Loading…
Loading…
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 1,451–1,475 of 3,086 · Page 59 of 124
20 Nov 2025
20 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/118351/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
20 Nov 2025
20 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 1,451–1,475 of 3,086 · Page 59 of 124
20 Nov 2025
20 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/118351/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
20 Nov 2025
20 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/118349/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
20 Nov 2025
20 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/127120/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
19 Nov 2025
19 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/08/132218/2025 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
19 Nov 2025
19 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124203/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Atul Kumar Singh appeared for the complainant. For the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The learned advocate for the respondent company
19 Nov 2025
19 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124190/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Atul Kumar Singh appeared for the complainant. For the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The learned advocate for the respondent company
19 Nov 2025
19 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124163/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Atul Kumar Singh appeared for the complainant. For the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The learned advocate for the respondent company
19 Nov 2025
19 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124144/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the learned advocate Shri Atul Kumar Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for the learned advocate Shri Manendra Kumar. The learned advocate for the opposite company has requested f
19 Nov 2025
19 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/132459/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. Upon call, complainant absent. Learned counsel Mr. Punit Jain, proxy counsel for learned counsel Mr. Manendra Kumar, appeared on behalf of the respondent. Notice be issued to the complainant for appearance. The learned counsel for the res
19 Nov 2025
19 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/131045/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, learned counsel Mr. Amit Garg appeared on behalf of the complainant. Proxy counsel Mr. Punit Jain for learned counsel Mr. Ae Kumar appeared on behalf of the respondent. A request has been made by the learned counsel for the compl
18 Nov 2025
18 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/97169/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
18 Nov 2025
18 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/109063/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
18 Nov 2025
18 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/105404/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/01/1031/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 47.44.2025 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was taken up. When called, the complainant's representative, Shri C.A. Yogesh Goyal, appeared on behalf of the complainant. On behalf of the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. Both parties were heard and
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/12/103566/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 47.44.2025 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was presented. Upon call, learned advocate Mr. Utkarsh appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. It was apprise
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/102356/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/94103/2022 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/119962/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/109066/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/109064/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/04/119318/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/04/119316/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/105469/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/116182/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddha Nagar Hearing Bench-3 43 - Complaint Number -—NCRI44/0/I682/2024 Manisha Goyal versus Domus Greens Private Limited Date :-47 /44 /2025 The complainant's case was presented under msi [?] through video conferencing. On call, advocate Mr. Vikas Gupta ap
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/116109/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddha Nagar Hearing Bench-3 2 - Complaint Number -—NCR44/0I/4609/2024 Pallavi Agarwal versus Domus Greens Private Limited Date :-47 /44 /2025 The complainant's case was presented under asi} [?] through video conferencing. On call, advocate Mr. Vikas Gupta
Complaint No. NCR144/03/118349/2024 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
20 Nov 2025
20 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/127120/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
19 Nov 2025
19 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/08/132218/2025 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
19 Nov 2025
19 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124203/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Atul Kumar Singh appeared for the complainant. For the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The learned advocate for the respondent company
19 Nov 2025
19 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124190/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Atul Kumar Singh appeared for the complainant. For the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The learned advocate for the respondent company
19 Nov 2025
19 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124163/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Atul Kumar Singh appeared for the complainant. For the respondent, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The learned advocate for the respondent company
19 Nov 2025
19 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/10/124144/2024 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the learned advocate Shri Atul Kumar Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri Puneet Jain appeared as proxy for the learned advocate Shri Manendra Kumar. The learned advocate for the opposite company has requested f
19 Nov 2025
19 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/09/132459/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. Upon call, complainant absent. Learned counsel Mr. Punit Jain, proxy counsel for learned counsel Mr. Manendra Kumar, appeared on behalf of the respondent. Notice be issued to the complainant for appearance. The learned counsel for the res
19 Nov 2025
19 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/131045/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, learned counsel Mr. Amit Garg appeared on behalf of the complainant. Proxy counsel Mr. Punit Jain for learned counsel Mr. Ae Kumar appeared on behalf of the respondent. A request has been made by the learned counsel for the compl
18 Nov 2025
18 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/97169/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
18 Nov 2025
18 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/109063/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
18 Nov 2025
18 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/105404/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/01/1031/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 47.44.2025 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was taken up. When called, the complainant's representative, Shri C.A. Yogesh Goyal, appeared on behalf of the complainant. On behalf of the opposite party, learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. Both parties were heard and
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/12/103566/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 47.44.2025 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was presented. Upon call, learned advocate Mr. Utkarsh appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. It was apprise
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/102356/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/94103/2022 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/119962/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/109066/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/109064/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/04/119318/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/04/119316/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/105469/2023 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/116182/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddha Nagar Hearing Bench-3 43 - Complaint Number -—NCRI44/0/I682/2024 Manisha Goyal versus Domus Greens Private Limited Date :-47 /44 /2025 The complainant's case was presented under msi [?] through video conferencing. On call, advocate Mr. Vikas Gupta ap
17 Nov 2025
17 Nov 2025Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/116109/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddha Nagar Hearing Bench-3 2 - Complaint Number -—NCR44/0I/4609/2024 Pallavi Agarwal versus Domus Greens Private Limited Date :-47 /44 /2025 The complainant's case was presented under asi} [?] through video conferencing. On call, advocate Mr. Vikas Gupta