⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
8,241–8,260 · Page 413 of 500
Supreme Court of India28 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1000 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 687
1.2 Every voter has a fundamental right to know about the educational qualification of a candidate. It is also clear from the F provisions of the Act, Rules and Form 26 that there is a duty cast on the candidates to give correct information about their educational qualifications.[Para l 7][700-B-C] 1.3 The declaration …
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2016Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
8,241–8,260 · Page 413 of 500
Supreme Court of India28 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 1000 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 687
1.2 Every voter has a fundamental right to know about the educational qualification of a candidate. It is also clear from the F provisions of the Act, Rules and Form 26 that there is a duty cast on the candidates to give correct information about their educational qualifications.[Para l 7][700-B-C] 1.3 The declaration …
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 100 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 49
D S.S. Shamshery, AAG, Amit Sharma, Yishu Prayash, S. Spandana Reddy, Milind Kumar for the Appellant. Charu Mathur, (for Mukul Kumar) for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E M. Y. EQBAL, J. I. This appeal by the appellant State is directed against the judgment and order dated 15.09.2008 passed …
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2016Full text
2015 INSC 808 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 651
- There is conflict between statutory provision and the standing order regarding taking of samples - Central Government directed . to re-examine the matter and take suitable steps in this direction -EAn application for sampling and certification needs to be made without undue delay and .the Magistrate on receipt of any…
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2016Full text
2014 INSC 428 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 221
Partly allowing the review petitions and disposing of the interlocutory applications, the Court HELD: The notices were -issued by the High Court to the selected candidates, which were made returnable on 2•• March, F 2011. The matter was finally decided on 4rh March, 2011. This showed that sufficient time was not given …
Supreme Court of India2015
(2015) 8 SCC 293
Every breach of contract cannot give rise to criminal prosecution for cheating; Section 420 cannot be used as a shortcut to settle civil commercial disputes.
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull textCited by 1
(2015) 5 SCC 1
Established clear distinction between discussion, advocacy, and incitement; Section 66A of IT Act struck down for being unconstitutionally vague, overbroad, and causing a chilling effect on speech.
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2015Full text
[2016] 9 S.C.R. 771
771 772 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 9 S.C.R. A examination and interview/viva-voce. Since the MJS Rules already stipuiated that less than 40% marks is Grade 'F' with Grade Value '0', it was implicit in the Rules that for ·a 'pass' in -the examination, 40% minimum marks need to be obtained, though of course as per MJS …
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2015Full text
[2016] 9 S.C.R. 771
771 772 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 9 S.C.R. A examination and interview/viva-voce. Since the MJS Rules already stipuiated that less than 40% marks is Grade 'F' with Grade Value '0', it was implicit in the Rules that for ·a 'pass' in -the examination, 40% minimum marks need to be obtained, though of course as per MJS …
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2015Full text
[2015] 14 S.C.R. 269
F Himanshu Dubey and M.C. Dhingra, Advs. for the Appellant. Naveen and Mishra Saurabh,Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 01.08.2013 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Criminal A…
Supreme Court of India26 Nov 2015Full text
2019 INSC 372 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 158
D. N. Goburdhan, Lal Ratimaman, AbhishekAggarwal G for the Appellants. Ansar Ahmad Choudhary for the Respondent. The Order of the Court was delivered DIPAK MISRA, J. 1. Leave granted. H SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UC OF INDIALTD. v. 161 SHREE LAL MEENA [DIPAK MISRA, J.] 2. The present appeal, by special leave, is direct…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2015Full text
2018 INSC 982 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 1101
ORDER 1. We had by our order dated gth October, 2015 issued certain directions, aimed at mitigating the hardship which the people living in Delhi undergo having regard to the high of D pollution in the city that has earned to it the dubious reputation of being the most polluted city in the world. We had among others di…
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2015Full text
2016 INSC 988 · [2015] 14 S.C.R. 927
927 928 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 14 S.C.R. A raised by the appellant could not be adjudicated in the writ proceeding; and that the authorities under the Act had correctly stated that they have no jurisdiction to decide the soundness of registration of Extinguishment Deed or the sale deeds and declare them as null a…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2015Full text
2016 INSC 496 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 930
GARIB DASS High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in R. S. A. A No, 3785 of 2009. · Pravin H. Parekh, Shashank Kumar, Shashank Bhansali, Anurag Tripathi, Ajay Awasthi (for Parekh & Co.), for the Appellant. B Manoj Swarup, Ankit Swarup, Tanya Swarup, Rohit Kumar Singh for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court…
Supreme Court of India15 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 999 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 943
[2015) 9 S.C.R. 943 SHABNAM A V. STATE OF U. P. (Criminal Appeal Nos. 802-803 of 2015) B MAY 15, 2015 [H. L. DATTU, CJI., S. A. BOBDE AND ARUN MISHRA,JJ.] Sentence/Sentencing- Death penalty- For the murder C of seven persons of her own family including a 10 months old child - Propriety of- Held: Life Sentence is the ru…
Supreme Court of India14 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 998 · [2015] 7 S.C.R. 166
2. The concern of the High Court regarding delay in criminal trials, expressed by it can be appreciated but c the manner in which sweeping directions were issued in the present case by the High Court, cannot be appreciated, particularly the directions, which are not in ' conformity with the provisions of Cr.P.C. No cou…
Supreme Court of India13 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 996 · [2015] 7 S.C.R. 1104
[2015]7S.C.R.1104 A HINDUSTAN ZINC LTD. v. RAJASTHAN ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION (Civil Appeal No.4417of2015) B MAY 13, 2015 [V. GOPALA GOWDA AND R. BANUMATHI, JJ.] Rajasthan Electricity R&gulatory Commission c (Renewable Energy Obligation) Regulations, 2007; Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission (Renewable…
Supreme Court of India7 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 995 · [2015] 7 S.C.R. 122
Jyotendrasinghji vs. S.I. Tripathi and Others (201 ITR 611) - referred to. c Case Law Reference 2011 (2) SCR 1087 Referred to. Para 7 1991 (55) E.L.T. 444 S.C. Referred to. Para 10 1965 (1) SCR 900 Referred to. .,·:Para 11 D 1987 (28) E.L. T. 56 (S.C.) Referred to. Para 11 (201 ITR 611) Referred to. Para 13 CIVIL APPEL…
Supreme Court of India5 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 994 · [2015] 6 S.C.R. 175
HELD: 1.1 The test identification parade was not held. The two witnesses-PW-2 and PW-3 identified the accused-appellants in court. As per their evidence they had seen the accused-appellants in torch light and they had also seen them running away. They chased them H 175 176 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 6 S.C.R. A but th…
Supreme Court of India5 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 993 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 770
G Pinky Anand, ASG, Ritesh Kumar, K. Subba Rao, B. Krishna Prasad for the Appellants. S. K. Bagaria (AC.), K. A. Singh, Prity Kunwar, George Thomas, Ejaz Maqbool for the Respondent. H UNION OF INDIA v. UTIAM STEEL LTD. 773 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A R.F. NARIMAN, J. 1. The respondent herein was engage…
Supreme Court of India1 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 992 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 633
G Sanjay Singh, Rajeev Singh for the Appellants. Gaurav Bhatia, AAG, Gaurav Srivastava, Abhishek Chaudhary, Chandra Bhushan Prasad, Kripa Suankar Prasad, Sukanta Kumar Biswal, Ravi Prakash Mehrotra for the H Respondents. SAVITRI PANDEYv. STATE OF U.P. 635 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A PRAFULLA C. PANT, J…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2016 INSC 100 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 49
D S.S. Shamshery, AAG, Amit Sharma, Yishu Prayash, S. Spandana Reddy, Milind Kumar for the Appellant. Charu Mathur, (for Mukul Kumar) for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E M. Y. EQBAL, J. I. This appeal by the appellant State is directed against the judgment and order dated 15.09.2008 passed …
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2016Full text
2015 INSC 808 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 651
- There is conflict between statutory provision and the standing order regarding taking of samples - Central Government directed . to re-examine the matter and take suitable steps in this direction -EAn application for sampling and certification needs to be made without undue delay and .the Magistrate on receipt of any…
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2016Full text
2014 INSC 428 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 221
Partly allowing the review petitions and disposing of the interlocutory applications, the Court HELD: The notices were -issued by the High Court to the selected candidates, which were made returnable on 2•• March, F 2011. The matter was finally decided on 4rh March, 2011. This showed that sufficient time was not given …
Supreme Court of India2015
(2015) 8 SCC 293
Every breach of contract cannot give rise to criminal prosecution for cheating; Section 420 cannot be used as a shortcut to settle civil commercial disputes.
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull textCited by 1
(2015) 5 SCC 1
Established clear distinction between discussion, advocacy, and incitement; Section 66A of IT Act struck down for being unconstitutionally vague, overbroad, and causing a chilling effect on speech.
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2015Full text
[2016] 9 S.C.R. 771
771 772 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 9 S.C.R. A examination and interview/viva-voce. Since the MJS Rules already stipuiated that less than 40% marks is Grade 'F' with Grade Value '0', it was implicit in the Rules that for ·a 'pass' in -the examination, 40% minimum marks need to be obtained, though of course as per MJS …
Supreme Court of India7 Oct 2015Full text
[2016] 9 S.C.R. 771
771 772 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 9 S.C.R. A examination and interview/viva-voce. Since the MJS Rules already stipuiated that less than 40% marks is Grade 'F' with Grade Value '0', it was implicit in the Rules that for ·a 'pass' in -the examination, 40% minimum marks need to be obtained, though of course as per MJS …
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2015Full text
[2015] 14 S.C.R. 269
F Himanshu Dubey and M.C. Dhingra, Advs. for the Appellant. Naveen and Mishra Saurabh,Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 01.08.2013 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Criminal A…
Supreme Court of India26 Nov 2015Full text
2019 INSC 372 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 158
D. N. Goburdhan, Lal Ratimaman, AbhishekAggarwal G for the Appellants. Ansar Ahmad Choudhary for the Respondent. The Order of the Court was delivered DIPAK MISRA, J. 1. Leave granted. H SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UC OF INDIALTD. v. 161 SHREE LAL MEENA [DIPAK MISRA, J.] 2. The present appeal, by special leave, is direct…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2015Full text
2018 INSC 982 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 1101
ORDER 1. We had by our order dated gth October, 2015 issued certain directions, aimed at mitigating the hardship which the people living in Delhi undergo having regard to the high of D pollution in the city that has earned to it the dubious reputation of being the most polluted city in the world. We had among others di…
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2015Full text
2016 INSC 988 · [2015] 14 S.C.R. 927
927 928 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 14 S.C.R. A raised by the appellant could not be adjudicated in the writ proceeding; and that the authorities under the Act had correctly stated that they have no jurisdiction to decide the soundness of registration of Extinguishment Deed or the sale deeds and declare them as null a…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2015Full text
2016 INSC 496 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 930
GARIB DASS High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in R. S. A. A No, 3785 of 2009. · Pravin H. Parekh, Shashank Kumar, Shashank Bhansali, Anurag Tripathi, Ajay Awasthi (for Parekh & Co.), for the Appellant. B Manoj Swarup, Ankit Swarup, Tanya Swarup, Rohit Kumar Singh for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court…
Supreme Court of India15 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 999 · [2015] 9 S.C.R. 943
[2015) 9 S.C.R. 943 SHABNAM A V. STATE OF U. P. (Criminal Appeal Nos. 802-803 of 2015) B MAY 15, 2015 [H. L. DATTU, CJI., S. A. BOBDE AND ARUN MISHRA,JJ.] Sentence/Sentencing- Death penalty- For the murder C of seven persons of her own family including a 10 months old child - Propriety of- Held: Life Sentence is the ru…
Supreme Court of India14 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 998 · [2015] 7 S.C.R. 166
2. The concern of the High Court regarding delay in criminal trials, expressed by it can be appreciated but c the manner in which sweeping directions were issued in the present case by the High Court, cannot be appreciated, particularly the directions, which are not in ' conformity with the provisions of Cr.P.C. No cou…
Supreme Court of India13 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 996 · [2015] 7 S.C.R. 1104
[2015]7S.C.R.1104 A HINDUSTAN ZINC LTD. v. RAJASTHAN ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION (Civil Appeal No.4417of2015) B MAY 13, 2015 [V. GOPALA GOWDA AND R. BANUMATHI, JJ.] Rajasthan Electricity R&gulatory Commission c (Renewable Energy Obligation) Regulations, 2007; Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission (Renewable…
Supreme Court of India7 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 995 · [2015] 7 S.C.R. 122
Jyotendrasinghji vs. S.I. Tripathi and Others (201 ITR 611) - referred to. c Case Law Reference 2011 (2) SCR 1087 Referred to. Para 7 1991 (55) E.L.T. 444 S.C. Referred to. Para 10 1965 (1) SCR 900 Referred to. .,·:Para 11 D 1987 (28) E.L. T. 56 (S.C.) Referred to. Para 11 (201 ITR 611) Referred to. Para 13 CIVIL APPEL…
Supreme Court of India5 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 994 · [2015] 6 S.C.R. 175
HELD: 1.1 The test identification parade was not held. The two witnesses-PW-2 and PW-3 identified the accused-appellants in court. As per their evidence they had seen the accused-appellants in torch light and they had also seen them running away. They chased them H 175 176 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 6 S.C.R. A but th…
Supreme Court of India5 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 993 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 770
G Pinky Anand, ASG, Ritesh Kumar, K. Subba Rao, B. Krishna Prasad for the Appellants. S. K. Bagaria (AC.), K. A. Singh, Prity Kunwar, George Thomas, Ejaz Maqbool for the Respondent. H UNION OF INDIA v. UTIAM STEEL LTD. 773 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A R.F. NARIMAN, J. 1. The respondent herein was engage…
Supreme Court of India1 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 992 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 633
G Sanjay Singh, Rajeev Singh for the Appellants. Gaurav Bhatia, AAG, Gaurav Srivastava, Abhishek Chaudhary, Chandra Bhushan Prasad, Kripa Suankar Prasad, Sukanta Kumar Biswal, Ravi Prakash Mehrotra for the H Respondents. SAVITRI PANDEYv. STATE OF U.P. 635 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A PRAFULLA C. PANT, J…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis