⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
861–880 · Page 44 of 500
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 184 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 963
Father of the respondent passed away while in service of the appellant. A scheme for appointment on compassionate ground, formulated by the appellant and contained in Circular No. 154/93 dated 8th May, 1993, was in force when such death occurred. The issues inter alia were: 1) Whether the Division Bench of the High Court was unjustified in not allowing the intra-court appeal of the appellant and in upholding the judgment of the Single Judge while directing the compassionate appointment of respondent at a point of time when he was past 44 (forty-four) years of age; 2) Whether there was a lapse
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2025Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
861–880 · Page 44 of 500
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 184 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 963
Father of the respondent passed away while in service of the appellant. A scheme for appointment on compassionate ground, formulated by the appellant and contained in Circular No. 154/93 dated 8th May, 1993, was in force when such death occurred. The issues inter alia were: 1) Whether the Division Bench of the High Court was unjustified in not allowing the intra-court appeal of the appellant and in upholding the judgment of the Single Judge while directing the compassionate appointment of respondent at a point of time when he was past 44 (forty-four) years of age; 2) Whether there was a lapse
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 183 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 937
The issues before the Hon’ble Court were as to whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the application for condonation of delay in filing the application for substitution and could the second appeal be regarded as having abated; and as to what is the proper sequence in which the said applications are to be filed.
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 182 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 289
Whether the present case is a fit case where proceedings could be quashed, particularly when Section 307, IPC inter alia was invoked and there was a settlement between the parties.
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 181 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 756
Matter pertains to the correctness of the judgments of the High Court setting aside various amendments made to the Finance Act, 1994; and whether sole distributor/purchaser of the lottery tickets is liable to pay service tax on the sale of paper and online lottery tickets.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 18 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 93
Impugned in this appeal is the judgment and order of the High Court dated 26.03.2018 whereby it has been held that the Will, subject matter of controversy, allegedly of one Testator-SR, had not been proved, thereby finding that the Lower Appellate Court had erred in holding otherwise.
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 178 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 612
The appellant was convicted for offence u/s.302 IPC. Whether the appellant can be held guilty of the commission of offence beyond reasonable doubt.
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 177 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1588
An auction was conducted on 31.07.2007 and sale certificate was issued on 30.11.2007. The respondent no.4-guarantor questioned the validity of auction proceedings. In 2019, the High Court declared the auction to be illegal. Whether the High Court failed in noticing equitable consideration in exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction.
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 176 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 24
The core issues presented for adjudication before this Court in these appeals are:- (1) Whether the advertisement dated 29.07.2010 issued by respondent no. 4 and appointment process carried out in pursuance thereof, was valid in the eyes of law; (2) Whether the direction issued by the High Court vide order dated 12.09.2018 was justified considering the fact that the candidates earlier appointed to the subject posts were neither impleaded as party nor were heard before the issuance of a direction that adversely affected their service.
Supreme Court of India17 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 175 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1598
A suit for confirmation of possession or in the alternative recovery of possession and injunction was filed by the predecessor in interest of the Respondents against the predecessor in interest of the Appellants. The suit was decreed and 40 years later, Execution Application was filed claiming breach of decree of permanent injunction. When the written objections of the Appellants were not accepted to the same by the Trial Court, a Revision Application was filed before High court; During its pendency, Trial Court allowed the Execution Application ex-parte and ordered arrest and detention of App
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 174 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1545
If a wife owes a stock market debt, can the registered stock broker invoke arbitration against her husband under BSE Bye-Laws, 1957 and hold him jointly and severally liable for debt based on an oral agreement.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 173 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1643
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court acquitting the respondents for the offence punishable u/ss.306, 498A, and 34 IPC; and incase the first informant dies before stepping into the witness box, whether the contents of such FIR can be proved through the evidence of the Investigating Officer and read into the evidence.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 172 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1491
Plain reading and interpretation of Order XXII Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013.
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 170 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 526
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court convicting the appellant-husband for the murder of his wife.
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 169 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1659
Whether there has been a miscarriage of justice as the second appeal was allowed ex parte without hearing the appellant and without framing any substantial questions of law.
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 168 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 452
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order of High Court declining to quash the proceedings against the appellants u/s.306, Penal Code, 1860.
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 167 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 461
Whether the prosecution failed to prove the chain of circumstances leading to the guilt of the appellant-accused, beyond reasonable doubt.
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 164 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1508
Matter pertains to the sustainability of the order passed by the High Court upholding the order of conviction and death sentence awarded to the appellant by the trial court.
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 163 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1674
Whether the High Court was justified in rejecting the petition seeking quashing of the chargesheet in the criminal case qua the appellants-parents.
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 162 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 424
The main issue canvassed by the appellant in this appeal is the violation of the appellant’s right under Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India as the appellant was not informed of the grounds for his arrest.
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 161 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 602
The instant appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 31.07.2019 passed by the High Court in a motor accident case. The Tribunal assessed the compensation at ₹28,66,994/-. The High Court applied the Split method for calculation of dependency and reduced the compensation to ₹19,66,833/-.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2025 INSC 183 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 937
The issues before the Hon’ble Court were as to whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the application for condonation of delay in filing the application for substitution and could the second appeal be regarded as having abated; and as to what is the proper sequence in which the said applications are to be filed.
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 182 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 289
Whether the present case is a fit case where proceedings could be quashed, particularly when Section 307, IPC inter alia was invoked and there was a settlement between the parties.
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 181 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 756
Matter pertains to the correctness of the judgments of the High Court setting aside various amendments made to the Finance Act, 1994; and whether sole distributor/purchaser of the lottery tickets is liable to pay service tax on the sale of paper and online lottery tickets.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 18 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 93
Impugned in this appeal is the judgment and order of the High Court dated 26.03.2018 whereby it has been held that the Will, subject matter of controversy, allegedly of one Testator-SR, had not been proved, thereby finding that the Lower Appellate Court had erred in holding otherwise.
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 178 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 612
The appellant was convicted for offence u/s.302 IPC. Whether the appellant can be held guilty of the commission of offence beyond reasonable doubt.
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 177 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1588
An auction was conducted on 31.07.2007 and sale certificate was issued on 30.11.2007. The respondent no.4-guarantor questioned the validity of auction proceedings. In 2019, the High Court declared the auction to be illegal. Whether the High Court failed in noticing equitable consideration in exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction.
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 176 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 24
The core issues presented for adjudication before this Court in these appeals are:- (1) Whether the advertisement dated 29.07.2010 issued by respondent no. 4 and appointment process carried out in pursuance thereof, was valid in the eyes of law; (2) Whether the direction issued by the High Court vide order dated 12.09.2018 was justified considering the fact that the candidates earlier appointed to the subject posts were neither impleaded as party nor were heard before the issuance of a direction that adversely affected their service.
Supreme Court of India17 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 175 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1598
A suit for confirmation of possession or in the alternative recovery of possession and injunction was filed by the predecessor in interest of the Respondents against the predecessor in interest of the Appellants. The suit was decreed and 40 years later, Execution Application was filed claiming breach of decree of permanent injunction. When the written objections of the Appellants were not accepted to the same by the Trial Court, a Revision Application was filed before High court; During its pendency, Trial Court allowed the Execution Application ex-parte and ordered arrest and detention of App
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 174 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1545
If a wife owes a stock market debt, can the registered stock broker invoke arbitration against her husband under BSE Bye-Laws, 1957 and hold him jointly and severally liable for debt based on an oral agreement.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 173 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1643
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court acquitting the respondents for the offence punishable u/ss.306, 498A, and 34 IPC; and incase the first informant dies before stepping into the witness box, whether the contents of such FIR can be proved through the evidence of the Investigating Officer and read into the evidence.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 172 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1491
Plain reading and interpretation of Order XXII Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013.
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 170 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 526
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court convicting the appellant-husband for the murder of his wife.
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 169 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1659
Whether there has been a miscarriage of justice as the second appeal was allowed ex parte without hearing the appellant and without framing any substantial questions of law.
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 168 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 452
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order of High Court declining to quash the proceedings against the appellants u/s.306, Penal Code, 1860.
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 167 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 461
Whether the prosecution failed to prove the chain of circumstances leading to the guilt of the appellant-accused, beyond reasonable doubt.
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 164 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1508
Matter pertains to the sustainability of the order passed by the High Court upholding the order of conviction and death sentence awarded to the appellant by the trial court.
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 163 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1674
Whether the High Court was justified in rejecting the petition seeking quashing of the chargesheet in the criminal case qua the appellants-parents.
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 162 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 424
The main issue canvassed by the appellant in this appeal is the violation of the appellant’s right under Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India as the appellant was not informed of the grounds for his arrest.
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 161 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 602
The instant appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 31.07.2019 passed by the High Court in a motor accident case. The Tribunal assessed the compensation at ₹28,66,994/-. The High Court applied the Split method for calculation of dependency and reduced the compensation to ₹19,66,833/-.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis