10-WP-1187-2024.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1187 OF 2024 Girdhari Lal Goenka …Petitioner through POA Holder Person Sumit Kumar Ladia Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents Mr. Vikrant Pandey a/w. Mr. Eshaan Naik, for the Petitioner. Mr. Nilkanth D. Gadge i/b. Mr. Narayan R. Awate, for Respondent No.2. Mr. Mayur Sonavane, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 25th AUGUST 2026 PC:- 1. Heard Mr. Pandey, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. Sonavane, learned APP appearing for the Respondent-State. 2. By this Writ Petition, the challenge is to the legality and validity of the order dated 30th September 2013, by which the process has been issued under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The said order is challenged by filing the present Petition, which has been filed on 4th September 2023. No Page 1 Sonali 10-WP-1187-2024.DOC explanation has been given in the Writ Petition for the delay of about 10 years.

3. Apart from that, the same order has been challenged in earlier group of Writ Petitions bearing Writ Petition No.1649 of 2018, Writ Petition No.1651 of 2018, Writ Petition No.1653 of 2018 and Writ Petition No.1656 of 2018 raising the same contention which is raised in this Writ Petition. All these Writ Petition (one concerning the present complaint) have been dismissed by a learned Single Judge by order dated 19th April 2018. Thus, the filing of this Writ Petition is abuse of the process of law. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] SONALI MILIND PATIL Digitally signed by SONALI MILIND PATIL Date: 2026.08.27 17:33:40 +0530 Page 2 Sonali

10-WP-1187-2024.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1187 OF 2024 Girdhari Lal Goenka …Petitioner through POA Holder Person Sumit Kumar Ladia Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents Mr. Vikrant Pandey a/w. Mr. Eshaan Naik, for the Petitioner. Mr. Nilkanth D. Gadge i/b. Mr. Narayan R. Awate, for Respondent No.2. Mr. Mayur Sonavane, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 25th AUGUST 2026 PC:- 1. Heard Mr. Pandey, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. Sonavane, learned APP appearing for the Respondent-State. 2. By this Writ Petition, the challenge is to the legality and validity of the order dated 30th September 2013, by which the process has been issued under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The said order is challenged by filing the present Petition, which has been filed on 4th September 2023. No Page 1 Sonali 10-WP-1187-2024.DOC explanation has been given in the Writ Petition for the delay of about 10 years.

3. Apart from that, the same order has been challenged in earlier group of Writ Petitions bearing Writ Petition No.1649 of 2018, Writ Petition No.1651 of 2018, Writ Petition No.1653 of 2018 and Writ Petition No.1656 of 2018 raising the same contention which is raised in this Writ Petition. All these Writ Petition (one concerning the present complaint) have been dismissed by a learned Single Judge by order dated 19th April 2018. Thus, the filing of this Writ Petition is abuse of the process of law. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] SONALI MILIND PATIL Digitally signed by SONALI MILIND PATIL Date: 2026.08.27 17:33:40 +0530 Page 2 Sonali