⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
8,961–8,980 · Page 449 of 500
Supreme Court of India16 Nov 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1038 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 77
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal E Appeal No. 1581 of2009 From the Judgment and Order dated 28.11.2007 of the High Court of Chattisgarh at Bilaspur in Cr. Rev. No. 550 of 2007. F Kanhaiya Priyadarshi for the Appellant. Shashi Juneja, C. D. Singh, Vanshaja Shukla for the Respondents. G The order of the Court wa…
Supreme Court of India27 Oct 2015Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
8,961–8,980 · Page 449 of 500
Supreme Court of India16 Nov 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1038 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 77
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal E Appeal No. 1581 of2009 From the Judgment and Order dated 28.11.2007 of the High Court of Chattisgarh at Bilaspur in Cr. Rev. No. 550 of 2007. F Kanhaiya Priyadarshi for the Appellant. Shashi Juneja, C. D. Singh, Vanshaja Shukla for the Respondents. G The order of the Court wa…
Supreme Court of India27 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1037 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 917
WITH D Civil Appeal No. 4320 of 2012. V. Sridharan, Sr. Adv., M.P. Devanath, S.Vasudevan, L. · Charanaya, Shagun Arora, Hemant Bajaj, Anandh K., Aditya Bhattacharya, Ad vs., for the Appellants. E A. K. Sang hi, Sr. Adv., Arijit Prasad, Vikas Singh Jangra, Rashmi Malhotra, B. Krishna Prasad, Advs., for the Respondents. …
Supreme Court of India27 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1036 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 1009
Dismissing the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1.1 There are many holy and religious books like Quran, Bible, Guru Granth Sahib, Ramayan etc., to name a few. No person can claim the name of a holy or religious book as a trade mark for his goods or services Gmarketed by him. Moreover, the appellant has not been able to establ…
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1035 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 611
B Mis. Jethumu/I Bhojraj v. State of Bihar and others 1972 (3) SCR 193 : (1972) 1 sec 714; Delhi Airtech Services Private Ltd. and Another v. State ofUttarPradesh andAnother2012 (12) SCR 191 : (2011) 9 SCC 354; V. Chandrasekaran andAnr. C v. Administrative Officer and Ors.2012 (10) SCR 603: (2012) 12 sec 133 - referred…
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1034 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 660
SUBRATACHATTORAJ v. UNION OF INDIA 661 can ill-afford to do so on account of shortage of manpower A or any other constraint - Thus, the Central Government directed to take steps for comprehensive revision of the cadre strength of CBI and take immediate steps for filling up the vacancies that are already sanctioned -Con…
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1033 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 447
448 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12 S.C.R. A Act before the High Court was finally disposed of on 18. 3. 2009 - Challenge to impugned order in respect of views taken on the issue of limitation in the light of principles of s. 14 fails - As regards the claim for reimbursement, entire phraseology used in Article 3.8 of t…
Supreme Court of India15 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1032 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 888
- In the facts and circumstances of the case, High Court should have granted leave to appeal and thereafter should E have reappreciated the evidence and recorded its finding independently on merit - High Court should also have considered the FSL Report in proper perspective because the trial court order was passed with…
Supreme Court of India9 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1031 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 695
696 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 11 S.C.R. A appellants could not be exonerated of the charge found proved against them. Dismissing the appeal, the Court B HELD: 1.1 Ttie High Court took note of the various details with reference to the sequence of events spoken to by the eye witnesses, specific role played by such of …
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1030 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 982
Allowing the appeal, the Court H 982 MIS. NRC LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA 983 HELD: 1. A plain reading of ss.87(m)(ii)(b) and 95(ii)(b) A of Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme (KVSS) would indicate that in those cases where show cause notice had been issued or where the notice of demand for payment of indirect tax had been issued…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 103 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 372
G Allowing the appeals and dismissing the contempt petitions, the Court HELD: Section 2(b) of the l.D. Act defines 'award'. H 372 BENNET COLEMAN & CO. LTD v. STATE OF BIHAR 373 The provision shows that it must be the determination A of an industrial dispute or any question relating thereto by any Labour Court, Industri…
Supreme Court of India30 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1029 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 343
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by c KURIAN, J. 1. The appellant-Ganga Bai was tried before the Additional Sessions Judge, Nimbahera, Rajasthan along with one Udai Lal and Oaulat Ram under Section 302 read with Section 34 and Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') f…
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1028 · [2015] 14 S.C.R. 1
17. 11.2008 dismissed - On appeal, held: The respondent-Authority has the power u/s. 6(2-a) to cancel the allotment of H 1 2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2015] 14 S.C.R. A land only in the case of allotment made by it - In the case of property transferred by the State (prior to the Act) can be dealt with by the Authority onl…
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1027 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 454
F SCR 253; Mohan Lal v. Mirza Abdul Gaffar (1996) 1 sec 639: 1995 (6) Suppl. SCR 638; Annasaheb Bapusaheb Patil v. Ba/want (1995) 2 SCC 543: 1995 (1) SCR 88- relied on. G Case Law Reference (2001) 1 KarLJ 364 approved Para 7 1996 (1) SCR 683 relied on. Para 13 H 1996 (4) Suppl. SCR 319 relied on. Para 14 M. VENKATESH v…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1026 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 792
Ms. Sangeeta Kumar, Vijay Kumar, Advs, for the Appellant. Ms. N.S. Nappnal, Gopal Singh, Advs., for the Respondent. F The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. 1. Leave granted. G 2. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 19.10.2012, passed by Gauhati High Court in Criminal Appea…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1025 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 300
[Paras 16 and 17] [307-F-H; 308-A] G CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 7893 of2015. From the Judgment and Order dated 01.08.2013 of the High Court of Calcutta in S.A. No. 430 of 2004.. H 302 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 9 S.C.R. A Rauf Rahim, P. Das for the Appellants. Sukesh Ghosh, Dr. Kailash Chand, Arju…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1024 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 467
468 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 9 S.C.R. A Jai Bhagwan Singh v District Inspector of Schools, Gautambudh Nagar & Ors. 2006 3 UPLBEC 2391; Palak Dhari Yadav 1999 3 UPLBEC 2315; Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh v. Ff!CU/ty Association and others (1998) 4 SCC 1 :1998 (2) SCR 845; B Unio…
Supreme Court of India18 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1023 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 477
Karam Kaur v. Jalandhar Improvement Trust and thersI (2014) 6 sec 40~ - referred to. I G Case Law Reference (2014) s sec 409 referred to. .Para 5. ' CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 7011of2015. H 477 478 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 9 S.C.R. A From the Judgment and Order dated 02.01.2014 of the High Court…
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1022 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 772
Nikhil Merchant v. Central Bureau of Investigation 2008 (12) SCR 236: (2008) 9 SCC 677; Manoj Sharma v. State F and others 2008 (14) SCR 539: (2008) 16 sec 1; State of Kamataka v. L. MunesM1amy 1977 (3) SCR 113: (1977) 2 SCC 699; Madhvrao Jiwajirao Scindia and others v. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre and others 1988 (2…
Supreme Court of India11 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1021 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 1036
2. The law in force in the assessment year is to be applied unless there is an amendment which comes into E force having retrospective operation. The State legislature has intentionally reduced the period from eight years to six years. However, the outer limit has been fixed either six years or March 31, 2002. The F am…
Supreme Court of India10 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1020 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 436
MatajogDubeyv. H.C. BhariAIR 1956 SC44:1955 SCR 925 - followed. H 436 DR. (SMT.) MANORAMA TIWARI v. SURENDRA NATH RAI 437 Jacob Mathew v. ~ate of Punjab and Anr. (2005) 6 SCC A 1: 2005 (2) Suppl. SCR 307 - referred to. Case Law Reference 2005 (2) Suppl. SCR 307 referred to Para 10 B 1955 SCR 925 followed Para 11 CRIMIN…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2015 INSC 1037 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 917
WITH D Civil Appeal No. 4320 of 2012. V. Sridharan, Sr. Adv., M.P. Devanath, S.Vasudevan, L. · Charanaya, Shagun Arora, Hemant Bajaj, Anandh K., Aditya Bhattacharya, Ad vs., for the Appellants. E A. K. Sang hi, Sr. Adv., Arijit Prasad, Vikas Singh Jangra, Rashmi Malhotra, B. Krishna Prasad, Advs., for the Respondents. …
Supreme Court of India27 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1036 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 1009
Dismissing the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1.1 There are many holy and religious books like Quran, Bible, Guru Granth Sahib, Ramayan etc., to name a few. No person can claim the name of a holy or religious book as a trade mark for his goods or services Gmarketed by him. Moreover, the appellant has not been able to establ…
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1035 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 611
B Mis. Jethumu/I Bhojraj v. State of Bihar and others 1972 (3) SCR 193 : (1972) 1 sec 714; Delhi Airtech Services Private Ltd. and Another v. State ofUttarPradesh andAnother2012 (12) SCR 191 : (2011) 9 SCC 354; V. Chandrasekaran andAnr. C v. Administrative Officer and Ors.2012 (10) SCR 603: (2012) 12 sec 133 - referred…
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1034 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 660
SUBRATACHATTORAJ v. UNION OF INDIA 661 can ill-afford to do so on account of shortage of manpower A or any other constraint - Thus, the Central Government directed to take steps for comprehensive revision of the cadre strength of CBI and take immediate steps for filling up the vacancies that are already sanctioned -Con…
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1033 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 447
448 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12 S.C.R. A Act before the High Court was finally disposed of on 18. 3. 2009 - Challenge to impugned order in respect of views taken on the issue of limitation in the light of principles of s. 14 fails - As regards the claim for reimbursement, entire phraseology used in Article 3.8 of t…
Supreme Court of India15 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1032 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 888
- In the facts and circumstances of the case, High Court should have granted leave to appeal and thereafter should E have reappreciated the evidence and recorded its finding independently on merit - High Court should also have considered the FSL Report in proper perspective because the trial court order was passed with…
Supreme Court of India9 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1031 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 695
696 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 11 S.C.R. A appellants could not be exonerated of the charge found proved against them. Dismissing the appeal, the Court B HELD: 1.1 Ttie High Court took note of the various details with reference to the sequence of events spoken to by the eye witnesses, specific role played by such of …
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1030 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 982
Allowing the appeal, the Court H 982 MIS. NRC LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA 983 HELD: 1. A plain reading of ss.87(m)(ii)(b) and 95(ii)(b) A of Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme (KVSS) would indicate that in those cases where show cause notice had been issued or where the notice of demand for payment of indirect tax had been issued…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 103 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 372
G Allowing the appeals and dismissing the contempt petitions, the Court HELD: Section 2(b) of the l.D. Act defines 'award'. H 372 BENNET COLEMAN & CO. LTD v. STATE OF BIHAR 373 The provision shows that it must be the determination A of an industrial dispute or any question relating thereto by any Labour Court, Industri…
Supreme Court of India30 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1029 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 343
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by c KURIAN, J. 1. The appellant-Ganga Bai was tried before the Additional Sessions Judge, Nimbahera, Rajasthan along with one Udai Lal and Oaulat Ram under Section 302 read with Section 34 and Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') f…
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1028 · [2015] 14 S.C.R. 1
17. 11.2008 dismissed - On appeal, held: The respondent-Authority has the power u/s. 6(2-a) to cancel the allotment of H 1 2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2015] 14 S.C.R. A land only in the case of allotment made by it - In the case of property transferred by the State (prior to the Act) can be dealt with by the Authority onl…
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1027 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 454
F SCR 253; Mohan Lal v. Mirza Abdul Gaffar (1996) 1 sec 639: 1995 (6) Suppl. SCR 638; Annasaheb Bapusaheb Patil v. Ba/want (1995) 2 SCC 543: 1995 (1) SCR 88- relied on. G Case Law Reference (2001) 1 KarLJ 364 approved Para 7 1996 (1) SCR 683 relied on. Para 13 H 1996 (4) Suppl. SCR 319 relied on. Para 14 M. VENKATESH v…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1026 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 792
Ms. Sangeeta Kumar, Vijay Kumar, Advs, for the Appellant. Ms. N.S. Nappnal, Gopal Singh, Advs., for the Respondent. F The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. 1. Leave granted. G 2. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 19.10.2012, passed by Gauhati High Court in Criminal Appea…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1025 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 300
[Paras 16 and 17] [307-F-H; 308-A] G CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 7893 of2015. From the Judgment and Order dated 01.08.2013 of the High Court of Calcutta in S.A. No. 430 of 2004.. H 302 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 9 S.C.R. A Rauf Rahim, P. Das for the Appellants. Sukesh Ghosh, Dr. Kailash Chand, Arju…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1024 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 467
468 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 9 S.C.R. A Jai Bhagwan Singh v District Inspector of Schools, Gautambudh Nagar & Ors. 2006 3 UPLBEC 2391; Palak Dhari Yadav 1999 3 UPLBEC 2315; Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh v. Ff!CU/ty Association and others (1998) 4 SCC 1 :1998 (2) SCR 845; B Unio…
Supreme Court of India18 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1023 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 477
Karam Kaur v. Jalandhar Improvement Trust and thersI (2014) 6 sec 40~ - referred to. I G Case Law Reference (2014) s sec 409 referred to. .Para 5. ' CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 7011of2015. H 477 478 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 9 S.C.R. A From the Judgment and Order dated 02.01.2014 of the High Court…
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1022 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 772
Nikhil Merchant v. Central Bureau of Investigation 2008 (12) SCR 236: (2008) 9 SCC 677; Manoj Sharma v. State F and others 2008 (14) SCR 539: (2008) 16 sec 1; State of Kamataka v. L. MunesM1amy 1977 (3) SCR 113: (1977) 2 SCC 699; Madhvrao Jiwajirao Scindia and others v. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre and others 1988 (2…
Supreme Court of India11 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1021 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 1036
2. The law in force in the assessment year is to be applied unless there is an amendment which comes into E force having retrospective operation. The State legislature has intentionally reduced the period from eight years to six years. However, the outer limit has been fixed either six years or March 31, 2002. The F am…
Supreme Court of India10 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 1020 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 436
MatajogDubeyv. H.C. BhariAIR 1956 SC44:1955 SCR 925 - followed. H 436 DR. (SMT.) MANORAMA TIWARI v. SURENDRA NATH RAI 437 Jacob Mathew v. ~ate of Punjab and Anr. (2005) 6 SCC A 1: 2005 (2) Suppl. SCR 307 - referred to. Case Law Reference 2005 (2) Suppl. SCR 307 referred to Para 10 B 1955 SCR 925 followed Para 11 CRIMIN…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis