Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
621–640 · Page 32 of 500
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 50 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 651
Whether the High Court was justified in quashing the Sanction Order and setting aside the proceedings arising therefrom, thereby allowing the petition filed by the accused.
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 499 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1320
Filicide or suicide is the vexing question in the instant case where a father was tried and convicted u/s.302 of the Penal Code, 1860 r/w. s.25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
621–640 · Page 32 of 500
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 50 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 651
Whether the High Court was justified in quashing the Sanction Order and setting aside the proceedings arising therefrom, thereby allowing the petition filed by the accused.
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 499 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1320
Filicide or suicide is the vexing question in the instant case where a father was tried and convicted u/s.302 of the Penal Code, 1860 r/w. s.25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959.
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 498 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 835
Issue arose whether an offence u/s.8(c) of the NDPS Act could be said to have been made out when an accused “deals with” psychotropic substances mentioned in the Schedule to the NDPS Act but not figuring in Schedule I of the Rules thereunder; whether the decision in Sanjeev V. Deshpande’s case must operate with prospective effect; and that once, charge has been framed by a competent court u/s.228 CrPC, can an accused thereafter seek for discharge/deletion of a particular offence from the charge u/s.216 CrPC.
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 496 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 816
Sub-rule (20) of Rule 17 of the Central Sales Tax (Rajasthan) Rules, 1957 provided that where any dealer had generated declaration forms or certificates by misrepresentation of fact or by fraud or in contravention of the provisions of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 [CST Act] and rules made thereunder, the assessing authority or any other authority authorised by the Commissioner after affording such dealer an opportunity of being heard, is empowered to cancel such declaration forms or certificates. By the impugned judgment, the High Court held that the first appellant-State had no rule-making
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 494 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 806
Issue arose whether recruitment advertisement issued by the Punjab Public Service Commission providing reservation for “ex-servicemen” would include personnel from the Indian Military Nursing Service.
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 493 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 627
The appellant’s petition u/s.482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking quashment of Criminal Case No. 7489 of 2002 pending on the file of Chief Judicial Magistrate for offences u/s.420 of the Penal Code, 1860 was dismissed by the High Court.
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 491 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 217
Issue arose as to whether the decision in State of H.P. v. Rajesh Chander Sood, upholding the cut-off date of 02.12.2004, is per incuriam; whether the aforesaid decision is binding on the petitioners; whether a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution is maintainable to directly or collaterally challenge a judgment of the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 490 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 94
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court and the trial court rejecting the application filed by the appellant u/Ord.VII r.11(a) and (d) CPC for the rejection of plaint.
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 49 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 649
Whether the appellant can be granted anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No 13 dated 14.02.2023, for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Penal Code, 1860.
Supreme Court of India14 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 486 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 625
Issue arose whether use of Urdu on a signboard of the building of Municipal Council in Maharashtra is violative of any provision of law.
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 484 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 616
Issue arose as regards the order passed by the High Court, rejecting the writ petition filed by the appellants u/Article 226 of the Constitution praying for the possession of property given for temporary occupation to police officials in 1940.
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 483 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 765
i) What are the parameters for determining whether a work or an article falls within the limitation set out in s.15(2) of the Copyright Act, thereby classifying it as a ‘design’ u/s.2(d) of the Designs Act; ii) Whether the High Court erred in setting aside the order of the Commercial Court and thus rejecting the application u/Or.VII, R.11 of the CPC.
Supreme Court of India14 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 482 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 522
Whether the High Court erred in passing various orders granting bail to accused persons in matters involving offences of serious nature of child trafficking.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 481 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 985
a. What courses of action are available to the Governor in exercise of his powers under Article 200 of the Constitution. b. Whether the Governor can reserve a Bill for the consideration of the President when it is presented to him for assent after being reconsidered in accordance with the first proviso to Article 200, more particularly, when he had not reserved it for the consideration of the President in the first instance. c. Whether there is an express constitutionally prescribed time limit within which the Governor is required to act in the exercise of his powers under Article 200 of the C
Supreme Court of India31 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 480 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 205
Whether the demolition of the appellants’ residential premises/ buildings by the Prayagraj Development Authority (PDA) purportedly done under Section 27 of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 was illegal.
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 48 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 403
Matter pertains to the enforceability of the ex-parte awards against the employer-State Government and the principal of the medical college, when the employer objected the authenticity of the arbitration agreement relied on by the employee.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 479 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 193
Matter involves the question of reservations of posts in the government services of the State of Punjab; including reservation for women for the post of DSP under the ‘SC Sports’ category.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 478 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 734
Whether the High Court was justified in remanding the matter to the trial Court for a fresh trial on the issue of limitation, despite the existence of concurrent findings, when section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 empowered the High Court to decide the matter.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 477 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 485
Matter pertains to the sustainability of orders passed by the High Court granting anticipatory bail to respondents accused of serious economic offences, and avoiding execution of summons or warrants, disobeying the orders of the Court.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 476 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 475
Matter pertains to disallowance of the input tax credit claimed by the dealer. Whether the assessing officer correctly held that the dealer is not entitled to input tax credit for the purchase tax paid by him on the sales turnover made in favour of the manufacturer- exporter.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 498 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 835
Issue arose whether an offence u/s.8(c) of the NDPS Act could be said to have been made out when an accused “deals with” psychotropic substances mentioned in the Schedule to the NDPS Act but not figuring in Schedule I of the Rules thereunder; whether the decision in Sanjeev V. Deshpande’s case must operate with prospective effect; and that once, charge has been framed by a competent court u/s.228 CrPC, can an accused thereafter seek for discharge/deletion of a particular offence from the charge u/s.216 CrPC.
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 496 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 816
Sub-rule (20) of Rule 17 of the Central Sales Tax (Rajasthan) Rules, 1957 provided that where any dealer had generated declaration forms or certificates by misrepresentation of fact or by fraud or in contravention of the provisions of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 [CST Act] and rules made thereunder, the assessing authority or any other authority authorised by the Commissioner after affording such dealer an opportunity of being heard, is empowered to cancel such declaration forms or certificates. By the impugned judgment, the High Court held that the first appellant-State had no rule-making
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 494 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 806
Issue arose whether recruitment advertisement issued by the Punjab Public Service Commission providing reservation for “ex-servicemen” would include personnel from the Indian Military Nursing Service.
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 493 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 627
The appellant’s petition u/s.482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking quashment of Criminal Case No. 7489 of 2002 pending on the file of Chief Judicial Magistrate for offences u/s.420 of the Penal Code, 1860 was dismissed by the High Court.
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 491 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 217
Issue arose as to whether the decision in State of H.P. v. Rajesh Chander Sood, upholding the cut-off date of 02.12.2004, is per incuriam; whether the aforesaid decision is binding on the petitioners; whether a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution is maintainable to directly or collaterally challenge a judgment of the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 490 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 94
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court and the trial court rejecting the application filed by the appellant u/Ord.VII r.11(a) and (d) CPC for the rejection of plaint.
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 49 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 649
Whether the appellant can be granted anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No 13 dated 14.02.2023, for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Penal Code, 1860.
Supreme Court of India14 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 486 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 625
Issue arose whether use of Urdu on a signboard of the building of Municipal Council in Maharashtra is violative of any provision of law.
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 484 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 616
Issue arose as regards the order passed by the High Court, rejecting the writ petition filed by the appellants u/Article 226 of the Constitution praying for the possession of property given for temporary occupation to police officials in 1940.
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 483 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 765
i) What are the parameters for determining whether a work or an article falls within the limitation set out in s.15(2) of the Copyright Act, thereby classifying it as a ‘design’ u/s.2(d) of the Designs Act; ii) Whether the High Court erred in setting aside the order of the Commercial Court and thus rejecting the application u/Or.VII, R.11 of the CPC.
Supreme Court of India14 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 482 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 522
Whether the High Court erred in passing various orders granting bail to accused persons in matters involving offences of serious nature of child trafficking.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 481 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 985
a. What courses of action are available to the Governor in exercise of his powers under Article 200 of the Constitution. b. Whether the Governor can reserve a Bill for the consideration of the President when it is presented to him for assent after being reconsidered in accordance with the first proviso to Article 200, more particularly, when he had not reserved it for the consideration of the President in the first instance. c. Whether there is an express constitutionally prescribed time limit within which the Governor is required to act in the exercise of his powers under Article 200 of the C
Supreme Court of India31 Mar 2025Full text
2025 INSC 480 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 205
Whether the demolition of the appellants’ residential premises/ buildings by the Prayagraj Development Authority (PDA) purportedly done under Section 27 of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 was illegal.
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 48 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 403
Matter pertains to the enforceability of the ex-parte awards against the employer-State Government and the principal of the medical college, when the employer objected the authenticity of the arbitration agreement relied on by the employee.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 479 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 193
Matter involves the question of reservations of posts in the government services of the State of Punjab; including reservation for women for the post of DSP under the ‘SC Sports’ category.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 478 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 734
Whether the High Court was justified in remanding the matter to the trial Court for a fresh trial on the issue of limitation, despite the existence of concurrent findings, when section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 empowered the High Court to decide the matter.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 477 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 485
Matter pertains to the sustainability of orders passed by the High Court granting anticipatory bail to respondents accused of serious economic offences, and avoiding execution of summons or warrants, disobeying the orders of the Court.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 476 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 475
Matter pertains to disallowance of the input tax credit claimed by the dealer. Whether the assessing officer correctly held that the dealer is not entitled to input tax credit for the purchase tax paid by him on the sales turnover made in favour of the manufacturer- exporter.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis