⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,221–7,240 · Page 362 of 382
Supreme Court of India3 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 1 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 1
JAGAT SINGH v. STATE OF H. P. 3 exchanged through 'Gatras'. It is also seen from the A evidence that the main blow on the chest of the deceased was caused by A-2 who died during the pendency of the appeal before the High Court. [para 7] [10-D-HJ 1.2. Considering the evidence of the doctor with 8 regard to the injuries …
Supreme Court of India2011
(2012) 1 SCC 40
Non-punitive bail principles applied to Section 480 BNSS (bail in non-bailable offences).
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,221–7,240 · Page 362 of 382
Supreme Court of India3 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 1 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 1
JAGAT SINGH v. STATE OF H. P. 3 exchanged through 'Gatras'. It is also seen from the A evidence that the main blow on the chest of the deceased was caused by A-2 who died during the pendency of the appeal before the High Court. [para 7] [10-D-HJ 1.2. Considering the evidence of the doctor with 8 regard to the injuries …
Supreme Court of India2011
(2012) 1 SCC 40
Non-punitive bail principles applied to Section 480 BNSS (bail in non-bailable offences).
Supreme Court of India2011
(2011) 5 SCC 324
Distinction between Section 149 (membership of unlawful assembly sharing common object) and Section 34 (prior concert); mere passive presence in crowd does not attract Section 149. | Common object requirements and vicarious liability applied under Section 190 BNS.
Supreme Court of India2011
(2011) 5 SCC 532
Arbitrability of disputes; actions in rem are non-arbitrable, actions in personam are arbitrable; mortgage suits and tenancy rights not arbitrable.
Supreme Court of India2011
(2011) 4 SCC 454
Passive euthanasia permitted under strict High Court-supervised procedure (later refined in Common Cause).
Supreme Court of India2010
(2010) 14 SCC 370
Transfer pendente lite is not void ab initio, but the transferee takes the property subject to the rights of the litigants and is bound by the result of the suit.
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull textCited by 1
(2010) 7 SCC 263
Involuntary administration of polygraph, narco-analysis, and brain-mapping violates Articles 20(3) and 21; any subsequent discovery under Section 27 is tainted and inadmissible. | Protection against involuntary testimonial evidence and tainted discoveries applied under Section 23 BSA.
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 99 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 830
- Provisions· for SSFC and appellate authority are pari E materia - On facts, High Court erred in setting aside the orders of authorities that the finding of guilt recorded by SSFC and appellate authority was bad as no reasons were given by the authorities - Thus, matters remitted back to High Court for reconsideration…
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 98 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 805
The question which arose for consideration in these appeals was whether High Court was justified in quashing the summoning orders passed by trial court against accused-Directors under Section 138 of the G Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, on the ground that the averments made against them were unspecific and general an…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 97 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 756
- Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14. G The notification was issued u/s. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 proposing to acquire large tract of land. The land owners filed objections. The concerned Land Acquisition Officer released lands of some of the landowners and issued declaration u/s. 6 of the Act in H 756…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 96 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 729
Appeal - Appeal against acquittal - Scope for interference - Discussed. According to the prosecution, the appellant-accused, armed with the licensed gun of his brother, fired bullet G shots at PW3 and injured him as he was enraged with the fact that the farmers in the village had started irrigating their fields from th…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 93 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 554
H MANISHA TYAGI v. DEEPAK KUMAR 555 Division Bench to justify reversal, of the decree of judicial A separation - Order passed by the Single Judge restored. The husband-respondent filed petition under Section . 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty. The petition was dismissed by the…
Supreme Court of India30 Dec 2010Full text
2010 INSC 895 · [2010] 11 S.C.R. 868
F From the Judgment & Order dated 24.7.2002 of the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Criminal Appeal No. 1016 of 1996. I. Venkata Narayana, D. Mahesh Babu and D. Bharati Reddy for the Appellant. G Leela Sarveswar and V.N. Raghupathy for the Respondent. The following Order of the Court was deliv…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2010Full text
2010 INSC 893 · [2010] 15 S.C.R. 1272
1274 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 15 (ADDL.) S.C.R. A petitioners had not left the 8hartiya Janata Party at all, was not a mistake but was intentionally made, and that the High Court had erroneously held otherwise, is not borne out by the circumstances indicated in the writ petitions, if considered in their totality. T…
Supreme Court of India8 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 89 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 633
[2010] 2 S.C.R. 633 MULLA & ANR. A V. STATE OF U.P. (Criminal Appeal No. 396 of 2008) FEBRUARY 8, 2010 B [P. SATHASIVAM AND H. L. DATTU, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 - 3021149, 365 and 148 - Abduction and murder for ransom - Eye-witnesses to the incident -Three of them injured eye-witnesses - Prosecution case C supported by m…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2010Full text
2010 INSC 886 · [2010] 14 S.C.R. 1067
[2010] 14 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 1067 SUBHASH A V. Sl'ATE OF HARYANA (Criminal Appeal No. 184 of 2006) DECEMBER 16, 2010 B [HARJIT SINGH BEDI AND CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 - ss. 306 and 498A -Death of married woman due to 70% burn injuries - Dying declaration recorded C by Magistrate to the effect that the…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2010Full text
2010 INSC 882 · [2010] 14 S.C.R. 851
1.2. It cannot be said that the Explanation VIII to Notifications No. 175186 and 1193 refers only to 'brand names' and cannot be used to determine whether code names, as used by the appellant, fall within the said category. The mere difference in…
Supreme Court of India8 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 88 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 586
S. NAGARAJ (DEAD) BY LRS. v. B. R. VASUDEVA 587 MURTHY & ORS. ETC. ETC. paid to them for the land utilized by BOA for construction of A road - The order challenged - High Co"urt gave the finding in favour of the LRs of lndamdars, but quashed the direction of the State for resumption and restoration of the sites in favo…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2010Full text
2010 INSC 879 · [2010] 14 S.C.R. 1062
Smt. lcchu Devi Choraria Vs. Union of India & Ors. 1981 (1) SCR 640 = 1980 (4) SCC 531; and Kamleshkumar lswardas Patel Vs. Union of India & Ors. 1995 (3) SCR 279·= E 1995 (4) SCC 51; Rajesh Gulati Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. 2002 (7) SCC 129; and Gimik Piotr Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. 2009 (15) SCR 889 = 20…
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2010Full text
2010 INSC 873 · [2010] 15 S.C.R. 275
276 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 15 (ADDL.) S.C.R. A purchaser Rs. 17, 5001- without interest - Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - s. 123 - Registration - Deeds and documents. In the year 1974, respondent No. 8 dedicated certain property to the idol of Saibaba by way of a gift deed. The possession was handed over to the …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India2011
(2011) 5 SCC 324
Distinction between Section 149 (membership of unlawful assembly sharing common object) and Section 34 (prior concert); mere passive presence in crowd does not attract Section 149. | Common object requirements and vicarious liability applied under Section 190 BNS.
Supreme Court of India2011
(2011) 5 SCC 532
Arbitrability of disputes; actions in rem are non-arbitrable, actions in personam are arbitrable; mortgage suits and tenancy rights not arbitrable.
Supreme Court of India2011
(2011) 4 SCC 454
Passive euthanasia permitted under strict High Court-supervised procedure (later refined in Common Cause).
Supreme Court of India2010
(2010) 14 SCC 370
Transfer pendente lite is not void ab initio, but the transferee takes the property subject to the rights of the litigants and is bound by the result of the suit.
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull textCited by 1
(2010) 7 SCC 263
Involuntary administration of polygraph, narco-analysis, and brain-mapping violates Articles 20(3) and 21; any subsequent discovery under Section 27 is tainted and inadmissible. | Protection against involuntary testimonial evidence and tainted discoveries applied under Section 23 BSA.
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 99 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 830
- Provisions· for SSFC and appellate authority are pari E materia - On facts, High Court erred in setting aside the orders of authorities that the finding of guilt recorded by SSFC and appellate authority was bad as no reasons were given by the authorities - Thus, matters remitted back to High Court for reconsideration…
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 98 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 805
The question which arose for consideration in these appeals was whether High Court was justified in quashing the summoning orders passed by trial court against accused-Directors under Section 138 of the G Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, on the ground that the averments made against them were unspecific and general an…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 97 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 756
- Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14. G The notification was issued u/s. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 proposing to acquire large tract of land. The land owners filed objections. The concerned Land Acquisition Officer released lands of some of the landowners and issued declaration u/s. 6 of the Act in H 756…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 96 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 729
Appeal - Appeal against acquittal - Scope for interference - Discussed. According to the prosecution, the appellant-accused, armed with the licensed gun of his brother, fired bullet G shots at PW3 and injured him as he was enraged with the fact that the farmers in the village had started irrigating their fields from th…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 93 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 554
H MANISHA TYAGI v. DEEPAK KUMAR 555 Division Bench to justify reversal, of the decree of judicial A separation - Order passed by the Single Judge restored. The husband-respondent filed petition under Section . 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty. The petition was dismissed by the…
Supreme Court of India30 Dec 2010Full text
2010 INSC 895 · [2010] 11 S.C.R. 868
F From the Judgment & Order dated 24.7.2002 of the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Criminal Appeal No. 1016 of 1996. I. Venkata Narayana, D. Mahesh Babu and D. Bharati Reddy for the Appellant. G Leela Sarveswar and V.N. Raghupathy for the Respondent. The following Order of the Court was deliv…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2010Full text
2010 INSC 893 · [2010] 15 S.C.R. 1272
1274 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 15 (ADDL.) S.C.R. A petitioners had not left the 8hartiya Janata Party at all, was not a mistake but was intentionally made, and that the High Court had erroneously held otherwise, is not borne out by the circumstances indicated in the writ petitions, if considered in their totality. T…
Supreme Court of India8 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 89 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 633
[2010] 2 S.C.R. 633 MULLA & ANR. A V. STATE OF U.P. (Criminal Appeal No. 396 of 2008) FEBRUARY 8, 2010 B [P. SATHASIVAM AND H. L. DATTU, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 - 3021149, 365 and 148 - Abduction and murder for ransom - Eye-witnesses to the incident -Three of them injured eye-witnesses - Prosecution case C supported by m…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2010Full text
2010 INSC 886 · [2010] 14 S.C.R. 1067
[2010] 14 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 1067 SUBHASH A V. Sl'ATE OF HARYANA (Criminal Appeal No. 184 of 2006) DECEMBER 16, 2010 B [HARJIT SINGH BEDI AND CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 - ss. 306 and 498A -Death of married woman due to 70% burn injuries - Dying declaration recorded C by Magistrate to the effect that the…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2010Full text
2010 INSC 882 · [2010] 14 S.C.R. 851
1.2. It cannot be said that the Explanation VIII to Notifications No. 175186 and 1193 refers only to 'brand names' and cannot be used to determine whether code names, as used by the appellant, fall within the said category. The mere difference in…
Supreme Court of India8 Feb 2010Full text
2010 INSC 88 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 586
S. NAGARAJ (DEAD) BY LRS. v. B. R. VASUDEVA 587 MURTHY & ORS. ETC. ETC. paid to them for the land utilized by BOA for construction of A road - The order challenged - High Co"urt gave the finding in favour of the LRs of lndamdars, but quashed the direction of the State for resumption and restoration of the sites in favo…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2010Full text
2010 INSC 879 · [2010] 14 S.C.R. 1062
Smt. lcchu Devi Choraria Vs. Union of India & Ors. 1981 (1) SCR 640 = 1980 (4) SCC 531; and Kamleshkumar lswardas Patel Vs. Union of India & Ors. 1995 (3) SCR 279·= E 1995 (4) SCC 51; Rajesh Gulati Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. 2002 (7) SCC 129; and Gimik Piotr Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. 2009 (15) SCR 889 = 20…
Supreme Court of India13 Dec 2010Full text
2010 INSC 873 · [2010] 15 S.C.R. 275
276 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 15 (ADDL.) S.C.R. A purchaser Rs. 17, 5001- without interest - Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - s. 123 - Registration - Deeds and documents. In the year 1974, respondent No. 8 dedicated certain property to the idol of Saibaba by way of a gift deed. The possession was handed over to the …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis