The complainant's suit was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, learned counsel Mr. Punit Jain appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel Mr. Ayush Kumar Singh appeared on behalf of the respondent. A request was made by the learned counsel for the respondent company to grant time to up
10 Oct 2025
10 Oct 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/06/96102/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 40.40.2025 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was presented. When called, learned advocate Shri Atul Kumar appeared for the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for the opposite party. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. The complainant state