⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
2,181–2,200 · Page 110 of 113
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
Page1 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR CMP No. 1220 of 2025 and CRP.No.5521 of 2025 In both petitions: For Petitioner(s): MR.N.L.RAJAH Senior counsel for MS.Rohini Ravikumar For Respondent(s): MS.V. ANURADHA COMMON ORDER The revision petitioner, who is the wife of the respondent, has preferred this revision chal…
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
WP/21905/2026
This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the official respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 10.11.2025 and the subsequent reminder dated 28.03.2026. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner submitted a representation dated 10.11.2025 and a subsequent reminder date…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
2,181–2,200 · Page 110 of 113
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
Page1 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR CMP No. 1220 of 2025 and CRP.No.5521 of 2025 In both petitions: For Petitioner(s): MR.N.L.RAJAH Senior counsel for MS.Rohini Ravikumar For Respondent(s): MS.V. ANURADHA COMMON ORDER The revision petitioner, who is the wife of the respondent, has preferred this revision chal…
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
WP/21905/2026
This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the official respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 10.11.2025 and the subsequent reminder dated 28.03.2026. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner submitted a representation dated 10.11.2025 and a subsequent reminder date…
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
WP(MD)/4111/2026
Page 1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.4111 of 2026 in the cadre of Office Assistant and sanction full pension within a specified time frame. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Visvalingam For Respondents : Mrs.K.Porkodi Counsel for the Government O R D E R Heard Mr.S.Visvalingam, learned counsel for the petitioner…
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
CMP/24354/2025
3. Mr.D.Bhaskaran, learned counsel appearing for 2nd respondent / Insurance Company submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and hence, the same may be listed before the National Lok Adalat. 4. Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, in order and list th…
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
CMP/10159/2026
This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 467 days in filing the petition to restore CMA No.2143 of 2018 which had been dismissed for non prosecution. 2.It had been stated that in the cause list the name of the counsel was wrongly printed as Mr.B.Sunarapandiyan instead of Mr.B.Sundarapandiyan and hence, the …
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
WP/21207/2026
(Order of the Court was made by G.Jayachandran J.) The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the statutory appeal of the fourth respondent was disposed of on 08.01.2026 and the encroachment has been removed. Hence, nothing survives in the prayer. 2. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infruc…
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 10614 of 2026 The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 9, 39(1)(a)(b)(d), 39(3)(a)(b)(c), 40(2), 50, 51(1), 52 and 57 of Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 and Amendment Act 2022 in W.L.O.R.No. 9 of 2026 o…
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
WP/25485/2008
4. It is further submitted that on transfer of the Writ Petition to the Delhi High Court, the same were heard and decided by the Delhi High Court and the matter is now pending consideration before the Hon’ble Apex Court. 5. The learned counsel thus submits that the present Writ Petition cease to exist on the file of th…
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
WP(MD)/15587/2026
For Petitioner :Mr.N.Sudalai Muthu For Respondent :Mr.P.Sudarkodi Nachiyar Government Standing Counsel ORDER This writ petition challenges the impugned order dated 24.12.2025 which is an assessment order passed under Section 73 of the GST Act 2017. 2.I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned G…
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
The petitioner/wife seeks transfer of HMOP No.364 of 2023 from the file of Family Court, Theni to Family Court, Coimbatore. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/wife submits that the petitioner is having permanent residence at Coimbatore and as on date, she is living with two children and she finds it difficult to tra…
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
WP/19916/2026
__________ Page1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19916 of 2026 PRAYER in W.P.No.19924 of 2026: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, call for the Impugned order dated 09-12-2025 in Order No GSTIN 33ABTFA3715C1ZQ/2021-2022 issued …
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
2026:MHC:2153 · WA/1292/2026
In all cases In all Writ Appeals For Appellant(s): Mr.R.Syed Mustafa & Mr.T.Sundaravadanam for M/s.B.Saravanan Associates For Respondent(s): Dr.R.Gouri, Government Counsel for R1 to R4 COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The issues involved in the batch of intra-court appeals are…
Madras High Court9 Jun 2026Full text
For Appellants : Mr.Vijay Narayan, Advocate General, assisted by Mr.Mohammed Fayaz Ali, Government Pleader Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.63 of 2026 For Respondents : Mr.V.Raghavachari, Senior Counsel, for Mr.M.Venkatakrishnan JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice…
Madras High Court9 Jun 2026Full text
For Petitioners: Mr.P.A.Parasaran For Respondent: Mrs.R.S.Indira Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER This petition has been filed seeking to modify the conditions in Para No.7 of the order dated 17.09.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.25544 of 2025. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners,…
Madras High Court9 Jun 2026Full text
WP(MD)/6223/2026
4296/Aa4/2023, passed by the third respondent herein rejecting the representation of the petitioner dated 25.11.2025 and quash the same by consequently directing the second respondent to approve the appointment of the petitioner with the fourth respondent with effect from his date of joining i.e., 07.06.2023 and conseq…
Madras High Court9 Jun 2026Full text
CMP/12727/2026
09.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, in order and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis…
Madras High Court9 Jun 2026Full text
ORDER Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this petition is allowed on payment of cost of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only) to DT Siddha Med Officer CCRI PKM, Siddha Clinic, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court (A/c No.10767823177, IFSC Code: SBIN0000898, MICR Code: 625002601, Bank SBI…
Madras High Court9 Jun 2026Full text
HCP(MD)/343/2026
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Ansari For Respondents : Mr.G.Karuppasamy Pandian, Counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu, Criminal Side ORDER (Order of the Court was made by N. ANAND VENKATESH,J.) The petitioner is the mother of the detenu, by name, Arunpandi, son of Gopal, aged about 26 years. The detenu has been detained by the …
Madras High Court9 Jun 2026Full text
WMP(MD)/9914/2026
2.Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan, learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to allow this petition. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed. 4.Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments, wherever, it requires and also …
Madras High Court9 Jun 2026Full text
For Petitioner(s): P.Premkumar ORDER The Petitioner/Accused was convicted by the Trial Court for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in C.C. No. 4794 of 2021, by judgment dated 24.09.2025. Aggrieved by the same, the Petitioner preferred an appeal in C.A. No. 1358 of 2025 and filed…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
WP(MD)/4111/2026
Page 1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.4111 of 2026 in the cadre of Office Assistant and sanction full pension within a specified time frame. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Visvalingam For Respondents : Mrs.K.Porkodi Counsel for the Government O R D E R Heard Mr.S.Visvalingam, learned counsel for the petitioner…
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
CMP/24354/2025
3. Mr.D.Bhaskaran, learned counsel appearing for 2nd respondent / Insurance Company submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and hence, the same may be listed before the National Lok Adalat. 4. Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, in order and list th…
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
CMP/10159/2026
This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 467 days in filing the petition to restore CMA No.2143 of 2018 which had been dismissed for non prosecution. 2.It had been stated that in the cause list the name of the counsel was wrongly printed as Mr.B.Sunarapandiyan instead of Mr.B.Sundarapandiyan and hence, the …
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
WP/21207/2026
(Order of the Court was made by G.Jayachandran J.) The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the statutory appeal of the fourth respondent was disposed of on 08.01.2026 and the encroachment has been removed. Hence, nothing survives in the prayer. 2. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infruc…
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 10614 of 2026 The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 9, 39(1)(a)(b)(d), 39(3)(a)(b)(c), 40(2), 50, 51(1), 52 and 57 of Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 and Amendment Act 2022 in W.L.O.R.No. 9 of 2026 o…
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
WP/25485/2008
4. It is further submitted that on transfer of the Writ Petition to the Delhi High Court, the same were heard and decided by the Delhi High Court and the matter is now pending consideration before the Hon’ble Apex Court. 5. The learned counsel thus submits that the present Writ Petition cease to exist on the file of th…
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
WP(MD)/15587/2026
For Petitioner :Mr.N.Sudalai Muthu For Respondent :Mr.P.Sudarkodi Nachiyar Government Standing Counsel ORDER This writ petition challenges the impugned order dated 24.12.2025 which is an assessment order passed under Section 73 of the GST Act 2017. 2.I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned G…
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
The petitioner/wife seeks transfer of HMOP No.364 of 2023 from the file of Family Court, Theni to Family Court, Coimbatore. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/wife submits that the petitioner is having permanent residence at Coimbatore and as on date, she is living with two children and she finds it difficult to tra…
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
WP/19916/2026
__________ Page1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19916 of 2026 PRAYER in W.P.No.19924 of 2026: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, call for the Impugned order dated 09-12-2025 in Order No GSTIN 33ABTFA3715C1ZQ/2021-2022 issued …
Madras High Court10 Jun 2026Full text
2026:MHC:2153 · WA/1292/2026
In all cases In all Writ Appeals For Appellant(s): Mr.R.Syed Mustafa & Mr.T.Sundaravadanam for M/s.B.Saravanan Associates For Respondent(s): Dr.R.Gouri, Government Counsel for R1 to R4 COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The issues involved in the batch of intra-court appeals are…
Madras High Court9 Jun 2026Full text
For Appellants : Mr.Vijay Narayan, Advocate General, assisted by Mr.Mohammed Fayaz Ali, Government Pleader Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.63 of 2026 For Respondents : Mr.V.Raghavachari, Senior Counsel, for Mr.M.Venkatakrishnan JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice…
Madras High Court9 Jun 2026Full text
For Petitioners: Mr.P.A.Parasaran For Respondent: Mrs.R.S.Indira Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER This petition has been filed seeking to modify the conditions in Para No.7 of the order dated 17.09.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.25544 of 2025. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners,…
Madras High Court9 Jun 2026Full text
WP(MD)/6223/2026
4296/Aa4/2023, passed by the third respondent herein rejecting the representation of the petitioner dated 25.11.2025 and quash the same by consequently directing the second respondent to approve the appointment of the petitioner with the fourth respondent with effect from his date of joining i.e., 07.06.2023 and conseq…
Madras High Court9 Jun 2026Full text
CMP/12727/2026
09.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, in order and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis…
Madras High Court9 Jun 2026Full text
ORDER Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this petition is allowed on payment of cost of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only) to DT Siddha Med Officer CCRI PKM, Siddha Clinic, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court (A/c No.10767823177, IFSC Code: SBIN0000898, MICR Code: 625002601, Bank SBI…
Madras High Court9 Jun 2026Full text
HCP(MD)/343/2026
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Ansari For Respondents : Mr.G.Karuppasamy Pandian, Counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu, Criminal Side ORDER (Order of the Court was made by N. ANAND VENKATESH,J.) The petitioner is the mother of the detenu, by name, Arunpandi, son of Gopal, aged about 26 years. The detenu has been detained by the …
Madras High Court9 Jun 2026Full text
WMP(MD)/9914/2026
2.Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan, learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to allow this petition. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed. 4.Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments, wherever, it requires and also …
Madras High Court9 Jun 2026Full text
For Petitioner(s): P.Premkumar ORDER The Petitioner/Accused was convicted by the Trial Court for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in C.C. No. 4794 of 2021, by judgment dated 24.09.2025. Aggrieved by the same, the Petitioner preferred an appeal in C.A. No. 1358 of 2025 and filed…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis