⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
2,241–2,260 · Page 113 of 500
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121917/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite company, on behalf of the oppo…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121890/2024
E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-34 दिनांक: 22-05-2026 शिकायतकर्ता का परिवाद शिकायत मिलन बारूआ व अन्य बनाम ला रेसीडेन्सिया डेवलपर्स प्रा. लि. आदेश संख्या: NCRI44/07/2890/2024 द वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई पर शिकायतकर्ता की …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121890/2024
E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-34 दिनांक: 23-0-2026 शिकायत संख्या: NCRI44/07/I2890/2024 मिलन बारूआ व अन्य बनाम ला रेसीडेन्सिया डेवलपर्स प्रा. लि. आदेश शिकायतकर्ता का परिवाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु प्रस्तुत किया ग…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121818/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. If both…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121818/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite company submitted that a corre…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 Jul 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121815/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-2 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत ees 4-शिकायत संख्या — NCR44/07/285/2024 सौरभ SAR wal एवं प्रदीप कुमार बनाम इम्पीरिया wat fees दिनांक :- 22/07/2026 आदेश-पत्र शिकायतकर्ता का वाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority16 Sep 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121635/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 45 - शिकायत संख्या -— NCR44/07/42635/2024 रेनू भंडारी और अजय भंडारी बनाम पटेल एडवांस जेवी दिनांक :-- 76 /09 /2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-34 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता अनुपस्थित|…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority17 Jun 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121635/2024
43 दिनांक उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 - शिकायत संख्या :--र८२44/07/2635/2024 रेनू भंडारी एवं अजय भंडारी बनाम पटेल एडवांस श्रट Te :- 47 /06 /2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद anst के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया war) पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता की ओर से अध…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority18 Mar 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121635/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 30 - शिकायत संख्या :-रटार]44/07/2635/2024 रेनू भंडारी एवं अजय भंडारी बनाम पटेल एडवांस जेवी दिनांक :—8 /03 / 2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद ast के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता की ओर से अधिवक्…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121616/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates of both parties were heard at length. Both pa…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121616/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite com…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121605/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates of both parties were heard at length. Both pa…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121605/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. In this matter, according to the stateme…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121603/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When the case was called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. On behalf of the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates for both parti…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121603/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. In this matter, according to the stateme…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121600/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh, learned advocate, appeared on behalf of the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar, learned advocate, appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates for both parties were heard …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121600/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. In this matter, according to the stateme…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121593/2024
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates of both sides were heard in detail. Both …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121593/2024
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. As stated by the learned advocates of both sid…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121586/2024
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates of both sides were heard in detail. Both …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2,241–2,260 · Page 113 of 500
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121917/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite company, on behalf of the oppo…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121890/2024
E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-34 दिनांक: 22-05-2026 शिकायतकर्ता का परिवाद शिकायत मिलन बारूआ व अन्य बनाम ला रेसीडेन्सिया डेवलपर्स प्रा. लि. आदेश संख्या: NCRI44/07/2890/2024 द वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई पर शिकायतकर्ता की …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121890/2024
E-Court उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत धारा-34 दिनांक: 23-0-2026 शिकायत संख्या: NCRI44/07/I2890/2024 मिलन बारूआ व अन्य बनाम ला रेसीडेन्सिया डेवलपर्स प्रा. लि. आदेश शिकायतकर्ता का परिवाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु प्रस्तुत किया ग…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121818/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates of both parties were heard in detail. If both…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121818/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite company submitted that a corre…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 Jul 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121815/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-2 कार्यवाही अन्तर्गत ees 4-शिकायत संख्या — NCR44/07/285/2024 सौरभ SAR wal एवं प्रदीप कुमार बनाम इम्पीरिया wat fees दिनांक :- 22/07/2026 आदेश-पत्र शिकायतकर्ता का वाद वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority16 Sep 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121635/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 45 - शिकायत संख्या -— NCR44/07/42635/2024 रेनू भंडारी और अजय भंडारी बनाम पटेल एडवांस जेवी दिनांक :-- 76 /09 /2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद धारा-34 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता अनुपस्थित|…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority17 Jun 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121635/2024
43 दिनांक उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 - शिकायत संख्या :--र८२44/07/2635/2024 रेनू भंडारी एवं अजय भंडारी बनाम पटेल एडवांस श्रट Te :- 47 /06 /2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद anst के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया war) पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता की ओर से अध…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority18 Mar 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121635/2024
उ.प्र. भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 30 - शिकायत संख्या :-रटार]44/07/2635/2024 रेनू भंडारी एवं अजय भंडारी बनाम पटेल एडवांस जेवी दिनांक :—8 /03 / 2026 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद ast के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता की ओर से अधिवक्…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121616/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates of both parties were heard at length. Both pa…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121616/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The learned advocate of the opposite com…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121605/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates of both parties were heard at length. Both pa…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121605/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. In this matter, according to the stateme…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121603/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When the case was called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh. On behalf of the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Aa Kumar [?] appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates for both parti…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121603/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. In this matter, according to the stateme…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121600/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh, learned advocate, appeared on behalf of the complainant. For the opposite party, Shri [?] Kumar, learned advocate, appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates for both parties were heard …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121600/2024
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, learned Advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. In this matter, according to the stateme…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121593/2024
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates of both sides were heard in detail. Both …
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority23 Jan 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121593/2024
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar's proxy advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. As stated by the learned advocates of both sid…
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority22 May 2026
Complaint No. NCR144/07/121586/2024
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned advocate Shri Rishindra Vikram Singh appeared for the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar appeared. The arguments of the learned advocates of both sides were heard in detail. Both …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis