⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
201–220 · Page 11 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court27 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:36569 · EX.P./1955/2025
( 2026:HHC:36569 ) 2 such representation is made by the petitioners, the same shall be considered and decided within two months thereafter. 2. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 27th August, 2026 Judge (naveen)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court27 Aug 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
201–220 · Page 11 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court27 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:36569 · EX.P./1955/2025
( 2026:HHC:36569 ) 2 such representation is made by the petitioners, the same shall be considered and decided within two months thereafter. 2. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 27th August, 2026 Judge (naveen)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court27 Aug 2026Full text
CMP.M/627/2026
NIAC Ltd. Vs. Asha Devi & Ors. CMP(M) No. 627/2026 27.08.2026 Present: Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Ram Krishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant/appella…
Himachal Pradesh High Court27 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:36591 · COPC/803/2026
2. The petitioner was initially engaged on a contract basis as Clerk in the respondent No. 3/Municipal Counsel on 01.09.2001. The services of the petitioner were regularized on 25.03.2011. The sole contention raised by the petitioner is based on the judgment passed in SLP (Civil) No. 10399/2020, titled State of Himacha…
Himachal Pradesh High Court27 Aug 2026Full text
EX.P./335/2024
2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge 27th August, 2026 (Tarun Singh) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes…
Himachal Pradesh High Court27 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:36557 · FAO/568/2018
2 2026:HHC:36557 Petition No.79R/2 of 2015, titled as Jotu Devi versus Ram Lal & Another. 2. By way of award dated 18.08.2018, the learned Tribunal has allowed the claim petition, filed by respondent No.1, and awarded a sum of Rs.11,73,000/ along with interest @ 9% per annum, from the date of filing of the petition t…
Himachal Pradesh High Court27 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14879/2026
Maatri Medicity & Orthocare Hospital Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the dispute involved in this petition is covered by the said decision. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content if the respondents/competent authority are dire…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/3124/2015
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 26, 2026 Judge Mukesh…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14715/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
LPA/885/2025
For the respondent(s) : Mr. Rohit Sharma, Mr. Anuj Gupta and Mr. Surjeet Kumar, Advocates, for the workmen, in all the appeal(s). Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents-State. Bipin Chander Negi, Judge By way of the present appeals, a challenge has been laid to the impugned judgment dated 24.04.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14669/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
CMP/16312/2026
It appears that the judgment had been implemented prior to the passing of order dated 03.08.2026 in this application, imposing costs upon the respondent on account of non-implementation of the judgment. Hence, the costs imposed in the previous order shall stand waived. Taking note of the compliance affidavit, the prese…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14616/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
EX.P./1755/2026
3. In view of the above, these proceedings are closed, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, with directions to the respondents to file compliance affidavit on or before 24.09.2026. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 26, 2026 (Rishi) 45 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgme…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
LPA/787/2025
For the respondent(s) : Mr. Rohit Sharma, Mr. Anuj Gupta and Mr. Surjeet Kumar, Advocates, for the workmen, in all the appeal(s). Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents-State. Bipin Chander Negi, Judge By way of the present appeals, a challenge has been laid to the impugned judgment dated 24.04.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
CRMMO/657/2026
506, and 427 read with Section 34 of IPC and the consequential proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R. based on the compromise effected between the parties. 2. It has been asserted that the incident occurred at the spur of the moment. The parties know each other, and they want to maintain cordial relations with each…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
CMP.M/1231/2026
HP Horticulture Produce Marketing and Processing Corporation Ltd. Vs. Anil Kumar CMP(M) No.1231 of 2026 Item No.S-4 26.08.2026 Present: Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, duly supported by the affidavit of the official, delay of 125 days in …
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:36544 · CR.R/25/2015
1. Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2 2026:HHC:36544 were upheld. (The parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.) 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that …
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/8863/2025
concurrent orders passed against her by the Revenue Authorities. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the case file. 3. The case set up by the petitioner was that she had executed an agreement to purchase the subject land from Raja Joginder Sen; She was the owner of the land in dispute prior to the m…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
EX.P./747/2026
2. Taking note of above documents, the present execution petition to stand disposed of. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 redressal of her surviving grievances, if any.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14530/2026
Judge August 25 , 2026 (narender) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
CMP.M/627/2026
NIAC Ltd. Vs. Asha Devi & Ors. CMP(M) No. 627/2026 27.08.2026 Present: Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Ram Krishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant/appella…
Himachal Pradesh High Court27 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:36591 · COPC/803/2026
2. The petitioner was initially engaged on a contract basis as Clerk in the respondent No. 3/Municipal Counsel on 01.09.2001. The services of the petitioner were regularized on 25.03.2011. The sole contention raised by the petitioner is based on the judgment passed in SLP (Civil) No. 10399/2020, titled State of Himacha…
Himachal Pradesh High Court27 Aug 2026Full text
EX.P./335/2024
2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge 27th August, 2026 (Tarun Singh) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes…
Himachal Pradesh High Court27 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:36557 · FAO/568/2018
2 2026:HHC:36557 Petition No.79R/2 of 2015, titled as Jotu Devi versus Ram Lal & Another. 2. By way of award dated 18.08.2018, the learned Tribunal has allowed the claim petition, filed by respondent No.1, and awarded a sum of Rs.11,73,000/ along with interest @ 9% per annum, from the date of filing of the petition t…
Himachal Pradesh High Court27 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14879/2026
Maatri Medicity & Orthocare Hospital Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the dispute involved in this petition is covered by the said decision. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content if the respondents/competent authority are dire…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/3124/2015
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 26, 2026 Judge Mukesh…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14715/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
LPA/885/2025
For the respondent(s) : Mr. Rohit Sharma, Mr. Anuj Gupta and Mr. Surjeet Kumar, Advocates, for the workmen, in all the appeal(s). Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents-State. Bipin Chander Negi, Judge By way of the present appeals, a challenge has been laid to the impugned judgment dated 24.04.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14669/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
CMP/16312/2026
It appears that the judgment had been implemented prior to the passing of order dated 03.08.2026 in this application, imposing costs upon the respondent on account of non-implementation of the judgment. Hence, the costs imposed in the previous order shall stand waived. Taking note of the compliance affidavit, the prese…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14616/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
EX.P./1755/2026
3. In view of the above, these proceedings are closed, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, with directions to the respondents to file compliance affidavit on or before 24.09.2026. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 26, 2026 (Rishi) 45 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgme…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
LPA/787/2025
For the respondent(s) : Mr. Rohit Sharma, Mr. Anuj Gupta and Mr. Surjeet Kumar, Advocates, for the workmen, in all the appeal(s). Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents-State. Bipin Chander Negi, Judge By way of the present appeals, a challenge has been laid to the impugned judgment dated 24.04.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
CRMMO/657/2026
506, and 427 read with Section 34 of IPC and the consequential proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R. based on the compromise effected between the parties. 2. It has been asserted that the incident occurred at the spur of the moment. The parties know each other, and they want to maintain cordial relations with each…
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
CMP.M/1231/2026
HP Horticulture Produce Marketing and Processing Corporation Ltd. Vs. Anil Kumar CMP(M) No.1231 of 2026 Item No.S-4 26.08.2026 Present: Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, duly supported by the affidavit of the official, delay of 125 days in …
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
2026:HHC:36544 · CR.R/25/2015
1. Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2 2026:HHC:36544 were upheld. (The parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.) 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that …
Himachal Pradesh High Court26 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/8863/2025
concurrent orders passed against her by the Revenue Authorities. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the case file. 3. The case set up by the petitioner was that she had executed an agreement to purchase the subject land from Raja Joginder Sen; She was the owner of the land in dispute prior to the m…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
EX.P./747/2026
2. Taking note of above documents, the present execution petition to stand disposed of. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 redressal of her surviving grievances, if any.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CWP/14530/2026
Judge August 25 , 2026 (narender) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis