( 2026:HHC:36569 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Pet. No.1955 of 2025 Decided on: 27th August, 2026 Ravinder Kumar and Ors. ....Petitioners versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the mandate contained in the judgment has duly been complied with except credit of leave. Since the respondents have substantially complied with the judgment dated 20.09.2024 passed in CWP No.2887 of 2021, titled, Ravinder Kumar and Ors. vs. State of H.P. and Ors., the proceedings in the execution petition are closed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to make a representation to respondent No.2/competent authority within a period of four weeks from today and in case 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? ( 2026:HHC:36569 ) 2 such representation is made by the petitioners, the same shall be considered and decided within two months thereafter. 2. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 27th August, 2026 Judge (naveen)

( 2026:HHC:36569 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Pet. No.1955 of 2025 Decided on: 27th August, 2026 Ravinder Kumar and Ors. ....Petitioners versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the mandate contained in the judgment has duly been complied with except credit of leave. Since the respondents have substantially complied with the judgment dated 20.09.2024 passed in CWP No.2887 of 2021, titled, Ravinder Kumar and Ors. vs. State of H.P. and Ors., the proceedings in the execution petition are closed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to make a representation to respondent No.2/competent authority within a period of four weeks from today and in case 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? ( 2026:HHC:36569 ) 2 such representation is made by the petitioners, the same shall be considered and decided within two months thereafter. 2. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 27th August, 2026 Judge (naveen)