⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
461–480 · Page 24 of 500
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 709 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 202
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court upholding the interim custody arrangement made by the family court.
Supreme Court of India15 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 708 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 773
Whether the appellant is a ‘land grabber’ under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
461–480 · Page 24 of 500
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 709 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 202
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court upholding the interim custody arrangement made by the family court.
Supreme Court of India15 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 708 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 773
Whether the appellant is a ‘land grabber’ under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982.
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 704 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 499
Issue arose whether Uttar Pradesh Police Recruitment and Promotion Board was bound to accept the OBC certificates submitted by aspirants which, admittedly, were not in the format prescribed in the recruitment notification.
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 703 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 471
Whether the benefit of the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 can be granted to the appellants; if the answer to the aforesaid issue is in the negative, can the reduced sentence that the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Act envisages be imposed on the appellants instead.
Supreme Court of India6 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 702 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 513
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court upholding the conviction and death sentence of the appellant for causing rape and murder of a child aged 3 years and 9 months.
Supreme Court of India15 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 701 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1382
Issue arose whether the subject land is a Forest Land; whether the Divisional Commissioner was justified in recommending the allotment of subject land in favour of C family and as to whether the State Government was justified in accepting the said recommendation; whether the doctrine of desuetude and the doctrine of public trust would be applicable to the facts of the case; whether the Housing Society could be said to be bona fide purchaser of the subject land; and whether the Housing Society would be entitled to allotment of alternate piece of land.
Supreme Court of India15 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 700 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2014
The issues raised in the present case relates to: (i) the eligibility of a receiver for Sri Giriraj Temple, Govardhan, Mathura; (ii) temples facing severe administrative issues of crowd management.
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 70 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 414
Whether the High Court was justified in interfering with the order granting promotion to the appellant to the post of Associate Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Education Service, Health and Family Welfare Department, Kerala on 06.02.2013.
Supreme Court of India15 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 699 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2106
Issue arose whether the Division Bench of High Court was justified setting aside the directions related to pendente lite interest, holding that it was not open for the arbitral tribunal to have carved out three periods for payment of interest: pre-reference, pendente lite and future.
Supreme Court of India15 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 698 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2534
1. Whether an arbitral award rendered under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter “Act, 1996”), where the arbitration proceedings ought to have been governed by the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 (hereinafter “MP Act, 1983”), can be set aside solely on the ground of lack of jurisdiction, even when no such plea was raised before the arbitral tribunal in terms of Section 16(2) of the Act, 1996? 2. Whether the decision of this Court in M.P. Road Development Authority & Anr v. L.G. Chaudhary Engineers & Contractors reported in (2018) 10 SCC 826 can be said to be per i
Supreme Court of India15 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 697 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2062
(i) Whether the CERC, while exercising its functions u/s.79(1) of the Electricity Act, 2003, is circumscribed by statutory regulations enacted u/s.178 of the Act, 2003; (ii) Whether the CERC exercises regulatory or adjudicatory functions u/s.79 of the Act, 2003. In other words, what is the scope of the CERC’s power to regulate inter-state transmission of electricity and determine tariff for the same under clauses (c) and (d) of s.79(1); (iii) Whether the grant of compensation by the CERC for the delay vide the orders dated 21.01.2020 and 27.01.2020 respectively, is a regulatory or adjudicatory
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 696 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 431
Issue arose whether, due to non-compliance with s.12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, a suit should be dismissed u/Ord. VII r.11 CPC, or whether it should be kept in abeyance, directing the parties to first explore the possibility of settlement by instituting mediation; and whether the High Court erred in passing the impugned order, keeping the suit in abeyance and sending the parties to mediation as per the PIMS Rules and the 2020 SOP.
Supreme Court of India15 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 695 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1047
Matter pertains to suo moto cognizance taken by this Court in child rape cases; and directions to Union and States Government to set up Special POCSO Courts on top priority, and timeline compliances.
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 694 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 252
Whether the Secured creditors would have priority of interest over the assets attached under the Provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, (PMLA) and Maharashtra Protection of Investors and Depositors Act, 1999 (MPID Act), by virtue of the provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002 and RDB Act, 1993; whether the properties of the Judgment Debtors and Garnishees attached under the Provisions of MPID Act, 1999 would be available for the execution of the decrees against Judgment Debtors in view of the Provision of Moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC, 2016.
Supreme Court of India13 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 691 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 240
Matter pertains to whether clause 11(k) of the appointment letter that employee to work for minimum three years and in default to pay Rs 2 lakhs as liquidated damages on leaving employment amounts to restraint of trade u/s.27 of the Contract Act and/or opposed to public policy; and the correctness of order passed by the High Court quashing clause 11(k) of the appointment letter and thus, directing the bank to refund the said sum to the respondent-employee.
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 69 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 772
Whether an amendment to a plaint introducing a fresh cause of action can be allowed if it arises out of continuous transactions and does not alter the nature and character of the suit; whether the bar under Section 80 of the CPC applies to an amendment application in a pending suit.
Supreme Court of India13 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 689 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 422
In a case covered under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (Development) Act, 2006, whether the High Court erred in holding that the Delhi Arbitration Centre lacked jurisdiction to conduct arbitral proceedings on the ground that the contract between the appellant- supplier (located in Delhi) and the respondent (based in Bengaluru) provided that the seat for arbitration shall be at Bengaluru.
Supreme Court of India22 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 688 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2553
Issue arose whether the Chairman of Managing Committee which runs the school can be punished for offence of cruelty to the child u/s.75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act.
Supreme Court of India9 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 687 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1199
Can a trademark infringement suit be referred to arbitration if the defendant questions its maintainability on the ground of existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties and seeks a reference under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Act”).
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 686 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2558
Matter pertains to the extension of benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 to the appellant for causing a road accident, resulting in the death of the pedestrian.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 704 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 499
Issue arose whether Uttar Pradesh Police Recruitment and Promotion Board was bound to accept the OBC certificates submitted by aspirants which, admittedly, were not in the format prescribed in the recruitment notification.
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 703 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 471
Whether the benefit of the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 can be granted to the appellants; if the answer to the aforesaid issue is in the negative, can the reduced sentence that the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Act envisages be imposed on the appellants instead.
Supreme Court of India6 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 702 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 513
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court upholding the conviction and death sentence of the appellant for causing rape and murder of a child aged 3 years and 9 months.
Supreme Court of India15 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 701 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1382
Issue arose whether the subject land is a Forest Land; whether the Divisional Commissioner was justified in recommending the allotment of subject land in favour of C family and as to whether the State Government was justified in accepting the said recommendation; whether the doctrine of desuetude and the doctrine of public trust would be applicable to the facts of the case; whether the Housing Society could be said to be bona fide purchaser of the subject land; and whether the Housing Society would be entitled to allotment of alternate piece of land.
Supreme Court of India15 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 700 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2014
The issues raised in the present case relates to: (i) the eligibility of a receiver for Sri Giriraj Temple, Govardhan, Mathura; (ii) temples facing severe administrative issues of crowd management.
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 70 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 414
Whether the High Court was justified in interfering with the order granting promotion to the appellant to the post of Associate Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Education Service, Health and Family Welfare Department, Kerala on 06.02.2013.
Supreme Court of India15 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 699 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2106
Issue arose whether the Division Bench of High Court was justified setting aside the directions related to pendente lite interest, holding that it was not open for the arbitral tribunal to have carved out three periods for payment of interest: pre-reference, pendente lite and future.
Supreme Court of India15 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 698 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2534
1. Whether an arbitral award rendered under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter “Act, 1996”), where the arbitration proceedings ought to have been governed by the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 (hereinafter “MP Act, 1983”), can be set aside solely on the ground of lack of jurisdiction, even when no such plea was raised before the arbitral tribunal in terms of Section 16(2) of the Act, 1996? 2. Whether the decision of this Court in M.P. Road Development Authority & Anr v. L.G. Chaudhary Engineers & Contractors reported in (2018) 10 SCC 826 can be said to be per i
Supreme Court of India15 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 697 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2062
(i) Whether the CERC, while exercising its functions u/s.79(1) of the Electricity Act, 2003, is circumscribed by statutory regulations enacted u/s.178 of the Act, 2003; (ii) Whether the CERC exercises regulatory or adjudicatory functions u/s.79 of the Act, 2003. In other words, what is the scope of the CERC’s power to regulate inter-state transmission of electricity and determine tariff for the same under clauses (c) and (d) of s.79(1); (iii) Whether the grant of compensation by the CERC for the delay vide the orders dated 21.01.2020 and 27.01.2020 respectively, is a regulatory or adjudicatory
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 696 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 431
Issue arose whether, due to non-compliance with s.12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, a suit should be dismissed u/Ord. VII r.11 CPC, or whether it should be kept in abeyance, directing the parties to first explore the possibility of settlement by instituting mediation; and whether the High Court erred in passing the impugned order, keeping the suit in abeyance and sending the parties to mediation as per the PIMS Rules and the 2020 SOP.
Supreme Court of India15 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 695 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1047
Matter pertains to suo moto cognizance taken by this Court in child rape cases; and directions to Union and States Government to set up Special POCSO Courts on top priority, and timeline compliances.
Supreme Court of India14 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 694 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 252
Whether the Secured creditors would have priority of interest over the assets attached under the Provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, (PMLA) and Maharashtra Protection of Investors and Depositors Act, 1999 (MPID Act), by virtue of the provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002 and RDB Act, 1993; whether the properties of the Judgment Debtors and Garnishees attached under the Provisions of MPID Act, 1999 would be available for the execution of the decrees against Judgment Debtors in view of the Provision of Moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC, 2016.
Supreme Court of India13 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 691 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 240
Matter pertains to whether clause 11(k) of the appointment letter that employee to work for minimum three years and in default to pay Rs 2 lakhs as liquidated damages on leaving employment amounts to restraint of trade u/s.27 of the Contract Act and/or opposed to public policy; and the correctness of order passed by the High Court quashing clause 11(k) of the appointment letter and thus, directing the bank to refund the said sum to the respondent-employee.
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 69 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 772
Whether an amendment to a plaint introducing a fresh cause of action can be allowed if it arises out of continuous transactions and does not alter the nature and character of the suit; whether the bar under Section 80 of the CPC applies to an amendment application in a pending suit.
Supreme Court of India13 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 689 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 422
In a case covered under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (Development) Act, 2006, whether the High Court erred in holding that the Delhi Arbitration Centre lacked jurisdiction to conduct arbitral proceedings on the ground that the contract between the appellant- supplier (located in Delhi) and the respondent (based in Bengaluru) provided that the seat for arbitration shall be at Bengaluru.
Supreme Court of India22 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 688 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2553
Issue arose whether the Chairman of Managing Committee which runs the school can be punished for offence of cruelty to the child u/s.75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act.
Supreme Court of India9 May 2025Full text
2025 INSC 687 · [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1199
Can a trademark infringement suit be referred to arbitration if the defendant questions its maintainability on the ground of existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties and seeks a reference under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Act”).
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2025Full text
2025 INSC 686 · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2558
Matter pertains to the extension of benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 to the appellant for causing a road accident, resulting in the death of the pedestrian.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis