Law on Tips(LOTS)India's Premier Legal News

⌘K

Home
The Bar Room
The Gazette
The Library
Legal League
Judgments
Careers

⚖

Loading…

Law on Tips.

A free Indian legal platform. Bringing you the latest judgments, legislative updates, and in-depth legal analysis from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and Tribunals.

© 2026 Law on Tips Media Pvt Ltd.

Explore

The Bar Room
The Gazette
The Library
Compare Acts
Legal League
Judgments
Careers

Trust & Standards

About Us
Editorial Policy
Fact-Checking
Corrections
Methodology
Ownership
Masthead
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Contact

Subscribe

Get the latest legal news delivered to your inbox daily.

Bar News Acts League

Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels & Tours Pvt. Ltd. | Judgment | Law on Tips

Judgment Library/Case record

Supreme Court of India

Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels & Tours Pvt. Ltd.

(2012) 5 SCC 661

Decision date: 2012
Text availability: Summary or case record only
Bench: 3-Judge Bench

Source: landmark_precedents seed

Case summary

Arraigning the company as an accused is condition precedent for maintaining prosecution against its directors/officers under Section 141.

Advertisement

Principle

Arraigning the company as an accused is condition precedent for maintaining prosecution against its directors/officers under Section 141.

Connected provisions and cases

interpretsThe Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 · Section 141 Other decisions on this provision →

Related judgments

Sunita Palita v. Panchami Stone Quarry · (2022) 10 SCC 152 · 2022 · 1 shared provision
SMS Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Neeta Bhalla · (2005) 8 SCC 89 · 2005 · 1 shared provision

Judgment text

Full judgment text is not available in this record.

Judgment Library/Case record

Supreme Court of India

Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels & Tours Pvt. Ltd.

(2012) 5 SCC 661

Decision date: 2012
Text availability: Summary or case record only
Bench: 3-Judge Bench

Source: landmark_precedents seed

Case summary

Arraigning the company as an accused is condition precedent for maintaining prosecution against its directors/officers under Section 141.

Advertisement

Principle

Arraigning the company as an accused is condition precedent for maintaining prosecution against its directors/officers under Section 141.

Connected provisions and cases

interpretsThe Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 · Section 141 Other decisions on this provision →

Related judgments

Sunita Palita v. Panchami Stone Quarry · (2022) 10 SCC 152 · 2022 · 1 shared provision
SMS Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Neeta Bhalla · (2005) 8 SCC 89 · 2005 · 1 shared provision

Judgment text

Full judgment text is not available in this record.