⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
541–560 · Page 28 of 57
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
WP/2690/2025
(i) The petitioner as well as respondent No.4 to appear before the SRA on 2nd September, 2026 at 11.00 a.m. (ii) The Chief Executive Officer of the SRA after hearing the petitioner as well as respondent No.4 to pass appropriate orders on the representation, a reference to which is made in the prayer Amk 3/4 15-wp 2690-…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
IA/6568/2026
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
541–560 · Page 28 of 57
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
WP/2690/2025
(i) The petitioner as well as respondent No.4 to appear before the SRA on 2nd September, 2026 at 11.00 a.m. (ii) The Chief Executive Officer of the SRA after hearing the petitioner as well as respondent No.4 to pass appropriate orders on the representation, a reference to which is made in the prayer Amk 3/4 15-wp 2690-…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
IA/6568/2026
3. In my opinion, the jurisdiction in review is limited. The Court is required to examine whether, on the basis of the material available on record, there is an error apparent on the face of the record or any other legally recognised ground warranting exercise of review jurisdiction. A review cannot be treated as an op…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11087-DB · WP/614/2026
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Mr. P.A. Kadu, Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. A.V. Palshikar, A.G.P. for respondent No.1.. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE & NIVEDITA P. MEH…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
WP/1491/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1491 OF 2025 Ashish N. Parikh @ Aashish Navinchandra Parikh .. Petitioner Vs. The Union of India, Through the Ministry of External Affairs & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. Vivek Kantawala with Mr. Jash B. Vyas and Mr. Vivek M. Shar…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39074-DB · WP/10977/2026
2. Reliance is also placed on the order dated 18th March, 2026 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat in Writ Petition No. 15662 of 2025. 3. For the reasons stated in the above mentioned orders, the Writ Petitions are partly allowed with following directions: a. The Petitioners would be entitle…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38537 · APPLN/3544/2026
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was tried vide above sessions case and came to be convicted vide above judgment and order for the offence under Sections 353 and 332 of I.P.C. Sentence awarded is maximum three months imprisonment and pay fine. Against the same, 1 of 3 (( 2 )) 918-Cri-Apln…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38808 · WP/3515/2018
2026:BHC-AUG:38808 3515.18WP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 WRIT PETITION NO.3515 OF 2018 VIKAS RAOSAHEB DANDGE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.A.S.Shinde … CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J. DATE : 25.08.2026 P.C. : 1] The learned Advocate f…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
APEAL/635/2011
(2) APEAL-635.11.11.DOCX (i) The present proceedings be transferred to the Sessions Court, having jurisdiction; (ii) The Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to take appropriate steps for transferring these proceedings to the Sessions Court, having jurisdiction; (iii) The Sessions Court, to which these proceedings would …
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CAF/187/2020
63-FA(ST)-21816-2019.doc Shabnoor IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 21816 OF 2019 Maharashtra IndustrialSHABNOOR AYUB Development Corporation … Appellant PATHAN V/s. Digitally signed by SHABNOOR AYUB Shri. Jagdish Toranlal Damani PATHAN Date: 2026.08.25 16:19:0…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
WP/1187/2024
Sonali 10-WP-1187-2024.DOC explanation has been given in the Writ Petition for the delay of about 10 years. 3. Apart from that, the same order has been challenged in earlier group of Writ Petitions bearing Writ Petition No.1649 of 2018, Writ Petition No.1651 of 2018, Writ Petition No.1653 of 2018 and Writ Petition No.1…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
IA/13046/2025
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the directions issued in the said orders have been complied with and that the petitions can Bhalerao 1 35-IA-13046-2025@ IA-13078-2025.doc be disposed of. 3. We find that specific directions were also issued to the Respondent Police Inspector to report as to what s…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
WP/5992/2025
Sbw 8-WP-5992-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5992 OF 2025 Daya Niwas B Wing Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. … Petitioner V/s. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Mumbai & Ors. … Respondents Mr. Kunal M. Patel a/w Mr. Vijaykumar Mishra for the Petitio…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
APEAL/941/2013
(i) The present proceedings be transferred to the Sessions Court, having jurisdiction; (ii) The Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to take appropriate steps for transferring these proceedings to the Sessions Court, having jurisdiction; (iii) The Sessions Court, to which these proceedings would be transferred or assigne…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CA/4739/2025
3. In so far as civil application No. 8856 of 2015 is concerned, the same is filed for condonation of delay and bringing the legal representatives of respondent No.2 on record. Perused the application. Heard learned advocate for the applicants and learned advocate for the respondents. Learned advocate for the responden…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
BA/1065/2026
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Shri A.M. Tirukh, Advocate for the applicant. Shri H.R. Dhumale, APP for the non-applicant/State. CORAM: M.M. NERLIKAR, J. DATE : 25.08.2026. After h…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
WP/7401/2026
9 &10-WP-2651-2026+.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2651 OF 2026 Vasant Nagnath Adwal Petitioner versus The State Of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary Ministry Of Health And Family and Ors Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6693 OF 2026 Pravin Maruti Said Petitio…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
IA/12689/2024
026:BHC-AS:1 Megha 501_sa_561_2024 with ia_12689_2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.561 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.12689 OF 2024 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.561 OF 2024 Srinath Madhusudan Khaitan and Anr. ...Appellants V/s. GNET Trade Links Pvt. Ltd. ...Respond…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38811 · WP/1853/2018
3] In view of the same, nothing survives in the present Petition and the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] JUDGE DDC…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
BA/1269/2026
Total 701.740 Kgs MD was recovered from A5. It is alleged that the license of the factory where the raid was carried, was in Page 2 of 4 MEERA JADHAV 908 BA1269.2026.DOC the name of A10. He had allowed the premises and the machinery etc. there to A7 who was controller of the factory from whom 1723.250 kg of. MD was rec…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11090-DB · WP/1647/2026
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Mr. P.S. Kshirsagar, Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. A.V. Palshikar, A.G.P. for respondent No.1. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE & NIVEDITA …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
3. In my opinion, the jurisdiction in review is limited. The Court is required to examine whether, on the basis of the material available on record, there is an error apparent on the face of the record or any other legally recognised ground warranting exercise of review jurisdiction. A review cannot be treated as an op…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11087-DB · WP/614/2026
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Mr. P.A. Kadu, Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. A.V. Palshikar, A.G.P. for respondent No.1.. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE & NIVEDITA P. MEH…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
WP/1491/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1491 OF 2025 Ashish N. Parikh @ Aashish Navinchandra Parikh .. Petitioner Vs. The Union of India, Through the Ministry of External Affairs & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. Vivek Kantawala with Mr. Jash B. Vyas and Mr. Vivek M. Shar…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39074-DB · WP/10977/2026
2. Reliance is also placed on the order dated 18th March, 2026 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat in Writ Petition No. 15662 of 2025. 3. For the reasons stated in the above mentioned orders, the Writ Petitions are partly allowed with following directions: a. The Petitioners would be entitle…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38537 · APPLN/3544/2026
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was tried vide above sessions case and came to be convicted vide above judgment and order for the offence under Sections 353 and 332 of I.P.C. Sentence awarded is maximum three months imprisonment and pay fine. Against the same, 1 of 3 (( 2 )) 918-Cri-Apln…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38808 · WP/3515/2018
2026:BHC-AUG:38808 3515.18WP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 WRIT PETITION NO.3515 OF 2018 VIKAS RAOSAHEB DANDGE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.A.S.Shinde … CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J. DATE : 25.08.2026 P.C. : 1] The learned Advocate f…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
APEAL/635/2011
(2) APEAL-635.11.11.DOCX (i) The present proceedings be transferred to the Sessions Court, having jurisdiction; (ii) The Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to take appropriate steps for transferring these proceedings to the Sessions Court, having jurisdiction; (iii) The Sessions Court, to which these proceedings would …
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CAF/187/2020
63-FA(ST)-21816-2019.doc Shabnoor IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 21816 OF 2019 Maharashtra IndustrialSHABNOOR AYUB Development Corporation … Appellant PATHAN V/s. Digitally signed by SHABNOOR AYUB Shri. Jagdish Toranlal Damani PATHAN Date: 2026.08.25 16:19:0…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
WP/1187/2024
Sonali 10-WP-1187-2024.DOC explanation has been given in the Writ Petition for the delay of about 10 years. 3. Apart from that, the same order has been challenged in earlier group of Writ Petitions bearing Writ Petition No.1649 of 2018, Writ Petition No.1651 of 2018, Writ Petition No.1653 of 2018 and Writ Petition No.1…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
IA/13046/2025
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the directions issued in the said orders have been complied with and that the petitions can Bhalerao 1 35-IA-13046-2025@ IA-13078-2025.doc be disposed of. 3. We find that specific directions were also issued to the Respondent Police Inspector to report as to what s…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
WP/5992/2025
Sbw 8-WP-5992-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5992 OF 2025 Daya Niwas B Wing Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. … Petitioner V/s. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Mumbai & Ors. … Respondents Mr. Kunal M. Patel a/w Mr. Vijaykumar Mishra for the Petitio…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
APEAL/941/2013
(i) The present proceedings be transferred to the Sessions Court, having jurisdiction; (ii) The Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to take appropriate steps for transferring these proceedings to the Sessions Court, having jurisdiction; (iii) The Sessions Court, to which these proceedings would be transferred or assigne…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
CA/4739/2025
3. In so far as civil application No. 8856 of 2015 is concerned, the same is filed for condonation of delay and bringing the legal representatives of respondent No.2 on record. Perused the application. Heard learned advocate for the applicants and learned advocate for the respondents. Learned advocate for the responden…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
BA/1065/2026
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Shri A.M. Tirukh, Advocate for the applicant. Shri H.R. Dhumale, APP for the non-applicant/State. CORAM: M.M. NERLIKAR, J. DATE : 25.08.2026. After h…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
WP/7401/2026
9 &10-WP-2651-2026+.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2651 OF 2026 Vasant Nagnath Adwal Petitioner versus The State Of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary Ministry Of Health And Family and Ors Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6693 OF 2026 Pravin Maruti Said Petitio…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
IA/12689/2024
026:BHC-AS:1 Megha 501_sa_561_2024 with ia_12689_2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.561 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.12689 OF 2024 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.561 OF 2024 Srinath Madhusudan Khaitan and Anr. ...Appellants V/s. GNET Trade Links Pvt. Ltd. ...Respond…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38811 · WP/1853/2018
3] In view of the same, nothing survives in the present Petition and the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] JUDGE DDC…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
BA/1269/2026
Total 701.740 Kgs MD was recovered from A5. It is alleged that the license of the factory where the raid was carried, was in Page 2 of 4 MEERA JADHAV 908 BA1269.2026.DOC the name of A10. He had allowed the premises and the machinery etc. there to A7 who was controller of the factory from whom 1723.250 kg of. MD was rec…
Bombay High Court25 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11090-DB · WP/1647/2026
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Mr. P.S. Kshirsagar, Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. A.V. Palshikar, A.G.P. for respondent No.1. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE & NIVEDITA …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis