⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
8,481–8,500 · Page 425 of 500
Supreme Court of India28 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 702 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 823
Allowing the appeal and remitting the matter to the F High Court, the Court HELD: 1. It was legally obligatory upon the High Court to properly set out the case of the parties, findings recorded by the Trial Court and the first Appellate Court, G arguments of the parties on the questions of law framed and then answer th…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 70 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 1004
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
8,481–8,500 · Page 425 of 500
Supreme Court of India28 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 702 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 823
Allowing the appeal and remitting the matter to the F High Court, the Court HELD: 1. It was legally obligatory upon the High Court to properly set out the case of the parties, findings recorded by the Trial Court and the first Appellate Court, G arguments of the parties on the questions of law framed and then answer th…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 70 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 1004
H 1006 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 11 S.C.R. A Vibha Datta Makhija, Gagan Gupta for the Appellants. Ajay-Bansal, AAG, Akshat Goel, Kamal Mohan Gupta, Gaurav Yadav, for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 19.8.2011 passed …
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 7 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 563
[2015] 1 S.C.R. 563 A INDER SINGH & ORS. v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN (Criminal Appeal Nos. 493-495 of 2009) JANUARY 06, 2015 B [M.Y. EQBAL AND SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, ;J.l Penal Code, 1860: ss. 3021149, 3071149, 147 and 148 - Four persons died on account of assault - Complainant seriously injured in the occurrence - 29 accused - …
Supreme Court of India28 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 699 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 798
800 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12S.C.R. A the High Court of Judicature atAllahaba.d in Civil Revision No. 8of1990 · Dinesh Kumar Garg, Dhananjay Garg, Deepak Mishra, Abhishek Garg,Advs. for the Appellant. 8 Nikhil Jain, Adv. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. 1. This …
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 696 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 323
Dismissing the appeals, the Court H 323 324 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 11 S.C.R. A HELD: 1.1 There is a thin line in appreciating the scope of jurisdiction of the Company Court/Company Law Board. The jurisdiction is exclusive ifthe matter truly relates to rectification but if the issue is alien to rectification, such…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 694 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 352
S. N. BhatfortheAppellant. Kiran Suri, S. J. Amith, Gautam Kumar, Dr. Vipin Gupta C for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ARUN MISHRA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Dparties. 2. Leave granted. 3. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 24.9.2013 passed by the High Court of…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 693 · [2015] 14 S.C.R. 848
(2015] 14 S.C.R. 848 A COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BANGALORE v. MIS. G. M. EXPORTS & OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 3889 of 2006) B SEPTEMBER 23, 2015 [A. K. SIKRI AND R. F. NARIMAN, JJ.] Anti-dumping - Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on C Dumped Articles and for Determination of I…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 692 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 85
86 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 10 S.C.R. A that the juridical seat of the arbitration is at London and the arbitration agreement is governed by English law, thus, it was not open to UOI to argue that Part-I would be applicable -Valiant attempt to reopen a question settled twice by dismissal of review petition and cura…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 691 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 299
299 300 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 11 S.C.R. A evidence and its truthfulness or sufficiency - However, the High Court's inherent powers, either in civil or in criminal matter, ought not be permitted to degenerate into weapon of harassment or persecution - If the averments in the complaint do not constitute an offence…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 69 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 1016
- Held: Since the complaint was not filed abiding with the E provisions of the Act it was not open to the Magistrate to take cognizance - No mention of, or reference to the Power of Attorney in the body of the complaint nor was it exhibited as part of the said complaint- Further, in the list of evidence F just a mere m…
Supreme Court of India21 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 684 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 61
Allowing the appeal and remitting the matter to the High Court, the Court HELD: The prescribed maximum punishment for G offence under Section 466 of IPC is seven years and fine; under Section 467 of IPC, it is imprisonment for life or . imprisonment for ten years and fine; under Section 468 of IPC, it is seven years an…
Supreme Court of India21 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 682 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 1059
OF WEALTH TAX, KARNATAKA 3. The Assessing Officer took into consideration A the price which the property would have fetched on the valuation date, i.e. the market price, as if it was not under the rigors of Ceiling Act. Such estimation of the price which the asset would have fetched if sold in the open market on the va…
Supreme Court of India18 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 679 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 39
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. In a case where the appellant has proved c that he has lost his speaking power as also lost his memory retention power due to causing of head injury and further he is not able to move freely at the age of 35 years and lastly due to these injuries, he has also lost his job, there…
Supreme Court of India18 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 675 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 412
Dismissing the appeals, the Court H 412 KOSHAINVESTMENTS LTD. v. SECURITIES & 413 EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA HELD: A careful reading of the Securities & A Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares & Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 discloses that the public announcement should not be delayed beyond four worki…
Supreme Court of India18 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 674 · [2015] 15 S.C.R. 428
428 BENGAL AM BUJA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LTD. v. 429 PRAM I LA SAN FU I AND ORS. 'G' - The Subordinate Judge erred in passing order of A temporary injunction u/O.XXXIX, rr. 1 and 2 of CPC, in respect of the property in question after it was included to the suit schedule as order of temporary injunction can be granted aga…
Supreme Court of India18 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 673 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 369
Nagindas Ramdas v. Dalpatram lchharam alias Brijram and others 1974 (2) SCR 544: (1974) 1 G SCC 242; Gautam Sarup v. Leela Jelly and others 2008 (4) SCR 523: (2008) 7 SCC 85- relied on. Panchdeo Narain Srivastava v. Km. Jyoti Sahay and Another (1984) Supp. SCC 594 - partly H overruled. RAM NIRANJAN KAJARIA v. SHEO PRAK…
Supreme Court of India17 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 672 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 1020
2. Petitioner No.1 has described itself as "Committee for Citizenship Rights of the Chakmas of Arunachal Pradesh" ("CCRC"). According to the averments in the petition, representations were filed with the National Human Rights G Commission ("NHRC") alleging persecution ofChakmas and Hajongs in the State of Arunachal Pra…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 669 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 305
Allowing the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1. The order passed by the Family Court clearly showed that before passing the impugned order under Section 13-8(1) of the Act, the Family Court made necessary efforts for reconciliation between the parties but the efforts yielded no fruitful result. The Family Court, G before pas…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 668 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 569
570 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 10 S.C.R. A High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No. 8009 of 2015. Malini Poduval for the Appellant. P.H. Parekh (for Parekh & Co.,) for the Respondents. B The Order of the Court was delivered by M. Y. EQBAL, J.: 1. The petitioner has preferred this special leave petiti…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 665 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 402
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. v. PAWAN KUMAR 405 GUPTA With A C.A. No. 3420of2012 C.A. No. 2409 of 2009 R. D.Agrawala, Pavan Kumar, Maneesha Dhir, G…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
H 1006 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 11 S.C.R. A Vibha Datta Makhija, Gagan Gupta for the Appellants. Ajay-Bansal, AAG, Akshat Goel, Kamal Mohan Gupta, Gaurav Yadav, for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 19.8.2011 passed …
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 7 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 563
[2015] 1 S.C.R. 563 A INDER SINGH & ORS. v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN (Criminal Appeal Nos. 493-495 of 2009) JANUARY 06, 2015 B [M.Y. EQBAL AND SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, ;J.l Penal Code, 1860: ss. 3021149, 3071149, 147 and 148 - Four persons died on account of assault - Complainant seriously injured in the occurrence - 29 accused - …
Supreme Court of India28 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 699 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 798
800 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12S.C.R. A the High Court of Judicature atAllahaba.d in Civil Revision No. 8of1990 · Dinesh Kumar Garg, Dhananjay Garg, Deepak Mishra, Abhishek Garg,Advs. for the Appellant. 8 Nikhil Jain, Adv. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. 1. This …
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 696 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 323
Dismissing the appeals, the Court H 323 324 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 11 S.C.R. A HELD: 1.1 There is a thin line in appreciating the scope of jurisdiction of the Company Court/Company Law Board. The jurisdiction is exclusive ifthe matter truly relates to rectification but if the issue is alien to rectification, such…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 694 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 352
S. N. BhatfortheAppellant. Kiran Suri, S. J. Amith, Gautam Kumar, Dr. Vipin Gupta C for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ARUN MISHRA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Dparties. 2. Leave granted. 3. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 24.9.2013 passed by the High Court of…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 693 · [2015] 14 S.C.R. 848
(2015] 14 S.C.R. 848 A COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BANGALORE v. MIS. G. M. EXPORTS & OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 3889 of 2006) B SEPTEMBER 23, 2015 [A. K. SIKRI AND R. F. NARIMAN, JJ.] Anti-dumping - Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on C Dumped Articles and for Determination of I…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 692 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 85
86 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 10 S.C.R. A that the juridical seat of the arbitration is at London and the arbitration agreement is governed by English law, thus, it was not open to UOI to argue that Part-I would be applicable -Valiant attempt to reopen a question settled twice by dismissal of review petition and cura…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 691 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 299
299 300 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 11 S.C.R. A evidence and its truthfulness or sufficiency - However, the High Court's inherent powers, either in civil or in criminal matter, ought not be permitted to degenerate into weapon of harassment or persecution - If the averments in the complaint do not constitute an offence…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 69 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 1016
- Held: Since the complaint was not filed abiding with the E provisions of the Act it was not open to the Magistrate to take cognizance - No mention of, or reference to the Power of Attorney in the body of the complaint nor was it exhibited as part of the said complaint- Further, in the list of evidence F just a mere m…
Supreme Court of India21 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 684 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 61
Allowing the appeal and remitting the matter to the High Court, the Court HELD: The prescribed maximum punishment for G offence under Section 466 of IPC is seven years and fine; under Section 467 of IPC, it is imprisonment for life or . imprisonment for ten years and fine; under Section 468 of IPC, it is seven years an…
Supreme Court of India21 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 682 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 1059
OF WEALTH TAX, KARNATAKA 3. The Assessing Officer took into consideration A the price which the property would have fetched on the valuation date, i.e. the market price, as if it was not under the rigors of Ceiling Act. Such estimation of the price which the asset would have fetched if sold in the open market on the va…
Supreme Court of India18 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 679 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 39
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. In a case where the appellant has proved c that he has lost his speaking power as also lost his memory retention power due to causing of head injury and further he is not able to move freely at the age of 35 years and lastly due to these injuries, he has also lost his job, there…
Supreme Court of India18 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 675 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 412
Dismissing the appeals, the Court H 412 KOSHAINVESTMENTS LTD. v. SECURITIES & 413 EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA HELD: A careful reading of the Securities & A Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares & Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 discloses that the public announcement should not be delayed beyond four worki…
Supreme Court of India18 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 674 · [2015] 15 S.C.R. 428
428 BENGAL AM BUJA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LTD. v. 429 PRAM I LA SAN FU I AND ORS. 'G' - The Subordinate Judge erred in passing order of A temporary injunction u/O.XXXIX, rr. 1 and 2 of CPC, in respect of the property in question after it was included to the suit schedule as order of temporary injunction can be granted aga…
Supreme Court of India18 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 673 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 369
Nagindas Ramdas v. Dalpatram lchharam alias Brijram and others 1974 (2) SCR 544: (1974) 1 G SCC 242; Gautam Sarup v. Leela Jelly and others 2008 (4) SCR 523: (2008) 7 SCC 85- relied on. Panchdeo Narain Srivastava v. Km. Jyoti Sahay and Another (1984) Supp. SCC 594 - partly H overruled. RAM NIRANJAN KAJARIA v. SHEO PRAK…
Supreme Court of India17 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 672 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 1020
2. Petitioner No.1 has described itself as "Committee for Citizenship Rights of the Chakmas of Arunachal Pradesh" ("CCRC"). According to the averments in the petition, representations were filed with the National Human Rights G Commission ("NHRC") alleging persecution ofChakmas and Hajongs in the State of Arunachal Pra…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 669 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 305
Allowing the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1. The order passed by the Family Court clearly showed that before passing the impugned order under Section 13-8(1) of the Act, the Family Court made necessary efforts for reconciliation between the parties but the efforts yielded no fruitful result. The Family Court, G before pas…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 668 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 569
570 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 10 S.C.R. A High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No. 8009 of 2015. Malini Poduval for the Appellant. P.H. Parekh (for Parekh & Co.,) for the Respondents. B The Order of the Court was delivered by M. Y. EQBAL, J.: 1. The petitioner has preferred this special leave petiti…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2015Full text
2015 INSC 665 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 402
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. v. PAWAN KUMAR 405 GUPTA With A C.A. No. 3420of2012 C.A. No. 2409 of 2009 R. D.Agrawala, Pavan Kumar, Maneesha Dhir, G…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis