⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
6,761–6,780 · Page 339 of 382
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 515 · [2011] 15 S.C.R. 618
1.6. In view of the definition of "Vicarious Liability", it can be inferred that the person supervising the driver through the principle of Respondeat Superior should pay G for the damages of the victim. In the instant case, the driver was em…
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 514 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 453
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 s. 156 rlw s.198 and First Schedule (as amended by D Andhra Pradesh Act 3 of 1992) -Offences punishable ulss 494 and 495 !PC made cognizable and non-bailable in the State of Andhra Pradesh - Held: The amendment made shall prevail in the State of Andhra Pradesh notwithstanding the fact t…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
6,761–6,780 · Page 339 of 382
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 515 · [2011] 15 S.C.R. 618
1.6. In view of the definition of "Vicarious Liability", it can be inferred that the person supervising the driver through the principle of Respondeat Superior should pay G for the damages of the victim. In the instant case, the driver was em…
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 514 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 453
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 s. 156 rlw s.198 and First Schedule (as amended by D Andhra Pradesh Act 3 of 1992) -Offences punishable ulss 494 and 495 !PC made cognizable and non-bailable in the State of Andhra Pradesh - Held: The amendment made shall prevail in the State of Andhra Pradesh notwithstanding the fact t…
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 513 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 446
NIRMAL SINGH PEHLWAN @ NIMMA v. INSPECTOR, 447 CUSTOMS, CUSTOMS HOUSE.PUNJAB to follow the 'ratio of the said judgment, particularly, as the A · provisions of s. 50 of the NDPS Act, which are mandatory have also not been complied with - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - ss. 22 and 50 -Evidence Act,…
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 512 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 439
On 14.09.1983, the Dy. S.P. Cabinet (Vigilance) Department, Gov~rnment of Bihar, Patna, made a written complaint before the Office-in-charge, Vigilance Police Station, Patna, alleging that in six Schemes under National Rural Employment Programme ("NREP") after G preliminary enquiry, it was detected that Junior Engineer…
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 511 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 435
R.K. Kapoor, Neelam Khanna for the Appellant. 8 ' . Rajeev Gaur 'Nassem' (for Kamal Mohan Gupta) for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C SIRPURKAR, J. 1. Appellant Nikku Khan @ Mohammadeen, who has been convicted by both the courts below for the offence punishable under Section 21 of the Narcot…
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 510 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 402
Jurisdiction of arbitratorlarbitral tribunal - HELD: Special tribunals like arbitral tribunals and Labour Courts get jurisdiction to proceed with the case only from the reference H 404 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 9 S.C.R. A made to them - Thus, an arbitrator cannot be allowed to ~ assume jurisdiction over a question w…
Supreme Court of India14 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 51 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 883
MANJU MATHUR & ANR. 226/227 or the Constitution. The High Court held in the A impugnefi judgment that the Dietician and Senior Dietician ,working in the Union Territory Administration, Chandigarh, were entitled to pay scales at par with their counterp'arts in the State of Punjab and accordingly .issued a fTlandamus to …
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 509 · [2011] 15 S.C.R. 615
WITH B C.A. No. 1474 of 2007. L. Nageswara Rao, Rachana Srivastava for the Appellants. Jayant Bhushan, Anurag Dubey, Meenesh Dubey (for S.R. C Selia), Ajay Kr. Singh (for Shrish Kumar Misra) for the Respondents. The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER Civil Appeal No. 5130 of 2009D Heard learned counsel fo…
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 508 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 382
SMS TEA ESTATES PVT. LTD. v. CHANDMARI TEA 383 CO. PVT. LTD. Registration Act, 1908 - s. 49, proviso - Stamp Act, 1899 - A ss. 33,35,38 and 40. The respondent, under a lease deed dated 21.12.2006, granted lease of its two tea estates with all appurtenances to the appellant for a term of 30 years. 8 Clause 35 of the sai…
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 507 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 371
The only point for consideration before the Court was: what would be the reasonable amount the appellant-E wife was entitled by way of maintenance from the husband in terms of s. 25 of the Act. Partly allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 As per s. 25, of the Hindu Marriage Act, F 1955, while considering the claim …
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 506 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 359
[2011] 9 S.C.R. 359 DISHA A v. STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. (Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 33 of 2011) \ JULY 20, 2011 B ' [P. SATHASIVAM AND DR. B.S. CHAUHAN, JJ.] Constitution of India, 1950: Article 32 rlw s. 173 CrPC - Writ petition seeking to c transfer investigation to Central Bureau of Investigation - The Firms of pet…
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 505 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 348
MOHD.HAMID & ANR ETC.ETC. v. BAD! MASJID 349 TRUST & ORS.ETC.ETC. ~ Constitution of India, 1950: A Article 226 read with Articles 25 and 26 - Writ petition seeking redressal of grievances caused due to unauthorized burial of a saint in the school premises -HELD: The action -" done created disturbance of law and order a…
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 504 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 342
Siddharth Dave, Jemtiben Ao for the Appellant. D. Mahesh Babu, Ramesh Allanki, Savita Dhanda for the Respondent. c The following order of the Court was delivered ORDER .. 1. At the very outset, Mr. M.K. Gupta, Advocate, who -r claims to be a junior counsel with Mr. J.M. Khanna, Advocate D appeared before us and prayed …
Supreme Court of India19 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 503 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 328
- s.235(2). The appellants filed complaints against the respondents for offences punishable uls 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of C cheques issued by respondent no. 3, as Director of M/s 'ATO' Ltd. towards the dues of M/S 'SNS' P. Ltd. It was the case of the complainants that both M/s SNS P. …
Supreme Court of India19 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 502 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 313
The appellant, a general category candidate, who secured 95th rank in the Civil Services Examination, 1998 c conducted by the Union Public Service Commission, was appointed to the IPS and was allocated to the Manipur-Tripura Joint Cadre on 27.10.1999. Respondent No.4, an OBC candidate, who secured 133rd rank in the sai…
Supreme Court of India19 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 501 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 290
Recovery of differential compensation amount from land owners - Amount of compensation enhanced by reference •G court - High Court restoring the award of Land Acquisition .. Officer - Supreme Court upholding the order of High Court -Plea that the amount paid by way of compensation pursuant to judgment of reference cour…
Supreme Court of India19 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 500 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 287
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal ../ ... No. 1441 of 2011. F From the Judgment & Order dated 30.11.2010 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh n Crl. Revision Petition No. 2203 of 1983. ' Ravi Kumar Tomar for the Appellant. ' " G Ratnakar Dash, Shekhar Raj Sharma, Anuvrat Sharma fo…
Supreme Court of India14 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 50 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 770
.....(. Partly allowing the appeals, the Court c HELD: 1.1 Tile relevant date for determining the age of a person who claims to be a juvenile/child would be the date on which the offence has been committed and not the date when he is produced before the authority or in the court. [Para 9) [776-G-H; 777-A] D , '"( Prata…
Supreme Court of India3 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 5 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 590
HELD:1. In the instant case, this Court is only considering the bail matter and not deciding whether the respondent is guilty or not. Evidence has yet to be led and the trial yet to commence. Hence the prosecution is yet to establish by proof beyond reasonable doubt that G" ...... the respondent was part of a conspirac…
Supreme Court of India19 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 499 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 282
WITH Crl. A. No. 1180 of 2008. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Dr. V.P. Appan, Vibha Datta Makhija for the appearing parties. c The following order of the Court was delivered ORDER This Order will dispose of all the above appeals as they D arise from a common judgment. The facts of the case are as under: At 12.50 p.m. on the 30th S…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 513 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 446
NIRMAL SINGH PEHLWAN @ NIMMA v. INSPECTOR, 447 CUSTOMS, CUSTOMS HOUSE.PUNJAB to follow the 'ratio of the said judgment, particularly, as the A · provisions of s. 50 of the NDPS Act, which are mandatory have also not been complied with - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - ss. 22 and 50 -Evidence Act,…
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 512 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 439
On 14.09.1983, the Dy. S.P. Cabinet (Vigilance) Department, Gov~rnment of Bihar, Patna, made a written complaint before the Office-in-charge, Vigilance Police Station, Patna, alleging that in six Schemes under National Rural Employment Programme ("NREP") after G preliminary enquiry, it was detected that Junior Engineer…
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 511 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 435
R.K. Kapoor, Neelam Khanna for the Appellant. 8 ' . Rajeev Gaur 'Nassem' (for Kamal Mohan Gupta) for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C SIRPURKAR, J. 1. Appellant Nikku Khan @ Mohammadeen, who has been convicted by both the courts below for the offence punishable under Section 21 of the Narcot…
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 510 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 402
Jurisdiction of arbitratorlarbitral tribunal - HELD: Special tribunals like arbitral tribunals and Labour Courts get jurisdiction to proceed with the case only from the reference H 404 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 9 S.C.R. A made to them - Thus, an arbitrator cannot be allowed to ~ assume jurisdiction over a question w…
Supreme Court of India14 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 51 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 883
MANJU MATHUR & ANR. 226/227 or the Constitution. The High Court held in the A impugnefi judgment that the Dietician and Senior Dietician ,working in the Union Territory Administration, Chandigarh, were entitled to pay scales at par with their counterp'arts in the State of Punjab and accordingly .issued a fTlandamus to …
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 509 · [2011] 15 S.C.R. 615
WITH B C.A. No. 1474 of 2007. L. Nageswara Rao, Rachana Srivastava for the Appellants. Jayant Bhushan, Anurag Dubey, Meenesh Dubey (for S.R. C Selia), Ajay Kr. Singh (for Shrish Kumar Misra) for the Respondents. The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER Civil Appeal No. 5130 of 2009D Heard learned counsel fo…
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 508 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 382
SMS TEA ESTATES PVT. LTD. v. CHANDMARI TEA 383 CO. PVT. LTD. Registration Act, 1908 - s. 49, proviso - Stamp Act, 1899 - A ss. 33,35,38 and 40. The respondent, under a lease deed dated 21.12.2006, granted lease of its two tea estates with all appurtenances to the appellant for a term of 30 years. 8 Clause 35 of the sai…
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 507 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 371
The only point for consideration before the Court was: what would be the reasonable amount the appellant-E wife was entitled by way of maintenance from the husband in terms of s. 25 of the Act. Partly allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 As per s. 25, of the Hindu Marriage Act, F 1955, while considering the claim …
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 506 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 359
[2011] 9 S.C.R. 359 DISHA A v. STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. (Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 33 of 2011) \ JULY 20, 2011 B ' [P. SATHASIVAM AND DR. B.S. CHAUHAN, JJ.] Constitution of India, 1950: Article 32 rlw s. 173 CrPC - Writ petition seeking to c transfer investigation to Central Bureau of Investigation - The Firms of pet…
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 505 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 348
MOHD.HAMID & ANR ETC.ETC. v. BAD! MASJID 349 TRUST & ORS.ETC.ETC. ~ Constitution of India, 1950: A Article 226 read with Articles 25 and 26 - Writ petition seeking redressal of grievances caused due to unauthorized burial of a saint in the school premises -HELD: The action -" done created disturbance of law and order a…
Supreme Court of India20 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 504 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 342
Siddharth Dave, Jemtiben Ao for the Appellant. D. Mahesh Babu, Ramesh Allanki, Savita Dhanda for the Respondent. c The following order of the Court was delivered ORDER .. 1. At the very outset, Mr. M.K. Gupta, Advocate, who -r claims to be a junior counsel with Mr. J.M. Khanna, Advocate D appeared before us and prayed …
Supreme Court of India19 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 503 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 328
- s.235(2). The appellants filed complaints against the respondents for offences punishable uls 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of C cheques issued by respondent no. 3, as Director of M/s 'ATO' Ltd. towards the dues of M/S 'SNS' P. Ltd. It was the case of the complainants that both M/s SNS P. …
Supreme Court of India19 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 502 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 313
The appellant, a general category candidate, who secured 95th rank in the Civil Services Examination, 1998 c conducted by the Union Public Service Commission, was appointed to the IPS and was allocated to the Manipur-Tripura Joint Cadre on 27.10.1999. Respondent No.4, an OBC candidate, who secured 133rd rank in the sai…
Supreme Court of India19 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 501 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 290
Recovery of differential compensation amount from land owners - Amount of compensation enhanced by reference •G court - High Court restoring the award of Land Acquisition .. Officer - Supreme Court upholding the order of High Court -Plea that the amount paid by way of compensation pursuant to judgment of reference cour…
Supreme Court of India19 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 500 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 287
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal ../ ... No. 1441 of 2011. F From the Judgment & Order dated 30.11.2010 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh n Crl. Revision Petition No. 2203 of 1983. ' Ravi Kumar Tomar for the Appellant. ' " G Ratnakar Dash, Shekhar Raj Sharma, Anuvrat Sharma fo…
Supreme Court of India14 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 50 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 770
.....(. Partly allowing the appeals, the Court c HELD: 1.1 Tile relevant date for determining the age of a person who claims to be a juvenile/child would be the date on which the offence has been committed and not the date when he is produced before the authority or in the court. [Para 9) [776-G-H; 777-A] D , '"( Prata…
Supreme Court of India3 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 5 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 590
HELD:1. In the instant case, this Court is only considering the bail matter and not deciding whether the respondent is guilty or not. Evidence has yet to be led and the trial yet to commence. Hence the prosecution is yet to establish by proof beyond reasonable doubt that G" ...... the respondent was part of a conspirac…
Supreme Court of India19 Jul 2011Full text
2011 INSC 499 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 282
WITH Crl. A. No. 1180 of 2008. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Dr. V.P. Appan, Vibha Datta Makhija for the appearing parties. c The following order of the Court was delivered ORDER This Order will dispose of all the above appeals as they D arise from a common judgment. The facts of the case are as under: At 12.50 p.m. on the 30th S…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis