Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,701–7,720 · Page 386 of 500
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 956 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 827
Anish Kumar Gupta, AAG, Chandra Shekhar Suman, R. K. Rajwanshi, Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Dr. Monika Gusain, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by c J. S. KHEHAR, J. I. The instant criminal appeal by spe…
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 955 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 515
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,701–7,720 · Page 386 of 500
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 956 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 827
Anish Kumar Gupta, AAG, Chandra Shekhar Suman, R. K. Rajwanshi, Ms. Deepshikha Bharati, Dr. Monika Gusain, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by c J. S. KHEHAR, J. I. The instant criminal appeal by spe…
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 955 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 515
[2016] 9 S.C.R. 515 HIRAL P. HARSORA AND ORS. A v. KUSUM NAROTTAMDAS HARSORA AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. I 0084 of2016) OCTOBER 06, 2016 B [KURIAN JOSEPH AND R. F. NARIMAN, JJ.) Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - s. 2(q) and its proviso - Constitutional validity of s. 2(q) - Held; The object of the A…
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 952 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 840
HELD: 1.1 With regard to the allegations of cruelty levelledF by the appellant, the findings of the trial court are concurred with. There was no fault on the part of the appellant nor was there any reason for the respondent wife to make an attempt to commit suicide. No husband would ever be comfortable with or tolerate…
Supreme Court of India27 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 95 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 343
343 344 SUPREME COURT RFPORTS [2016] I S.C.R. A /998 - In terms o/umended I'. 7A(3J r!w I'. 51A. if one ll'ffe to he brouf!.hl 101ller 1/11.! categln~F <~f· qual~/ie£1 teacher re/iel'ell 011 accuu111 qf. ler111i11afiun ql raconcies, the lllllell<led r. 7/1(3) that .... uch engage111e11t /as/ell Ji>r one clear acalle111…
Supreme Court of India4 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 948 · [2016] 11 S.C.R. 521
"Fraud" - Meaning of Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: F Per A.K. Sikri, J. 1. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not make any provision excluding any category of disputes treating them as non-arbitrable. Notwithstanding the above, the Courts Ghave held that certain kinds of disputes may not be capable…
Supreme Court of India4 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 947 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 452
- One of the accused mentioned about the enmity on account of the E panchayat election - The said accused himself was injured which proved his presence at the scene of the occurrence - All the five eye witnesses consistently named appellants (A-1 toA-7)- Appellants (A-1 to A-7) were assigned specific role in assaulting…
Supreme Court of India4 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 946 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 615
[2016) 9 S.C.R. 615 RAJA AND OTHERS A v. STATE OF KARNATAKA (Criminal Appeal No. 1767of2011) OCTOBER 04, 2016 B [PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND AMITAVA ROY, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 - ss.376(g)/366/392 rlw. s.34 - Prosecutrix alleged gang rape by appellants - Inconsistencies in FIR and the deposition of prosecutrix - Appellants…
Supreme Court of India3 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 944 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 166
E WITH Criminal Appeal Nos. 957, 959 & 960 of2016. Ranjith B. Marar, Ms. Lakshmi N. Kaimal and T. K. Babu, Advs. for the Appellant. F G. Prakash, Jishnu M. L., Ms. Priyanka Prakash, Ms. Beena Prakash, Manu Srinath and Ramesh Babu M. R., Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by UDAY UMESH LAL…
Supreme Court of India3 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 943 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 872
[2016] 8 S.C.R. 872 A VIKAS YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ETC. ETC. (Criminal Appeal Nos. 1531-1533 of2015) B OCTOBER 03, 2016 [DIPAK MISRA AND C. NAGAPPAN, JJ.] Sentence/Sentencing: Fixed term sentence - Imposition of, permissibility - Held: It C is within the domain of judiciary to direct that convict shall suffer …
Supreme Court of India3 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 942 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 74
HELD: 1. The election of the appellant-returned candidate a is declared to be valid in law. [Para 17] (82-G] 2. Under s.100 (l)(d) of Representation of People Act,1951, an election is liable to be declared void on the ground of improper acceptance of a nomination if such improper acceptance of the nomination has materi…
Supreme Court of India3 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 941 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 115
Allowing the appeal, the Court G HELD: 1. Admittedly there is no eye-witness to the incident. The testimony of PWs 1, 6 and 7 would evince that when the persons sent by the appellant had reached the house of the appellant to fetch the medical records of his brother, they found the door open and when the deceased did no…
Supreme Court of India27 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 94 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 489
Case Law Reference (2000) 3 sec 242 relied on Para5 F CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 557 of 2016. From the Judgment and Order dated 24.05.2013 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi in Revision Petition No. 1931 of2013. G Amarendra Saran, Sr. Adv., Shaad Anwar, Subhash Chandra …
Supreme Court of India3 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 939 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 421
[2016] 5 S.C.R. 421 421 SADDIK @ LALO GULAM HUSSEIN SHAIKH & ORS. A v. STATE OF GUJARAT (Criminal Appeal Nos. 1999-2000 of20 I 0) OCTOBER 03, 2016 B [PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND AMITAVA ROY, JJ.) Penal Code, I860: "s.302 rlw s.I49, .s.143, 147, 148, 323 rlw s.149 - Conviction under - Unlawful assembly and murder - Common …
Supreme Court of India3 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 938 · [2016] 6 S.C.R. 512
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The questions formulated by High Court cannot H 512 SYEDA RAHIMUNNISA v. MALAN BI (DEAD) BY L.RS. & 513 ANR. ETC. be regarded as satisfying the test of being a "substantial questions A of law" within the meaning of Section 100 of CPC. These questions are essentially questions o…
Supreme Court of India3 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 937 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 736
F On a reference under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Tribunal had delivered an award in 1996 directing regularization of the workmen in.question. The High Court, however, modified the award in 2004 directing that .as and when regular workmen are employed, preference be given to the workmen in question. No appe…
Supreme Court of India30 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 934 · [2016] 6 S.C.R. 956
- The power under Regn. 351-A of 1975 Regulations can be delegated by the Governor , But such delegation cannot be under Business Transaction Rules - Jn the absence of any evidence to F show that the Government had delegated his power to the Minister concerned, under Regn. 351-A to accord sanction, the sanction granted…
Supreme Court of India29 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 931 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 803
Reservation - In Judicial Service - Role/power of Executive vis-a-vis Judiciary - Constitutional imperatives and limitations -FDiscussed - Held: Under the scheme of the Constitution, Executive is not the only authority to formulate a policy for reservation - It is under a constitutional obligation to consult the High C…
Supreme Court of India28 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 927 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 692
F Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The High Court went wrong both in its analysis of facts and approach on law. A cursory reading of the Loi issued by the appellant to the first respondent would clearly show that it G is not a case of forfeiture of security deposit " ... if the contract had frustrated on account…
Supreme Court of India28 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 926 · [2016] 6 S.C.R. 851
[2016] 6 S.C.R. 851 STATE OF H.P. & ORS. A v. RAJESH CHANDER SOOD ETC. ETC. (Civil Appeal Nos. 9750-9819of2016) 8 SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 [JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR AND C. NAGAPPAN, JJ.) Service law: Himachal Pradesh Government Corpora/e Sec/or E111ployees Pension (Fa111ily Pension, Co111mu1a1io11 of Pension and Gratuity) c Sche…
Supreme Court of India28 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 925 · [2016] 7 S.C.R. 912
Aniket Jain, Saurav Aggarwal, Kamlendra Mishra, Advs., for the Appellant. Gaurav Jain, Ms. Abha Jain, Advs., for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ANIL R. DAVE, J. I. Leave granted. D 2. Being aggrieved by the Judgment dated 21.9.2011 delivered by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in S…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
[2016] 9 S.C.R. 515 HIRAL P. HARSORA AND ORS. A v. KUSUM NAROTTAMDAS HARSORA AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. I 0084 of2016) OCTOBER 06, 2016 B [KURIAN JOSEPH AND R. F. NARIMAN, JJ.) Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - s. 2(q) and its proviso - Constitutional validity of s. 2(q) - Held; The object of the A…
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 952 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 840
HELD: 1.1 With regard to the allegations of cruelty levelledF by the appellant, the findings of the trial court are concurred with. There was no fault on the part of the appellant nor was there any reason for the respondent wife to make an attempt to commit suicide. No husband would ever be comfortable with or tolerate…
Supreme Court of India27 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 95 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 343
343 344 SUPREME COURT RFPORTS [2016] I S.C.R. A /998 - In terms o/umended I'. 7A(3J r!w I'. 51A. if one ll'ffe to he brouf!.hl 101ller 1/11.! categln~F <~f· qual~/ie£1 teacher re/iel'ell 011 accuu111 qf. ler111i11afiun ql raconcies, the lllllell<led r. 7/1(3) that .... uch engage111e11t /as/ell Ji>r one clear acalle111…
Supreme Court of India4 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 948 · [2016] 11 S.C.R. 521
"Fraud" - Meaning of Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: F Per A.K. Sikri, J. 1. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not make any provision excluding any category of disputes treating them as non-arbitrable. Notwithstanding the above, the Courts Ghave held that certain kinds of disputes may not be capable…
Supreme Court of India4 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 947 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 452
- One of the accused mentioned about the enmity on account of the E panchayat election - The said accused himself was injured which proved his presence at the scene of the occurrence - All the five eye witnesses consistently named appellants (A-1 toA-7)- Appellants (A-1 to A-7) were assigned specific role in assaulting…
Supreme Court of India4 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 946 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 615
[2016) 9 S.C.R. 615 RAJA AND OTHERS A v. STATE OF KARNATAKA (Criminal Appeal No. 1767of2011) OCTOBER 04, 2016 B [PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND AMITAVA ROY, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 - ss.376(g)/366/392 rlw. s.34 - Prosecutrix alleged gang rape by appellants - Inconsistencies in FIR and the deposition of prosecutrix - Appellants…
Supreme Court of India3 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 944 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 166
E WITH Criminal Appeal Nos. 957, 959 & 960 of2016. Ranjith B. Marar, Ms. Lakshmi N. Kaimal and T. K. Babu, Advs. for the Appellant. F G. Prakash, Jishnu M. L., Ms. Priyanka Prakash, Ms. Beena Prakash, Manu Srinath and Ramesh Babu M. R., Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by UDAY UMESH LAL…
Supreme Court of India3 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 943 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 872
[2016] 8 S.C.R. 872 A VIKAS YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ETC. ETC. (Criminal Appeal Nos. 1531-1533 of2015) B OCTOBER 03, 2016 [DIPAK MISRA AND C. NAGAPPAN, JJ.] Sentence/Sentencing: Fixed term sentence - Imposition of, permissibility - Held: It C is within the domain of judiciary to direct that convict shall suffer …
Supreme Court of India3 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 942 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 74
HELD: 1. The election of the appellant-returned candidate a is declared to be valid in law. [Para 17] (82-G] 2. Under s.100 (l)(d) of Representation of People Act,1951, an election is liable to be declared void on the ground of improper acceptance of a nomination if such improper acceptance of the nomination has materi…
Supreme Court of India3 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 941 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 115
Allowing the appeal, the Court G HELD: 1. Admittedly there is no eye-witness to the incident. The testimony of PWs 1, 6 and 7 would evince that when the persons sent by the appellant had reached the house of the appellant to fetch the medical records of his brother, they found the door open and when the deceased did no…
Supreme Court of India27 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 94 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 489
Case Law Reference (2000) 3 sec 242 relied on Para5 F CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 557 of 2016. From the Judgment and Order dated 24.05.2013 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi in Revision Petition No. 1931 of2013. G Amarendra Saran, Sr. Adv., Shaad Anwar, Subhash Chandra …
Supreme Court of India3 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 939 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 421
[2016] 5 S.C.R. 421 421 SADDIK @ LALO GULAM HUSSEIN SHAIKH & ORS. A v. STATE OF GUJARAT (Criminal Appeal Nos. 1999-2000 of20 I 0) OCTOBER 03, 2016 B [PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND AMITAVA ROY, JJ.) Penal Code, I860: "s.302 rlw s.I49, .s.143, 147, 148, 323 rlw s.149 - Conviction under - Unlawful assembly and murder - Common …
Supreme Court of India3 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 938 · [2016] 6 S.C.R. 512
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The questions formulated by High Court cannot H 512 SYEDA RAHIMUNNISA v. MALAN BI (DEAD) BY L.RS. & 513 ANR. ETC. be regarded as satisfying the test of being a "substantial questions A of law" within the meaning of Section 100 of CPC. These questions are essentially questions o…
Supreme Court of India3 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 937 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 736
F On a reference under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Tribunal had delivered an award in 1996 directing regularization of the workmen in.question. The High Court, however, modified the award in 2004 directing that .as and when regular workmen are employed, preference be given to the workmen in question. No appe…
Supreme Court of India30 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 934 · [2016] 6 S.C.R. 956
- The power under Regn. 351-A of 1975 Regulations can be delegated by the Governor , But such delegation cannot be under Business Transaction Rules - Jn the absence of any evidence to F show that the Government had delegated his power to the Minister concerned, under Regn. 351-A to accord sanction, the sanction granted…
Supreme Court of India29 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 931 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 803
Reservation - In Judicial Service - Role/power of Executive vis-a-vis Judiciary - Constitutional imperatives and limitations -FDiscussed - Held: Under the scheme of the Constitution, Executive is not the only authority to formulate a policy for reservation - It is under a constitutional obligation to consult the High C…
Supreme Court of India28 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 927 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 692
F Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The High Court went wrong both in its analysis of facts and approach on law. A cursory reading of the Loi issued by the appellant to the first respondent would clearly show that it G is not a case of forfeiture of security deposit " ... if the contract had frustrated on account…
Supreme Court of India28 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 926 · [2016] 6 S.C.R. 851
[2016] 6 S.C.R. 851 STATE OF H.P. & ORS. A v. RAJESH CHANDER SOOD ETC. ETC. (Civil Appeal Nos. 9750-9819of2016) 8 SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 [JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR AND C. NAGAPPAN, JJ.) Service law: Himachal Pradesh Government Corpora/e Sec/or E111ployees Pension (Fa111ily Pension, Co111mu1a1io11 of Pension and Gratuity) c Sche…
Supreme Court of India28 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 925 · [2016] 7 S.C.R. 912
Aniket Jain, Saurav Aggarwal, Kamlendra Mishra, Advs., for the Appellant. Gaurav Jain, Ms. Abha Jain, Advs., for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ANIL R. DAVE, J. I. Leave granted. D 2. Being aggrieved by the Judgment dated 21.9.2011 delivered by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in S…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis