⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,321–7,340 · Page 367 of 500
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 301 · [2017] 4 S.C.R. 673
No. l of2017. Basant R., Sr. Adv., Raghenth Basant, Karlik Ashok, James Joseph, Mishal Johari, Senthil Jagadeesan, Ms. Bina Madhavan, Ad vs.· E f0r the Appellants. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv., Deepak Prakash, Anoopam N. Prasad, Ali Chaudhury, Swati Ghildiyal, Kuna! Singh, Subhash Chandran, Ms. Usha Nandini, G. Prakash, …
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2017Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,321–7,340 · Page 367 of 500
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 301 · [2017] 4 S.C.R. 673
No. l of2017. Basant R., Sr. Adv., Raghenth Basant, Karlik Ashok, James Joseph, Mishal Johari, Senthil Jagadeesan, Ms. Bina Madhavan, Ad vs.· E f0r the Appellants. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv., Deepak Prakash, Anoopam N. Prasad, Ali Chaudhury, Swati Ghildiyal, Kuna! Singh, Subhash Chandran, Ms. Usha Nandini, G. Prakash, …
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 30 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 132
Allowing the appeal and disposing of the contempt petition, the Court . HELD: A person holding the premises gr.ituitously or inG the capacity as a caretaker or a servant would not acquire any right or interest in the property and even long possession in that capacity would be of no legal consequences. In the circumstan…
Supreme Court of India2 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 3 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 158
[2017] I S.C.R. 158 A ABHIRAM SINGH v. C.D. COMMACHEN (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 37of1992) B JANUARY 02, 2017 [T. S. THAKUR, C.J.l., MADAN B. LOKUR, S. A. BOBDE, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, UDAY UMESH LALIT, DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD AND L. NAGESWARA RAO, JJ.) c Representation of the People Act, 1951: s. 123 (3) (as ame…
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 297 · [2017] 3 S.C.R. 702
Allowing the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1. Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955 empowers the Court in any proceeding .under the Act, if ifappears to the Court that either the wife or the husband, as the case may be, has no independent income suffic~ent for her or his support and the necessary expenses of the procee…
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 296 · [2017] 4 S.C.R. 723
- Clearly disputes between the cooperative society and its employees are not covered uls.91 - Dispute in question does not come within the scope of 'management or business of a society' uls.91 (I) -Therefore, the Cooperative Court did not have jurisdiction to entertain the claim filed by the respondent - Petition filed…
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 293 · [2017] 3 S.C.R. 510
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The notification issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was with respect to the large chunk B of area, comprised in several villages, approximately 50,000 bighas was proposed to be acquired. The notification issued under Section 4 intended to exempt the land, w…
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 292 · [2017] 4 S.C.R. 658
[2017] 4 S.C.R. 658 A KATTUKULANGARA MADHAVAN (DEAD) THR. LRS. v. MAJEED & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No.400 of2006 etc.) B MARCH 30, 2017 [S. A. BOBDE AND L. NAGESWARA RAO, JJ.) Penal Code. 1860: s.302 rlw s.149 - Murder - Unlawful C assembly - 21 accused - Death caused by stabbing on account of political rivalry - Convict…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 290 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 943
Allowing the appeals and remitting the matter to High Court, the Court HELD: The moot question is whether the landlords are entitled to eviction on all the grounds taken by the landlords in the petitions for eviction. The eviction on the respective grounds G under the Act has different ramifications since the grounds b…
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 29 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 265
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. In the present case, apart from the identification by PWs 3, 5 and 16 and their version that they bad seen the B deceased in the company of four persons on the night intervening 11.7.1993 and 12.7.1993, there .is nothing which could point in the direction of the. guilt of the app…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 289 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 912
WITH C. A. No. 8810 of2012 F C. A. Nos. 4616, 4617-44, 4645, 4646-75 and 4676 of2017. Jaideep Gupta, Dhruv Mehta, A. B. Dial, Sr. Ad vs., Dinesh Mathur, Ms. Priyanka Bharti, Ms. Anindita Mitra, K. Rajeev, Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Rajesh Kumar, Gaurav Kumar Singh, Anant Gautam (For Mis GMitter & Mitter Co.), Kunal Anand,…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 287 · [2017] 5 S.C.R. 379
E Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv., Ramesh Singh, A. T. Patra, Ms. Bina Gupta, Ad vs. for the Appellant. Ms. Rachana Srivastava, Nitya Madhusoodhnan, Vishnu B. Saharya, Yiresh B. Saharya, M/s. Saharya & Co., Mukesh Kumar Sharma, Ad vs. for the Respondents. F The following Order of the Court was delivered: ORDER J. The appea…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 285 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 707
ORDER 1. We have heard the learned Solicitor General, learned Amicus Curiae, learned counsel for the interveners who are manufacturers of vehicles (two wheelers, three wheelers, four wheelers and commercial E vehicles - for short referred to as 'such vehicles') and learned counsel for the association of dealers of such…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 283 · [2017] 4 S.C.R. 373
- Penal Code, 1860 - ss.143, 147, 323, 302, 504, 114 rlw s.149 -Honour killing. H 373 374 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [20 J 7] 4 S.C.R. A Precedent: Binding effect of judgments/orders granting! rejecting bail - Held: A bail application is not to be entertained 011 the basis of certain observations made in a judgment in a dif…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 279 · [2017] 4 S.C.R. 735
D WITH C.A. No. 2163 of2007. Radha Shyam Jena, Adv. for the Appellant. Mukul Rohatgi, Ld. AG., Pritish Kapoor, Ms. Niranjana Singh, E Ms. Sadhana Sandhu, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Ad vs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. These appeals are filed against the final judgment…
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 278 · [2017] 3 S.C.R. 711
F Allowing the appeal, the Court. HELD: i. In the instant case, it is not in dispute that the business that had been carried on by original landlord is being continued by his legal heirs. It is a family business. If that be so, the requirement, as established and which has been upheld by the Appellate Authority after c…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 277 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 984
- Further, s. J(l)(d)(iv) provided !hat the remedy available t•nder the Act was without prejudice to any other remedy available under any other law- Withdrawal of the suit was lhus, no bar to proceedings F under the Act - Himacha/ Pradesh Public Moneys (Recovery af Dues) Act, 2000 - State Finance Corporation Act, 1951 …
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 276 · [2017] 4 S.C.R. 934
Witness: F Eyewitnesses - Evidence of - Discrepancies in - Appreciation of - Held: Generally in criminal cases, discrepancies in the evidence of witness is bound to happen as there is considerable gap between the date of incident and the time of deposing evidence before Court - But, if these contradictions create serio…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 275 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 939
B ORDER 1. Petitioner No. I - Sheetal Shankar Salvi, has approached this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution oflndia seeking directions to the respondents to allow her to undergo medical termination of her c pregnancy. 2. By order dated 22.3.2017, while issuing notice to the respondents, this Court gave a direct…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 273 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 743
WITH Special Leave Petition( Civil) No. 26614of2014. Maninder Singh, ASG, Sachin Sharma,Amarjeet Singh, B. Krishna Prasad, Shreekant N. Terdal, Advs. for the Appellant.G Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv., Ramesh Singh, Ms. Anne Mathew, SumanJoyti Khaitan, T. S.Ahuja, VarunAhuja, D. K. Thakur,Devendra Jha, Debasis Misra, Advs. fo…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 272 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 631
HELD: 1.1 Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 applies to the case of female Hindus. It specifies the general D rules of succession and provides the categories of heirs on whom the property of a female Hindu would devolve on her death. Sub-section(!) sets out four categories of heirs specified in clauses (a) to…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2017 INSC 30 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 132
Allowing the appeal and disposing of the contempt petition, the Court . HELD: A person holding the premises gr.ituitously or inG the capacity as a caretaker or a servant would not acquire any right or interest in the property and even long possession in that capacity would be of no legal consequences. In the circumstan…
Supreme Court of India2 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 3 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 158
[2017] I S.C.R. 158 A ABHIRAM SINGH v. C.D. COMMACHEN (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 37of1992) B JANUARY 02, 2017 [T. S. THAKUR, C.J.l., MADAN B. LOKUR, S. A. BOBDE, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, UDAY UMESH LALIT, DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD AND L. NAGESWARA RAO, JJ.) c Representation of the People Act, 1951: s. 123 (3) (as ame…
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 297 · [2017] 3 S.C.R. 702
Allowing the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1. Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955 empowers the Court in any proceeding .under the Act, if ifappears to the Court that either the wife or the husband, as the case may be, has no independent income suffic~ent for her or his support and the necessary expenses of the procee…
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 296 · [2017] 4 S.C.R. 723
- Clearly disputes between the cooperative society and its employees are not covered uls.91 - Dispute in question does not come within the scope of 'management or business of a society' uls.91 (I) -Therefore, the Cooperative Court did not have jurisdiction to entertain the claim filed by the respondent - Petition filed…
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 293 · [2017] 3 S.C.R. 510
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The notification issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was with respect to the large chunk B of area, comprised in several villages, approximately 50,000 bighas was proposed to be acquired. The notification issued under Section 4 intended to exempt the land, w…
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 292 · [2017] 4 S.C.R. 658
[2017] 4 S.C.R. 658 A KATTUKULANGARA MADHAVAN (DEAD) THR. LRS. v. MAJEED & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No.400 of2006 etc.) B MARCH 30, 2017 [S. A. BOBDE AND L. NAGESWARA RAO, JJ.) Penal Code. 1860: s.302 rlw s.149 - Murder - Unlawful C assembly - 21 accused - Death caused by stabbing on account of political rivalry - Convict…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 290 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 943
Allowing the appeals and remitting the matter to High Court, the Court HELD: The moot question is whether the landlords are entitled to eviction on all the grounds taken by the landlords in the petitions for eviction. The eviction on the respective grounds G under the Act has different ramifications since the grounds b…
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2017Full text
2017 INSC 29 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 265
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. In the present case, apart from the identification by PWs 3, 5 and 16 and their version that they bad seen the B deceased in the company of four persons on the night intervening 11.7.1993 and 12.7.1993, there .is nothing which could point in the direction of the. guilt of the app…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 289 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 912
WITH C. A. No. 8810 of2012 F C. A. Nos. 4616, 4617-44, 4645, 4646-75 and 4676 of2017. Jaideep Gupta, Dhruv Mehta, A. B. Dial, Sr. Ad vs., Dinesh Mathur, Ms. Priyanka Bharti, Ms. Anindita Mitra, K. Rajeev, Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Rajesh Kumar, Gaurav Kumar Singh, Anant Gautam (For Mis GMitter & Mitter Co.), Kunal Anand,…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 287 · [2017] 5 S.C.R. 379
E Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv., Ramesh Singh, A. T. Patra, Ms. Bina Gupta, Ad vs. for the Appellant. Ms. Rachana Srivastava, Nitya Madhusoodhnan, Vishnu B. Saharya, Yiresh B. Saharya, M/s. Saharya & Co., Mukesh Kumar Sharma, Ad vs. for the Respondents. F The following Order of the Court was delivered: ORDER J. The appea…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 285 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 707
ORDER 1. We have heard the learned Solicitor General, learned Amicus Curiae, learned counsel for the interveners who are manufacturers of vehicles (two wheelers, three wheelers, four wheelers and commercial E vehicles - for short referred to as 'such vehicles') and learned counsel for the association of dealers of such…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 283 · [2017] 4 S.C.R. 373
- Penal Code, 1860 - ss.143, 147, 323, 302, 504, 114 rlw s.149 -Honour killing. H 373 374 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [20 J 7] 4 S.C.R. A Precedent: Binding effect of judgments/orders granting! rejecting bail - Held: A bail application is not to be entertained 011 the basis of certain observations made in a judgment in a dif…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 279 · [2017] 4 S.C.R. 735
D WITH C.A. No. 2163 of2007. Radha Shyam Jena, Adv. for the Appellant. Mukul Rohatgi, Ld. AG., Pritish Kapoor, Ms. Niranjana Singh, E Ms. Sadhana Sandhu, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Ad vs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. These appeals are filed against the final judgment…
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 278 · [2017] 3 S.C.R. 711
F Allowing the appeal, the Court. HELD: i. In the instant case, it is not in dispute that the business that had been carried on by original landlord is being continued by his legal heirs. It is a family business. If that be so, the requirement, as established and which has been upheld by the Appellate Authority after c…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 277 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 984
- Further, s. J(l)(d)(iv) provided !hat the remedy available t•nder the Act was without prejudice to any other remedy available under any other law- Withdrawal of the suit was lhus, no bar to proceedings F under the Act - Himacha/ Pradesh Public Moneys (Recovery af Dues) Act, 2000 - State Finance Corporation Act, 1951 …
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 276 · [2017] 4 S.C.R. 934
Witness: F Eyewitnesses - Evidence of - Discrepancies in - Appreciation of - Held: Generally in criminal cases, discrepancies in the evidence of witness is bound to happen as there is considerable gap between the date of incident and the time of deposing evidence before Court - But, if these contradictions create serio…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 275 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 939
B ORDER 1. Petitioner No. I - Sheetal Shankar Salvi, has approached this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution oflndia seeking directions to the respondents to allow her to undergo medical termination of her c pregnancy. 2. By order dated 22.3.2017, while issuing notice to the respondents, this Court gave a direct…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 273 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 743
WITH Special Leave Petition( Civil) No. 26614of2014. Maninder Singh, ASG, Sachin Sharma,Amarjeet Singh, B. Krishna Prasad, Shreekant N. Terdal, Advs. for the Appellant.G Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv., Ramesh Singh, Ms. Anne Mathew, SumanJoyti Khaitan, T. S.Ahuja, VarunAhuja, D. K. Thakur,Devendra Jha, Debasis Misra, Advs. fo…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2017Full text
2017 INSC 272 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 631
HELD: 1.1 Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 applies to the case of female Hindus. It specifies the general D rules of succession and provides the categories of heirs on whom the property of a female Hindu would devolve on her death. Sub-section(!) sets out four categories of heirs specified in clauses (a) to…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis