⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,701–1,720 · Page 86 of 382
Supreme Court of India6 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 305 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 1052
H ** Corrigendum dated 06.04.2018 1052 BHARTIBEN NAYABHA KER v. SIDABHA PETHABHA 1053 MANKE out to Rs 1,14,000/- per annum. An amount of one fourth would A have to be reduced on account of personal expenses. The net income would work out to Rs 85,500/-. Applying a multiplier of 14, the total compensation would work out…
Supreme Court of India5 Apr 2018Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,701–1,720 · Page 86 of 382
Supreme Court of India6 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 305 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 1052
H ** Corrigendum dated 06.04.2018 1052 BHARTIBEN NAYABHA KER v. SIDABHA PETHABHA 1053 MANKE out to Rs 1,14,000/- per annum. An amount of one fourth would A have to be reduced on account of personal expenses. The net income would work out to Rs 85,500/-. Applying a multiplier of 14, the total compensation would work out…
Supreme Court of India5 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 304 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 837
837 838 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 3 S.C.R. A intended to implement the direct transfer scheme in kerosene in identified districts of different states on a pilot basis – These are essentially matters of policy – Union Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas is seized of the issue – Moreover, defence that petition has b…
Supreme Court of India4 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 303 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 688
Tribunal committed error in directing appointment of persons validity of whose selection was seriously doubted by the Government – Propriety of – Held: Proper – High Court has referred to material on record in the form of call details between candidates and members of the KPSC – All the members who F interviewed the ca…
Supreme Court of India4 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 302 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 517
2. The Information Bulletin in question lays down, inter alia, conditions for admission to Post-Graduate Medical and Dental Courses D in respect of government quota seats in Medical/Dental Colleges in State of Karnataka and was published on the website on 10.03.2018. Relevant portion of Clause 4 of this Information Bul…
Supreme Court of India17 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 30 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 814
WITH C.A. No. 10300 OF 2011 H 814 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE BELGAUM v. M/S. 815 VASAVADATTA CEMENTS LTD. C.A. No. 11923, 11914, 11898, 11899, 11919, 11904, 11925, 11870, A 11924, 11900-11901, 11402, 11909, 11403, 11947, 11946, 11920, 11874, 11913, 11399, 11401, 11902, 11877-11884, 11876, 11922, 11921, 11400, 11875…
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 3 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 74
did not adduce any cogent evidence as against the evidence of the factory owner, thus, it was not possible for this Court to hold that the finding of the High Court is wholly arbitrary or illegal or against the evidence – Since the strength of workers was below 100, it was not necessary for the factory owner to ensure …
Supreme Court of India3 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 299 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 698
Steel Authority of India Ltd. & Ors. v. National Union F Waterfront Workers & Ors. (2001) 7 SCC 1 : [2002] 2 Suppl. SCR 106 – referred to. Case Law Reference [2002] 2 Suppl. SCR 106 referred to Para 4 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 3511 G of 2018. From the Judgment and Order dated 02.02.2012 of the Hig…
Supreme Court of India3 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 298 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 287
made by way of “commission” – In view thereof, the appellant was under statutory obligation to deduct the income tax at the time of credit or/and payment to the advertisement agencies – Non-compliance of s.194H by the assessee attracts the rigor of s. 201 which provides for consequences of failure to deduct or pay the …
Supreme Court of India3 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 297 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 858
whereby employee was retired from service – Dismissal by the Single Judge, however, set aside by the Division Bench – On appeal, held: High Court was not correct in its approach in reopening the case of the employee – It is a Judgment in personam – For all intents and purposes, employee is bound by that judgment for ev…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 291 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 1090
issue of determination of vacancies was embroiled in continuous litigation – The Quota-Rota rule could not be applied in the absence of determination of vacancies – The rule provided for seniority of the promotees to be fixed from the date of availability of vacancy but such seniority could also not be given in the pre…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 290 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 732
732 SUPREME COURT[2018] REPORTS3 S.C.R. 732 [2018] 3 S.C.R. A HARITA SUNIL PARAB v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS (Transfer Petition (Crl.) Nos. 254-255 of 2017) B MARCH 28, 2018 [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, R. F. NARIMAN AND NAVIN SINHA, JJ.] Transfer Petitions – Petitioner, a resident of Mumbai and a C practicing Advocate …
Supreme Court of India17 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 29 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 255
Dismissing the appeals, the Court G HELD: 1. The record showed that in order to satisfy the requirement of Section 55 of N.D.P.S. Act, the case property was accordingly tampered by the police. In the prescribed form, the place of seizure was mentioned as Nagwain and not Panarsa Bridge and the name of only one accused w…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 289 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 667
[2018] 6 S.C.R. 667 667 P. MEENAKSHISUNDARAM A v. P. VIJAYAKUMAR & ANR. (Civil Appeal Nos. 3353-3354 of 2018) MARCH 28, 2018 B [R. BANUMATHI AND UDAY UMESH LALIT, JJ.] Specific performance: Appellant had mortgaged the suit property with a bank and the bank had initiated recovery proceedings – Meanwhile, appellant enter…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 288 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 1098
2.3 Since one trial and one appeal are considered to be components of fair system of administration of justice in criminal cases of serious nature, adjudication at the original forum and at one appellate forum must be within reasonable time which should not normally exceed one to two years, as noted by the Law H 1100 S…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 287 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 662
H 662 DR. PANKAJ KUMUDCHANDRA PHADNIS v. U.O.I MINISTRY 663 OF LAW AND JUSTICE A. Sharan, Sr. Adv.(AC), Sanchit Guru, Ms. Garima Bose, A Ms. Aprajita Mukherjee, Samarth Khanna, Advs. for the appearing parties. Dr. Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis, Petitioner-in-person. The following Order of the Court was passed : B O R D E…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 285 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 599
an…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 283 · [2018] 7 S.C.R. 1027
– Decree sheet drawn on 19th August, 1972 and the suit for possession filed thereafter on 11th June, 1974, was thus, within the prescribed period of limitation in terms of Art.2(b) of the Schedule G of 1920 Act – Further, s.14 of the 1963 Act is also attracted in the present case and the tests specified in s.14 are sat…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 282 · [2018] 2 S.C.R. 1045
Jurisdiction of High Court and power to grant stay in such matters – Whether an order on charge framed under the provisions of 1988 Act, is an interlocutory order, and thereby in view of s.19(3)(c), exercise of revisional power of High Court u/ s.397(2),CrPC is barred – Also whether s.19(3)(c) which bars revision would…
Supreme Court of India17 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 28 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 821
WITH H Crl. A. No. 314, 313, 312 and 311 OF 2011 MAUVIN GODINHO v. STATE OF GOA 823 M. L. Varma, Sr. Adv., Umesh Kumar Khaitan, Ms. Asha Gopalan A Nair, Ms. Nivedha Nair, Ms. Dimple Nagpal, Pitamber Dutt Nautiyal, Triveni Potekar, Chander Shekhar Ashri, Ms. Binu Tamta, Advs. for the Appellant. Ms. A. Subhashini, Mrs. A…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 278 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 696
696 SUPREME COURT[2018] REPORTS3 S.C.R. 696 [2018] 3 S.C.R. A MANJU SURANA v. SUNIL ARORA & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No. 457 of 2018) B MARCH 27, 2018 [J. CHELAMESWAR AND SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, JJ.] Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – s.19 – Previous sanction necessary for prosecution – Allegation of corruption in respect o…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2018 INSC 304 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 837
837 838 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 3 S.C.R. A intended to implement the direct transfer scheme in kerosene in identified districts of different states on a pilot basis – These are essentially matters of policy – Union Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas is seized of the issue – Moreover, defence that petition has b…
Supreme Court of India4 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 303 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 688
Tribunal committed error in directing appointment of persons validity of whose selection was seriously doubted by the Government – Propriety of – Held: Proper – High Court has referred to material on record in the form of call details between candidates and members of the KPSC – All the members who F interviewed the ca…
Supreme Court of India4 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 302 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 517
2. The Information Bulletin in question lays down, inter alia, conditions for admission to Post-Graduate Medical and Dental Courses D in respect of government quota seats in Medical/Dental Colleges in State of Karnataka and was published on the website on 10.03.2018. Relevant portion of Clause 4 of this Information Bul…
Supreme Court of India17 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 30 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 814
WITH C.A. No. 10300 OF 2011 H 814 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE BELGAUM v. M/S. 815 VASAVADATTA CEMENTS LTD. C.A. No. 11923, 11914, 11898, 11899, 11919, 11904, 11925, 11870, A 11924, 11900-11901, 11402, 11909, 11403, 11947, 11946, 11920, 11874, 11913, 11399, 11401, 11902, 11877-11884, 11876, 11922, 11921, 11400, 11875…
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 3 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 74
did not adduce any cogent evidence as against the evidence of the factory owner, thus, it was not possible for this Court to hold that the finding of the High Court is wholly arbitrary or illegal or against the evidence – Since the strength of workers was below 100, it was not necessary for the factory owner to ensure …
Supreme Court of India3 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 299 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 698
Steel Authority of India Ltd. & Ors. v. National Union F Waterfront Workers & Ors. (2001) 7 SCC 1 : [2002] 2 Suppl. SCR 106 – referred to. Case Law Reference [2002] 2 Suppl. SCR 106 referred to Para 4 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 3511 G of 2018. From the Judgment and Order dated 02.02.2012 of the Hig…
Supreme Court of India3 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 298 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 287
made by way of “commission” – In view thereof, the appellant was under statutory obligation to deduct the income tax at the time of credit or/and payment to the advertisement agencies – Non-compliance of s.194H by the assessee attracts the rigor of s. 201 which provides for consequences of failure to deduct or pay the …
Supreme Court of India3 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 297 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 858
whereby employee was retired from service – Dismissal by the Single Judge, however, set aside by the Division Bench – On appeal, held: High Court was not correct in its approach in reopening the case of the employee – It is a Judgment in personam – For all intents and purposes, employee is bound by that judgment for ev…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 291 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 1090
issue of determination of vacancies was embroiled in continuous litigation – The Quota-Rota rule could not be applied in the absence of determination of vacancies – The rule provided for seniority of the promotees to be fixed from the date of availability of vacancy but such seniority could also not be given in the pre…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 290 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 732
732 SUPREME COURT[2018] REPORTS3 S.C.R. 732 [2018] 3 S.C.R. A HARITA SUNIL PARAB v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS (Transfer Petition (Crl.) Nos. 254-255 of 2017) B MARCH 28, 2018 [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, R. F. NARIMAN AND NAVIN SINHA, JJ.] Transfer Petitions – Petitioner, a resident of Mumbai and a C practicing Advocate …
Supreme Court of India17 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 29 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 255
Dismissing the appeals, the Court G HELD: 1. The record showed that in order to satisfy the requirement of Section 55 of N.D.P.S. Act, the case property was accordingly tampered by the police. In the prescribed form, the place of seizure was mentioned as Nagwain and not Panarsa Bridge and the name of only one accused w…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 289 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 667
[2018] 6 S.C.R. 667 667 P. MEENAKSHISUNDARAM A v. P. VIJAYAKUMAR & ANR. (Civil Appeal Nos. 3353-3354 of 2018) MARCH 28, 2018 B [R. BANUMATHI AND UDAY UMESH LALIT, JJ.] Specific performance: Appellant had mortgaged the suit property with a bank and the bank had initiated recovery proceedings – Meanwhile, appellant enter…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 288 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 1098
2.3 Since one trial and one appeal are considered to be components of fair system of administration of justice in criminal cases of serious nature, adjudication at the original forum and at one appellate forum must be within reasonable time which should not normally exceed one to two years, as noted by the Law H 1100 S…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 287 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 662
H 662 DR. PANKAJ KUMUDCHANDRA PHADNIS v. U.O.I MINISTRY 663 OF LAW AND JUSTICE A. Sharan, Sr. Adv.(AC), Sanchit Guru, Ms. Garima Bose, A Ms. Aprajita Mukherjee, Samarth Khanna, Advs. for the appearing parties. Dr. Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis, Petitioner-in-person. The following Order of the Court was passed : B O R D E…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 285 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 599
an…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 283 · [2018] 7 S.C.R. 1027
– Decree sheet drawn on 19th August, 1972 and the suit for possession filed thereafter on 11th June, 1974, was thus, within the prescribed period of limitation in terms of Art.2(b) of the Schedule G of 1920 Act – Further, s.14 of the 1963 Act is also attracted in the present case and the tests specified in s.14 are sat…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 282 · [2018] 2 S.C.R. 1045
Jurisdiction of High Court and power to grant stay in such matters – Whether an order on charge framed under the provisions of 1988 Act, is an interlocutory order, and thereby in view of s.19(3)(c), exercise of revisional power of High Court u/ s.397(2),CrPC is barred – Also whether s.19(3)(c) which bars revision would…
Supreme Court of India17 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 28 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 821
WITH H Crl. A. No. 314, 313, 312 and 311 OF 2011 MAUVIN GODINHO v. STATE OF GOA 823 M. L. Varma, Sr. Adv., Umesh Kumar Khaitan, Ms. Asha Gopalan A Nair, Ms. Nivedha Nair, Ms. Dimple Nagpal, Pitamber Dutt Nautiyal, Triveni Potekar, Chander Shekhar Ashri, Ms. Binu Tamta, Advs. for the Appellant. Ms. A. Subhashini, Mrs. A…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 278 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 696
696 SUPREME COURT[2018] REPORTS3 S.C.R. 696 [2018] 3 S.C.R. A MANJU SURANA v. SUNIL ARORA & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No. 457 of 2018) B MARCH 27, 2018 [J. CHELAMESWAR AND SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, JJ.] Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – s.19 – Previous sanction necessary for prosecution – Allegation of corruption in respect o…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis