1094 SUPREME COURT[2021]REPORTS6 S.C.R. 1094 [2021] 6 S.C.R. A M/S MAGADH SUGAR & ENERGY LTD. v. THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. (Miscellaneous Application No 1608 of 2021) B In (Civil Appeal No 5728 of 2021) October 20, 2021 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AND C BV NAGARATHNA, JJ.] Constitution of India: Art. 226 – Typographical error in the judgment – Correction of – Amount of Rs 56 crores and Rs 67 crores mentioned in paragraph 8 of the judgment to be read as Rs 5.6 crores and Rs 67 lakhs respectively – Amount of Rs 67 crores in D paragraph 10 of the judgment to be read as Rs 67 lakhs – Appearances of Mr S K Bagaria and Mr Saket Singh in paragraph 15 to be read as Mr S K Bagaria, learned Senior Counsel and Mr Saket Singh, learned Counsel, respectively – Judgment/Order. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Miscellaneous Application E No.1608 of 2021 In Civil Appeal No.5728 of 2021 From the Judgment and Order dated 18.09.2017 of the High Court F of Judicature at Patna in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4300 of 2015. Praveen Kumar, Ms. Sunaina Kumar, Advs. for the appellant. Saket Singh, Mrs. Niranjana Singh, Advs. for the Respondents. The Order of the Court was passed : G ORDER 1. The Miscellaneous Application has been filed for correction of a typographical error in the judgment dated 24 September 2021. 2. The amount of Rs 56 crores and Rs 67 crores mentioned in H paragraph 8 of the judgment shall be corrected to read as Rs 5.6 crores 1094

M/S MAGADH SUGAR & ENERGY LTD. v. THE STATE OF BIHAR 1095 and Rs 67 lakhs respectively and the amount of Rs 67 crores in paragraph A 10 of the judgment shall be corrected to read as Rs 67 lakhs. 3. In paragraph 15 of the judgment, the appearances of Mr S K Bagaria and Mr Saket Singh shall be corrected to read as Mr S K Bagaria, learned Senior Counsel and Mr Saket Singh, learned Counsel, respectively. B 4. The Miscellaneous Application is accordingly disposed of. Nidhi Jain Miscellaneous Application disposed of. C D E F G H

1094 SUPREME COURT[2021]REPORTS6 S.C.R. 1094 [2021] 6 S.C.R. A M/S MAGADH SUGAR & ENERGY LTD. v. THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. (Miscellaneous Application No 1608 of 2021) B In (Civil Appeal No 5728 of 2021) October 20, 2021 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AND C BV NAGARATHNA, JJ.] Constitution of India: Art. 226 – Typographical error in the judgment – Correction of – Amount of Rs 56 crores and Rs 67 crores mentioned in paragraph 8 of the judgment to be read as Rs 5.6 crores and Rs 67 lakhs respectively – Amount of Rs 67 crores in D paragraph 10 of the judgment to be read as Rs 67 lakhs – Appearances of Mr S K Bagaria and Mr Saket Singh in paragraph 15 to be read as Mr S K Bagaria, learned Senior Counsel and Mr Saket Singh, learned Counsel, respectively – Judgment/Order. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Miscellaneous Application E No.1608 of 2021 In Civil Appeal No.5728 of 2021 From the Judgment and Order dated 18.09.2017 of the High Court F of Judicature at Patna in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4300 of 2015. Praveen Kumar, Ms. Sunaina Kumar, Advs. for the appellant. Saket Singh, Mrs. Niranjana Singh, Advs. for the Respondents. The Order of the Court was passed : G ORDER 1. The Miscellaneous Application has been filed for correction of a typographical error in the judgment dated 24 September 2021. 2. The amount of Rs 56 crores and Rs 67 crores mentioned in H paragraph 8 of the judgment shall be corrected to read as Rs 5.6 crores 1094

M/S MAGADH SUGAR & ENERGY LTD. v. THE STATE OF BIHAR 1095 and Rs 67 lakhs respectively and the amount of Rs 67 crores in paragraph A 10 of the judgment shall be corrected to read as Rs 67 lakhs. 3. In paragraph 15 of the judgment, the appearances of Mr S K Bagaria and Mr Saket Singh shall be corrected to read as Mr S K Bagaria, learned Senior Counsel and Mr Saket Singh, learned Counsel, respectively. B 4. The Miscellaneous Application is accordingly disposed of. Nidhi Jain Miscellaneous Application disposed of. C D E F G H