⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,381–7,400 · Page 370 of 382
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2010Full text
2010 INSC 581 · [2010] 11 S.C.R. 102
Anil Srivastav for the Respondents. The following order of the Court was delivered H 102 CRAIG ALLEN COATES v. STATE & ANR. 103 ORDER A Leave granted. Heard Mr. Krishna Mani, Senior advocate and Mr. Mohindru Singh, advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Gopal Subramaniam, learned Solicitor General who has appeared as B am…
Supreme Court of India7 Sep 2010Full text
2010 INSC 579 · [2010] 11 S.C.R. 89
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,381–7,400 · Page 370 of 382
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2010Full text
2010 INSC 581 · [2010] 11 S.C.R. 102
Anil Srivastav for the Respondents. The following order of the Court was delivered H 102 CRAIG ALLEN COATES v. STATE & ANR. 103 ORDER A Leave granted. Heard Mr. Krishna Mani, Senior advocate and Mr. Mohindru Singh, advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Gopal Subramaniam, learned Solicitor General who has appeared as B am…
Supreme Court of India7 Sep 2010Full text
2010 INSC 579 · [2010] 11 S.C.R. 89
[2010] 11 S.C.R. 89 PALRAJ A V. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NEKRTC (Civil Appeal No. 7430 of 2010) SEPTEMBER 07, 2010 B [ALTAMAS KABIR AND A.K. PATNAIK, JJ.] Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923: s.4 and Schedule I, Part II - Compensation due to c disability during employment - State Road Transport Corporation bus met with …
Supreme Court of India7 Sep 2010Full text
2010 INSC 577 · [2010] 11 S.C.R. 336
[2010] 11 S.C.R. 336 A MAIN PAL v. STATE OF HARYANA (Criminal Appeal No. 1696 of 2010 ) SEPTEMBER 07, 2010 B [R.V. RAVEENDRAN AND H.L. GOKHALE, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 - ss. 452 and 354 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - ss. 211, 212, 215 and 464 - Accused C charged with having entered the house of PW1 and assaulting h…
Supreme Court of India7 Sep 2010Full text
2010 INSC 574 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 1022
[2010] 10 S.C.R. 1022 A K.K. POONACHA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 730 of 2004) SEPTEMBER 07, 2010B [G.S. SINGHVI AND ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, JJ.] Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 -Constitutional validity of - Challenged on the ground of non-e compliance of Article 31(3) - Held: The 1976 Act …
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2010Full text
2010 INSC 571 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 971
Withdrawal of a petition - It is not permissible for a party filing a writ petition, to obtain certain orders during the pendency of the petition and then withdraw the petition without D getting proper adjudication of the issue involved therein - In such a situation, the benefit of interim relief automatically gets wit…
Supreme Court of India31 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 561 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 773
- in lieu of re-instatement just and equitable - Equity - D Compensation. The respondent was engaged as daily wager by the appellants in 1978. He worked for about 7 years. In 1985, he was terminated from service. He raised industrial E dispute challenging his termination on the ground that the procedure under Section 2…
Supreme Court of India31 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 560 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 757
LEELA GUPTA & ORS. v. STATE OF UTTAR 759 PRADESH & ORS. 1.3 The High Court was clearly in error in reducing A by 1/3rd the compensation assessed, after ascertainment of multiplicand capitalized on a particular multiplier since the very method of ascertainment of multiplicand takes into consideration many )attars of imp…
Supreme Court of India31 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 559 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 746
The appellant-painter, aged 30 years sustained several injuries in a road accident. He was hit by a tempo. G The appellant filed a claim petition. PW-2, Orthopaedic Surgeon, opined that the appellant suffered a disability of 33% of right upper limb and 21% of left upper limb and 20% total disability of the whole body a…
Supreme Court of India31 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 558 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 731
HUSSAINBHAI ALLARAKHBHAI DARIAYA & ORS. v. 733 STATE OF GUJARAT two additional requirements of Rule 38 will also have to A be complied with. They are: (i) compromise cannot be entered without the leave of the court expressly recorded in the proceedings; and (ii) before granting such leave, the court shall give notice t…
Supreme Court of India31 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 557 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 598
[2010] 10 S.C.R. 598 A DEHAL SINGH V. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH (Criminal appeal no. 1215 of 2005 etc.) AUGUST 31, 2010 8 [HARJIT SINGH BEDI AND CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, JJ.] Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: c s. 20 - Accused found in possession of large quantity of 'charas' - Conviction - Plea tha…
Supreme Court of India30 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 556 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 717
717 H 718 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 10 S.C.R. A The appellant, the daughter of A's brother-in-law, claiming herself to be beneficiary under the said Will, challenged the decree before the Supreme Court. Per contra, the respondents contended that the Will was not probated and was also neither genuine nor valid.8 They…
Supreme Court of India30 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 554 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 561
- Also there was no age limit prescribed for the appointment of a Chairman of the Board under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - In such circumstances, the conclusion by High Court G in this regard was erroneous, contrary to the record of proceedings placed before it and, therefore, liable to be set aside - The appel…
Supreme Court of India27 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 552 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 703
704 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 10 S.C.R. A Appellant-company, engaged in the manufacture and sale of high grade coconut oil and the registered owners of the trade mark "Shalimar", filed suit seeking permanent injunction against the respondents on the ground that the latter had infringed upon the appellant's B trade m…
Supreme Court of India27 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 550 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 550
Ujjal Singh, J.P. Singh, A.S. Bahar, R.C. Kaushik for the Petitioner. · F S.S. Rana, Bindra Rana, Vikrant Rana, Sanatombi Koijam, Pooja Thakur (for S.S. Rana & Co.) for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G ALTAMAS KABIR, J. 1. This Special Leave Petition is directed against the judgment and orde…
Supreme Court of India27 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 544 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 232
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The facts of the case lead to only one conclusion that the appellant was wrongly appointed to C a post that was reserved for 'Group B' category. The High Court also found that the appellant's selection for appointment to the post was tainted by the participation of the Head of…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 539 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 615
E (i) The object of the scheme was to honour, and where necessary, to mitigate the sufferings of those who had struggled to achieve independence for the country. Many freedom fighters, even though they did not have F sufficient income to maintain themselves, would even be reluctant to receive the Pension under the Sche…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 536 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 217
Thereafter, the appellant served a notice dated 2.3.1998 informing the first respondent that the electricity supply would be disconnected if the arrears due from the C previous owner were not paid. Thereafter the electricity supplied was disconnected on 9.3.1998. The first respondent filed a suit challenging the demand…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 535 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 183
1. 94 crores, sufficient to establish that the application made G by assessee u/s. 245C(1) could not be entertained as it did not contain a 'true and full' disclosure' of their undisclosed income and 'the manner' in which such income had been 183 H 184 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010) 10 S.C.R. A derived - Income Tax Settl…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 534 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 172
In the instant appeals, the appellants contended that since the acquisition of the land was for DMRC and there D was a specific Act, namely, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the authorities were not justified in invoking the urgency provision in the Land Acquisition Act by dispensing with the enqui…
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2010Full text
2010 INSC 53 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 291
- Thus, arbitration clause did not exist in regard to tender D stage dispute or pre-contract differences, at a stage when there was no privily of contract - Since a purchase order was not placed, there was no contract or agreement and the terms of arbitration clause did not come into existence - Government contracts - …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
[2010] 11 S.C.R. 89 PALRAJ A V. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NEKRTC (Civil Appeal No. 7430 of 2010) SEPTEMBER 07, 2010 B [ALTAMAS KABIR AND A.K. PATNAIK, JJ.] Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923: s.4 and Schedule I, Part II - Compensation due to c disability during employment - State Road Transport Corporation bus met with …
Supreme Court of India7 Sep 2010Full text
2010 INSC 577 · [2010] 11 S.C.R. 336
[2010] 11 S.C.R. 336 A MAIN PAL v. STATE OF HARYANA (Criminal Appeal No. 1696 of 2010 ) SEPTEMBER 07, 2010 B [R.V. RAVEENDRAN AND H.L. GOKHALE, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 - ss. 452 and 354 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - ss. 211, 212, 215 and 464 - Accused C charged with having entered the house of PW1 and assaulting h…
Supreme Court of India7 Sep 2010Full text
2010 INSC 574 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 1022
[2010] 10 S.C.R. 1022 A K.K. POONACHA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 730 of 2004) SEPTEMBER 07, 2010B [G.S. SINGHVI AND ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, JJ.] Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 -Constitutional validity of - Challenged on the ground of non-e compliance of Article 31(3) - Held: The 1976 Act …
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2010Full text
2010 INSC 571 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 971
Withdrawal of a petition - It is not permissible for a party filing a writ petition, to obtain certain orders during the pendency of the petition and then withdraw the petition without D getting proper adjudication of the issue involved therein - In such a situation, the benefit of interim relief automatically gets wit…
Supreme Court of India31 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 561 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 773
- in lieu of re-instatement just and equitable - Equity - D Compensation. The respondent was engaged as daily wager by the appellants in 1978. He worked for about 7 years. In 1985, he was terminated from service. He raised industrial E dispute challenging his termination on the ground that the procedure under Section 2…
Supreme Court of India31 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 560 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 757
LEELA GUPTA & ORS. v. STATE OF UTTAR 759 PRADESH & ORS. 1.3 The High Court was clearly in error in reducing A by 1/3rd the compensation assessed, after ascertainment of multiplicand capitalized on a particular multiplier since the very method of ascertainment of multiplicand takes into consideration many )attars of imp…
Supreme Court of India31 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 559 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 746
The appellant-painter, aged 30 years sustained several injuries in a road accident. He was hit by a tempo. G The appellant filed a claim petition. PW-2, Orthopaedic Surgeon, opined that the appellant suffered a disability of 33% of right upper limb and 21% of left upper limb and 20% total disability of the whole body a…
Supreme Court of India31 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 558 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 731
HUSSAINBHAI ALLARAKHBHAI DARIAYA & ORS. v. 733 STATE OF GUJARAT two additional requirements of Rule 38 will also have to A be complied with. They are: (i) compromise cannot be entered without the leave of the court expressly recorded in the proceedings; and (ii) before granting such leave, the court shall give notice t…
Supreme Court of India31 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 557 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 598
[2010] 10 S.C.R. 598 A DEHAL SINGH V. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH (Criminal appeal no. 1215 of 2005 etc.) AUGUST 31, 2010 8 [HARJIT SINGH BEDI AND CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, JJ.] Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: c s. 20 - Accused found in possession of large quantity of 'charas' - Conviction - Plea tha…
Supreme Court of India30 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 556 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 717
717 H 718 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 10 S.C.R. A The appellant, the daughter of A's brother-in-law, claiming herself to be beneficiary under the said Will, challenged the decree before the Supreme Court. Per contra, the respondents contended that the Will was not probated and was also neither genuine nor valid.8 They…
Supreme Court of India30 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 554 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 561
- Also there was no age limit prescribed for the appointment of a Chairman of the Board under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - In such circumstances, the conclusion by High Court G in this regard was erroneous, contrary to the record of proceedings placed before it and, therefore, liable to be set aside - The appel…
Supreme Court of India27 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 552 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 703
704 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 10 S.C.R. A Appellant-company, engaged in the manufacture and sale of high grade coconut oil and the registered owners of the trade mark "Shalimar", filed suit seeking permanent injunction against the respondents on the ground that the latter had infringed upon the appellant's B trade m…
Supreme Court of India27 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 550 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 550
Ujjal Singh, J.P. Singh, A.S. Bahar, R.C. Kaushik for the Petitioner. · F S.S. Rana, Bindra Rana, Vikrant Rana, Sanatombi Koijam, Pooja Thakur (for S.S. Rana & Co.) for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G ALTAMAS KABIR, J. 1. This Special Leave Petition is directed against the judgment and orde…
Supreme Court of India27 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 544 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 232
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The facts of the case lead to only one conclusion that the appellant was wrongly appointed to C a post that was reserved for 'Group B' category. The High Court also found that the appellant's selection for appointment to the post was tainted by the participation of the Head of…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 539 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 615
E (i) The object of the scheme was to honour, and where necessary, to mitigate the sufferings of those who had struggled to achieve independence for the country. Many freedom fighters, even though they did not have F sufficient income to maintain themselves, would even be reluctant to receive the Pension under the Sche…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 536 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 217
Thereafter, the appellant served a notice dated 2.3.1998 informing the first respondent that the electricity supply would be disconnected if the arrears due from the C previous owner were not paid. Thereafter the electricity supplied was disconnected on 9.3.1998. The first respondent filed a suit challenging the demand…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 535 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 183
1. 94 crores, sufficient to establish that the application made G by assessee u/s. 245C(1) could not be entertained as it did not contain a 'true and full' disclosure' of their undisclosed income and 'the manner' in which such income had been 183 H 184 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010) 10 S.C.R. A derived - Income Tax Settl…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2010Full text
2010 INSC 534 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 172
In the instant appeals, the appellants contended that since the acquisition of the land was for DMRC and there D was a specific Act, namely, the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, the authorities were not justified in invoking the urgency provision in the Land Acquisition Act by dispensing with the enqui…
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2010Full text
2010 INSC 53 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 291
- Thus, arbitration clause did not exist in regard to tender D stage dispute or pre-contract differences, at a stage when there was no privily of contract - Since a purchase order was not placed, there was no contract or agreement and the terms of arbitration clause did not come into existence - Government contracts - …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis