Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
361–380 · Page 19 of 57
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39603 · APEAL/236/2006
1. In this appeal, there is challenge to the judgment and order of acquittal dated 04.07.2005 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raver in Summary Criminal Case No.800 of 2004, acquitting the present respondent from offence punishable under Section 138 of CriAppeal-236-2006 -2- the Negotiable Instruments…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
361–380 · Page 19 of 57
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39603 · APEAL/236/2006
1. In this appeal, there is challenge to the judgment and order of acquittal dated 04.07.2005 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raver in Summary Criminal Case No.800 of 2004, acquitting the present respondent from offence punishable under Section 138 of CriAppeal-236-2006 -2- the Negotiable Instruments…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39851-DB · WP/218/2023
3. Though the present petition has been filed belatedly and the impugned order indicates that there was no immediate threat to the life of the petitioner, we are of the opinion that the petitioner may file a fresh application before the competent authority for grant of a revolver/pistol license, if there is, in fact, a…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:40106-DB · WP/11059/2026
5. Therefore, these petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents to undertake scrutiny of petitioners’ proposals independently on its own merits and take appropriate decision, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
IA/17691/2023
Similarly, no sufficient explanation has been given for the period from March 2022 till October 2023. The reason stated in paragraph 8 is general in nature and does not satisfactorily explain the delay during these periods. In these circumstances, this Court finds that sufficient cause for condonation of delay has not …
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39781 · CA/9663/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:39781 ( 1 ) 928 ca 9663.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 928 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9663 OF 2026 IN CRAST/25704/2026 JIJABHAU TUKARAM SHINDE VERSUS DEELIP VITHALRAO GADGE ….. Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R.R. Shaikh h/f. Bayas Anandsingh Sangramsingh ….. CORAM : SANJAY A. DES…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AS:36188 · WP/7522/2026
katkam Page No. 1 of 2 k 2/2 41 wp 7522.26 as.doc 2. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of by leaving open the remedy of filing Appeal/Revision for the Petitioner against Recovery Certificate dated 26 May 2023. The amount deposited in this Court, which is permitted to be withdrawn by the Respondent-Credit Society sh…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
BA/1519/2026
Digitally signed by H.C.SHIV 906.BA1519.26.DOC HEMANT HEMANT CHANDERSEN CHANDERSEN SHIV SHIV Date: 2026.09.05 11:24:48 +0300 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.1519 OF 2026 Zeenath Munawarali Shah …. Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Mithilesh…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
APPLN/474/2026
1 979criappln474.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 979 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 474 OF 2026 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2461 OF 2026 BHAGWAT DNYANOBA MULGIR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Salunke Sudarshan J. APP for Respondents/State : Mr. …
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39722-DB · WP/7597/2026
8. It is made clear that, this order is passed only in the peculiar facts of this case without touching to other aspects of the matter. This order shall not be treated as precedent and shall not be cited as precedent. This order is restricted to these p…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11464-DB · CP/183/2025
Mr. A.M. Sudame, Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Shaikh Majid, Counsel for respondent no.2. Ms. K.K. Pathak, Counsel for respondent nos. 3 and 4. ..... CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. SEPTEMBER 1, 2026 The Counsel for respondent no.2 submits that the order under question has been complied with. 2] Th…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39692 · WP/1850/2012
2. Accordingly, the orders of status quo dated 29.02.2012 and 01.03.2012 shall continue to operate till disposal of the suits. 903 WP1843.2012+ -2- 3. Needless to state that the trial court shall make an endeavour to decide the suits expeditiously and in any case within a period of one year from today and shall not be …
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
IA/12245/2024
87-IA-12244-2024.doc Sayali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12244 OF 2024 SAYALI DEEPAK IN UPASANI FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 32628 OF 2022 Digitally signed by WITHSAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Date: 2026.09.02 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12245 OF 2024 11:29:03 +0530 The St…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
WP/11513/2026
1 The Writ Petition seek direction to rectify the Mutation Entry No. 2545 in respect of land bearing survey No.78/4/b, situated at Village Nadhal, Taluka Khalapur, District Raigad, with remark ‘Vane’. The Petition also seek restoration of the nomenclature stated in the said land while setting aside the Mutation Entry, …
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39856-DB · WP/674/2021
2026:BHC-AUG:39856-DB 918 wp 674-21 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 918 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 674 OF 2021 GANESH SAMPAT SHELAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Ms. A. S. Kharade h/f Mr. Karpe Rahul R., Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for Respondent-Sta…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:40092-DB · WP/11013/2026
“4. In various judgments of this Court, it was consistently held that the Government Resolution dated 24/08/2017, would operate prospectively and would not have the effect of retrospective denial of advance increments. The State Government and various Zilla Parishads had filed Review Petitions seeking review of various…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11528 · APPR/173/2026
CORAM : MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J. DATE : 01/09/2026 The record shows that vide order dated 28.07.2026, the sentence imposed upon the present applicant came to be suspended till the returnable date, subject to the applicant depositing the amount of Rs.78,000/- before this Court till 31.07.2026. The applicant has already depo…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11659-DB · APPW/260/2026
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. D. R. Anandani, Advocate for applicant/petitioner. Ms. S. S. Jachak, APP for State. Ms. A. M. Raut, Advocate for intervenor. CORAM : URMILA …
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CAS/1012/2025
Mr. Rohan Bhisidkar, Advocate for respondent No.3 Ms. I. P. Khisti, Advocate for respondent Nos.1, 2(A to C) in SA 224/23 and for respondent Nos.1(A to C) and 2 in SA 226/23 and for appellant in SA 334/25. Mr. N. J. Patil, Advocate for respondent No.2(i and iii) in S.A. 334/25. CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J. DATE :…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
IA/1848/2026
85-FA(ST)-5886-2024 (copy).doc Sayali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 5886 OF 2024 WITHDigitally signed by SAYALI DEEPAK INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 16132 OF 2024UPASANI Date: 2026.09.02 11:29:03 +0530 State Of Maharashtra Through The Deputy…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AS:36392-DB · WP/9037/2026
b) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus or Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order and Direction, directing the respondents to fix the number of posts of Laboratory Assistants in Secondary, Higher Secondary Schools and Junior Colleges with Science faculty.” 2. Thus, the pe…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2026:BHC-AUG:39851-DB · WP/218/2023
3. Though the present petition has been filed belatedly and the impugned order indicates that there was no immediate threat to the life of the petitioner, we are of the opinion that the petitioner may file a fresh application before the competent authority for grant of a revolver/pistol license, if there is, in fact, a…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:40106-DB · WP/11059/2026
5. Therefore, these petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents to undertake scrutiny of petitioners’ proposals independently on its own merits and take appropriate decision, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
IA/17691/2023
Similarly, no sufficient explanation has been given for the period from March 2022 till October 2023. The reason stated in paragraph 8 is general in nature and does not satisfactorily explain the delay during these periods. In these circumstances, this Court finds that sufficient cause for condonation of delay has not …
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39781 · CA/9663/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:39781 ( 1 ) 928 ca 9663.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 928 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9663 OF 2026 IN CRAST/25704/2026 JIJABHAU TUKARAM SHINDE VERSUS DEELIP VITHALRAO GADGE ….. Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R.R. Shaikh h/f. Bayas Anandsingh Sangramsingh ….. CORAM : SANJAY A. DES…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AS:36188 · WP/7522/2026
katkam Page No. 1 of 2 k 2/2 41 wp 7522.26 as.doc 2. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of by leaving open the remedy of filing Appeal/Revision for the Petitioner against Recovery Certificate dated 26 May 2023. The amount deposited in this Court, which is permitted to be withdrawn by the Respondent-Credit Society sh…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
BA/1519/2026
Digitally signed by H.C.SHIV 906.BA1519.26.DOC HEMANT HEMANT CHANDERSEN CHANDERSEN SHIV SHIV Date: 2026.09.05 11:24:48 +0300 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.1519 OF 2026 Zeenath Munawarali Shah …. Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Mithilesh…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
APPLN/474/2026
1 979criappln474.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 979 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 474 OF 2026 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2461 OF 2026 BHAGWAT DNYANOBA MULGIR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Salunke Sudarshan J. APP for Respondents/State : Mr. …
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39722-DB · WP/7597/2026
8. It is made clear that, this order is passed only in the peculiar facts of this case without touching to other aspects of the matter. This order shall not be treated as precedent and shall not be cited as precedent. This order is restricted to these p…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11464-DB · CP/183/2025
Mr. A.M. Sudame, Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Shaikh Majid, Counsel for respondent no.2. Ms. K.K. Pathak, Counsel for respondent nos. 3 and 4. ..... CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. SEPTEMBER 1, 2026 The Counsel for respondent no.2 submits that the order under question has been complied with. 2] Th…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39692 · WP/1850/2012
2. Accordingly, the orders of status quo dated 29.02.2012 and 01.03.2012 shall continue to operate till disposal of the suits. 903 WP1843.2012+ -2- 3. Needless to state that the trial court shall make an endeavour to decide the suits expeditiously and in any case within a period of one year from today and shall not be …
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
IA/12245/2024
87-IA-12244-2024.doc Sayali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12244 OF 2024 SAYALI DEEPAK IN UPASANI FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 32628 OF 2022 Digitally signed by WITHSAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Date: 2026.09.02 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12245 OF 2024 11:29:03 +0530 The St…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
WP/11513/2026
1 The Writ Petition seek direction to rectify the Mutation Entry No. 2545 in respect of land bearing survey No.78/4/b, situated at Village Nadhal, Taluka Khalapur, District Raigad, with remark ‘Vane’. The Petition also seek restoration of the nomenclature stated in the said land while setting aside the Mutation Entry, …
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39856-DB · WP/674/2021
2026:BHC-AUG:39856-DB 918 wp 674-21 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 918 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 674 OF 2021 GANESH SAMPAT SHELAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Ms. A. S. Kharade h/f Mr. Karpe Rahul R., Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for Respondent-Sta…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:40092-DB · WP/11013/2026
“4. In various judgments of this Court, it was consistently held that the Government Resolution dated 24/08/2017, would operate prospectively and would not have the effect of retrospective denial of advance increments. The State Government and various Zilla Parishads had filed Review Petitions seeking review of various…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11528 · APPR/173/2026
CORAM : MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J. DATE : 01/09/2026 The record shows that vide order dated 28.07.2026, the sentence imposed upon the present applicant came to be suspended till the returnable date, subject to the applicant depositing the amount of Rs.78,000/- before this Court till 31.07.2026. The applicant has already depo…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11659-DB · APPW/260/2026
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. D. R. Anandani, Advocate for applicant/petitioner. Ms. S. S. Jachak, APP for State. Ms. A. M. Raut, Advocate for intervenor. CORAM : URMILA …
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CAS/1012/2025
Mr. Rohan Bhisidkar, Advocate for respondent No.3 Ms. I. P. Khisti, Advocate for respondent Nos.1, 2(A to C) in SA 224/23 and for respondent Nos.1(A to C) and 2 in SA 226/23 and for appellant in SA 334/25. Mr. N. J. Patil, Advocate for respondent No.2(i and iii) in S.A. 334/25. CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J. DATE :…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
IA/1848/2026
85-FA(ST)-5886-2024 (copy).doc Sayali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 5886 OF 2024 WITHDigitally signed by SAYALI DEEPAK INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 16132 OF 2024UPASANI Date: 2026.09.02 11:29:03 +0530 State Of Maharashtra Through The Deputy…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AS:36392-DB · WP/9037/2026
b) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus or Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order and Direction, directing the respondents to fix the number of posts of Laboratory Assistants in Secondary, Higher Secondary Schools and Junior Colleges with Science faculty.” 2. Thus, the pe…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis