IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 6875 of 2025. Decided on : 1 st July , 2026. Uma Devi ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R. P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral). By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:-“i) That Annexure P-1 may be set aside/quashed and the respondents may be ordered to allow the petitioner to continue in service upto the age of 60 years with all benefits incidental thereof” 2. In light of the fact that the issue raised by the petitioner in this petition is pending adjudication before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, as agreed, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the parties shall abide by the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 final judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Satya Devi’s case. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 1st July, 2026. (jai)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 6875 of 2025. Decided on : 1 st July , 2026. Uma Devi ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R. P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral). By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:-“i) That Annexure P-1 may be set aside/quashed and the respondents may be ordered to allow the petitioner to continue in service upto the age of 60 years with all benefits incidental thereof” 2. In light of the fact that the issue raised by the petitioner in this petition is pending adjudication before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, as agreed, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the parties shall abide by the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 final judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Satya Devi’s case. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 1st July, 2026. (jai)