⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,641–1,660 · Page 83 of 382
Supreme Court of India19 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 37 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 245
[2018] 1 S.C.R. 245 245 ATUL THAKUR A v. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ETC. ETC. (Criminal Appeal Nos. 522-523 of 2016) JANUARY 19, 2018 B [DIPAK MISRA,CJI, A. M. KHANWILKAR AND DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – s.302 – Assault resulting in death – Prosecution case was that the appellant caused six injuries to…
Supreme Court of India19 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 369 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 1
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,641–1,660 · Page 83 of 382
Supreme Court of India19 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 37 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 245
[2018] 1 S.C.R. 245 245 ATUL THAKUR A v. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ETC. ETC. (Criminal Appeal Nos. 522-523 of 2016) JANUARY 19, 2018 B [DIPAK MISRA,CJI, A. M. KHANWILKAR AND DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – s.302 – Assault resulting in death – Prosecution case was that the appellant caused six injuries to…
Supreme Court of India19 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 369 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 1
[2018] 9 S.C.R. 1 1 TEHSEEN POONAWALLA A v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 19 of 2018) APRIL 19, 2018 B [DIPAK MISRA, CJI, A.M. KHANWILKAR AND DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ.] Constitution of India – Art.32 – Judge Loya death case – Writ petitions seeking inquiry into the circumstances of the death of C t…
Supreme Court of India19 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 368 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 265
Parag Tripathi, Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Advs., Prabhat Kumar, Sridhar Potaraju, Sudhir Mishra, Ms. Petal Chandok, Prabhat Kumar, Ms. Sindoora VNL, Ms. Ankita Sharma, Rishabh, Udai Khanna, Rishabh Kapur, Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Vikas Sood, Harsh Parashar, Bhuvan H 265 266 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 4 S.C.R. A Mishra, Divy…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 364 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 355
Dismissing the appeals, the Court G HELD: 1.1 Having regard to the limited scope of interference with an order granting bail and keeping in mind the parameters on which such an order can be interdicted, the reasons given by the High Court to grant bail to respondent No. 2, cannot be termed as perverse. The High Court k…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 363 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 1033
Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. Article 30 of the Constitution of India grants a fundamental right to all minorities, whether based on religion or language, to establish and administer educational institutions of G their choice. Section 11(f) empowers the National Commission for Minority Educational Instit…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 362 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 870
Mehal S. Shah, Sr. Adv., Hemal Kiritkumar Sheth, Advs. for the Appellants. C Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Hetu Arora Sethi, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. 1. Fate can be cruel. This is a tragic case where the only daughter of a lawyer husband and a doctor D wife, who…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 361 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 806
inasmuch the effect is that not only seniority of the respondent is forfeited by 24 months, he is also deprived of his salary for more than five years – Such a sentence would meet the ends of justice and in these circumstances discretion exercised by the Tribunal is not interfered with – Navy Act, 1957 – s.77(2) – Serv…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 360 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 270
WITH F C. A. Nos. 4258 and 4259 of 2018. Saurabh Mishra, AAG., Jugal Kishore Gilda, Purushaindra Kumar, Advs. Gen., Naman Nagrath, Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Parag Triathi, Ms. Kiran Suri, Sr. Advs., Harsh Parashar, Jubin Prasad, Aman Pandey, Jasdeep S. Dhillon, Prabhat K. Chaurasia, Ms. Renuka Sahu, Jay Savla, G Amar Varun, …
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 360 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 263
D Case Law Reference 2017 (2) MPLJ 681 approved Para 2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 4018 of 2018. From the Judgment and Order dated 04.02.2016 of the High Court E of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore in Arbitration Appeal No. 11 of 2015. Saurabh Mishra, AAG., Jugal Kishore Gilda, Purushaindra Kumar, Advs…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 360 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 260
260 M/S GANGOTRI ENTERPRISES LTD. v. MADHYA PRADESH 261 ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Kumar, Ms. Petal Chandok, Ms. Ankita Sharma, Rishabh, M. R. A Shamshad, Aditya Samaddar, B. S. Banthia, Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Saurabh S. Sinha, Aditya Dev Triguna, Sunil Singh Parihar, M/S. AP & J Chambers, Prafulla Kumar Behera, M…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 360 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 257
accordance with the 1983 Act – In view of the fact that award was passed long back and matter is pending for execution, it is directed that award would be treated to have been passed under 1983 Act – The pending proceedings before Delhi High Court transferred to Madhya Pradesh High Court to be treated as Revision Petit…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 360 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 255
*Va Tech Escher Wyass Flovel Ltd. v. MPSE Board & D Another (2011) 13 SCC 261 – Stood overruled. Case Law Reference (2011) 13 SCC 261 Stood overruled Para 2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 4012 of 2018. E From the Judgment and Order dated 11.05.2011 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore in Arbitr…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 360 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 663
Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority and Anr. v. L.G. Chaudhary Engineers and Contractors (2012) 2 SCC 495 : [2012] 2 SCR 162 – relied on. D *Va Tech Escher Wyass Flovel Ltd. v. MPSE Board & Another [2011] 13 SCC 261 – Stood overruled. Case Law Reference [2012] 2 SCR 162 relied on Para 3 E (2011) 13 SCC 261 …
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 360 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 268
Case Law Reference (2011) 13 SCC 261 Stood overruled Para 2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 4011 of E 2018. From the Judgment and Order dated 29.11.2010 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore in W. P. No. 7105 of 2010. WITH F Civil Appeal No. 4015 of 2018. Saurabh Mishra, AAG., Jugal Kishore Gilda…
Supreme Court of India19 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 36 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 195
E The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A. M. KHANWILKAR, J. 1. This appeal questions the legality and tenability of the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in First Appeal from Order No.1138 of 2000, dated 9th October, 2014, whereby the appeal filed by the appellants was dismissed by the High F …
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 359 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 814
814 SUPREME COURT[2018]REPORTS6 S.C.R. 814 [2018] 6 S.C.R. A SHANKER v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (Criminal Appeal No.1785 of 2011) B APRIL 18, 2018 [N. V. RAMANA AND S. ABDUL NAZEER, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – s.302 – Prosecution case that the victim while attending a marriage, had altercation with some persons who threate…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 358 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 863
pursuing the litigation in the wrong forum or by not approaching the right forum – For this, the appellants are themselves to be blamed and cannot hide behind the veil of a lack of jurisdiction of the civil court – Appellants were given a full-fledged hearing by the Special Court under the Act – Special court held that…
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 357 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 763
[2018] 6 S.C.R. 763 763 LT. CDR. M. RAMESH A v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Transferred Case (Civil) No.11 of 2017 WITH B I.A. No.132315/2017 – Clarification/Direction) APRIL 17, 2018 [MADAN B. LOKUR, KURIAN JOSEPH AND DEEPAK GUPTA, JJ.] C Indian Police Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1954 and Amended Rules, 2011– r.8 as amend…
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 356 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 469
confirmed by High Court – On appeal, held: Both the parties are permanent citizens of USA – Courts in India as well as in USA have concurrent jurisdiction – Though wife is amenable to jurisdiction of Family Court in India, there is nothing on record to hold that other party could suffer grave injustice if injunction is…
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 354 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 302
Regulations, 2011 provides that acquisition of shares or voting rights referred to in s.5(a)(i) or s.5(a)(ii) does not entitle the acquirer to hold 25% or more of the total shares or voting rights of the company, directly or indirectly – In the instant case, by the second transaction appellant’s holding exceeded more t…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
[2018] 9 S.C.R. 1 1 TEHSEEN POONAWALLA A v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 19 of 2018) APRIL 19, 2018 B [DIPAK MISRA, CJI, A.M. KHANWILKAR AND DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ.] Constitution of India – Art.32 – Judge Loya death case – Writ petitions seeking inquiry into the circumstances of the death of C t…
Supreme Court of India19 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 368 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 265
Parag Tripathi, Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Advs., Prabhat Kumar, Sridhar Potaraju, Sudhir Mishra, Ms. Petal Chandok, Prabhat Kumar, Ms. Sindoora VNL, Ms. Ankita Sharma, Rishabh, Udai Khanna, Rishabh Kapur, Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Vikas Sood, Harsh Parashar, Bhuvan H 265 266 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 4 S.C.R. A Mishra, Divy…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 364 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 355
Dismissing the appeals, the Court G HELD: 1.1 Having regard to the limited scope of interference with an order granting bail and keeping in mind the parameters on which such an order can be interdicted, the reasons given by the High Court to grant bail to respondent No. 2, cannot be termed as perverse. The High Court k…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 363 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 1033
Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. Article 30 of the Constitution of India grants a fundamental right to all minorities, whether based on religion or language, to establish and administer educational institutions of G their choice. Section 11(f) empowers the National Commission for Minority Educational Instit…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 362 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 870
Mehal S. Shah, Sr. Adv., Hemal Kiritkumar Sheth, Advs. for the Appellants. C Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Hetu Arora Sethi, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. 1. Fate can be cruel. This is a tragic case where the only daughter of a lawyer husband and a doctor D wife, who…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 361 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 806
inasmuch the effect is that not only seniority of the respondent is forfeited by 24 months, he is also deprived of his salary for more than five years – Such a sentence would meet the ends of justice and in these circumstances discretion exercised by the Tribunal is not interfered with – Navy Act, 1957 – s.77(2) – Serv…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 360 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 270
WITH F C. A. Nos. 4258 and 4259 of 2018. Saurabh Mishra, AAG., Jugal Kishore Gilda, Purushaindra Kumar, Advs. Gen., Naman Nagrath, Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Parag Triathi, Ms. Kiran Suri, Sr. Advs., Harsh Parashar, Jubin Prasad, Aman Pandey, Jasdeep S. Dhillon, Prabhat K. Chaurasia, Ms. Renuka Sahu, Jay Savla, G Amar Varun, …
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 360 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 263
D Case Law Reference 2017 (2) MPLJ 681 approved Para 2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 4018 of 2018. From the Judgment and Order dated 04.02.2016 of the High Court E of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore in Arbitration Appeal No. 11 of 2015. Saurabh Mishra, AAG., Jugal Kishore Gilda, Purushaindra Kumar, Advs…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 360 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 260
260 M/S GANGOTRI ENTERPRISES LTD. v. MADHYA PRADESH 261 ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Kumar, Ms. Petal Chandok, Ms. Ankita Sharma, Rishabh, M. R. A Shamshad, Aditya Samaddar, B. S. Banthia, Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Saurabh S. Sinha, Aditya Dev Triguna, Sunil Singh Parihar, M/S. AP & J Chambers, Prafulla Kumar Behera, M…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 360 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 257
accordance with the 1983 Act – In view of the fact that award was passed long back and matter is pending for execution, it is directed that award would be treated to have been passed under 1983 Act – The pending proceedings before Delhi High Court transferred to Madhya Pradesh High Court to be treated as Revision Petit…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 360 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 255
*Va Tech Escher Wyass Flovel Ltd. v. MPSE Board & D Another (2011) 13 SCC 261 – Stood overruled. Case Law Reference (2011) 13 SCC 261 Stood overruled Para 2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 4012 of 2018. E From the Judgment and Order dated 11.05.2011 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore in Arbitr…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 360 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 663
Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority and Anr. v. L.G. Chaudhary Engineers and Contractors (2012) 2 SCC 495 : [2012] 2 SCR 162 – relied on. D *Va Tech Escher Wyass Flovel Ltd. v. MPSE Board & Another [2011] 13 SCC 261 – Stood overruled. Case Law Reference [2012] 2 SCR 162 relied on Para 3 E (2011) 13 SCC 261 …
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 360 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 268
Case Law Reference (2011) 13 SCC 261 Stood overruled Para 2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 4011 of E 2018. From the Judgment and Order dated 29.11.2010 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore in W. P. No. 7105 of 2010. WITH F Civil Appeal No. 4015 of 2018. Saurabh Mishra, AAG., Jugal Kishore Gilda…
Supreme Court of India19 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 36 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 195
E The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A. M. KHANWILKAR, J. 1. This appeal questions the legality and tenability of the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in First Appeal from Order No.1138 of 2000, dated 9th October, 2014, whereby the appeal filed by the appellants was dismissed by the High F …
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 359 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 814
814 SUPREME COURT[2018]REPORTS6 S.C.R. 814 [2018] 6 S.C.R. A SHANKER v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (Criminal Appeal No.1785 of 2011) B APRIL 18, 2018 [N. V. RAMANA AND S. ABDUL NAZEER, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – s.302 – Prosecution case that the victim while attending a marriage, had altercation with some persons who threate…
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 358 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 863
pursuing the litigation in the wrong forum or by not approaching the right forum – For this, the appellants are themselves to be blamed and cannot hide behind the veil of a lack of jurisdiction of the civil court – Appellants were given a full-fledged hearing by the Special Court under the Act – Special court held that…
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 357 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 763
[2018] 6 S.C.R. 763 763 LT. CDR. M. RAMESH A v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Transferred Case (Civil) No.11 of 2017 WITH B I.A. No.132315/2017 – Clarification/Direction) APRIL 17, 2018 [MADAN B. LOKUR, KURIAN JOSEPH AND DEEPAK GUPTA, JJ.] C Indian Police Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1954 and Amended Rules, 2011– r.8 as amend…
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 356 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 469
confirmed by High Court – On appeal, held: Both the parties are permanent citizens of USA – Courts in India as well as in USA have concurrent jurisdiction – Though wife is amenable to jurisdiction of Family Court in India, there is nothing on record to hold that other party could suffer grave injustice if injunction is…
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 354 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 302
Regulations, 2011 provides that acquisition of shares or voting rights referred to in s.5(a)(i) or s.5(a)(ii) does not entitle the acquirer to hold 25% or more of the total shares or voting rights of the company, directly or indirectly – In the instant case, by the second transaction appellant’s holding exceeded more t…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis