⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,661–5,680 · Page 284 of 500
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 292 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 1078
With Criminal Appeal No. 1805 of 2011. Santosh Mishra, Manish Kumar, Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay, Ms. Aparajita Singh, T. Mahipal, Advs. for the Appellant. H 1080 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 3 S.C.R. A P. K. Dey, A. K. Srivastava, Arvind Kumar Sharma, Ashok Kumar Srivastava, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Cou…
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 291 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 54
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,661–5,680 · Page 284 of 500
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 292 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 1078
With Criminal Appeal No. 1805 of 2011. Santosh Mishra, Manish Kumar, Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay, Ms. Aparajita Singh, T. Mahipal, Advs. for the Appellant. H 1080 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 3 S.C.R. A P. K. Dey, A. K. Srivastava, Arvind Kumar Sharma, Ashok Kumar Srivastava, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Cou…
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 291 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 54
Referring the matter to larger Bench, the Court HELD: 1. Contention of the appellant is that mere proof of receipt of money by the accused in the absence of proof of demand of illegal gratification is not sufficient to prove the guilt of the G accused. It was contended that when the complainant passed away, primary evi…
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 290 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 465
VIDYA DROLIA & ORS. v. DURGA TRADING CORPORATION 467 Property Act situation between a landlord and tenant is very far A removed from the situation in either Natraj Studios or in Booz Allen. Therefore, the question involved in a Transfer of Property Act situation cannot possibly be said to have been answered by the two …
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 29 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 168
Evidence: E Circumstantial evidence – Evidentiary value – Held: While scrutinising the circumstantial evidence, a court has to evaluate it to ensure that the chain of events is established clearly and completely to rule out any reasonable likelihood of innocence of the accused. F Extra-judicial confession Evidentiary v…
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 289 · [2019] 18 S.C.R. 898
898 SUPREME COURT[2019]REPORTS18 S.C.R. 898 [2019] 18 S.C.R. A ADJUDICATING OFFICER, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA v. BHAVESH PABARI B (Civil Appeal No.11311 of 2013) FEBRUARY 28, 2019 [RANJAN GOGOI, CJI, DEEPAK GUPTA AND SANJIV KHANNA, JJ.] Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 – s.15-J, C Cl. (a),…
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 288 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 275
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMNR. (II) W. B. v. 277 VIVEKANANDA VIDYAMANDIR & ORS. employees. There is no occasion to interfere with the concurrent A conclusions of facts. [Para 14][287-F-F, 288-A-B] Bridge and Roof Co. (India) Ltd. v. Union of India [1963] 3 SCR 978 - relied on. Muir Mills Co. Ltd., Kanpur v. Its Workme…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 287 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 469
[2019] 4 S.C.R. 469 469 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY A v. VIRENDER LAL BAHRI & ORS. (SLP (C ) No. 37375 of 2016) FEBRUARY 27, 2019 B [R. F. NARIMAN AND VINEET SARAN, JJ.] Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: s. 24 Proviso – Whether the proviso governs…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 286 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 885
plus interest thereon – Tribunal held that the principal amount to be paid back to the respondent by the appellant would be Rs.84,74,087/- with 9% interest thereon after deducting Rs.25,83,181/- (12% liquidated damages) from Rs. 1,10,57,268/- – On appeal, held: Instant case is covered by s. 74 – Tribunal rightly held t…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 285 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 868
F Judgments/Orders – Reasoned/Speaking order – Every order/judgment, which decides the lis between the parties, must contain the reasons/grounds for arriving at a particular conclusion – In order to decide as to whether the impugned order is legally sustainable or not, the Appellate Court is entitled to know as to what…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 284 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 875
IPC – In the dying declaration, deceased had only mentioned the name of her sister-in-law and she had not mentioned the names of others – Even the charge sheet for the offence punishable under s.302 IPC was filed only against her sister-in-law – For summoning an accused under s.319, it requires much stronger evidence t…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 283 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 47
– The gift deed was correctly interpreted by the trial court and the First Appellate Court – Further, order of mutation also only refers to the valuation of the property – There was nothing to indicate that the said amount of Rs.5000/- was paid as consideration to the donor – Thus, Judgment of the High Court set aside.…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 282 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 273
273 274 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 4 S.C.R. A common golden thread of commonality running through them – Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972 – s.30. Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972: s.4 – Whether having regard to the mandate of s.4 of the Antiquities Act, the prosecution under ss.132/135 of the Customs Ac…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 280 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 749
– s.6(1-A). Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987: s.3 – Mere possession of walky-talkies per se would not be an offence E under TADA – In the instant case, sanction order in respect of respondent no.3 showed that there was nothing to indicate as to whether the sanctioning authority was conscious o…
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 28 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 94
94 STATE OF UTTARAKHAND v. RAJ KUMAR 95 dispute in place of Rs.30,000/- awarded by the Labour Court. A [Paras 12, 13 and 15][98-C-D, G] Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. Bhurumal (2014) 7 SCC 177 : [2013] 16 SCR 1023; District Development Officer and Anr. v. Satish Kantilal Amerelia (2018) 12 SCC 298 : [2017] 12 SCR 414 …
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 279 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 899
[2019] 4 S.C.R. 899 899 SHRI RAM MANDIR INDORE A v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 5043 of 2009) FEBRUARY 27, 2019 B [R. BANUMATHI AND R. SUBHASH REDDY, JJ.] Trusts and Charities: Shri Ram Mandir, Indoukh – Nature of – Mandir, a public temple or a private temple – Held: Shri Ram Mandir, Indoukh is…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 278 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 485
Disposing of the appeals and the writ petition, the Court G HELD: 1.1 On 26.2.2010, Government of India sent its clarification to the Government of Maharashtra regarding the use of extrusion technology and as to mandatory specifications laid down in the recipe dated 28.7.2009. It was clarified by the Government of Indi…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 277 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 732
From the Judgment and Order dated 23.03.2015 of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in C.R.P. (NPD) No. 1261 of 2006 R. Anand Padmanabhan, Romil Pathak, Prawal Chaturvedi, Ms. Nishaka Tyagi, Aravind C. and Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Advs for the appearing parties. E The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. F. NARIMA…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 274 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 739
H 739 740 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 2 S.C.R. A CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal Nos. 2285-2330 of 2019. From the Judgment and Order dated 07.09.2017 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal Nos. 382, 447, 879, 881, 648, 649, 650, 651, 982, 1145, 1146, 1147, 1315, 7…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 272 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 915
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The controversy in the instant case related to Gthe classification of services rendered by the respondents. It is not in dispute that if the show cause notices culminate into an order, the appeal would lie to this Court. If any finding is recorded by this Court at this stage, sam…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 270 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 400
documentary or otherwise – In the facts of the present case, the statement made in the anticipatory bail application cannot be tested against unimpeachable evidence as evidence has not yet been led – High Court has not scrutinised any evidence as there was none to scrutinise – All that the High Court has seen is a prel…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Referring the matter to larger Bench, the Court HELD: 1. Contention of the appellant is that mere proof of receipt of money by the accused in the absence of proof of demand of illegal gratification is not sufficient to prove the guilt of the G accused. It was contended that when the complainant passed away, primary evi…
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 290 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 465
VIDYA DROLIA & ORS. v. DURGA TRADING CORPORATION 467 Property Act situation between a landlord and tenant is very far A removed from the situation in either Natraj Studios or in Booz Allen. Therefore, the question involved in a Transfer of Property Act situation cannot possibly be said to have been answered by the two …
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 29 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 168
Evidence: E Circumstantial evidence – Evidentiary value – Held: While scrutinising the circumstantial evidence, a court has to evaluate it to ensure that the chain of events is established clearly and completely to rule out any reasonable likelihood of innocence of the accused. F Extra-judicial confession Evidentiary v…
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 289 · [2019] 18 S.C.R. 898
898 SUPREME COURT[2019]REPORTS18 S.C.R. 898 [2019] 18 S.C.R. A ADJUDICATING OFFICER, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA v. BHAVESH PABARI B (Civil Appeal No.11311 of 2013) FEBRUARY 28, 2019 [RANJAN GOGOI, CJI, DEEPAK GUPTA AND SANJIV KHANNA, JJ.] Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 – s.15-J, C Cl. (a),…
Supreme Court of India28 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 288 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 275
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMNR. (II) W. B. v. 277 VIVEKANANDA VIDYAMANDIR & ORS. employees. There is no occasion to interfere with the concurrent A conclusions of facts. [Para 14][287-F-F, 288-A-B] Bridge and Roof Co. (India) Ltd. v. Union of India [1963] 3 SCR 978 - relied on. Muir Mills Co. Ltd., Kanpur v. Its Workme…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 287 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 469
[2019] 4 S.C.R. 469 469 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY A v. VIRENDER LAL BAHRI & ORS. (SLP (C ) No. 37375 of 2016) FEBRUARY 27, 2019 B [R. F. NARIMAN AND VINEET SARAN, JJ.] Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: s. 24 Proviso – Whether the proviso governs…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 286 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 885
plus interest thereon – Tribunal held that the principal amount to be paid back to the respondent by the appellant would be Rs.84,74,087/- with 9% interest thereon after deducting Rs.25,83,181/- (12% liquidated damages) from Rs. 1,10,57,268/- – On appeal, held: Instant case is covered by s. 74 – Tribunal rightly held t…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 285 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 868
F Judgments/Orders – Reasoned/Speaking order – Every order/judgment, which decides the lis between the parties, must contain the reasons/grounds for arriving at a particular conclusion – In order to decide as to whether the impugned order is legally sustainable or not, the Appellate Court is entitled to know as to what…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 284 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 875
IPC – In the dying declaration, deceased had only mentioned the name of her sister-in-law and she had not mentioned the names of others – Even the charge sheet for the offence punishable under s.302 IPC was filed only against her sister-in-law – For summoning an accused under s.319, it requires much stronger evidence t…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 283 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 47
– The gift deed was correctly interpreted by the trial court and the First Appellate Court – Further, order of mutation also only refers to the valuation of the property – There was nothing to indicate that the said amount of Rs.5000/- was paid as consideration to the donor – Thus, Judgment of the High Court set aside.…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 282 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 273
273 274 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 4 S.C.R. A common golden thread of commonality running through them – Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972 – s.30. Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972: s.4 – Whether having regard to the mandate of s.4 of the Antiquities Act, the prosecution under ss.132/135 of the Customs Ac…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 280 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 749
– s.6(1-A). Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987: s.3 – Mere possession of walky-talkies per se would not be an offence E under TADA – In the instant case, sanction order in respect of respondent no.3 showed that there was nothing to indicate as to whether the sanctioning authority was conscious o…
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 28 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 94
94 STATE OF UTTARAKHAND v. RAJ KUMAR 95 dispute in place of Rs.30,000/- awarded by the Labour Court. A [Paras 12, 13 and 15][98-C-D, G] Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. Bhurumal (2014) 7 SCC 177 : [2013] 16 SCR 1023; District Development Officer and Anr. v. Satish Kantilal Amerelia (2018) 12 SCC 298 : [2017] 12 SCR 414 …
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 279 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 899
[2019] 4 S.C.R. 899 899 SHRI RAM MANDIR INDORE A v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 5043 of 2009) FEBRUARY 27, 2019 B [R. BANUMATHI AND R. SUBHASH REDDY, JJ.] Trusts and Charities: Shri Ram Mandir, Indoukh – Nature of – Mandir, a public temple or a private temple – Held: Shri Ram Mandir, Indoukh is…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 278 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 485
Disposing of the appeals and the writ petition, the Court G HELD: 1.1 On 26.2.2010, Government of India sent its clarification to the Government of Maharashtra regarding the use of extrusion technology and as to mandatory specifications laid down in the recipe dated 28.7.2009. It was clarified by the Government of Indi…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 277 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 732
From the Judgment and Order dated 23.03.2015 of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in C.R.P. (NPD) No. 1261 of 2006 R. Anand Padmanabhan, Romil Pathak, Prawal Chaturvedi, Ms. Nishaka Tyagi, Aravind C. and Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Advs for the appearing parties. E The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. F. NARIMA…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 274 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 739
H 739 740 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 2 S.C.R. A CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal Nos. 2285-2330 of 2019. From the Judgment and Order dated 07.09.2017 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal Nos. 382, 447, 879, 881, 648, 649, 650, 651, 982, 1145, 1146, 1147, 1315, 7…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 272 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 915
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The controversy in the instant case related to Gthe classification of services rendered by the respondents. It is not in dispute that if the show cause notices culminate into an order, the appeal would lie to this Court. If any finding is recorded by this Court at this stage, sam…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 270 · [2019] 3 S.C.R. 400
documentary or otherwise – In the facts of the present case, the statement made in the anticipatory bail application cannot be tested against unimpeachable evidence as evidence has not yet been led – High Court has not scrutinised any evidence as there was none to scrutinise – All that the High Court has seen is a prel…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis