⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
9,641–9,660 · Page 483 of 500
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 216 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 171
WORDS AND PHRASES: Word 'shall' as occurring in s. 202 Cr. P. C. - Connotation F of. In a complaint filed regarding commission of offences punishable u/ss. 323,380 and 506 read with s.34 IPC, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, after taking cognizance, transferred the complaint to the Court of G Judicial Magistra…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 215 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 183
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
9,641–9,660 · Page 483 of 500
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 216 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 171
WORDS AND PHRASES: Word 'shall' as occurring in s. 202 Cr. P. C. - Connotation F of. In a complaint filed regarding commission of offences punishable u/ss. 323,380 and 506 read with s.34 IPC, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, after taking cognizance, transferred the complaint to the Court of G Judicial Magistra…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 215 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 183
184 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2014] 4 S.C.R. A Court of Special Judge when evidence had been concluded as against the appellant and the second respondent had been examined as PW9 by the prosecution and cross-examined by the appellant, the latter moved an application under the proviso to s. 234 B Cr.P.C. before the Special…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 214 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 988
establish the ingredients of Section 498-A IPC, the prosecution examined PW4, the maternal grand-father of the deceased, who had brought her up,8 on the demise of her parents. PW4 deposed that the accused persons had demanded a dowry of Rs.10,000/-and a scooter and, on 14.8.1993, PW4 gave Rs.10,000/-in cash to the accu…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 213 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 306
H 308 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 14 S.C.R. A Jayesh Gaurav (for Krishnanand Pandeya), Adv., for the Appellants. S. D. Sanjay, Sr. Advocate, and Ravi Bharuka (for Dr. Sushil Balwada),.Adv. forthe Respondent. The following Order of the Court was passed: B ORDER .. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and ord…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 212 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 197
198 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 4 S.C.R. A violation of the provisions contained in the 2013 Act -Inasmuch as the Act 2013 occupies the entire field, no further monitoring required by the Supreme Court - However, duty cast on all the States and the Union Territories to fully implement and to take action against the vi…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 211 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 475
o Subsequently, a public interest litigation was filed against NAFED before the High Court on the allegations of misappropriation of funds by its officials in non-agricultural business. The Government of India, in its reply, stated that GBI enquiry will be conducted. The CBI E filed charge-sheet against the appellant a…
Supreme Court of India26 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 210 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 907
908 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 4 S.C.R. A responsibility of the State Administration in association with the intelligence agencies of both State and Centre to prevent such recurrence of communal violence in any part of the State - The officers responsible for maintaining law and order, if found negligent, should be b…
Supreme Court of India10 Jan 2014Full text
2014 INSC 21 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 1
• becomes available for summoning an additional accused, is · concurred with - 'Trial' commences only on charges being 1 H 2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2014] 2 S.C.R. A framed -- The view that in a criminal case, trial commences on cognizance being taken, is not approved -- The interpretation given by the Constitution Benc…
Supreme Court of India26 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 209 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 113
114 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 4 S.C.R. A disabled persons in terms of s. 33 of the 1995 Act. Initially, Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Welfare and University Grants Commission (U.G.C.) through its Chairperson were impleaded as party respondents. The Court further ordered impleadment of the States,…
Supreme Court of India26 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 208 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 838
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. D 4026 of 2014. From the Judgment and Order dated 21.02.2012 of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in WP No. 38280 of 2011. E Dr. Rajiv Dhawan, Anurag Sharma, Prashant Kumar, Joseph Pookkatt, AP & J Chambers for the Appellants. Shushil Kumar Jain, Satish G., H. Chan…
Supreme Court of India26 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 207 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 121
[2014] 4 S.C.R. 121 WESTERN ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CO. OF ORISSA LTD A & ORS. v. M/S BABA BAIJANATH ROLLER AND FLOUR MILL P. LTD. (Civil Appeal No. 4023 of 2014) B MARCH 26, 2014 [GYAN SUDHA MISRA AND PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, JJ.) c Electricity Act, 1910: s.26 - Applicability of, in case of tampering of meter- Held: s.26 is a…
Supreme Court of India26 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 206 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 141
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The Statutory Boards and Development Authorities which are allotting sites with the promise of H development, are amenable to the jurisdiction of HARYANASTATEAGRICULTURAL MARKT. BOARD v. 143 BISHAMBER DAYAL GOYAL consumer forum in case of deficiency of services. [Para A 6] [150…
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 205 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 795
Dismissing the SLP, the Court HELD: 1. Section 16 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 enables the acquiring authority to take possession of acquired land and when that is taken, it would be free F from all encumbrances. Therefore, on a plain reading of the provision, in the absence of possession of the suit property bein…
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 204 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 810
[2014) 3 S.C.R. 810 A SMT. SAVITA v. BINDAR SINGH & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 4001 of 2014) MARCH 25, 2014B [GYAN SUDHA MISRA AND PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, JJ.] MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988: C s. 166 -- Fatal motor accident - Compensation --Tribunal and High Court ignoring to award compensation towards future prospects -- Awardin…
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 203 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 821
- Thus, provisions of 0. 7,r. 11 (a) are attracted. In a title suit for declaration and permanent injunction filed by mother and son against the husband, who was a joint owner of the flat in question, the mother, plaintiff F no.1, filed an application under 0.7, r.11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for deletion of…
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 202 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 105
- High Court duly noticed that the trial court while deciding the issues framed, duly considered the facts which were incidental thereto - High Court held that the issues tried by trial court cannot be said to be within the jurisdiction of the authorities under the Mundkar Act - High Court further held that the /is G w…
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 201 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 803
UNION OF INDIA v. SHEO SHAMBHU GIRi 805 Dr. Ashok Dhamija, Binu Tamta, Sonia Dhamija, B.K. A . Prasad, Shawna Singh Dev, B.V. Balaram Das for the Appellant. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Nirmal Kumar Ambastha, Aviral Shukla for the Respondent. B The Judgment of the Court was delivered by J. CHELAMESWAR, J. 1. Aggrieved b…
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 200 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 830
G Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 From the evidence of the eye-witnesses, it is evident that appellant no.1 had caused one injury to H 830 VIJAY SINGH & ANR. v. STATE OF MADHYA 831 PRADESH the deceased by ballam whereas appellant no.2 caused A one injury on the neck by farsa. They have also testified th…
Supreme Court of India10 Jan 2014Full text
2014 INSC 20 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 397
G Evidence: Circumstantial evidence - Last seen theory - Held: This is one of the major circumstances pressed by prosecution -397 H 398 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014) 1 S.C.R. A High Court has rightly found certain inherent contradictions in the deposition of witnesses as regards the prosecution case that deceased was la…
Supreme Court of India2 Jan 2014Full text
2014 INSC 2 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 303
O.P. Bhadani. Ashok Anand, Rakesh Kumar Singh, Fazal Ahmad for the Appellants. c S.L. Gupta, Ram Ashray, D.P. Singh Yadav, J.P. Jayant, Shalu Sharma for the Respondents. The following order of the Court was delivered ORDERD 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted. E 3. The appellants are the wife and the relatives of decea…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
184 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2014] 4 S.C.R. A Court of Special Judge when evidence had been concluded as against the appellant and the second respondent had been examined as PW9 by the prosecution and cross-examined by the appellant, the latter moved an application under the proviso to s. 234 B Cr.P.C. before the Special…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 214 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 988
establish the ingredients of Section 498-A IPC, the prosecution examined PW4, the maternal grand-father of the deceased, who had brought her up,8 on the demise of her parents. PW4 deposed that the accused persons had demanded a dowry of Rs.10,000/-and a scooter and, on 14.8.1993, PW4 gave Rs.10,000/-in cash to the accu…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 213 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 306
H 308 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 14 S.C.R. A Jayesh Gaurav (for Krishnanand Pandeya), Adv., for the Appellants. S. D. Sanjay, Sr. Advocate, and Ravi Bharuka (for Dr. Sushil Balwada),.Adv. forthe Respondent. The following Order of the Court was passed: B ORDER .. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and ord…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 212 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 197
198 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 4 S.C.R. A violation of the provisions contained in the 2013 Act -Inasmuch as the Act 2013 occupies the entire field, no further monitoring required by the Supreme Court - However, duty cast on all the States and the Union Territories to fully implement and to take action against the vi…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 211 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 475
o Subsequently, a public interest litigation was filed against NAFED before the High Court on the allegations of misappropriation of funds by its officials in non-agricultural business. The Government of India, in its reply, stated that GBI enquiry will be conducted. The CBI E filed charge-sheet against the appellant a…
Supreme Court of India26 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 210 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 907
908 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 4 S.C.R. A responsibility of the State Administration in association with the intelligence agencies of both State and Centre to prevent such recurrence of communal violence in any part of the State - The officers responsible for maintaining law and order, if found negligent, should be b…
Supreme Court of India10 Jan 2014Full text
2014 INSC 21 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 1
• becomes available for summoning an additional accused, is · concurred with - 'Trial' commences only on charges being 1 H 2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2014] 2 S.C.R. A framed -- The view that in a criminal case, trial commences on cognizance being taken, is not approved -- The interpretation given by the Constitution Benc…
Supreme Court of India26 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 209 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 113
114 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 4 S.C.R. A disabled persons in terms of s. 33 of the 1995 Act. Initially, Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Welfare and University Grants Commission (U.G.C.) through its Chairperson were impleaded as party respondents. The Court further ordered impleadment of the States,…
Supreme Court of India26 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 208 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 838
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. D 4026 of 2014. From the Judgment and Order dated 21.02.2012 of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in WP No. 38280 of 2011. E Dr. Rajiv Dhawan, Anurag Sharma, Prashant Kumar, Joseph Pookkatt, AP & J Chambers for the Appellants. Shushil Kumar Jain, Satish G., H. Chan…
Supreme Court of India26 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 207 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 121
[2014] 4 S.C.R. 121 WESTERN ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CO. OF ORISSA LTD A & ORS. v. M/S BABA BAIJANATH ROLLER AND FLOUR MILL P. LTD. (Civil Appeal No. 4023 of 2014) B MARCH 26, 2014 [GYAN SUDHA MISRA AND PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, JJ.) c Electricity Act, 1910: s.26 - Applicability of, in case of tampering of meter- Held: s.26 is a…
Supreme Court of India26 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 206 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 141
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The Statutory Boards and Development Authorities which are allotting sites with the promise of H development, are amenable to the jurisdiction of HARYANASTATEAGRICULTURAL MARKT. BOARD v. 143 BISHAMBER DAYAL GOYAL consumer forum in case of deficiency of services. [Para A 6] [150…
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 205 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 795
Dismissing the SLP, the Court HELD: 1. Section 16 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 enables the acquiring authority to take possession of acquired land and when that is taken, it would be free F from all encumbrances. Therefore, on a plain reading of the provision, in the absence of possession of the suit property bein…
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 204 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 810
[2014) 3 S.C.R. 810 A SMT. SAVITA v. BINDAR SINGH & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 4001 of 2014) MARCH 25, 2014B [GYAN SUDHA MISRA AND PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, JJ.] MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988: C s. 166 -- Fatal motor accident - Compensation --Tribunal and High Court ignoring to award compensation towards future prospects -- Awardin…
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 203 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 821
- Thus, provisions of 0. 7,r. 11 (a) are attracted. In a title suit for declaration and permanent injunction filed by mother and son against the husband, who was a joint owner of the flat in question, the mother, plaintiff F no.1, filed an application under 0.7, r.11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for deletion of…
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 202 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 105
- High Court duly noticed that the trial court while deciding the issues framed, duly considered the facts which were incidental thereto - High Court held that the issues tried by trial court cannot be said to be within the jurisdiction of the authorities under the Mundkar Act - High Court further held that the /is G w…
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 201 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 803
UNION OF INDIA v. SHEO SHAMBHU GIRi 805 Dr. Ashok Dhamija, Binu Tamta, Sonia Dhamija, B.K. A . Prasad, Shawna Singh Dev, B.V. Balaram Das for the Appellant. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Nirmal Kumar Ambastha, Aviral Shukla for the Respondent. B The Judgment of the Court was delivered by J. CHELAMESWAR, J. 1. Aggrieved b…
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 200 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 830
G Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 From the evidence of the eye-witnesses, it is evident that appellant no.1 had caused one injury to H 830 VIJAY SINGH & ANR. v. STATE OF MADHYA 831 PRADESH the deceased by ballam whereas appellant no.2 caused A one injury on the neck by farsa. They have also testified th…
Supreme Court of India10 Jan 2014Full text
2014 INSC 20 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 397
G Evidence: Circumstantial evidence - Last seen theory - Held: This is one of the major circumstances pressed by prosecution -397 H 398 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014) 1 S.C.R. A High Court has rightly found certain inherent contradictions in the deposition of witnesses as regards the prosecution case that deceased was la…
Supreme Court of India2 Jan 2014Full text
2014 INSC 2 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 303
O.P. Bhadani. Ashok Anand, Rakesh Kumar Singh, Fazal Ahmad for the Appellants. c S.L. Gupta, Ram Ashray, D.P. Singh Yadav, J.P. Jayant, Shalu Sharma for the Respondents. The following order of the Court was delivered ORDERD 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted. E 3. The appellants are the wife and the relatives of decea…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis