Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,561–3,580 · Page 179 of 500
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1270 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 835
Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. (2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. E Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors. (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] 1 SCR 783 – referred to. Case Law Reference [2014] 1 SCR 783 referred to Para 2 F [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 2.1 CI…
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 127 · [2022] 2 S.C.R. 258
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,561–3,580 · Page 179 of 500
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1270 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 835
Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. (2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. E Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors. (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] 1 SCR 783 – referred to. Case Law Reference [2014] 1 SCR 783 referred to Para 2 F [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 2.1 CI…
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 127 · [2022] 2 S.C.R. 258
260 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 2 S.C.R. A With Criminal Appeal No. 159 of 2022. Ms. Manju Jetley, Chandan Mishra, Brahmadandi Ramesh, Ms. Manisha Chava, M. Vijaya Bhaskar, Advs. for the Appellant. B Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Ms. Harshita Raghuvanshi, Ms. Saloni Tangri Java, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Cou…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1269 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 829
– In view of the fact that the possession was taken, acquisition proceedings is not deemed to be lapsed. H 829 830 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 17 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: In the case of Godfrey Philips (I) Ltd. & Ors., it is observed and held that the subsequent purchaser is not entitled to claim …
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1268 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 840
Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. (2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. E Case Law Reference [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 3 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 8993 of 2022. F From the Judgment and Order dated 27.11.2018 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (C) N…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1267 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 845
and Order dated 29.04.2019 of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Bench…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1266 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 427
[2022] 18 S.C.R. 427 427 MOHD. SABEER @ SHABIR HUSSAIN A v. REGIONAL MANAGER, U. P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION (Civil Appeal Nos. 9070-9071 of 2022) B DECEMBER 09, 2022 [KRISHNA MURARI AND S. RAVINDRA BHAT, JJ.] Motor Vehicle – Accident – Claim – Assessment of compensation – Permanent Disability Percentage – Appe…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1265 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 713
ssed by the High Court is not liable to be sustained. The functional disability of the appellant is liable to be assessed as 100% and, Caccordi…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1264 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 441
of Orissa at Cuttack in L.A.A. No. 79 of 2015. Dr. Janmejaya Ray, Aneesh Mittal, S. R. Sundaram, Gaurav Teotia, Ms. Sanjana Manchanda, Advs. for the Appellants. Dr. Kedarnath Tripathy, Ramendra Mohan Patnaik, Bhuwan Raj, Raghunath Pathak, Advs. for the Respondents. E The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHA…
Supreme Court of India8 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1263 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 446
– Pursuant to the interim order, appellant deposited Rs.7,78,280/- – Respondent withdrew this amount after furnishing the personal undertaking on 08.11.2001 – Whether respondent entitled to interest @ the rate of 18% p.a. as per award on the principal amount of Rs. E 14,49,300/- till decision of appeal u/s. 37 of the A…
Supreme Court of India8 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1262 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 478
478 SUPREME COURT[2022]REPORTS14 S.C.R. 478 [2022] 14 S.C.R. A T.P. GOPALAKRISHNAN v. STATE OF KERALA (Criminal Appeal Nos.187-188 of 2017) B DECEMBER 08, 2022 [B. R. GAVAI AND B. V. NAGARATHNA, JJ.] Constitution of India: Art.20(2) – Protection against double jeopardy – Code of Criminal Procedure – s.300 – ‘Same offen…
Supreme Court of India7 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1261 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 410
of over three decades – Respondent like any vigilant citizen, especially given that she does not belong to economically or socially backward segments of the society, was expected to assert her rights before an appropriate forum within a reasonable time – Repeated representations neither give rise nor revive the cause o…
Supreme Court of India7 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1260 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 73
H 73 74 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 16 S.C.R. A Penal Code, 1860 – s.34 – Application of – Discussed. Penal Code, 1860– s.34 – Common intention – Evidence– Held: Common intention can be formed at the spur of the moment and during the occurrence itself – It is a psychological fact and as such, direct evidence normally …
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 126 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 861
[2022] 18 S.C.R. 861 861 M/s AGMATEL INDIA PVT. LTD. A v. M/s RESOURSYS TELECOM & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 786 of 2022) JANUARY 31, 2022 B [DINESH MAHESHWARI AND VIKRAM NATH, JJ.] Tender – Scope of judicial review – Notice inviting tenders (NIT) issued by Navodaya Vidyalaya samite (NVS) on Govt. Portal (GeM) for supply o…
Supreme Court of India6 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1258 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 661
[2022] 16 S.C.R. 661 661 SMT. ANJALI & ORS. A v. LOKENDRA RATHOD & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 009014 of 2022) DECEMBER 06, 2022 B [KRISHNA MURARI AND BELA M. TRIVEDI, JJ.] Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: s.168 – Fatal accident – Just and Fair Compensation – Claimants (the heirs and legal representative of the victim-deceased) so…
Supreme Court of India6 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1257 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 876
G CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 174 of 2021. From the Judgment and Order dated 21.05.2019 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Civil Writ Petition No. 16581 of 2018. H 876 SUDESH CHHIKARA v. RAMTI DEVI & ANR. 877 Kanhaiya Singhal, Chetan Bhardwaj, Prasanna, Udit Bakshi, Priyal A Gar…
Supreme Court of India6 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1256 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 650
appellant-Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation – The private respondent (sub-lessee) challenged the termination of lease before the High Court – High Court allowed the writ petition holding that appellant took over the possession forcibly and highhandedly by entering into the premises and, therefore, the same was arbitrary an…
Supreme Court of India5 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1255 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 330
330 KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS LIMITED v. RAMCHARAN AND 331 ORS. Allowing the appeals, the Court A HELD 1.1 The contesting respondents were the contractual labourers of the respondent No. 7-contractor, who was a contractor engaged by the appellant in terms of the contract dated 22.04.1995, which was renewed from time to time. …
Supreme Court of India5 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1254 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 326
Mukul Rohtagi, Maninder Singh, C. S. Vaidhyanath, Sr. Advs., Anirban Bhattacharya, Apoorv Agarwal, Ms. Niharika Gupta, Rajeev Choudhary, Manav Goel, Ms. Shikha Khurana, Shubham Sagar Dayma, G Advs. for the Petitioner. Balbir Singh, ASG, Arijit Prasad, Sr. Adv., Naman Tandon, Samarvir Singh, Shyam Gopal, Ms. Rukhmini Bo…
Supreme Court of India5 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1253 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 28
regarding the value of the goods sold to the Respondent’s sister concerns is in consonance with Supreme Court’s earlier judgments and the Circular dated 01.07.2002 – Demand made by the Appellant is confirmed however, the levy of interest and penalties upon the H 28 COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX, ROHTAK 29 v. …
Supreme Court of India5 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1252 · [2022] 10 S.C.R. 156
– In the case of acquittal, the power should be exercised before the D order of acquittal is pronounced – In case of conviction, summoning order u/s. 319 has to precede the conclusion of trial by imposition of sentence – If the order is passed on the same day, it will have to be examined on the facts and circumstances …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
260 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 2 S.C.R. A With Criminal Appeal No. 159 of 2022. Ms. Manju Jetley, Chandan Mishra, Brahmadandi Ramesh, Ms. Manisha Chava, M. Vijaya Bhaskar, Advs. for the Appellant. B Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Ms. Harshita Raghuvanshi, Ms. Saloni Tangri Java, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Cou…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1269 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 829
– In view of the fact that the possession was taken, acquisition proceedings is not deemed to be lapsed. H 829 830 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 17 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: In the case of Godfrey Philips (I) Ltd. & Ors., it is observed and held that the subsequent purchaser is not entitled to claim …
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1268 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 840
Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. (2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. E Case Law Reference [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 3 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 8993 of 2022. F From the Judgment and Order dated 27.11.2018 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (C) N…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1267 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 845
and Order dated 29.04.2019 of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Bench…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1266 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 427
[2022] 18 S.C.R. 427 427 MOHD. SABEER @ SHABIR HUSSAIN A v. REGIONAL MANAGER, U. P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION (Civil Appeal Nos. 9070-9071 of 2022) B DECEMBER 09, 2022 [KRISHNA MURARI AND S. RAVINDRA BHAT, JJ.] Motor Vehicle – Accident – Claim – Assessment of compensation – Permanent Disability Percentage – Appe…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1265 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 713
ssed by the High Court is not liable to be sustained. The functional disability of the appellant is liable to be assessed as 100% and, Caccordi…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1264 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 441
of Orissa at Cuttack in L.A.A. No. 79 of 2015. Dr. Janmejaya Ray, Aneesh Mittal, S. R. Sundaram, Gaurav Teotia, Ms. Sanjana Manchanda, Advs. for the Appellants. Dr. Kedarnath Tripathy, Ramendra Mohan Patnaik, Bhuwan Raj, Raghunath Pathak, Advs. for the Respondents. E The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHA…
Supreme Court of India8 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1263 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 446
– Pursuant to the interim order, appellant deposited Rs.7,78,280/- – Respondent withdrew this amount after furnishing the personal undertaking on 08.11.2001 – Whether respondent entitled to interest @ the rate of 18% p.a. as per award on the principal amount of Rs. E 14,49,300/- till decision of appeal u/s. 37 of the A…
Supreme Court of India8 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1262 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 478
478 SUPREME COURT[2022]REPORTS14 S.C.R. 478 [2022] 14 S.C.R. A T.P. GOPALAKRISHNAN v. STATE OF KERALA (Criminal Appeal Nos.187-188 of 2017) B DECEMBER 08, 2022 [B. R. GAVAI AND B. V. NAGARATHNA, JJ.] Constitution of India: Art.20(2) – Protection against double jeopardy – Code of Criminal Procedure – s.300 – ‘Same offen…
Supreme Court of India7 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1261 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 410
of over three decades – Respondent like any vigilant citizen, especially given that she does not belong to economically or socially backward segments of the society, was expected to assert her rights before an appropriate forum within a reasonable time – Repeated representations neither give rise nor revive the cause o…
Supreme Court of India7 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1260 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 73
H 73 74 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 16 S.C.R. A Penal Code, 1860 – s.34 – Application of – Discussed. Penal Code, 1860– s.34 – Common intention – Evidence– Held: Common intention can be formed at the spur of the moment and during the occurrence itself – It is a psychological fact and as such, direct evidence normally …
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 126 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 861
[2022] 18 S.C.R. 861 861 M/s AGMATEL INDIA PVT. LTD. A v. M/s RESOURSYS TELECOM & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 786 of 2022) JANUARY 31, 2022 B [DINESH MAHESHWARI AND VIKRAM NATH, JJ.] Tender – Scope of judicial review – Notice inviting tenders (NIT) issued by Navodaya Vidyalaya samite (NVS) on Govt. Portal (GeM) for supply o…
Supreme Court of India6 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1258 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 661
[2022] 16 S.C.R. 661 661 SMT. ANJALI & ORS. A v. LOKENDRA RATHOD & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 009014 of 2022) DECEMBER 06, 2022 B [KRISHNA MURARI AND BELA M. TRIVEDI, JJ.] Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: s.168 – Fatal accident – Just and Fair Compensation – Claimants (the heirs and legal representative of the victim-deceased) so…
Supreme Court of India6 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1257 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 876
G CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 174 of 2021. From the Judgment and Order dated 21.05.2019 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Civil Writ Petition No. 16581 of 2018. H 876 SUDESH CHHIKARA v. RAMTI DEVI & ANR. 877 Kanhaiya Singhal, Chetan Bhardwaj, Prasanna, Udit Bakshi, Priyal A Gar…
Supreme Court of India6 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1256 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 650
appellant-Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation – The private respondent (sub-lessee) challenged the termination of lease before the High Court – High Court allowed the writ petition holding that appellant took over the possession forcibly and highhandedly by entering into the premises and, therefore, the same was arbitrary an…
Supreme Court of India5 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1255 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 330
330 KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS LIMITED v. RAMCHARAN AND 331 ORS. Allowing the appeals, the Court A HELD 1.1 The contesting respondents were the contractual labourers of the respondent No. 7-contractor, who was a contractor engaged by the appellant in terms of the contract dated 22.04.1995, which was renewed from time to time. …
Supreme Court of India5 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1254 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 326
Mukul Rohtagi, Maninder Singh, C. S. Vaidhyanath, Sr. Advs., Anirban Bhattacharya, Apoorv Agarwal, Ms. Niharika Gupta, Rajeev Choudhary, Manav Goel, Ms. Shikha Khurana, Shubham Sagar Dayma, G Advs. for the Petitioner. Balbir Singh, ASG, Arijit Prasad, Sr. Adv., Naman Tandon, Samarvir Singh, Shyam Gopal, Ms. Rukhmini Bo…
Supreme Court of India5 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1253 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 28
regarding the value of the goods sold to the Respondent’s sister concerns is in consonance with Supreme Court’s earlier judgments and the Circular dated 01.07.2002 – Demand made by the Appellant is confirmed however, the levy of interest and penalties upon the H 28 COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX, ROHTAK 29 v. …
Supreme Court of India5 Dec 2022Full text
2022 INSC 1252 · [2022] 10 S.C.R. 156
– In the case of acquittal, the power should be exercised before the D order of acquittal is pronounced – In case of conviction, summoning order u/s. 319 has to precede the conclusion of trial by imposition of sentence – If the order is passed on the same day, it will have to be examined on the facts and circumstances …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis