⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
761–780 · Page 39 of 500
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 322 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 432
The four appellants were convicted by the Trial Court u/ss.306 and 114 of Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 5 years. The High Court affirmed the conviction and sentence. Whether the High Court was justified in affirming the conviction and sentence.
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 320 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1531
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
761–780 · Page 39 of 500
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 322 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 432
The four appellants were convicted by the Trial Court u/ss.306 and 114 of Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 5 years. The High Court affirmed the conviction and sentence. Whether the High Court was justified in affirming the conviction and sentence.
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 320 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1531
Issue arose whether the High Court justified in denying anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with FIR registered against the petitioner for the offence punishable u/s.7 of the 1988 Act and s.61(2) of the BNS 2023.
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 32 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 281
Interim release of conveyances during the pendency of the trial in NDPS (Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985) cases.
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 319 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1547
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing an application for recalling an order passed on a concession made by the Appellant’s counsel? Whether the Central Administrative Tribunal has correctly interpreted the recruitment rules while directing the Appellant to treat the Respondents as ‘Initial Constituents’?
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 318 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 317
Whether the High Court was correct to uphold the conviction and life imprisonment granted by the Trial Court.
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 317 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1790
The Appellant/accused was convicted under Section 302 IPC and 376(2)(G) IPC for alleged murder of a four-year-old girl. The Trial Court convicted the Appellant and sentenced him to death, which was later confirmed by the High Court. The High Court confirmed the sentence based on key findings. The victim’s dead body was recovered following the accused’s disclosure and was identified by PW1, the victim’s father. The last-seen evidence was firmly established through the testimonies of PW1, PW2, PW3, PW6, and PW7, confirming that the victim was last seen with the accused. The accused’s confession
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 315 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the petitions filed under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of criminal proceedings.
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 314 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 325
Whether the execution of penalty orders passed by the NCDRC can be stayed under the interim moratorium provisions of s.96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 31 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 230
By the impugned judgment, the High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by the appellant for quashing a First Information Report registered at the instance of the 4th respondent for the offence punishable under Section 420 of the Penal Code, 1860.
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 309 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 629
Whether a handwriting expert’s testimony has to be corroborated; whether in the absence of primary evidence, i.e. the original postal cover, a copy of the document is admissible.
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 308 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 303
Matter pertains to the liability of the appellant to be prosecuted for committing rape upon the complainant by giving her a false promise of marriage; and the correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing the petition seeking the quashing of the criminal proceedings arising out of the chargesheet u/ss.376, 384, 323, 504, 506 IPC.
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 307 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 367
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court granting bail to in-laws of the deceased wife, charged for causing dowry death of the deceased.
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 306 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 341
The Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) had issued process to the respondent pursuant to the complaint filed by the appellants alleging violation by the respondent of the provisions of the Factories Act, 1948 and thereby committing offences punishable u/s.92 thereof. However, the High Court had quashed the said order of the JMFC. Was the High Court justified in quashing the process issued.
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 303 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1721
Appellant-R, a bank manager, was convicted of murdering his two minor children, along with his sister-in-law and mother-in- law, in June 2010. His motive stemmed from disapproval of his sister-in-law’s relationship, which his wife and her family supported. On 16.06.2010, he allegedly killed his sister-in-law and mother-in- law at his house in Tumkur and disposed of their bodies in a sump tank. The next day, he took his children to a water tank in Mangalore and drowned them. He later sent messages to his wife, suggesting she end her life. His wife reported the matter, leading to his arrest. The
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 302 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1772
1. Whether a Writ of Mandamus should be issued to the Respondents to act and thereby construct feeding rooms and child care rooms, etc. or any other facilities related to infants and mothers at public places. 2. Whether a Writ of Mandamus be issued to the Respondents to ensure that the fundamental rights of nursing women and infant children are protected.
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 301 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1745
Suit filed by appellant seeking specific performance of contract based on an agreement of sale executed by respondents was allowed on 20-01-2012 and appellant was directed to deposit the balance sale consideration within two months. The judgment and decree was upheld by the First Appellate Court on 21-04-2015. Two years thereafter, the decree holder preferred execution petition wherein he sought permission to deposit the balance sale consideration. On 20-05-2019, the executing court permitted the decree holder-appellants to deposit the balance sale consideration and directed the Respondents to
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 300 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 222
Whether visually impaired candidates can be said to be ‘not suitable’ for judicial service; Whether the amendment made in Rule 6A of Madhya Pradesh Judicial Services (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1994 falls foul of the constitution; Whether proviso to Rule 7 of the Madhya Pradesh Judicial Service (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1994 violates the equality doctrine and the principle of reasonable accommodation; Whether relaxation can be done in assessing the suitability of candidates when adequate PwD candidates are not available, after selection in their respecti
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 30 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 184
Whether it is necessary to implead a Foreign Registration Officer appointed under Rule 3 of the Registration of Foreigners Rules, 1992 in the bail application filed by a foreigner within the meaning of the Foreigners Act, 1946.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 3 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 190
The Lands of appellants herein were acquired and they were deprived of their property without paying any compensation for twenty-two years. For payment of compensation, the appellants pleaded to shift the date for considering the market value of land as on the date of the award and not as on the date of the Preliminary Notification. Whether this Court should direct shifting of the date for determination of the market value of the land in question of the appellants.
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 299 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 377
Whether ‘A’ having severe cognitive limitations is capable of making independent decisions; whether best interests and welfare of ‘A’, a US citizen would be served by permitting him to continue residing with Respondent No.4-father in India.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Issue arose whether the High Court justified in denying anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with FIR registered against the petitioner for the offence punishable u/s.7 of the 1988 Act and s.61(2) of the BNS 2023.
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 32 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 281
Interim release of conveyances during the pendency of the trial in NDPS (Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985) cases.
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 319 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1547
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing an application for recalling an order passed on a concession made by the Appellant’s counsel? Whether the Central Administrative Tribunal has correctly interpreted the recruitment rules while directing the Appellant to treat the Respondents as ‘Initial Constituents’?
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 318 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 317
Whether the High Court was correct to uphold the conviction and life imprisonment granted by the Trial Court.
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 317 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1790
The Appellant/accused was convicted under Section 302 IPC and 376(2)(G) IPC for alleged murder of a four-year-old girl. The Trial Court convicted the Appellant and sentenced him to death, which was later confirmed by the High Court. The High Court confirmed the sentence based on key findings. The victim’s dead body was recovered following the accused’s disclosure and was identified by PW1, the victim’s father. The last-seen evidence was firmly established through the testimonies of PW1, PW2, PW3, PW6, and PW7, confirming that the victim was last seen with the accused. The accused’s confession
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 315 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the petitions filed under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of criminal proceedings.
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 314 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 325
Whether the execution of penalty orders passed by the NCDRC can be stayed under the interim moratorium provisions of s.96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 31 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 230
By the impugned judgment, the High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by the appellant for quashing a First Information Report registered at the instance of the 4th respondent for the offence punishable under Section 420 of the Penal Code, 1860.
Supreme Court of India3 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 309 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 629
Whether a handwriting expert’s testimony has to be corroborated; whether in the absence of primary evidence, i.e. the original postal cover, a copy of the document is admissible.
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 308 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 303
Matter pertains to the liability of the appellant to be prosecuted for committing rape upon the complainant by giving her a false promise of marriage; and the correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing the petition seeking the quashing of the criminal proceedings arising out of the chargesheet u/ss.376, 384, 323, 504, 506 IPC.
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 307 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 367
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court granting bail to in-laws of the deceased wife, charged for causing dowry death of the deceased.
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 306 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 341
The Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) had issued process to the respondent pursuant to the complaint filed by the appellants alleging violation by the respondent of the provisions of the Factories Act, 1948 and thereby committing offences punishable u/s.92 thereof. However, the High Court had quashed the said order of the JMFC. Was the High Court justified in quashing the process issued.
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 303 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1721
Appellant-R, a bank manager, was convicted of murdering his two minor children, along with his sister-in-law and mother-in- law, in June 2010. His motive stemmed from disapproval of his sister-in-law’s relationship, which his wife and her family supported. On 16.06.2010, he allegedly killed his sister-in-law and mother-in- law at his house in Tumkur and disposed of their bodies in a sump tank. The next day, he took his children to a water tank in Mangalore and drowned them. He later sent messages to his wife, suggesting she end her life. His wife reported the matter, leading to his arrest. The
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 302 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1772
1. Whether a Writ of Mandamus should be issued to the Respondents to act and thereby construct feeding rooms and child care rooms, etc. or any other facilities related to infants and mothers at public places. 2. Whether a Writ of Mandamus be issued to the Respondents to ensure that the fundamental rights of nursing women and infant children are protected.
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2025Full text
2025 INSC 301 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 1745
Suit filed by appellant seeking specific performance of contract based on an agreement of sale executed by respondents was allowed on 20-01-2012 and appellant was directed to deposit the balance sale consideration within two months. The judgment and decree was upheld by the First Appellate Court on 21-04-2015. Two years thereafter, the decree holder preferred execution petition wherein he sought permission to deposit the balance sale consideration. On 20-05-2019, the executing court permitted the decree holder-appellants to deposit the balance sale consideration and directed the Respondents to
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 300 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 222
Whether visually impaired candidates can be said to be ‘not suitable’ for judicial service; Whether the amendment made in Rule 6A of Madhya Pradesh Judicial Services (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1994 falls foul of the constitution; Whether proviso to Rule 7 of the Madhya Pradesh Judicial Service (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1994 violates the equality doctrine and the principle of reasonable accommodation; Whether relaxation can be done in assessing the suitability of candidates when adequate PwD candidates are not available, after selection in their respecti
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 30 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 184
Whether it is necessary to implead a Foreign Registration Officer appointed under Rule 3 of the Registration of Foreigners Rules, 1992 in the bail application filed by a foreigner within the meaning of the Foreigners Act, 1946.
Supreme Court of India1 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 3 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 190
The Lands of appellants herein were acquired and they were deprived of their property without paying any compensation for twenty-two years. For payment of compensation, the appellants pleaded to shift the date for considering the market value of land as on the date of the award and not as on the date of the Preliminary Notification. Whether this Court should direct shifting of the date for determination of the market value of the land in question of the appellants.
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 299 · [2025] 3 S.C.R. 377
Whether ‘A’ having severe cognitive limitations is capable of making independent decisions; whether best interests and welfare of ‘A’, a US citizen would be served by permitting him to continue residing with Respondent No.4-father in India.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis