⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,601–7,620 · Page 381 of 382
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2010Full text
2010 INSC 14 · [2010] 1 S.C.R. 149
- It did not exercise the caution while dealing with the E judgment of acquittal by trial court - Evidence of witnesses full of contradictions and omissions - Discrepancies regarding filing of FIR - Thus, judgment of High Court set aside and that of trial court restored - Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - ss. 3 and 5 -A…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2010Full text
2010 INSC 139 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 315
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,601–7,620 · Page 381 of 382
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2010Full text
2010 INSC 14 · [2010] 1 S.C.R. 149
- It did not exercise the caution while dealing with the E judgment of acquittal by trial court - Evidence of witnesses full of contradictions and omissions - Discrepancies regarding filing of FIR - Thus, judgment of High Court set aside and that of trial court restored - Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - ss. 3 and 5 -A…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2010Full text
2010 INSC 139 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 315
ORS. Chemplast be directed to forbear from laying of pipelines A for drawing VCM raw material from jetty to their plant. High Court dismissed the writ petition. A writ petition was filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India before Supreme Court by another individual challenging the permission granted by MOEF o…
Supreme Court of India9 Mar 2010Full text
2010 INSC 138 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 236
[2010) 3 S.C.R. 236 A JAVED MASOOD AND ANR. v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN (Criminal Appeal No. 1522 of 2008) MARCH 09, 2010 B [8. SUDERSHAN REDDY AND SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: s.302 - Conviction under, by courts C below, on the basis of evidence of eye witnesses - Justification of - Held: On facts, not just…
Supreme Court of India9 Mar 2010Full text
2010 INSC 136 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 213
Allowing the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1. The manner in which the High Court disposed of the appeal u/s 378(1) and (3) Cr.P.C., is bad. It is true that in an appeal from acquittal, the High Court has full power to re-appreciate and re-assess the entire G evidence upon which the order of acquittal was founded and then t…
Supreme Court of India9 Mar 2010Full text
2010 INSC 133 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 190
- Special facts and circumstances of the case warrant review - Application for modification of the earlier order passed in the writ petition allowed, albeit with clarifications - Victoria Memorial Act, 1903 - Public Interest Litigation. F Administrative Law - Expert Body/Committee - Decision of- Scope for judicial revi…
Supreme Court of India9 Mar 2010Full text
2010 INSC 132 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 159
·CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Curative Petition (Crl.) Nos.7-8 of 2009 G IN R.P. (CRL.) D 379!~ of 2008. 1. State of M.P. v. Sughar Singh & Ors. (2008) 1 SCR 725. 159 H 160 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 3 S.C.R. A IN Criminal Appeal Nos.1362-1363 of 2004. From the Judgment & Order dated 3.1.2003 of the ,High Court o…
Supreme Court of India8 Mar 2010Full text
2010 INSC 131 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 141
[2010] 3 S.C.R. 141 THAKUR KULDEEP SINGH (D) THR. L.R. & ORS. A v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 8636 of 2002) MARCH 8, 2010 B [P. SATHASIVAM AND H.L. DATIU, JJ.] Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - ss. 4, 18, 23 (1-A) and 54 - Land Acquisition for public purpose - Property situated in Karol Bagh, Delhi - Compensati…
Supreme Court of India8 Mar 2010Full text
2010 INSC 130 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 123
In the year 1980 the Mutt filed eviction petition bearing ATC No. 35 of 1980 against the appellants and F the same was dismissed on 24.8.1987. The appeal filed by the Mutt bearing ATC No. 9 of 1987 was allowed by the Additional District Judge on 3.6.1996. The revision petitions were dismissed by the High Court on 17.11…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 128 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 1172
The question which arose for consideration was whether the Division Bench of High Court was justified in condoning more than four years' delay in filing of appeal by the respondents against judgment and decree F passed by the Civil Judge in the Special Civil Suit. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1. The law of li…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 125 · [2010] 4 S.C.R. 1
1 H 2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 4 S.C.R. A The respondents, manufacturers of notified chemicals, were given central registration u/s 7 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and also Recognition Certificates u/s 4-B of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 for purchase of high speed diesel oil (HSD) at B concessional ra…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 122 · [2010] 4 S.C.R. 299
299 H 300 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 4 S.C.R. A provisions of the Scheme will prevail over the provisions of Contract Act or any other Jaw or any principle of contract, and having regard to the binding nature of the scheme, the employees, upon exercising the option, cannot withdraw from the same - Paragraph 5(4) of t…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 121 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 1167
(i) That the select list which was prepared by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission pursuant to the judgment and order of this Court dated 14.09.2006 in Civil Appeal No. G 4129 of 2006 and which is contained in the official records of the Public Service Commission is restored and that appointment shall be given…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 120 · [2010] 4 S.C.R. 904
H 904 R. HANUMAIAH v. SEC. TO GOVT. OF KARNATAKA 905 REV. DEPTI.. possession should be actual, open and visible, hostile to the A owner and continued during entire period necessary to create bar under the law of limitation. Appellant-plaintiffs filed the present suit for declara'ffon of title and consequential relief o…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 118 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 27
. NARATA SINGH & ANR. by Circular No. 54 of 1985. Thus the Division Bench A allowed the claim of respondent No. 1. The ques~ion for consideration before this Court was whether the work-charged service rendered by respondent No. 1 under the State Government prior to 8 securing employment with the Board, would qualify fo…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 115 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 1086
2.2. The…
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2010Full text
2010 INSC 11 · [2010] 1 S.C.R. 76
Raja Kulkarni v. State of Bombay AIR 1954 SCR 384; Mela Ram v. CIT AIR 1956 SC 367; S.R.Abhayankar v. K.D. Bapat (1969) 2 SCC 74; Tirupati Balaji v. State of Bihar (2004) 5 C sec 1, relied on. Gramophone Company of India vs. Birendra Bahadur Pandey and Ors. (1984) 2 SCC 534; Central Bank of India v. State of Kera/a 200…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 109 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 1030
Dismissing the appeal, the Court H 1030 ABDUL MANNAN v. STATE OF ASSAM 1031 HELD: 1.1. The medical evidence corroborated the A evidence of five eye witnesses including the statement$ of the injured eye witnesses. The Trial Court gravely erred in ignoring the most important and material aspect of the prosecution version…
Supreme Court of India17 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 108 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 960
- Held: On facts, No - The limited requirement pleaded in the eviction petition by the original owners was their own E personal occupation and not occupation of their family members, dependant or otherwise - ·in. any event, the LRs of deceased-owners were all married and settled in their respective matrimonial homes in…
Supreme Court of India17 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 104 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 979
[2010] 2 S.C.R. 979 STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. A v. THE COMMITTEE FOR PROTECTION OF DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS, WEST BENGAL & ORS. (Civil Appeal Nos. 6249-6250 of 2001) B FEBRUARY 17, 2010 [K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, CJI., R.V. RAVEENDRAN, D.K. JAIN, P. SATHASIVAM AND J.M. PANCHAL, JJ.] ,1·-. Constitution of India, 1950: c Articles 32…
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 102 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 879
- The whole purpose of s. 115J was to take care of the phenomenon of prosperous 'zero tax' Companies not paying E taxes though they continued to earn profits and declare dividends - Therefore, a Minimum Alternate Tax was sought to be imposed on 'zero tax' Companies - Section 115J imposes tax on a deemed income - The sa…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
ORS. Chemplast be directed to forbear from laying of pipelines A for drawing VCM raw material from jetty to their plant. High Court dismissed the writ petition. A writ petition was filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India before Supreme Court by another individual challenging the permission granted by MOEF o…
Supreme Court of India9 Mar 2010Full text
2010 INSC 138 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 236
[2010) 3 S.C.R. 236 A JAVED MASOOD AND ANR. v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN (Criminal Appeal No. 1522 of 2008) MARCH 09, 2010 B [8. SUDERSHAN REDDY AND SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: s.302 - Conviction under, by courts C below, on the basis of evidence of eye witnesses - Justification of - Held: On facts, not just…
Supreme Court of India9 Mar 2010Full text
2010 INSC 136 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 213
Allowing the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1. The manner in which the High Court disposed of the appeal u/s 378(1) and (3) Cr.P.C., is bad. It is true that in an appeal from acquittal, the High Court has full power to re-appreciate and re-assess the entire G evidence upon which the order of acquittal was founded and then t…
Supreme Court of India9 Mar 2010Full text
2010 INSC 133 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 190
- Special facts and circumstances of the case warrant review - Application for modification of the earlier order passed in the writ petition allowed, albeit with clarifications - Victoria Memorial Act, 1903 - Public Interest Litigation. F Administrative Law - Expert Body/Committee - Decision of- Scope for judicial revi…
Supreme Court of India9 Mar 2010Full text
2010 INSC 132 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 159
·CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Curative Petition (Crl.) Nos.7-8 of 2009 G IN R.P. (CRL.) D 379!~ of 2008. 1. State of M.P. v. Sughar Singh & Ors. (2008) 1 SCR 725. 159 H 160 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 3 S.C.R. A IN Criminal Appeal Nos.1362-1363 of 2004. From the Judgment & Order dated 3.1.2003 of the ,High Court o…
Supreme Court of India8 Mar 2010Full text
2010 INSC 131 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 141
[2010] 3 S.C.R. 141 THAKUR KULDEEP SINGH (D) THR. L.R. & ORS. A v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 8636 of 2002) MARCH 8, 2010 B [P. SATHASIVAM AND H.L. DATIU, JJ.] Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - ss. 4, 18, 23 (1-A) and 54 - Land Acquisition for public purpose - Property situated in Karol Bagh, Delhi - Compensati…
Supreme Court of India8 Mar 2010Full text
2010 INSC 130 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 123
In the year 1980 the Mutt filed eviction petition bearing ATC No. 35 of 1980 against the appellants and F the same was dismissed on 24.8.1987. The appeal filed by the Mutt bearing ATC No. 9 of 1987 was allowed by the Additional District Judge on 3.6.1996. The revision petitions were dismissed by the High Court on 17.11…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 128 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 1172
The question which arose for consideration was whether the Division Bench of High Court was justified in condoning more than four years' delay in filing of appeal by the respondents against judgment and decree F passed by the Civil Judge in the Special Civil Suit. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1. The law of li…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 125 · [2010] 4 S.C.R. 1
1 H 2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 4 S.C.R. A The respondents, manufacturers of notified chemicals, were given central registration u/s 7 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and also Recognition Certificates u/s 4-B of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 for purchase of high speed diesel oil (HSD) at B concessional ra…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 122 · [2010] 4 S.C.R. 299
299 H 300 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 4 S.C.R. A provisions of the Scheme will prevail over the provisions of Contract Act or any other Jaw or any principle of contract, and having regard to the binding nature of the scheme, the employees, upon exercising the option, cannot withdraw from the same - Paragraph 5(4) of t…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 121 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 1167
(i) That the select list which was prepared by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission pursuant to the judgment and order of this Court dated 14.09.2006 in Civil Appeal No. G 4129 of 2006 and which is contained in the official records of the Public Service Commission is restored and that appointment shall be given…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 120 · [2010] 4 S.C.R. 904
H 904 R. HANUMAIAH v. SEC. TO GOVT. OF KARNATAKA 905 REV. DEPTI.. possession should be actual, open and visible, hostile to the A owner and continued during entire period necessary to create bar under the law of limitation. Appellant-plaintiffs filed the present suit for declara'ffon of title and consequential relief o…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 118 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 27
. NARATA SINGH & ANR. by Circular No. 54 of 1985. Thus the Division Bench A allowed the claim of respondent No. 1. The ques~ion for consideration before this Court was whether the work-charged service rendered by respondent No. 1 under the State Government prior to 8 securing employment with the Board, would qualify fo…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 115 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 1086
2.2. The…
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2010Full text
2010 INSC 11 · [2010] 1 S.C.R. 76
Raja Kulkarni v. State of Bombay AIR 1954 SCR 384; Mela Ram v. CIT AIR 1956 SC 367; S.R.Abhayankar v. K.D. Bapat (1969) 2 SCC 74; Tirupati Balaji v. State of Bihar (2004) 5 C sec 1, relied on. Gramophone Company of India vs. Birendra Bahadur Pandey and Ors. (1984) 2 SCC 534; Central Bank of India v. State of Kera/a 200…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 109 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 1030
Dismissing the appeal, the Court H 1030 ABDUL MANNAN v. STATE OF ASSAM 1031 HELD: 1.1. The medical evidence corroborated the A evidence of five eye witnesses including the statement$ of the injured eye witnesses. The Trial Court gravely erred in ignoring the most important and material aspect of the prosecution version…
Supreme Court of India17 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 108 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 960
- Held: On facts, No - The limited requirement pleaded in the eviction petition by the original owners was their own E personal occupation and not occupation of their family members, dependant or otherwise - ·in. any event, the LRs of deceased-owners were all married and settled in their respective matrimonial homes in…
Supreme Court of India17 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 104 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 979
[2010] 2 S.C.R. 979 STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. A v. THE COMMITTEE FOR PROTECTION OF DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS, WEST BENGAL & ORS. (Civil Appeal Nos. 6249-6250 of 2001) B FEBRUARY 17, 2010 [K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, CJI., R.V. RAVEENDRAN, D.K. JAIN, P. SATHASIVAM AND J.M. PANCHAL, JJ.] ,1·-. Constitution of India, 1950: c Articles 32…
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 102 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 879
- The whole purpose of s. 115J was to take care of the phenomenon of prosperous 'zero tax' Companies not paying E taxes though they continued to earn profits and declare dividends - Therefore, a Minimum Alternate Tax was sought to be imposed on 'zero tax' Companies - Section 115J imposes tax on a deemed income - The sa…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis