Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,121–7,140 · Page 357 of 382
Supreme Court of India8 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 190 · [2011] 4 S.C.R. 525
- High Court had given an opportunity to the counsel of State to take instructions whether the Government intended to D institute any further enquiry in the matter - Despite the opportunity, the counsel did not report any instructions in the matter- High Court, therefore, proceeded on the basis that the Government did …
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 19 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 160
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,121–7,140 · Page 357 of 382
Supreme Court of India8 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 190 · [2011] 4 S.C.R. 525
- High Court had given an opportunity to the counsel of State to take instructions whether the Government intended to D institute any further enquiry in the matter - Despite the opportunity, the counsel did not report any instructions in the matter- High Court, therefore, proceeded on the basis that the Government did …
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 19 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 160
1 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. YADU 161 SAMBHAJI MORE & ORS. arising out of the use of the petrol tanker and there was A --{ a time gap of about four hours. The appeals were filed before the High Court. One 'VU' whose son died in the accident also filed a'n appeal. The Single Judge of the High Court set aside th…
Supreme Court of India8 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 189 · [2011] 4 S.C.R. 1176
- The High Court gravely erred in discarding the evidence of PWs merely because they were relatives of the deceased -It further fell into error in not giving due weightage to o deposition of a stamped witness, who had suffered gun shot injuries - The High Court made too much of insignificant discrepancies, which were m…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 188 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 728
F In the appeals filed by the land-owners the question for consideration before the Court was: whether in the admitted facts of the case, invoking the urgency clause uls 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was justified. Allowing the appeals, the Court G HELD: 1.1 Admittedly, the Land Acquisition Act, 1897, a pre-C…
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 186 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 721
[2011] 3 S.C.R. 721 SANT SINGH A v. SUKHDEV SINGH AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 2882 of 2011) MARCH 4, 2011 B [G.S. SINGHVI AND ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, JJ.] Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: ss. 163A and 166; Second Schedule - Claim petition c under s. 166 - Determination of compensation - Structured formula as provided for under the…
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 185 · [2011] 5 S.C.R. 587
-- 588 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 5 S.C.R. A proceeded to another issue - More so, none of the courts below took into consideration the clause contained in the agreement to sell which provided that in the event of any default on the part of the vendors in completing the sale, the appellant could get refund of earnest…
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 184 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 546
[2011] 3 S.C.R. 546 A M/S HYDERABAD ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Civil Appeal No. 3781 of 2003) MARCH 04, 2011 B [D.K. JAIN AND H.L. DATTU, JJ.] Central Sales Tax Act, 1956: c s.3(a) - Inter-State trade - Sales agreement between assessee and the purchaser - Movement of goods from one State to anot…
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 183 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 527
K.K. BASKARAN v. STATE REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, 529 TAMIL NADU & ORS. [Paras 12, 14, 22, 23 and 44] [536-C-D; 540-B-D; 537-C; A 545-E] Vijay C. Punja/ vs. State of Maharashtra (2005) 4 CTC 705 - disapproved. 6 2.1 It often happens that a legislation overlaps both Lists I as well as List II of the Seventh Schedule. In suc…
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 182 · [2011] 4 S.C.R. 509
Regularisation - Casual workers engaged by Border G Roads Organization (BRO) for thirty to forty years, with short breaks - Need for appropriate regulation/scheme - Union of India to consider enacting an appropriate regulation/scheme 509 H 510 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 4 S.C.R. • A for absorption and regularization …
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 181 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 496
c The respondent in the instant appeals, were declared as land grabbers by the Special Tribunal in the separate matters. The Special Tribunal directed the Revenue Officer to evict the respondents from the land and put appellants in the possession of the .land. He respondent filed an appeal. The Special Court dismissed …
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 180 · [2011] 6 S.C.R. 1
F WITH C.A. No. 2321 of 2011. Mohan Parasaran, ASG, T. Harish Kumar, V. Vasudevan, G V.Balachandran for the Appellant V. Balachandran, R. Nedumaran, S. Thananjayan for the Respondents. The Order of the Court was delivered by H • TAMIL NADU HOUSING BOARD v. SERVICE 3 SOCIETY & ANR. ORDER A R. V. .RAVEENDRAN J. 1. Leave …
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 18 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 146
In the instant appeals, the question for consideration before the Court was: whether interest u/s 2348 can be 1. Kwality Biscuits Ltd. Vs. CIT (2000) 243 !TR 519 .. H 146 JT. C. I. T., MUMBAI v. ROLTA INDIA LTD. 147 charged on the tax calculated on book profits u/s 115JA? A -~ Allowing the appeals of Revenue and dismis…
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 179 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 711
"1. OMNIA does hereby appoint PIM as its Representative for Europe, and PIM hereby accepts the aforesaid appointment, upon the following G terms: (a) PIM would market the Products manufactured by OMNIA, on an exclusive basis, to his clients in Europe, and would be responsible for obtaining the H OMNIA TECHNOLOGIES P. L…
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 178 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 718
G 3630 of 2007 etc. From the Judgment & Order dated 07.07.2005 of the High Court of Judicature of Utaranchal, at Nainital, in First Appeal No. 1073 of 2001. H 718 KUMAON SEEDS COPRN. & ORS. v. KRISHI 719 UTPADAN MANDI SAMIT!, KASHIPUR & ORS. WITH A Civil Appeal No. 3631 of 2007. ; P.S. Patwalia, Vibha Datta Makhija for…
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 177 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 698
The appellant thereafter filed a complaint case before the Judicial Magistrate under section 138 of the E Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The trial Court convicted respondent no.1 to suffer simple imprisonment till rising of the court and to pay compensation of Rs.7,10,000/- and in default of payment thereof, to suff…
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 176 · [2011] 4 S.C.R. 1000
Disposing of the appeals, the C~urt H 1002 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 4 S.C.R. • A HELD: 1.1. The respondent company's mark 'Eenadu' has acquired extra-ordinary reputation and goodwill in the State of Andhra Pradesh. 'Eenadu' newspaper and TV are extremely well known and almost household words in the State of Andhra …
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 175 · [2011] 4 S.C.R. 445
(2011] 4 S.C.R. 445• CENTRE FOR PIL & ANR. A v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. (Writ Petition (C) No. 348 of 2010) MARCH 3, 2011 B [S.H. KAPADIA, CJI, K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.] Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003: c Object of its enactment - Discussed. s.4(1), proviso - Appointment of respondent no.2 (Shri…
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 174 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 632
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORP. LTD. v. CHEMBUR 633 SERVICE STATION the High Court was justified in upholding the grant of interim A order of status quo and diracting the appellant to secure possession from the raspondent of the petrol pump premises by resorting to proceedings under the 1971 Act; and whether the respondent had …
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 173 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 489
-- . . STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. MAHESH "KUMAR 491 .. . . . . SHARMA.. . ' ; goverrnrtent Y,111 not recover 'the amount .which hai been. A. paid to the respondent, nor will the government recover any amount which has been similarly paid to other employees seeking such medical reimbursement under *Shankarlal's judgment whic…
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 172 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 480
(2011) 3 S.C.R. 480 -- A KUSUM LATA & ORS. v. SATBIR & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 2269 of 2011) MARCH 02, 2011 B [G.S. SINGHVI AND ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, JJ.] MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988: c s. 166 - Fatal motor accident - Claim petition -Appreciation of evidence - Claim disallowed by Tribunal as a/so by High Court on the ground …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
1 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. YADU 161 SAMBHAJI MORE & ORS. arising out of the use of the petrol tanker and there was A --{ a time gap of about four hours. The appeals were filed before the High Court. One 'VU' whose son died in the accident also filed a'n appeal. The Single Judge of the High Court set aside th…
Supreme Court of India8 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 189 · [2011] 4 S.C.R. 1176
- The High Court gravely erred in discarding the evidence of PWs merely because they were relatives of the deceased -It further fell into error in not giving due weightage to o deposition of a stamped witness, who had suffered gun shot injuries - The High Court made too much of insignificant discrepancies, which were m…
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 188 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 728
F In the appeals filed by the land-owners the question for consideration before the Court was: whether in the admitted facts of the case, invoking the urgency clause uls 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was justified. Allowing the appeals, the Court G HELD: 1.1 Admittedly, the Land Acquisition Act, 1897, a pre-C…
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 186 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 721
[2011] 3 S.C.R. 721 SANT SINGH A v. SUKHDEV SINGH AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 2882 of 2011) MARCH 4, 2011 B [G.S. SINGHVI AND ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, JJ.] Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: ss. 163A and 166; Second Schedule - Claim petition c under s. 166 - Determination of compensation - Structured formula as provided for under the…
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 185 · [2011] 5 S.C.R. 587
-- 588 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 5 S.C.R. A proceeded to another issue - More so, none of the courts below took into consideration the clause contained in the agreement to sell which provided that in the event of any default on the part of the vendors in completing the sale, the appellant could get refund of earnest…
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 184 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 546
[2011] 3 S.C.R. 546 A M/S HYDERABAD ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Civil Appeal No. 3781 of 2003) MARCH 04, 2011 B [D.K. JAIN AND H.L. DATTU, JJ.] Central Sales Tax Act, 1956: c s.3(a) - Inter-State trade - Sales agreement between assessee and the purchaser - Movement of goods from one State to anot…
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 183 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 527
K.K. BASKARAN v. STATE REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, 529 TAMIL NADU & ORS. [Paras 12, 14, 22, 23 and 44] [536-C-D; 540-B-D; 537-C; A 545-E] Vijay C. Punja/ vs. State of Maharashtra (2005) 4 CTC 705 - disapproved. 6 2.1 It often happens that a legislation overlaps both Lists I as well as List II of the Seventh Schedule. In suc…
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 182 · [2011] 4 S.C.R. 509
Regularisation - Casual workers engaged by Border G Roads Organization (BRO) for thirty to forty years, with short breaks - Need for appropriate regulation/scheme - Union of India to consider enacting an appropriate regulation/scheme 509 H 510 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 4 S.C.R. • A for absorption and regularization …
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 181 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 496
c The respondent in the instant appeals, were declared as land grabbers by the Special Tribunal in the separate matters. The Special Tribunal directed the Revenue Officer to evict the respondents from the land and put appellants in the possession of the .land. He respondent filed an appeal. The Special Court dismissed …
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 180 · [2011] 6 S.C.R. 1
F WITH C.A. No. 2321 of 2011. Mohan Parasaran, ASG, T. Harish Kumar, V. Vasudevan, G V.Balachandran for the Appellant V. Balachandran, R. Nedumaran, S. Thananjayan for the Respondents. The Order of the Court was delivered by H • TAMIL NADU HOUSING BOARD v. SERVICE 3 SOCIETY & ANR. ORDER A R. V. .RAVEENDRAN J. 1. Leave …
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 18 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 146
In the instant appeals, the question for consideration before the Court was: whether interest u/s 2348 can be 1. Kwality Biscuits Ltd. Vs. CIT (2000) 243 !TR 519 .. H 146 JT. C. I. T., MUMBAI v. ROLTA INDIA LTD. 147 charged on the tax calculated on book profits u/s 115JA? A -~ Allowing the appeals of Revenue and dismis…
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 179 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 711
"1. OMNIA does hereby appoint PIM as its Representative for Europe, and PIM hereby accepts the aforesaid appointment, upon the following G terms: (a) PIM would market the Products manufactured by OMNIA, on an exclusive basis, to his clients in Europe, and would be responsible for obtaining the H OMNIA TECHNOLOGIES P. L…
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 178 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 718
G 3630 of 2007 etc. From the Judgment & Order dated 07.07.2005 of the High Court of Judicature of Utaranchal, at Nainital, in First Appeal No. 1073 of 2001. H 718 KUMAON SEEDS COPRN. & ORS. v. KRISHI 719 UTPADAN MANDI SAMIT!, KASHIPUR & ORS. WITH A Civil Appeal No. 3631 of 2007. ; P.S. Patwalia, Vibha Datta Makhija for…
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 177 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 698
The appellant thereafter filed a complaint case before the Judicial Magistrate under section 138 of the E Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The trial Court convicted respondent no.1 to suffer simple imprisonment till rising of the court and to pay compensation of Rs.7,10,000/- and in default of payment thereof, to suff…
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 176 · [2011] 4 S.C.R. 1000
Disposing of the appeals, the C~urt H 1002 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 4 S.C.R. • A HELD: 1.1. The respondent company's mark 'Eenadu' has acquired extra-ordinary reputation and goodwill in the State of Andhra Pradesh. 'Eenadu' newspaper and TV are extremely well known and almost household words in the State of Andhra …
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 175 · [2011] 4 S.C.R. 445
(2011] 4 S.C.R. 445• CENTRE FOR PIL & ANR. A v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. (Writ Petition (C) No. 348 of 2010) MARCH 3, 2011 B [S.H. KAPADIA, CJI, K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.] Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003: c Object of its enactment - Discussed. s.4(1), proviso - Appointment of respondent no.2 (Shri…
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 174 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 632
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORP. LTD. v. CHEMBUR 633 SERVICE STATION the High Court was justified in upholding the grant of interim A order of status quo and diracting the appellant to secure possession from the raspondent of the petrol pump premises by resorting to proceedings under the 1971 Act; and whether the respondent had …
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 173 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 489
-- . . STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. MAHESH "KUMAR 491 .. . . . . SHARMA.. . ' ; goverrnrtent Y,111 not recover 'the amount .which hai been. A. paid to the respondent, nor will the government recover any amount which has been similarly paid to other employees seeking such medical reimbursement under *Shankarlal's judgment whic…
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 172 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 480
(2011) 3 S.C.R. 480 -- A KUSUM LATA & ORS. v. SATBIR & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 2269 of 2011) MARCH 02, 2011 B [G.S. SINGHVI AND ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, JJ.] MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988: c s. 166 - Fatal motor accident - Claim petition -Appreciation of evidence - Claim disallowed by Tribunal as a/so by High Court on the ground …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis