⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
761–780 · Page 39 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Jul 2026Full text
EX.P./1254/2026
2. Follow up action if any, on the basis of aforesaid order be taken within four weeks as prayed. 3. In view of above, this execution petition is disposed of with liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of her surviving grievances if any, in accordance with law. Pending miscellan…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Jul 2026Full text
CMPMO/286/2026
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
761–780 · Page 39 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Jul 2026Full text
EX.P./1254/2026
2. Follow up action if any, on the basis of aforesaid order be taken within four weeks as prayed. 3. In view of above, this execution petition is disposed of with liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of her surviving grievances if any, in accordance with law. Pending miscellan…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Jul 2026Full text
CMPMO/286/2026
2. The facts as emerge in the present case are that the respondents/plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration, injunction and in the alternative for possession against the defendants. 3. The defendants were duly served for 04.10.2021 and on the said date, defendant No.5 neither appeared herself nor through her counsel. T…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10369/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Jul 2026Full text
CRMMO/907/2025
? Yes.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Jul 2026Full text
CRMMO/35/2026
? Yes.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Jul 2026Full text
CR.R/232/2025
138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in short the "Act”), convicted and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months and pay compensation to the tune of Rs.4,00,000/- to the respondent No.1-complainant (hereinafter "complainant"). 2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the re…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10256/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.10256 of 2026 Decided on 01st July, 2026 Parkash Chand …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: M/s Rocky and Sourav Sharma, Advocates…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:25842 · EX.P./2080/2025
2. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of as satisfied, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 01, 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/6875/2025
2. In light of the fact that the issue raised by the petitioner in this petition is pending adjudication before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, as agreed, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the parties shall abide by the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgme…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:25800 · CR.R/187/2026
2026:HHC:25800 sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and pay fine to the tune of Rs.7,50,000/- to the respondent-complainant (hereinafter, ‘complainant’), was upheld. 2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the record, are that the respondent-complainant-bank instituted a com…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:25728 · CRMMO/239/2026
2026:HHC:25728 out of the FIR based on the compromise effected between the parties. 2. It has been asserted that the informant has settled the matter with the petitioner with the intervention of their relatives and respectable persons of the society. The parties want to maintain a cordial relationship. Hence, the petit…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10196/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.10196 of 2026 Decided on 01st July, 2026 Seema Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: M/s Surender Verma and Hitesh Bali, Adv…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
COPC/528/2026
2. Taking note of above documents, these contempt proceedings are closed. Notice issued to the respondent is discharged. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of her surviving 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - grievan…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10289/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.10289 of 2026 Decided on 01st July, 2026 Praveen Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Ms. Tim Saran, Advocate. For the respo…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:25721 · CRMPM/558/2026
2026:HHC:25721 24 capsules). Thus, the police had recovered 1176 capsules in all the strips. The petitioner has been behind bars for about one year and four months. The police filed the charge sheet on 24.05.2025, and the charges were framed on 28.06.2025. The prosecution has cited 24 witnesses, out of whom only 11 wit…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/1798/2026
ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to refund the amount of Rs. 15,000/-already recovered from the Petitioner's salary alongwith interest thereon @ 12% pa.” 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that in terms of Annexure P-1, certain recoveries have been ordered to be effected from her on the alleged…
Himachal Pradesh High Court30 Jun 2026Full text
CMP.M/981/2026
List on 17th August, 2026. (G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice (Bipin C. Negi) Judge 30th June, 2026 (Tarun Singh)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court30 Jun 2026Full text
2026:HHC:25416 · RSA/156/2006
2026:HHC:25416 parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience). 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the plaintiffs filed a civil suit before the learned Trial Court seeking a declaration that they are th…
Himachal Pradesh High Court30 Jun 2026Full text
2026:HHC:25702 · CR.R/284/2026
2026:HHC:25702 learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Theog, District Shimla, H.P. (learned Trial Court), were upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.) 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present revisio…
Himachal Pradesh High Court30 Jun 2026Full text
2026:HHC:26313 · CMPMO/668/2025
2. The present petitioners had filed two applications, whereby the right to re-examine PW-3 was denied by the learned Tribunal and simultaneously, an application under Order 16 Rule 1(3) read with Section 151 of CPC for allowing the petitioners to produce the additional witness was rejected. 2 2026:HHC:26313 3. While a…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2. The facts as emerge in the present case are that the respondents/plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration, injunction and in the alternative for possession against the defendants. 3. The defendants were duly served for 04.10.2021 and on the said date, defendant No.5 neither appeared herself nor through her counsel. T…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10369/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Jul 2026Full text
CRMMO/907/2025
? Yes.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Jul 2026Full text
CRMMO/35/2026
? Yes.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court2 Jul 2026Full text
CR.R/232/2025
138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in short the "Act”), convicted and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months and pay compensation to the tune of Rs.4,00,000/- to the respondent No.1-complainant (hereinafter "complainant"). 2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the re…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10256/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.10256 of 2026 Decided on 01st July, 2026 Parkash Chand …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: M/s Rocky and Sourav Sharma, Advocates…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:25842 · EX.P./2080/2025
2. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of as satisfied, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 01, 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/6875/2025
2. In light of the fact that the issue raised by the petitioner in this petition is pending adjudication before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, as agreed, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the parties shall abide by the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgme…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:25800 · CR.R/187/2026
2026:HHC:25800 sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and pay fine to the tune of Rs.7,50,000/- to the respondent-complainant (hereinafter, ‘complainant’), was upheld. 2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the record, are that the respondent-complainant-bank instituted a com…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:25728 · CRMMO/239/2026
2026:HHC:25728 out of the FIR based on the compromise effected between the parties. 2. It has been asserted that the informant has settled the matter with the petitioner with the intervention of their relatives and respectable persons of the society. The parties want to maintain a cordial relationship. Hence, the petit…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10196/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.10196 of 2026 Decided on 01st July, 2026 Seema Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: M/s Surender Verma and Hitesh Bali, Adv…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
COPC/528/2026
2. Taking note of above documents, these contempt proceedings are closed. Notice issued to the respondent is discharged. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of her surviving 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - grievan…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/10289/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.10289 of 2026 Decided on 01st July, 2026 Praveen Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Ms. Tim Saran, Advocate. For the respo…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:25721 · CRMPM/558/2026
2026:HHC:25721 24 capsules). Thus, the police had recovered 1176 capsules in all the strips. The petitioner has been behind bars for about one year and four months. The police filed the charge sheet on 24.05.2025, and the charges were framed on 28.06.2025. The prosecution has cited 24 witnesses, out of whom only 11 wit…
Himachal Pradesh High Court1 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/1798/2026
ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to refund the amount of Rs. 15,000/-already recovered from the Petitioner's salary alongwith interest thereon @ 12% pa.” 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that in terms of Annexure P-1, certain recoveries have been ordered to be effected from her on the alleged…
Himachal Pradesh High Court30 Jun 2026Full text
CMP.M/981/2026
List on 17th August, 2026. (G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice (Bipin C. Negi) Judge 30th June, 2026 (Tarun Singh)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court30 Jun 2026Full text
2026:HHC:25416 · RSA/156/2006
2026:HHC:25416 parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience). 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the plaintiffs filed a civil suit before the learned Trial Court seeking a declaration that they are th…
Himachal Pradesh High Court30 Jun 2026Full text
2026:HHC:25702 · CR.R/284/2026
2026:HHC:25702 learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Theog, District Shimla, H.P. (learned Trial Court), were upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.) 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present revisio…
Himachal Pradesh High Court30 Jun 2026Full text
2026:HHC:26313 · CMPMO/668/2025
2. The present petitioners had filed two applications, whereby the right to re-examine PW-3 was denied by the learned Tribunal and simultaneously, an application under Order 16 Rule 1(3) read with Section 151 of CPC for allowing the petitioners to produce the additional witness was rejected. 2 2026:HHC:26313 3. While a…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis