⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
6,361–6,380 · Page 319 of 382
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 112 · [2012] 4 S.C.R. 802
How far deductions are allowable under rule 9(a) of E the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963 for trade discounts is the question which arose for consideration in the present appeal. The High Court had held that unless the discount was shown in the invoice itself, it would not qualify for F deduction and further that …
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 111 · [2012] 3 S.C.R. 581
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
6,361–6,380 · Page 319 of 382
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 112 · [2012] 4 S.C.R. 802
How far deductions are allowable under rule 9(a) of E the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963 for trade discounts is the question which arose for consideration in the present appeal. The High Court had held that unless the discount was shown in the invoice itself, it would not qualify for F deduction and further that …
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 111 · [2012] 3 S.C.R. 581
- Since the Government did not and could not possibly B exercise the said power as a result of the quashing of the marks awarded by way of moderation the proposed addition of the vacancies to the number already notified. became clearly infructuous - High Court was in the light of the subsequent development justified in…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 110 · [2012] 2 S.C.R. 195
c Words and phrases: Compromise/Settlement - Meaning of. A partition suit was compromised between the parties. 'K', the predecessor of the appellants although D had appeared in the suit and filed written statement, however, thereafter chose not to contest. The compromise petition stated that the parties were in separat…
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2012Full text
2012 INSC 11 · [2012] 2 S.C.R. 897
ORDER D SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. 1. The petitioner has filed the present application under Sections 11 (4) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') read with paragraph 2 of the appointment of the Arbitrators by the Chief Justice of India Scheme, 1996. It is E stated …
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 109 · [2012] 1 S.C.R. 1118
"IN RE: NETWORKING OF RIVERS" 1119 Cabinet of the Government of India - Central and the State A Governments concerned directed to comply with the directions contained in the judgment effectively and expeditiously -Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - River Boards Act, 1956 - Public interest litigation - Judicial revi…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 108 · [2012] 1 S.C.R. 1066
before the Court was: "whether under Section 154 G Cr.P.C., a police officer is bound to register an FIR when a cognizable offence is made out or he (police officer) has an option, discretion or latitude of conducting some kind of preliminary enquiry before registering the FIR?" The Court passed a comprehensive order showing H 1066 LALITA KUMAR I v. GOVERNMENT OF U.P. 1067 its concern in respect of the matter of non-registration of A FIR in a case of cognizable offence and directed notice to issue to Chief Secretaries of the States and Administrators of the Union Territories. Consequently, var
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 107 · [2012] 3 S.C.R. 571
/ 572 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012] 3 S.C.R. A amount deposited by the appellant - Respondent-Corporation had engaged an alternative agency for getting the work executed and had incurred an extra amount in that regard and thus, could make a claim for recovery of the extra expenditure incurred by it - Corporation directe…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 106 · [2012] 2 S.C.R. 395
Appellants-plaintiffs filed two suits. The trial judge held that the suits were maintainable, as also granted F interim order in favour of the appellants, directing the parties to the suits to maintain status quo during the pendency of the suits. The Division B~nch of the High Court held that the suits were not maintai…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 105 · [2012] 1 S.C.R. 1045
1045 H 1046 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012) 1 S.C.R. A Respondent no.1 was aggrieved by the decision of the appellant-Postal Department regarding the denial of concessional rate of postage on certain issue of the magazine. Respondent no.1 filed writ petitions before the Hi~h Court. The High Court allowed the writ petition…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 104 · [2012] 1 S.C.R. 1023
[2012] 1 S.C.R. 1023 K.B. NAGUR M.D. (AYU.) A v. UNION OF INDIA (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 33 of 2009) FEBRUARY 24, 2012 B [S.H. KAPADIA, CJI, A.K. PATNAIK AND SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.] CONSTITUTION OF IND/A, 1950: c Arts. 14 and 16 - Held: The concept of equality has to be patently infringed by a provision before that pro…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 103 · [2012] 4 S.C.R. 971
972 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012] 4 S.C.R. A The decision to forcibly evict the innocent public sleeping on the Ramlila Maidan in the midnight of 4th/5th June, 2011, whether taken by the police independently or in consultation with the Ministry of Home Affairs was amiss and suffered from element of arbitrariness and abu…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 102 · [2012] 4 S.C.R. 780
LADLI CONSTRUCTION CO. (P) LTD. v. PUNJAB 781 POLICE HOUSING CORPN. LTD. but the appellant failed to avail of that opportunity - Since the A parties entered into a contract knowing the role, authority or power of the Chief Engineer in the affairs relating to the contract but nevertheless agreed for him to be arbitrator…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 101 · [2012] 3 S.C.R. 558
According to the prosecution, appellant, 'A' and others committed dacoity in the house of 'S' and thereafter, committed murder of 'S', his driver, his wife · H 558 SONU SARDAR v. STATE OF CHHATISGARH 559 and his two minor children with rod, knife and axe. The A appellant and the other co-accused went to the house of 'S…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 100 · [2012] 1 S.C.R. 1009
The prosecution case was that on the fateful day, the appellant came to the house of PW-1 and while mother D of PW-1 and his wife were present in the house, the appellant took away daughter of PW-1 aged 3 years (victim) on the pretext of giving her biscuits. In the evening when the appellant returned home, he was asked…
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2012Full text
2012 INSC 10 · [2012] 2 S.C.R. 912
ORDER 1. This writ petition has been filed making grievance that H the respondents, namely, Yog Guru Baba Ramdev; Shri Anna V.K. NASWA 11. HOME SECRETARY, U.0.1. 915 Hazare, Mrs. Kiran Bedi and others have, on several occasions A insulted the National Flag and violated the norms of waiving of National Flag, as provided…
Supreme Court of India3 Jan 2012Full text
2012 INSC 1 · [2012] 2 S.C.R. 595
•e596 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012] 2 S.CR. A passed by the High Court set aside and acquisition of land of the appellant quashed. s. 17 (1) and (4) - Invocation of urgency provisions under - Justification of - Held: Invocation of urgency provisions can B be justified only if even small delay of few weeks or months may …
Supreme Court of India2012
(2012) 9 SCC 1
Even in terror trials, fair-trial and legal-aid guarantees under Articles 21 and 22 apply.
Supreme Court of India2012
(2012) 10 SCC 303
Quashing on compromise: permissible in commercial, mercantile, civil, or matrimonial disputes, but strictly barred in heinous crimes (murder, rape, dacoity). | Compromise quashing principles applied to Section 528 BNSS.
Supreme Court of India2012
(2012) 5 SCC 661
Arraigning the company as an accused is condition precedent for maintaining prosecution against its directors/officers under Section 141.
Supreme Court of India2011
(2012) 1 SCC 656
Immovable property can be legally transferred only by registered deed of conveyance; SA/GPA/WILL (agreement to sell/power of attorney/will) transfers do not confer title or ownership under Section 54.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
- Since the Government did not and could not possibly B exercise the said power as a result of the quashing of the marks awarded by way of moderation the proposed addition of the vacancies to the number already notified. became clearly infructuous - High Court was in the light of the subsequent development justified in…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 110 · [2012] 2 S.C.R. 195
c Words and phrases: Compromise/Settlement - Meaning of. A partition suit was compromised between the parties. 'K', the predecessor of the appellants although D had appeared in the suit and filed written statement, however, thereafter chose not to contest. The compromise petition stated that the parties were in separat…
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2012Full text
2012 INSC 11 · [2012] 2 S.C.R. 897
ORDER D SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. 1. The petitioner has filed the present application under Sections 11 (4) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') read with paragraph 2 of the appointment of the Arbitrators by the Chief Justice of India Scheme, 1996. It is E stated …
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 109 · [2012] 1 S.C.R. 1118
"IN RE: NETWORKING OF RIVERS" 1119 Cabinet of the Government of India - Central and the State A Governments concerned directed to comply with the directions contained in the judgment effectively and expeditiously -Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - River Boards Act, 1956 - Public interest litigation - Judicial revi…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 108 · [2012] 1 S.C.R. 1066
before the Court was: "whether under Section 154 G Cr.P.C., a police officer is bound to register an FIR when a cognizable offence is made out or he (police officer) has an option, discretion or latitude of conducting some kind of preliminary enquiry before registering the FIR?" The Court passed a comprehensive order showing H 1066 LALITA KUMAR I v. GOVERNMENT OF U.P. 1067 its concern in respect of the matter of non-registration of A FIR in a case of cognizable offence and directed notice to issue to Chief Secretaries of the States and Administrators of the Union Territories. Consequently, var
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 107 · [2012] 3 S.C.R. 571
/ 572 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012] 3 S.C.R. A amount deposited by the appellant - Respondent-Corporation had engaged an alternative agency for getting the work executed and had incurred an extra amount in that regard and thus, could make a claim for recovery of the extra expenditure incurred by it - Corporation directe…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 106 · [2012] 2 S.C.R. 395
Appellants-plaintiffs filed two suits. The trial judge held that the suits were maintainable, as also granted F interim order in favour of the appellants, directing the parties to the suits to maintain status quo during the pendency of the suits. The Division B~nch of the High Court held that the suits were not maintai…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 105 · [2012] 1 S.C.R. 1045
1045 H 1046 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012) 1 S.C.R. A Respondent no.1 was aggrieved by the decision of the appellant-Postal Department regarding the denial of concessional rate of postage on certain issue of the magazine. Respondent no.1 filed writ petitions before the Hi~h Court. The High Court allowed the writ petition…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 104 · [2012] 1 S.C.R. 1023
[2012] 1 S.C.R. 1023 K.B. NAGUR M.D. (AYU.) A v. UNION OF INDIA (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 33 of 2009) FEBRUARY 24, 2012 B [S.H. KAPADIA, CJI, A.K. PATNAIK AND SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.] CONSTITUTION OF IND/A, 1950: c Arts. 14 and 16 - Held: The concept of equality has to be patently infringed by a provision before that pro…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 103 · [2012] 4 S.C.R. 971
972 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012] 4 S.C.R. A The decision to forcibly evict the innocent public sleeping on the Ramlila Maidan in the midnight of 4th/5th June, 2011, whether taken by the police independently or in consultation with the Ministry of Home Affairs was amiss and suffered from element of arbitrariness and abu…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 102 · [2012] 4 S.C.R. 780
LADLI CONSTRUCTION CO. (P) LTD. v. PUNJAB 781 POLICE HOUSING CORPN. LTD. but the appellant failed to avail of that opportunity - Since the A parties entered into a contract knowing the role, authority or power of the Chief Engineer in the affairs relating to the contract but nevertheless agreed for him to be arbitrator…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 101 · [2012] 3 S.C.R. 558
According to the prosecution, appellant, 'A' and others committed dacoity in the house of 'S' and thereafter, committed murder of 'S', his driver, his wife · H 558 SONU SARDAR v. STATE OF CHHATISGARH 559 and his two minor children with rod, knife and axe. The A appellant and the other co-accused went to the house of 'S…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 100 · [2012] 1 S.C.R. 1009
The prosecution case was that on the fateful day, the appellant came to the house of PW-1 and while mother D of PW-1 and his wife were present in the house, the appellant took away daughter of PW-1 aged 3 years (victim) on the pretext of giving her biscuits. In the evening when the appellant returned home, he was asked…
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2012Full text
2012 INSC 10 · [2012] 2 S.C.R. 912
ORDER 1. This writ petition has been filed making grievance that H the respondents, namely, Yog Guru Baba Ramdev; Shri Anna V.K. NASWA 11. HOME SECRETARY, U.0.1. 915 Hazare, Mrs. Kiran Bedi and others have, on several occasions A insulted the National Flag and violated the norms of waiving of National Flag, as provided…
Supreme Court of India3 Jan 2012Full text
2012 INSC 1 · [2012] 2 S.C.R. 595
•e596 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012] 2 S.CR. A passed by the High Court set aside and acquisition of land of the appellant quashed. s. 17 (1) and (4) - Invocation of urgency provisions under - Justification of - Held: Invocation of urgency provisions can B be justified only if even small delay of few weeks or months may …
Supreme Court of India2012
(2012) 9 SCC 1
Even in terror trials, fair-trial and legal-aid guarantees under Articles 21 and 22 apply.
Supreme Court of India2012
(2012) 10 SCC 303
Quashing on compromise: permissible in commercial, mercantile, civil, or matrimonial disputes, but strictly barred in heinous crimes (murder, rape, dacoity). | Compromise quashing principles applied to Section 528 BNSS.
Supreme Court of India2012
(2012) 5 SCC 661
Arraigning the company as an accused is condition precedent for maintaining prosecution against its directors/officers under Section 141.
Supreme Court of India2011
(2012) 1 SCC 656
Immovable property can be legally transferred only by registered deed of conveyance; SA/GPA/WILL (agreement to sell/power of attorney/will) transfers do not confer title or ownership under Section 54.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis