⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
6,121–6,140 · Page 307 of 500
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 100 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 548
application for eviction – On appeal, held: As per s.111(e) and (f) of the Transfer of property Act lease can be determined by express or implied surrender – The conditions of the sale agreement do not make out a case of express or implied surrender – Therefore, sale agreement did not result in termination of the tenan…
Supreme Court of India2 Jan 2019Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
6,121–6,140 · Page 307 of 500
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 100 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 548
application for eviction – On appeal, held: As per s.111(e) and (f) of the Transfer of property Act lease can be determined by express or implied surrender – The conditions of the sale agreement do not make out a case of express or implied surrender – Therefore, sale agreement did not result in termination of the tenan…
Supreme Court of India2 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 1
1 2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 1 S.C.R. A applied against such vacancies for a job while seeking re-employment in the services – This was, therefore, not a case of a retrenchment of the respondent from service as contemplated under s.25(H) of the ID Act. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – s.25(H) – Regularization and B …
Supreme Court of India27 Aug 2019Full text
2018 INSC 423 · [2019] 12 S.C.R. 607
However, it will be open for the respondent in the above cases to show, by adducing the necessary facts, that they are direct exporters as well and can therefore avail of the deduction available under Section 80HHC (1) read with (3). For this G purpose, these matters stand remanded to the Appellate Tribunal. [Paras 7, …
Supreme Court of India18 Sep 2019Full text
2018 INSC 1203 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 569
F(1)(a) in conformity with Art. 14, the words “..of the fact that he has attained majority..” is eliminated so that the intimation that is to be made by the landlord has to be made to tenants of all the three categories of landlords covered by the provision – Interpretation of statutes – Constitution of India – Art.14.…
Supreme Court of India5 Dec 2019Full text
2017 INSC 265 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 16
H 16 M/S BHUWALKA STEEL INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR. v. UNION 17 OF INDIA & ORS. With A Civil Appeal Nos. 7824, 7825 of 2014, S.L.P.(C) Nos. 16445 of 2010, 2014 of 2009, 34051 of 2017, T.C. (C) Nos. 20, 22, 23-24, 34 of 2010, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 of 2011, 106 of 2015, T.P. (C) Nos. 419, 691, 1200 of 2016, B Mrs. Nalini Chidambaram,…
Supreme Court of India8 May 2019Full text
2015 INSC 891 · [2019] 7 S.C.R. 400
Rainbow Industries (P) Ltd. v. CCE (1994) 6 SCC 563 : [1994] 4 Suppl. SCR 135 ; Balarpur Industries Ltd. v. Assistant Collector of Customs and Central Excise & Ors. (1995) Suppl. (3) SCC 429 ; Collector F of Central Excise, Baroda v. Cotspun Ltd. (1999) 7 SCC 633 : [1999] 3 Suppl. SCR 184 ; M/s. Eastland Combines, Coim…
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2019Full text
2014 INSC 623 · [2019] 12 S.C.R. 631
[2019] 12 S.C.R. 631 631 CHANDANA DAS (MALAKAR) A v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 2858 of 2007 etc.) SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 B [R. F. NARIMAN, R. SUBHASH REDDY AND SURYA KANT, JJ.] Service Law: Appointment – Of teachers – In minority institution – Not C approved by District Inspector of Schools on the g…
Supreme Court of India2019
(2019) 9 SCC 608
Distinction between false promise of marriage made dishonestly at inception (vitiating consent under Section 90 IPC) and bona fide breach of promise to marry. | Consent principles and false promise vs breach of promise applied to Section 63 BNS.
Supreme Court of India2019
(2020) 20 SCC 760
A party having an interest in the dispute or having authority to appoint sole arbitrator is disqualified from appointing arbitrator unilaterally.
Supreme Court of India2019
(2020) 13 SCC 337
Triple test for bail applied to Section 483 BNSS (special powers of High Court/Sessions Court).
Supreme Court of India2019
(2019) 4 SCC 163
Scope of interference under Section 37 is narrower than Section 34; appellate court cannot travel beyond grounds in Section 34 or reassess evidence.
Supreme Court of India2019
(2020) 8 SCC 531
Commercial wisdom of Committee of Creditors (CoC) is supreme; adjudicating authority cannot interfere with commercial decisions; operational creditors need not be paid equally to financial creditors.
Supreme Court of India2019
(2019) 4 SCC 197
Presumption under Section 139 applies even if blank cheque leaf was voluntarily signed and handed over by drawer; drawer liable unless debt disproved.
Supreme Court of India2019
(2019) 5 SCC 418
Principles governing rebuttal of presumption under Section 139; accused can rebut by relying on prosecution evidence or probabilities without stepping into witness box.
Supreme Court of India2018
(2018) 10 SCC 443
Restored police powers under Section 498A while directing strict compliance with Arnesh Kumar safeguards to balance protection of married women with prevention of abuse. | Cruelty provisions and safeguards against misuse applied to Section 85 BNS (corresponding to Section 498A IPC).
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2018Full text
[2018] 6 S.C.R. 962
WITH B C. A. No. 3345 of 2018. Naman Nagrath, Rajeev Dhawan, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Parag P. Tripathi, Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sanjay R. Hegde, Sr. Advs., Purushaindra Kaurav, A.G., Harsh Parashar, Zubin Prasad, Aman Pandey, Prateek Khandelwal, Shadan Farasat, Arjun Garg, Prashant C Kumar, Saurabh Suman Sinha, Aditya De…
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2018Full text
[2018] 6 S.C.R. 683
H 683 684 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 6 S.C.R. A Naman Nagrath, Rajeev Dhawan, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Parag P. Tripathi, Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sanjay R. Hegde, Sr. Advs., Purushaindra Kaurav, AG, Harsh Parashar, Zubin Prasad, Aman Pandey, Prateek Khandelwal, Shadan Farasat, Arjun Garg, Prashant Kumar, Saurabh Suman S…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2018Full text
[2018] 4 S.C.R. 955
fundamental right under Arts.19 and 21 of the Constitution, if the said choice does not transgress any valid legal framework – Once that aspect is clear, the enquiry and determination have to come to an end – In a writ of habeas corpus, especially in the instant case, it was absolutely unnecessary to reflect upon the s…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
[2018] 3 S.C.R. 65
of the seniority indicated in the office order – Justice Jawad Rahim to discharge the duties of Chairperson for all purposes, until a regular appointment of a new Chairperson is made – This would be in the nature of an interim arrangement. CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (Civil) F No. 1235 of 2017. Under Ar…
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2018Full text
[2018] 14 S.C.R. 1
F James P. Thomas, Adv. for the Appellant. C. K. Sasi, Adv. for the Respondent. The following Order of the Court was passed : O R D E R G 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 28.06.2017 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulum in Criminal Appeal No.1580 of 2011 …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2019 INSC 1 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 1
1 2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 1 S.C.R. A applied against such vacancies for a job while seeking re-employment in the services – This was, therefore, not a case of a retrenchment of the respondent from service as contemplated under s.25(H) of the ID Act. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – s.25(H) – Regularization and B …
Supreme Court of India27 Aug 2019Full text
2018 INSC 423 · [2019] 12 S.C.R. 607
However, it will be open for the respondent in the above cases to show, by adducing the necessary facts, that they are direct exporters as well and can therefore avail of the deduction available under Section 80HHC (1) read with (3). For this G purpose, these matters stand remanded to the Appellate Tribunal. [Paras 7, …
Supreme Court of India18 Sep 2019Full text
2018 INSC 1203 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 569
F(1)(a) in conformity with Art. 14, the words “..of the fact that he has attained majority..” is eliminated so that the intimation that is to be made by the landlord has to be made to tenants of all the three categories of landlords covered by the provision – Interpretation of statutes – Constitution of India – Art.14.…
Supreme Court of India5 Dec 2019Full text
2017 INSC 265 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 16
H 16 M/S BHUWALKA STEEL INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR. v. UNION 17 OF INDIA & ORS. With A Civil Appeal Nos. 7824, 7825 of 2014, S.L.P.(C) Nos. 16445 of 2010, 2014 of 2009, 34051 of 2017, T.C. (C) Nos. 20, 22, 23-24, 34 of 2010, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 of 2011, 106 of 2015, T.P. (C) Nos. 419, 691, 1200 of 2016, B Mrs. Nalini Chidambaram,…
Supreme Court of India8 May 2019Full text
2015 INSC 891 · [2019] 7 S.C.R. 400
Rainbow Industries (P) Ltd. v. CCE (1994) 6 SCC 563 : [1994] 4 Suppl. SCR 135 ; Balarpur Industries Ltd. v. Assistant Collector of Customs and Central Excise & Ors. (1995) Suppl. (3) SCC 429 ; Collector F of Central Excise, Baroda v. Cotspun Ltd. (1999) 7 SCC 633 : [1999] 3 Suppl. SCR 184 ; M/s. Eastland Combines, Coim…
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2019Full text
2014 INSC 623 · [2019] 12 S.C.R. 631
[2019] 12 S.C.R. 631 631 CHANDANA DAS (MALAKAR) A v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 2858 of 2007 etc.) SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 B [R. F. NARIMAN, R. SUBHASH REDDY AND SURYA KANT, JJ.] Service Law: Appointment – Of teachers – In minority institution – Not C approved by District Inspector of Schools on the g…
Supreme Court of India2019
(2019) 9 SCC 608
Distinction between false promise of marriage made dishonestly at inception (vitiating consent under Section 90 IPC) and bona fide breach of promise to marry. | Consent principles and false promise vs breach of promise applied to Section 63 BNS.
Supreme Court of India2019
(2020) 20 SCC 760
A party having an interest in the dispute or having authority to appoint sole arbitrator is disqualified from appointing arbitrator unilaterally.
Supreme Court of India2019
(2020) 13 SCC 337
Triple test for bail applied to Section 483 BNSS (special powers of High Court/Sessions Court).
Supreme Court of India2019
(2019) 4 SCC 163
Scope of interference under Section 37 is narrower than Section 34; appellate court cannot travel beyond grounds in Section 34 or reassess evidence.
Supreme Court of India2019
(2020) 8 SCC 531
Commercial wisdom of Committee of Creditors (CoC) is supreme; adjudicating authority cannot interfere with commercial decisions; operational creditors need not be paid equally to financial creditors.
Supreme Court of India2019
(2019) 4 SCC 197
Presumption under Section 139 applies even if blank cheque leaf was voluntarily signed and handed over by drawer; drawer liable unless debt disproved.
Supreme Court of India2019
(2019) 5 SCC 418
Principles governing rebuttal of presumption under Section 139; accused can rebut by relying on prosecution evidence or probabilities without stepping into witness box.
Supreme Court of India2018
(2018) 10 SCC 443
Restored police powers under Section 498A while directing strict compliance with Arnesh Kumar safeguards to balance protection of married women with prevention of abuse. | Cruelty provisions and safeguards against misuse applied to Section 85 BNS (corresponding to Section 498A IPC).
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2018Full text
[2018] 6 S.C.R. 962
WITH B C. A. No. 3345 of 2018. Naman Nagrath, Rajeev Dhawan, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Parag P. Tripathi, Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sanjay R. Hegde, Sr. Advs., Purushaindra Kaurav, A.G., Harsh Parashar, Zubin Prasad, Aman Pandey, Prateek Khandelwal, Shadan Farasat, Arjun Garg, Prashant C Kumar, Saurabh Suman Sinha, Aditya De…
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2018Full text
[2018] 6 S.C.R. 683
H 683 684 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 6 S.C.R. A Naman Nagrath, Rajeev Dhawan, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Parag P. Tripathi, Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sanjay R. Hegde, Sr. Advs., Purushaindra Kaurav, AG, Harsh Parashar, Zubin Prasad, Aman Pandey, Prateek Khandelwal, Shadan Farasat, Arjun Garg, Prashant Kumar, Saurabh Suman S…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2018Full text
[2018] 4 S.C.R. 955
fundamental right under Arts.19 and 21 of the Constitution, if the said choice does not transgress any valid legal framework – Once that aspect is clear, the enquiry and determination have to come to an end – In a writ of habeas corpus, especially in the instant case, it was absolutely unnecessary to reflect upon the s…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
[2018] 3 S.C.R. 65
of the seniority indicated in the office order – Justice Jawad Rahim to discharge the duties of Chairperson for all purposes, until a regular appointment of a new Chairperson is made – This would be in the nature of an interim arrangement. CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (Civil) F No. 1235 of 2017. Under Ar…
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2018Full text
[2018] 14 S.C.R. 1
F James P. Thomas, Adv. for the Appellant. C. K. Sasi, Adv. for the Respondent. The following Order of the Court was passed : O R D E R G 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 28.06.2017 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulum in Criminal Appeal No.1580 of 2011 …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis