WP No. 21905 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 21905 of 2026 Anuradha ..Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Namakkal District. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Mohanur Road, Namakkal District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal District. 4. The Thasildhar, Mohanur Taluk Office, Namakkal District. 5. The Village Administrative Officer, Madakasampatti Village, Namakkal District. 6. Kandasami ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a writ of mandamus, directing the official respondents, particularly the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 10.11.2025 and reminder dated 28.03.2026, and consequently, remove the name of the 6th respondent from Pattas bearing Nos. 908, 909, 910, 911 and 366 pertaining to Survey Nos. 193/1, 194/1, 194/2, 194/3 and 193/4 situated at Madakasampatti Village, Mohanur Taluk, Namakkal District. __________ Page1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21905 of 2026 For Petitioner: Mr.K.V.Muthu Visakan For Respondents: Mr.B.Pachaiyappan Government’s Counsel for R1 to R5 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the official respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 10.11.2025 and the subsequent reminder dated 28.03.2026.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner submitted a representation dated 10.11.2025 and a subsequent reminder dated 28.03.2026 to the official respondents, seeking removal of 6th respondent’s name from Patta Nos. 908, 909, 910, 911, and 366 pertaining to Survey Nos. 193/1, 194/1, 194/2, 194/3, and 193/4, situated at Madakasampatti Village, Mohanur Taluk, Namakkal District. However, the said representation has not been considered to date. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 5 and submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 10.11.2025 and the subsequent reminder dated 28.03.2026 will be considered within a period of twelve weeks. __________ Page2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21905 of 2026 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the third respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 10.11.2025 and the subsequent reminder dated 28.03.2026, after issuing due notice to the petitioner as well as to the 6th respondent and other aggrieved persons, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 10-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM __________ Page3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21905 of 2026 To 1. The District Collector, Namakkal District. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Mohanur Road, Namakkal District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal District. 4. The Thasildhar, Mohanur Taluk Office, Namakkal District. 5. The Village Administrative Officer, Madakasampatti Village, Namakkal District. __________ Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21905 of 2026 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 21905 of 2026 10-06-2026 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

WP No. 21905 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 21905 of 2026 Anuradha ..Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Namakkal District. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Mohanur Road, Namakkal District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal District. 4. The Thasildhar, Mohanur Taluk Office, Namakkal District. 5. The Village Administrative Officer, Madakasampatti Village, Namakkal District. 6. Kandasami ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a writ of mandamus, directing the official respondents, particularly the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 10.11.2025 and reminder dated 28.03.2026, and consequently, remove the name of the 6th respondent from Pattas bearing Nos. 908, 909, 910, 911 and 366 pertaining to Survey Nos. 193/1, 194/1, 194/2, 194/3 and 193/4 situated at Madakasampatti Village, Mohanur Taluk, Namakkal District. __________ Page1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21905 of 2026 For Petitioner: Mr.K.V.Muthu Visakan For Respondents: Mr.B.Pachaiyappan Government’s Counsel for R1 to R5 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the official respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 10.11.2025 and the subsequent reminder dated 28.03.2026.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner submitted a representation dated 10.11.2025 and a subsequent reminder dated 28.03.2026 to the official respondents, seeking removal of 6th respondent’s name from Patta Nos. 908, 909, 910, 911, and 366 pertaining to Survey Nos. 193/1, 194/1, 194/2, 194/3, and 193/4, situated at Madakasampatti Village, Mohanur Taluk, Namakkal District. However, the said representation has not been considered to date. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 5 and submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 10.11.2025 and the subsequent reminder dated 28.03.2026 will be considered within a period of twelve weeks. __________ Page2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21905 of 2026 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the third respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 10.11.2025 and the subsequent reminder dated 28.03.2026, after issuing due notice to the petitioner as well as to the 6th respondent and other aggrieved persons, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 10-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM __________ Page3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21905 of 2026 To 1. The District Collector, Namakkal District. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Mohanur Road, Namakkal District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal District. 4. The Thasildhar, Mohanur Taluk Office, Namakkal District. 5. The Village Administrative Officer, Madakasampatti Village, Namakkal District. __________ Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21905 of 2026 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 21905 of 2026 10-06-2026 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis