⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
841–860 · Page 43 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court23 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/10045/2026
2. Learned Assistant Advocate General submits that facts of this case are almost similar to the facts of 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 State of H.P. & Ors. Versus Binu Ram2, which, in turn, was based upon Bindumati Versus State of H.P. and others3. Decision in …
Himachal Pradesh High Court23 Jun 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
841–860 · Page 43 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court23 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/10045/2026
2. Learned Assistant Advocate General submits that facts of this case are almost similar to the facts of 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 State of H.P. & Ors. Versus Binu Ram2, which, in turn, was based upon Bindumati Versus State of H.P. and others3. Decision in …
Himachal Pradesh High Court23 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/9537/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9537 of 2026 Decided on: 23.06.2026 Hitendra Thakur … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? ____________________________________________________ _ For th…
Himachal Pradesh High Court23 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/9494/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9494 of 2026 Decided on: 23.06.2026 Deepika Thapa … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? ____________________________________________________ _ For the …
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CMP/12732/2026
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that benefits of aforesaid order have not been extended in petitioners’ favour as yet. Taking note of above office instructions and the consideration order passed by the respondents, present application is allowed. The respondent to release the benefits, if not released, flow…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CMP.M/602/2026
Sanjeev Kumar vs. Rikhi Ram RSA No. 237 of 2017 22.6.2026 Present: Mr. Rajesh Prakash, Advocate vice Mr. Sunny Moudgill, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Respondents No. 2 and 15 are stated to have expired. CMP (M) No. 602 of 2026 Due to technical defect, learned vice cou…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CMP/11971/2026
In light of this development, these proceedings are closed with the direction that needful at the end of the Principal Accountant General be done expeditiously and preferably before 31.07.2026. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 22, 2026 (Vinod)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/2079/2015
In view of above submissions, the writ petitions are disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 22nd June, 2026 (rohit)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/9386/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 9386 of 2026 Decided on 22.6.2026 Surekha …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Shammi Heer Advocate. For the respondents: Mr.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
2026:HHC:23651 · CR.R/339/2021
1. Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2 2026:HHC:23651 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the complainant filed a complaint against the accused for the commission of an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Ac…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/9898/2026
credentials as completely satisfying the eligibility criteria, and consequently process his formal appointment based on his written test merit score of 83 marks. d) A writ of mandamus directing the respondents to treat the petitioner as eligible for the post of English Teacher and grant him appointment, if otherwise fo…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
2026:HHC:23762 · CWP/6576/2026
3. In view of above, petition is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of in the same terms. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 22nd June, 2026 (Pardeep)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/9425/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.9425 of 2026 Decided on 22nd June, 2026 Vinay Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: M/s Sourav Sharma and Rocky, Advocates. F…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/9402/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.9402 of 2026 Decided on 22nd June, 2026 Sanjay Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate For the res…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
2026:HHC:24022 · CRMMO/762/2022
Cr.MMO No.127 of 2022 2. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with their arraignment as accused No.1 to 6 in the criminal complaint filed at the instance of Drugs Inspector, Central Drugs Standard Control Organization, Sub Zone Baddi, 2026:HHC:24022 2 District Solan (in short “Drug Inspector”) under Sections 18(a) (i), 18(…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/9351/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.9351 of 2026 Decided on 22nd June, 2026 Sapna Devi …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate For the respon…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CRMP/2310/2026
2. Learned counsel for the respondent under instructions, submits that the complainant/respondent does not 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 want to proceed further with the complaint in view of the compromise effected between the parties. 3. In view of above, present revisi…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/9216/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 9216 of 2026 Decided on 22.6.2026 Anchal and others …Petitioner s Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: M/s. Pavan Kumar & Nitish, Advocates. …
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
2026:HHC:24054 · CMPMO/309/2026
2. The facts, as emerge in the present case, are that the respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for declaration and for recovery of Rs.10,50,000/- as compensation for damages against the present petitioners. The petitioners were served on 02.09.2025 and Mr.Narender Chandel, Advocate, had filed his memo of appearance and so…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/9405/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.9405 of 2026 Decided on 22nd June, 2026 Menka …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Gurmeet Bhardwaj, Advocate For the responde…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Jun 2026Full text
2026:HHC:24050 · CWP/1588/2013
2026:HHC:24050 for distance to the respondent No. 6 may kindly be modified to 06 marks in Annexure P-3, dated 23.12.2011(after perusal of Annexure P-7 to P-9) and the petitioner may be given appointment as Part time water carrier at GPS Dhar Education Block Nurpur, Tehsil Jawali Distt. Kangra alongwith seniority from t…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
CWP/9537/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9537 of 2026 Decided on: 23.06.2026 Hitendra Thakur … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? ____________________________________________________ _ For th…
Himachal Pradesh High Court23 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/9494/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9494 of 2026 Decided on: 23.06.2026 Deepika Thapa … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? ____________________________________________________ _ For the …
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CMP/12732/2026
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that benefits of aforesaid order have not been extended in petitioners’ favour as yet. Taking note of above office instructions and the consideration order passed by the respondents, present application is allowed. The respondent to release the benefits, if not released, flow…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CMP.M/602/2026
Sanjeev Kumar vs. Rikhi Ram RSA No. 237 of 2017 22.6.2026 Present: Mr. Rajesh Prakash, Advocate vice Mr. Sunny Moudgill, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Respondents No. 2 and 15 are stated to have expired. CMP (M) No. 602 of 2026 Due to technical defect, learned vice cou…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CMP/11971/2026
In light of this development, these proceedings are closed with the direction that needful at the end of the Principal Accountant General be done expeditiously and preferably before 31.07.2026. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 22, 2026 (Vinod)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/2079/2015
In view of above submissions, the writ petitions are disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 22nd June, 2026 (rohit)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/9386/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 9386 of 2026 Decided on 22.6.2026 Surekha …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Shammi Heer Advocate. For the respondents: Mr.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
2026:HHC:23651 · CR.R/339/2021
1. Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2 2026:HHC:23651 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the complainant filed a complaint against the accused for the commission of an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Ac…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/9898/2026
credentials as completely satisfying the eligibility criteria, and consequently process his formal appointment based on his written test merit score of 83 marks. d) A writ of mandamus directing the respondents to treat the petitioner as eligible for the post of English Teacher and grant him appointment, if otherwise fo…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
2026:HHC:23762 · CWP/6576/2026
3. In view of above, petition is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of in the same terms. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 22nd June, 2026 (Pardeep)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/9425/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.9425 of 2026 Decided on 22nd June, 2026 Vinay Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: M/s Sourav Sharma and Rocky, Advocates. F…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/9402/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.9402 of 2026 Decided on 22nd June, 2026 Sanjay Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate For the res…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
2026:HHC:24022 · CRMMO/762/2022
Cr.MMO No.127 of 2022 2. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with their arraignment as accused No.1 to 6 in the criminal complaint filed at the instance of Drugs Inspector, Central Drugs Standard Control Organization, Sub Zone Baddi, 2026:HHC:24022 2 District Solan (in short “Drug Inspector”) under Sections 18(a) (i), 18(…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/9351/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.9351 of 2026 Decided on 22nd June, 2026 Sapna Devi …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate For the respon…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CRMP/2310/2026
2. Learned counsel for the respondent under instructions, submits that the complainant/respondent does not 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 want to proceed further with the complaint in view of the compromise effected between the parties. 3. In view of above, present revisi…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/9216/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 9216 of 2026 Decided on 22.6.2026 Anchal and others …Petitioner s Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: M/s. Pavan Kumar & Nitish, Advocates. …
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
2026:HHC:24054 · CMPMO/309/2026
2. The facts, as emerge in the present case, are that the respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for declaration and for recovery of Rs.10,50,000/- as compensation for damages against the present petitioners. The petitioners were served on 02.09.2025 and Mr.Narender Chandel, Advocate, had filed his memo of appearance and so…
Himachal Pradesh High Court22 Jun 2026Full text
CWP/9405/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.9405 of 2026 Decided on 22nd June, 2026 Menka …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Gurmeet Bhardwaj, Advocate For the responde…
Himachal Pradesh High Court20 Jun 2026Full text
2026:HHC:24050 · CWP/1588/2013
2026:HHC:24050 for distance to the respondent No. 6 may kindly be modified to 06 marks in Annexure P-3, dated 23.12.2011(after perusal of Annexure P-7 to P-9) and the petitioner may be given appointment as Part time water carrier at GPS Dhar Education Block Nurpur, Tehsil Jawali Distt. Kangra alongwith seniority from t…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis