Judgment Library

Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.

12,705 judgments

1,781–1,800 · Page 90 of 500

Sort

Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court of India2 Apr 2024Full text
M/S Bharti Airtel Limited v. A.S. Raghavendra
2024 INSC 265 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 100
Whether the respondent would or would not come within the definitional stipulation of a “workman” as laid out under Section 2(s), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Supreme Court of India2 Apr 2024Full text
The General Manager, M/S Barsua Iron Ore Mines v. The Vice President United Mines Mazdoor Union & Ors.
2024 INSC 264 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 63
Respondent initially declared his date of birth as 27.12.1948. Later, in descriptive roll, he changed his initially recorded date of birth i.e. 27.12.1948 to 12.03.1955. Based on his declaration at the time of initial employment the Competent Authority of the appellant determined the date of birth of the respondent no.3 as 27.12.1948. The respondent no.3 superannuated from service based on his initially recorded date of birth [27.12.1948]. Whether the respondent no.3 is held to have been rightly retired in terms of his date of birth as 27.12.1948.

Judgment Library

Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.

12,705 judgments

1,781–1,800 · Page 90 of 500

Sort

Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court of India2 Apr 2024Full text
M/S Bharti Airtel Limited v. A.S. Raghavendra
2024 INSC 265 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 100
Whether the respondent would or would not come within the definitional stipulation of a “workman” as laid out under Section 2(s), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Supreme Court of India2 Apr 2024Full text
The General Manager, M/S Barsua Iron Ore Mines v. The Vice President United Mines Mazdoor Union & Ors.
2024 INSC 264 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 63
Respondent initially declared his date of birth as 27.12.1948. Later, in descriptive roll, he changed his initially recorded date of birth i.e. 27.12.1948 to 12.03.1955. Based on his declaration at the time of initial employment the Competent Authority of the appellant determined the date of birth of the respondent no.3 as 27.12.1948. The respondent no.3 superannuated from service based on his initially recorded date of birth [27.12.1948]. Whether the respondent no.3 is held to have been rightly retired in terms of his date of birth as 27.12.1948.