⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
621–640 · Page 32 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11341/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.11341 of 2026 Decided on 14th July, 2026 Mr. Surinder Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate. For t…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/881/2023
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
621–640 · Page 32 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11341/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.11341 of 2026 Decided on 14th July, 2026 Mr. Surinder Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate. For t…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/881/2023
upon him was withdrawn with immediate effect and as a result thereof, recovery of an amount of Rs.1,92,479/- was effected from the DCRG amount payable to him. 3. As per the learned Counsel for the petitioner, after the petitioner had superannuated from the service of the respondent, even if it was to be assumed that th…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11233/2026
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 14, 2026 (Vinod)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
CRMMO/337/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 337 of 2026 Date of Decision : 14.07.2026 Ravinder Sharma ....Petitioner Versus M/s SARS Hotel and Cottages ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No For the petitioner : Mr. Jyotirmay Bhatt, Advocate. For…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11286/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.11286 of 2026 Decided on 14th July, 2026 Ramesh Chand …Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advo…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
EX.P./1538/2025
2. Taking note of the above, this execution petition is disposed of. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judg…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11361/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.11361 of 2026 Decided on 14th July, 2026 Nitika Bansal …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Yogesh Kumar…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11274/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 11274 of 2026 Decided on 14th July, 2026 Shyam Lal Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
LPA/393/2026
2. The learned Single Judge chose not to interfere in the order dated 29.02.2020 (Annexure P-8) wrongly mentioned as 29.02.2021 in the writ petition. The reasons, which weighed with the learned Single Judge, were that valid reasons were given by the competent authority, while rejecting the representation of the 1Whethe…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11256/2026
2. This could not be disputed on behalf of the respondent-Department, though learned Additional Advocate General submitted that any order passed in this petition shall be subject to the right of the State to assail the judgment passed by this Court in Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. (supra). Ordered accordingly. …
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
EX.P./1231/2026
Judge 13th July, 2026. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:28319 · COPC/798/2026
2. learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record a communication dated 09.07.2026, issued by the Regional Manager, HRTC, Baijnath to the petitioner whereby the matter with respect to grant of two additional increments has been processed. The said communication is ordered to be taken on record. 3. Faced with …
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:28276 · COPC/599/2026
2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 ( 2026:HHC:28276 ) petitioner is at liberty to avail appropriate…
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/16734/2026
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavits of all the applicants, coupled with the fact that till date, no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality, the same is allowed and the award amount, lying…
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:28322 · RSA/19/2025
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/9625/2026
By Order Secretary (Education to the Government of Himachal Pradesh. ” 2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner acknowledges the factum of the petitioner having been suitably adjusted. Accordingly, 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… nothing survives in this petition and …
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:28366 · CWP/7594/2024
1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. 2026:HHC:28366 “CMP No. 15195 of 2024. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in light of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed. Applicant is ordered to arrayed as respondent No.5 because this Court is of the co…
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
COPC/651/2026
2. In view of this, no further action is required to be taken, in the matter. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Notice discharged. (Virender Singh) Judge 13.7.2026 Kalpana…
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11241/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11263/2026
?…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
upon him was withdrawn with immediate effect and as a result thereof, recovery of an amount of Rs.1,92,479/- was effected from the DCRG amount payable to him. 3. As per the learned Counsel for the petitioner, after the petitioner had superannuated from the service of the respondent, even if it was to be assumed that th…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11233/2026
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 14, 2026 (Vinod)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
CRMMO/337/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 337 of 2026 Date of Decision : 14.07.2026 Ravinder Sharma ....Petitioner Versus M/s SARS Hotel and Cottages ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No For the petitioner : Mr. Jyotirmay Bhatt, Advocate. For…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11286/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.11286 of 2026 Decided on 14th July, 2026 Ramesh Chand …Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advo…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
EX.P./1538/2025
2. Taking note of the above, this execution petition is disposed of. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judg…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11361/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.11361 of 2026 Decided on 14th July, 2026 Nitika Bansal …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Yogesh Kumar…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11274/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 11274 of 2026 Decided on 14th July, 2026 Shyam Lal Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
LPA/393/2026
2. The learned Single Judge chose not to interfere in the order dated 29.02.2020 (Annexure P-8) wrongly mentioned as 29.02.2021 in the writ petition. The reasons, which weighed with the learned Single Judge, were that valid reasons were given by the competent authority, while rejecting the representation of the 1Whethe…
Himachal Pradesh High Court14 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11256/2026
2. This could not be disputed on behalf of the respondent-Department, though learned Additional Advocate General submitted that any order passed in this petition shall be subject to the right of the State to assail the judgment passed by this Court in Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. (supra). Ordered accordingly. …
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
EX.P./1231/2026
Judge 13th July, 2026. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:28319 · COPC/798/2026
2. learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record a communication dated 09.07.2026, issued by the Regional Manager, HRTC, Baijnath to the petitioner whereby the matter with respect to grant of two additional increments has been processed. The said communication is ordered to be taken on record. 3. Faced with …
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:28276 · COPC/599/2026
2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 ( 2026:HHC:28276 ) petitioner is at liberty to avail appropriate…
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/16734/2026
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavits of all the applicants, coupled with the fact that till date, no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality, the same is allowed and the award amount, lying…
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:28322 · RSA/19/2025
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/9625/2026
By Order Secretary (Education to the Government of Himachal Pradesh. ” 2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner acknowledges the factum of the petitioner having been suitably adjusted. Accordingly, 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… nothing survives in this petition and …
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:28366 · CWP/7594/2024
1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. 2026:HHC:28366 “CMP No. 15195 of 2024. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in light of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed. Applicant is ordered to arrayed as respondent No.5 because this Court is of the co…
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
COPC/651/2026
2. In view of this, no further action is required to be taken, in the matter. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Notice discharged. (Virender Singh) Judge 13.7.2026 Kalpana…
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11241/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court13 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11263/2026
?…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis