Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,041–4,060 · Page 203 of 500
Supreme Court of India8 Feb 2021Full text
2021 INSC 66 · [2021] 1 S.C.R. 858
Service Law – Departmental enquiry – Findings recorded by F Enquiry Officer – Punishment order passed by disciplinary authority – Recording of reasons – Held: If the disciplinary authority accepts the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer and passes an order, no detailed reasons are required to be recorded in the or…
Supreme Court of India22 Oct 2021Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,041–4,060 · Page 203 of 500
Supreme Court of India8 Feb 2021Full text
2021 INSC 66 · [2021] 1 S.C.R. 858
Service Law – Departmental enquiry – Findings recorded by F Enquiry Officer – Punishment order passed by disciplinary authority – Recording of reasons – Held: If the disciplinary authority accepts the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer and passes an order, no detailed reasons are required to be recorded in the or…
Supreme Court of India22 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 659 · [2021] 12 S.C.R. 210
– Seventh Schedule, List II, Entry 49 – Jal Sansthan (Assessment of Annual Value of Premises) Rules 1981 – Jal Sansthan (Radius regarding Levy of Water Tax) Rules 1993. H 210 JALKAL VIBHAG NAGAR NIGAM v. PRADESHIYA INDUSTRIAL AND 211 INVESTMENT CORP. Uttar Pradesh Water Supply and Sewerage Act 1975 – s.52 – A Held: Lev…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 658 · [2021] 6 S.C.R. 1176
Allowing the appeal, the Court G HELD:1. After investigation, a charge-sheet was filed against respondent no.2 – accused for the offences punishable under sections 406, 420 of IPC also. Thus, it was found that there is a prima facie case against the accused. It came on record that the arrest warrant was issued by the M…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 657 · [2021] 8 S.C.R. 765
and without giving any opportunity of being heard to the other applicants – Before the High Court, it was brought on record that there were two other applicants who submitted their EOI and even one of the applicants was ready and willing to lift the gas within 65 days – Till writ petition was filed and matter was heard…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 656 · [2021] 10 S.C.R. 72
reckoned as qualifying service for pension – The said Government Order has taken note of the several requests received to reckon the prior qualifying service – Further, the main aspect of reckoning the service rendered in Central Government for pensionary benefit after joining State Government service was given effect …
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 655 · [2021] 10 S.C.R. 59
60 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2021] 10 S.C.R. A an assignment pre the decree and an assignment post the decree – Once the legislative intent is clear, and the law is amended, then the earlier position of law cannot be said to prevail post the amendment – The Explanation clearly stipulates that nothing in Or.XXI, r.16 of th…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 654 · [2021] 10 S.C.R. 309
[2021] 10 S.C.R. 309 KAVITHA LANKESH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No. 1236 of 2021) OCTOBER 21, 2021 [A. M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI AND C. T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.] Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act, 2000: s.24 – Purport of – The purport of s.24 is that information regarding commission of an off…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 653 · [2021] 10 S.C.R. 330
– Respondent successfully filed petition under s.482 CrPC for setting aside order dated 8 May 2021 – Aggrieved State filed instant E appeal – Held: r.4(4) of the Rules provides for denial of furlough on grounds of disturbance to public peace and tranquility – Order dated 8 May 2021 has adduced a number of circumstances…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 650 · [2021] 6 S.C.R. 1100
Ms. Jaspreet Gogia, Ms. Mandakini Singh, Karanvir Gogia, Ms. Shivangi Singhal, Ms. Ashima Mandla, Advs. for the Respondents. The Order of the Court was passed by VIKRAM NATH, J. C 1. By means of this appeal, the appellant Jaswant Singh has prayed for quashing of the order dated 06.02.2020 passed by the learned Single J…
Supreme Court of India8 Feb 2021Full text
2021 INSC 65 · [2021] 1 S.C.R. 879
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. In the present case the possession of the plaintiff B was upheld by the High Court on two main reasons. Firstly, the defendant of the suit, had earlier filed a suit for recovery of possession and declaration for the same property against the manager of the property which suit w…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 649 · [2021] 10 S.C.R. 353
(4) or (5) of s.6 and the actual taking up of the investigation by the NIA, there should be no hiatus in the investigation to the detriment of the interests of national security involved in the enactment of the legislation. National Investigation Agency Act, 2008: s.6(7) – G Continuation of investigation by the ATS Nan…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 648 · [2021] 6 S.C.R. 1094
In Civil Appeal No.5728 of 2021 From the Judgment and Order dated 18.09.2017 of the High Court F of Judicature at Patna in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4300 of 2015. Praveen Kumar, Ms. Sunaina Kumar, Advs. for the appellant. Saket Singh, Mrs. Niranjana Singh, Advs. for the Respondents. The Order of the Court was pas…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 647 · [2021] 6 S.C.R. 1125
– Respondent filed appeal before High Court – Appellant was duly served and appeared in the said matter through his counsel – However, due to enhancement of pecuniary jurisdiction of District Court, appeal stood transferred to District Court from High Court and fresh notice issued to appellant through paper publication…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 645 · [2021] 10 S.C.R. 161
E Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The material at this stage cannot be examined with a fine toothcomb in the manner of a criminal trial. What needs to be determined is whether the parameters for the grant of anticipatory bail were correctly formulated and applied by the FSingle Judge. [Para 21][174-A] 2. In re…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 644 · [2021] 5 S.C.R. 1056
MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COM. 1057 LTD. v. MERC & ORC. supervision in directing the appellant to make payment of LPS within A the time stipulated – APTEL rightly upheld the direction – In any case, such a direction cannot be interfered with in exercise of powers u/s. 125 – Code of Civil Procedure, 190…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 643 · [2021] 13 S.C.R. 364
H 364 CBI v. T. H. VIJAYALAKSHMI 365 Constitution of India – Article 226 – Code of Criminal A Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of FIR – Review by High Court – Scope of – Discussed. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 If a Preliminary Enquiry is necessary, it is Bcovered by Chapter 9 of the CBI Manual. Two distin…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 642 · [2021] 13 S.C.R. 566
of over 7 years since the date of the incident, a retrial would not advance the cause of justice but would result in a serious miscarriage of justice – Even if it is conceded that the alleged offences committed in the two FIRs were committed in the course of the same transaction, within the meaning of the phrase in s. …
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 641 · [2021] 8 S.C.R. 720
From the Judgment and Order dated 26.09.2019 of the High Court Dof Uttarakhand at Nainital in Writ Petition (MS) No.2708 of 2019. Ajay Kumar, Pinakin Ravaal, Subrata Ray, Ashish Chaubey, Advs. for the Appellant. Jitender Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E M. …
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 640 · [2021] 8 S.C.R. 707
[2021] 8 S.C.R. 707 707 MANOJ MISHRA @ CHHOTKAU A v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (Criminal Appeal No. 1167 of 2021) OCTOBER 08, 2021 B [M. R. SHAH AND A. S. BOPANNA, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – ss.363, 366, 376-D, 506 – Appellant alongwith other accused persons convicted and sentenced u/ss.363, 366, 376-D, 506 and s.4, POCS…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 639 · [2021] 6 S.C.R. 1144
1144 SUPREME COURT[2021]REPORTS6 S.C.R. 1144 [2021] 6 S.C.R. A SRI SRINIVAS K GOUDA v. KARNATAKA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 6217 of 2021) B OCTOBER 08, 2021 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AND B. V. NAGARATHNA, JJ.] Service Law – Appointment – Appellant appointed as Junior Lab Technician in th…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2021 INSC 659 · [2021] 12 S.C.R. 210
– Seventh Schedule, List II, Entry 49 – Jal Sansthan (Assessment of Annual Value of Premises) Rules 1981 – Jal Sansthan (Radius regarding Levy of Water Tax) Rules 1993. H 210 JALKAL VIBHAG NAGAR NIGAM v. PRADESHIYA INDUSTRIAL AND 211 INVESTMENT CORP. Uttar Pradesh Water Supply and Sewerage Act 1975 – s.52 – A Held: Lev…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 658 · [2021] 6 S.C.R. 1176
Allowing the appeal, the Court G HELD:1. After investigation, a charge-sheet was filed against respondent no.2 – accused for the offences punishable under sections 406, 420 of IPC also. Thus, it was found that there is a prima facie case against the accused. It came on record that the arrest warrant was issued by the M…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 657 · [2021] 8 S.C.R. 765
and without giving any opportunity of being heard to the other applicants – Before the High Court, it was brought on record that there were two other applicants who submitted their EOI and even one of the applicants was ready and willing to lift the gas within 65 days – Till writ petition was filed and matter was heard…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 656 · [2021] 10 S.C.R. 72
reckoned as qualifying service for pension – The said Government Order has taken note of the several requests received to reckon the prior qualifying service – Further, the main aspect of reckoning the service rendered in Central Government for pensionary benefit after joining State Government service was given effect …
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 655 · [2021] 10 S.C.R. 59
60 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2021] 10 S.C.R. A an assignment pre the decree and an assignment post the decree – Once the legislative intent is clear, and the law is amended, then the earlier position of law cannot be said to prevail post the amendment – The Explanation clearly stipulates that nothing in Or.XXI, r.16 of th…
Supreme Court of India21 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 654 · [2021] 10 S.C.R. 309
[2021] 10 S.C.R. 309 KAVITHA LANKESH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No. 1236 of 2021) OCTOBER 21, 2021 [A. M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI AND C. T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.] Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act, 2000: s.24 – Purport of – The purport of s.24 is that information regarding commission of an off…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 653 · [2021] 10 S.C.R. 330
– Respondent successfully filed petition under s.482 CrPC for setting aside order dated 8 May 2021 – Aggrieved State filed instant E appeal – Held: r.4(4) of the Rules provides for denial of furlough on grounds of disturbance to public peace and tranquility – Order dated 8 May 2021 has adduced a number of circumstances…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 650 · [2021] 6 S.C.R. 1100
Ms. Jaspreet Gogia, Ms. Mandakini Singh, Karanvir Gogia, Ms. Shivangi Singhal, Ms. Ashima Mandla, Advs. for the Respondents. The Order of the Court was passed by VIKRAM NATH, J. C 1. By means of this appeal, the appellant Jaswant Singh has prayed for quashing of the order dated 06.02.2020 passed by the learned Single J…
Supreme Court of India8 Feb 2021Full text
2021 INSC 65 · [2021] 1 S.C.R. 879
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. In the present case the possession of the plaintiff B was upheld by the High Court on two main reasons. Firstly, the defendant of the suit, had earlier filed a suit for recovery of possession and declaration for the same property against the manager of the property which suit w…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 649 · [2021] 10 S.C.R. 353
(4) or (5) of s.6 and the actual taking up of the investigation by the NIA, there should be no hiatus in the investigation to the detriment of the interests of national security involved in the enactment of the legislation. National Investigation Agency Act, 2008: s.6(7) – G Continuation of investigation by the ATS Nan…
Supreme Court of India20 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 648 · [2021] 6 S.C.R. 1094
In Civil Appeal No.5728 of 2021 From the Judgment and Order dated 18.09.2017 of the High Court F of Judicature at Patna in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4300 of 2015. Praveen Kumar, Ms. Sunaina Kumar, Advs. for the appellant. Saket Singh, Mrs. Niranjana Singh, Advs. for the Respondents. The Order of the Court was pas…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 647 · [2021] 6 S.C.R. 1125
– Respondent filed appeal before High Court – Appellant was duly served and appeared in the said matter through his counsel – However, due to enhancement of pecuniary jurisdiction of District Court, appeal stood transferred to District Court from High Court and fresh notice issued to appellant through paper publication…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 645 · [2021] 10 S.C.R. 161
E Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The material at this stage cannot be examined with a fine toothcomb in the manner of a criminal trial. What needs to be determined is whether the parameters for the grant of anticipatory bail were correctly formulated and applied by the FSingle Judge. [Para 21][174-A] 2. In re…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 644 · [2021] 5 S.C.R. 1056
MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COM. 1057 LTD. v. MERC & ORC. supervision in directing the appellant to make payment of LPS within A the time stipulated – APTEL rightly upheld the direction – In any case, such a direction cannot be interfered with in exercise of powers u/s. 125 – Code of Civil Procedure, 190…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 643 · [2021] 13 S.C.R. 364
H 364 CBI v. T. H. VIJAYALAKSHMI 365 Constitution of India – Article 226 – Code of Criminal A Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of FIR – Review by High Court – Scope of – Discussed. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 If a Preliminary Enquiry is necessary, it is Bcovered by Chapter 9 of the CBI Manual. Two distin…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 642 · [2021] 13 S.C.R. 566
of over 7 years since the date of the incident, a retrial would not advance the cause of justice but would result in a serious miscarriage of justice – Even if it is conceded that the alleged offences committed in the two FIRs were committed in the course of the same transaction, within the meaning of the phrase in s. …
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 641 · [2021] 8 S.C.R. 720
From the Judgment and Order dated 26.09.2019 of the High Court Dof Uttarakhand at Nainital in Writ Petition (MS) No.2708 of 2019. Ajay Kumar, Pinakin Ravaal, Subrata Ray, Ashish Chaubey, Advs. for the Appellant. Jitender Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E M. …
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 640 · [2021] 8 S.C.R. 707
[2021] 8 S.C.R. 707 707 MANOJ MISHRA @ CHHOTKAU A v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (Criminal Appeal No. 1167 of 2021) OCTOBER 08, 2021 B [M. R. SHAH AND A. S. BOPANNA, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – ss.363, 366, 376-D, 506 – Appellant alongwith other accused persons convicted and sentenced u/ss.363, 366, 376-D, 506 and s.4, POCS…
Supreme Court of India8 Oct 2021Full text
2021 INSC 639 · [2021] 6 S.C.R. 1144
1144 SUPREME COURT[2021]REPORTS6 S.C.R. 1144 [2021] 6 S.C.R. A SRI SRINIVAS K GOUDA v. KARNATAKA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 6217 of 2021) B OCTOBER 08, 2021 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AND B. V. NAGARATHNA, JJ.] Service Law – Appointment – Appellant appointed as Junior Lab Technician in th…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis