IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.11361 of 2026 Decided on 14th July, 2026 Nitika Bansal …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Issue notice. Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that representation (Annexure P-9) filed by the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority within a period of twelve weeks from today in terms of the contents therein. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 14, 2026 (vinod)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.11361 of 2026 Decided on 14th July, 2026 Nitika Bansal …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Issue notice. Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that representation (Annexure P-9) filed by the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority within a period of twelve weeks from today in terms of the contents therein. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 14, 2026 (vinod)