⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
6,961–6,980 · Page 349 of 500
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 957 · [2017] 9 S.C.R. 743
3. Various provisions of the Code would indicate that there F are three stages. First stage is the filing of the application. The Registry of the adjudicating authority is supposed to scrutinise the same to find out as to whether it is complete in.all respects or there are certain defects. If it is complete, the same s…
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2017Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
6,961–6,980 · Page 349 of 500
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 957 · [2017] 9 S.C.R. 743
3. Various provisions of the Code would indicate that there F are three stages. First stage is the filing of the application. The Registry of the adjudicating authority is supposed to scrutinise the same to find out as to whether it is complete in.all respects or there are certain defects. If it is complete, the same s…
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 956 · [2017] 9 S.C.R. 706
[2017) 9 S.C.R. 706 A GANPAT SINGH v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (Criminal Appeal No. 630 of2009) B SEPTEMBER 19,2017 [N. V. RAMANA ANU DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ.f Penal Code, 1860 - s. 302 - Dead body found in a dry well - identified to be that of PW-4 '.~ mother - Appellant absconded c immediately aper the incident …
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 955 · [2017] 14 S.C.R. 519
[2017] 14 S.C.R. 519. RE- INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS A WITH I.A. No. 68248 of2017 · (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 406 of2013) B SEPTEMBER 15,2017 [MADAN B. LOKUR AND DEEPAK GUPTA, JJ,) Human Rights - Custodial death - Unnatural deaths in prisons - Remedial steps - Letter by (Retd.)Chitf Justice R. C. Lahoti highli…
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 954 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 682
- This power is to be exercised only for strong and valid reasons and it should be exercised with caution and circumspection - Recall E is not a matter of course and the discretion given to the court has to be exercised judicially to prevent failure of justice - The reasons for exercising this power should be spelt out…
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 95 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 546
From the Judgment and Order dated 18.03.201? of the High Court H of Calcutta in C. 0. No. 824 of2015. 546 BITHIKA MAZUMDAR AND ANR. v. SAGAR PAL AND ORS. 547 Bijan Kumar Ghosh, Ujjwal Banerjee, Asit Kumar Rari, Ms. Ratna A Banerjee, Mrs. Sarla Chandra, Advs. for the Appellants. · A.K. Raina, Binay Kumar Das, Advs. for …
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 945 · [2017] 10 S.C.R. 330
[2017] 10 S.C.R. 330 A STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. v. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 1699 of2007) B SEPTEMBER 15, 2017 [ARUN MISHRA AND MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, JJ.J Land Acquisition Act, 1894: C ss. 3(a) and 49 - Acquisition of part of building - Without acquiring land underneath such building - Whe…
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 94 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 594
Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv., Manoj C. Mishra, Hrishikesh Chitaley, B Advs. for the Appellant. Rauf Rahim, Mrs. Poulami Das Dey, Advs. for the Respondents. The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER c 1. Leave granted. · 2. This appeal has been filed by the landlord against the judgment and order of the High Court o…
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 914 · [2017] 12 S.C.R. 1058
H 1058 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI v. DHARMA 1059 PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. Partly allowing the appeal, the Court A HELD: Whether notice under Section 126 of the Act which was received on April 4, 1998 i.e. after March 31, 1997 would be invalid as beyond the period of limitation prescribed as per Section B126(2) and (4) …
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 913 · [2017] 9 S.C.R. 482
E Repeal - .New enactment after repeal - Applicability of General Clauses Act to the fresh enactment - Held: If the repeal is followed by a fresh enactment 011 the same subject, the applicability of the General Clauses Act would undoubtedly require a11 exami11atio11 of the language in the new enactment to see if it F e…
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 912 · [2017] 11 S.C.R. 591
Transit fee - Levy of on transit of forest produce - Marbles blocks, marble slabs, marble chips, if.forest produce and /eviability G of transit fee on the said goods - Held: Marbles blocks, marble slabs, marble chips are all forest produce - Transit Fee 011 marble slabs and tiles cannot be denied - State did not commit…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 911 · [2017] 9 S.C.R. 524
Sanjay Parikh, Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, Uday Manaktala, Rajan Mani, Advs. for the Appellant. H 524 RIMA TAIPODIA v. ARUNACHAL PRADESH PUBLIC · 525 SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS. Ginnyu J. Raotray. Ms.Kanchim Kaur Dhodi, Ms. Bhawna Pal, A Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi, Harish Pandey, Anil Shrivastav, Advs. for the Respondents. The Jud…
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 91 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 764
(2017] 2 S.C.R. 764 A NAJABHAI DESURBHAI WAGH v. VALERABHAI DEGANBHAI VAGH & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No. 2339 of2010) B FEBRUARYOl,2017 [S. A. BOBDE AND·L. NAGESWARA RAO, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: ss. 149 and 141 - Width and amplitude of - Unlawful c ass~mbly .:_ When - Accused persons attacked the appell;nt-complainani aft…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 909 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 938
Balraj Dewan, Adv. for the Appellant. Puneet Jain, Ms.Christi Jain, Priyal Jain, Ms.Pratibha Jain, Advs. for the Respondents. H 940 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 8 S.C.R. A The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KURIAN, J. I. Leave granted. 2. What is the period oflimitation for filing a suit or claim under The Fata…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 906 · [2017] 11 S.C.R. 713
WITH c C. A. Nos. 997-998 of 2009 Jayant Bhushan, V. Prakash, Sr. Advs. N. Subramaniyan, Pranav Sachdeva, Ms. Neha Rathi, Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Nikhil Nayyar, Eashwar. A. V. Rangam, Buddy A. Ranganadhan, K. V. Vijaykumar, Ms. Maitrcyee Mishra, P. Rajendran, Beno Banugar, Harsh Prabha (for Sanjay Kumar Viscn), R. Nedum~ra…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 905 · [2017] 14 S.C.R. 17
17 18 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 14 S.C.R. A no. I failed to prove that there was a change of ownership of the vessel in its favour on the date of arrest i.e. on 2.5.2000 - Judgment of High Court is set aside and the decree of trial court is restored -Constitution of India - Art. 372 - The Admiralty (Jurisdiction and…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 904 · [2017] 11 S.C.R. 1074
1074 KARPAGAM FACULTY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND 1075 RESEARCH v. U.0.1. AND ORS. appellant college for academic session 2017-18 as having being A made for academic session 2018-19 - For that purpose, MCI directed to conduct inspection of the appellant college and inform the appellant about the deficiencies - Appellant co…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 903 · [2017] 10 S.C.R. 1113
1113 1114 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] IO S.C.R. A submitted by t/ie petitioner-college for t/ie academic session 2017-18 as hal'ing been made for the academic session 2018-19 -Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999 - cl.8(3)( I )(d). Disposing of the writ petition and I.A., the Court HELD: 1. On a bare per…
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 902 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 675
DTC v. Ba/wan Singh in CA. No.7159 of 2014 dated F 19.11.2016; DTC v. Lillu Ram 2017 (11) SCALE 588-referred to. Case Law Reference 2017 (11) SCALE 588 referred to Para4 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No.12743 G of2017. From the Impugned Order dated 15.03.2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi…
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 901 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 904
Ambreesh Kumar Aggarwal, Ms. Surabhi Aggarwal, Advs. for the Appellant. Pallav Mongia, Pankaj Singh, Ms. Jasmine Damkewala, Ms. Nidhi, Advs.for the Respondents. D The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ASHOK BHUSHAN, J. I. This appeal has been filed against the judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court dated I 4.…
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 900 · [2017] 9 S.C.R. 512
Mathai M. Paikaday, Sr. Adv., Shishir Pinaki, Sanjay Jaih, Advs. for the Appellant. ' E. M. S. Anam, G. Prakash, Jishnu M. L., Ms. Priyanka Prakash, D Ms. Beena Prakash, Vijay Shankar V. L., Ranjith K. C. Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DEEPAK GUPTA, J. I. Respondent No.6, Manageme…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2017 INSC 956 · [2017] 9 S.C.R. 706
[2017) 9 S.C.R. 706 A GANPAT SINGH v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (Criminal Appeal No. 630 of2009) B SEPTEMBER 19,2017 [N. V. RAMANA ANU DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ.f Penal Code, 1860 - s. 302 - Dead body found in a dry well - identified to be that of PW-4 '.~ mother - Appellant absconded c immediately aper the incident …
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 955 · [2017] 14 S.C.R. 519
[2017] 14 S.C.R. 519. RE- INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS A WITH I.A. No. 68248 of2017 · (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 406 of2013) B SEPTEMBER 15,2017 [MADAN B. LOKUR AND DEEPAK GUPTA, JJ,) Human Rights - Custodial death - Unnatural deaths in prisons - Remedial steps - Letter by (Retd.)Chitf Justice R. C. Lahoti highli…
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 954 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 682
- This power is to be exercised only for strong and valid reasons and it should be exercised with caution and circumspection - Recall E is not a matter of course and the discretion given to the court has to be exercised judicially to prevent failure of justice - The reasons for exercising this power should be spelt out…
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 95 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 546
From the Judgment and Order dated 18.03.201? of the High Court H of Calcutta in C. 0. No. 824 of2015. 546 BITHIKA MAZUMDAR AND ANR. v. SAGAR PAL AND ORS. 547 Bijan Kumar Ghosh, Ujjwal Banerjee, Asit Kumar Rari, Ms. Ratna A Banerjee, Mrs. Sarla Chandra, Advs. for the Appellants. · A.K. Raina, Binay Kumar Das, Advs. for …
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 945 · [2017] 10 S.C.R. 330
[2017] 10 S.C.R. 330 A STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. v. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 1699 of2007) B SEPTEMBER 15, 2017 [ARUN MISHRA AND MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, JJ.J Land Acquisition Act, 1894: C ss. 3(a) and 49 - Acquisition of part of building - Without acquiring land underneath such building - Whe…
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 94 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 594
Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv., Manoj C. Mishra, Hrishikesh Chitaley, B Advs. for the Appellant. Rauf Rahim, Mrs. Poulami Das Dey, Advs. for the Respondents. The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER c 1. Leave granted. · 2. This appeal has been filed by the landlord against the judgment and order of the High Court o…
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 914 · [2017] 12 S.C.R. 1058
H 1058 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI v. DHARMA 1059 PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. Partly allowing the appeal, the Court A HELD: Whether notice under Section 126 of the Act which was received on April 4, 1998 i.e. after March 31, 1997 would be invalid as beyond the period of limitation prescribed as per Section B126(2) and (4) …
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 913 · [2017] 9 S.C.R. 482
E Repeal - .New enactment after repeal - Applicability of General Clauses Act to the fresh enactment - Held: If the repeal is followed by a fresh enactment 011 the same subject, the applicability of the General Clauses Act would undoubtedly require a11 exami11atio11 of the language in the new enactment to see if it F e…
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 912 · [2017] 11 S.C.R. 591
Transit fee - Levy of on transit of forest produce - Marbles blocks, marble slabs, marble chips, if.forest produce and /eviability G of transit fee on the said goods - Held: Marbles blocks, marble slabs, marble chips are all forest produce - Transit Fee 011 marble slabs and tiles cannot be denied - State did not commit…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 911 · [2017] 9 S.C.R. 524
Sanjay Parikh, Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, Uday Manaktala, Rajan Mani, Advs. for the Appellant. H 524 RIMA TAIPODIA v. ARUNACHAL PRADESH PUBLIC · 525 SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS. Ginnyu J. Raotray. Ms.Kanchim Kaur Dhodi, Ms. Bhawna Pal, A Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi, Harish Pandey, Anil Shrivastav, Advs. for the Respondents. The Jud…
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 91 · [2017] 2 S.C.R. 764
(2017] 2 S.C.R. 764 A NAJABHAI DESURBHAI WAGH v. VALERABHAI DEGANBHAI VAGH & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No. 2339 of2010) B FEBRUARYOl,2017 [S. A. BOBDE AND·L. NAGESWARA RAO, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: ss. 149 and 141 - Width and amplitude of - Unlawful c ass~mbly .:_ When - Accused persons attacked the appell;nt-complainani aft…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 909 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 938
Balraj Dewan, Adv. for the Appellant. Puneet Jain, Ms.Christi Jain, Priyal Jain, Ms.Pratibha Jain, Advs. for the Respondents. H 940 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 8 S.C.R. A The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KURIAN, J. I. Leave granted. 2. What is the period oflimitation for filing a suit or claim under The Fata…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 906 · [2017] 11 S.C.R. 713
WITH c C. A. Nos. 997-998 of 2009 Jayant Bhushan, V. Prakash, Sr. Advs. N. Subramaniyan, Pranav Sachdeva, Ms. Neha Rathi, Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Nikhil Nayyar, Eashwar. A. V. Rangam, Buddy A. Ranganadhan, K. V. Vijaykumar, Ms. Maitrcyee Mishra, P. Rajendran, Beno Banugar, Harsh Prabha (for Sanjay Kumar Viscn), R. Nedum~ra…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 905 · [2017] 14 S.C.R. 17
17 18 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 14 S.C.R. A no. I failed to prove that there was a change of ownership of the vessel in its favour on the date of arrest i.e. on 2.5.2000 - Judgment of High Court is set aside and the decree of trial court is restored -Constitution of India - Art. 372 - The Admiralty (Jurisdiction and…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 904 · [2017] 11 S.C.R. 1074
1074 KARPAGAM FACULTY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND 1075 RESEARCH v. U.0.1. AND ORS. appellant college for academic session 2017-18 as having being A made for academic session 2018-19 - For that purpose, MCI directed to conduct inspection of the appellant college and inform the appellant about the deficiencies - Appellant co…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 903 · [2017] 10 S.C.R. 1113
1113 1114 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] IO S.C.R. A submitted by t/ie petitioner-college for t/ie academic session 2017-18 as hal'ing been made for the academic session 2018-19 -Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999 - cl.8(3)( I )(d). Disposing of the writ petition and I.A., the Court HELD: 1. On a bare per…
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 902 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 675
DTC v. Ba/wan Singh in CA. No.7159 of 2014 dated F 19.11.2016; DTC v. Lillu Ram 2017 (11) SCALE 588-referred to. Case Law Reference 2017 (11) SCALE 588 referred to Para4 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No.12743 G of2017. From the Impugned Order dated 15.03.2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi…
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 901 · [2017] 8 S.C.R. 904
Ambreesh Kumar Aggarwal, Ms. Surabhi Aggarwal, Advs. for the Appellant. Pallav Mongia, Pankaj Singh, Ms. Jasmine Damkewala, Ms. Nidhi, Advs.for the Respondents. D The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ASHOK BHUSHAN, J. I. This appeal has been filed against the judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court dated I 4.…
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 900 · [2017] 9 S.C.R. 512
Mathai M. Paikaday, Sr. Adv., Shishir Pinaki, Sanjay Jaih, Advs. for the Appellant. ' E. M. S. Anam, G. Prakash, Jishnu M. L., Ms. Priyanka Prakash, D Ms. Beena Prakash, Vijay Shankar V. L., Ranjith K. C. Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DEEPAK GUPTA, J. I. Respondent No.6, Manageme…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis