Sanjeev Kumar vs. Rikhi Ram RSA No. 237 of 2017 22.6.2026 Present: Mr. Rajesh Prakash, Advocate vice Mr. Sunny Moudgill, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Respondents No. 2 and 15 are stated to have expired. CMP (M) No. 602 of 2026 Due to technical defect, learned vice counsel for the applicant, under instructions, submits that he intends to withdraw the present application, with liberty to file fresh one, under the appropriate provisions of law. Request considered and allowed. Consequently, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty, as aforementioned. The application is, thus, disposed of. (Virender Singh) Judge June 22, 2026 (kalpana)

Sanjeev Kumar vs. Rikhi Ram RSA No. 237 of 2017 22.6.2026 Present: Mr. Rajesh Prakash, Advocate vice Mr. Sunny Moudgill, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Respondents No. 2 and 15 are stated to have expired. CMP (M) No. 602 of 2026 Due to technical defect, learned vice counsel for the applicant, under instructions, submits that he intends to withdraw the present application, with liberty to file fresh one, under the appropriate provisions of law. Request considered and allowed. Consequently, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty, as aforementioned. The application is, thus, disposed of. (Virender Singh) Judge June 22, 2026 (kalpana)