2026:BHC-AUG:39851-DB 920 wp 218-23 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 920 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 218 OF 2023 JAYESH PRAKASH PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Syed Masood Chand, Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. M. N. Ghanekar, APP for Respondent-State …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 01/09/2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 06/09/2017 passed by the District Collector, Dhule, rejecting his prayer for grant of a revolver/pistol license on the basis of his application dated 21/09/2013. The said order was subsequently confirmed by the Divisional Commissioner by order dated 21/11/2017. 3. Though the present petition has been filed belatedly and the impugned order indicates that there was no immediate threat to the life of the petitioner, we are of the opinion that the petitioner may file a fresh application before the competent authority for grant of a revolver/pistol license, if there is, in fact, any threat to his life. VS Maind/ Page|1 920 wp 218-23 . 4. Learned APP also submits that as and when such an application is filed, the same will be considered and dealt with in accordance with law.

5. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application before the competent authority for grant of a revolver/pistol license. The said application, if filed, shall be considered in accordance with law. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|2

2026:BHC-AUG:39851-DB 920 wp 218-23 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 920 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 218 OF 2023 JAYESH PRAKASH PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Syed Masood Chand, Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. M. N. Ghanekar, APP for Respondent-State …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 01/09/2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 06/09/2017 passed by the District Collector, Dhule, rejecting his prayer for grant of a revolver/pistol license on the basis of his application dated 21/09/2013. The said order was subsequently confirmed by the Divisional Commissioner by order dated 21/11/2017. 3. Though the present petition has been filed belatedly and the impugned order indicates that there was no immediate threat to the life of the petitioner, we are of the opinion that the petitioner may file a fresh application before the competent authority for grant of a revolver/pistol license, if there is, in fact, any threat to his life. VS Maind/ Page|1 920 wp 218-23 . 4. Learned APP also submits that as and when such an application is filed, the same will be considered and dealt with in accordance with law.

5. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application before the competent authority for grant of a revolver/pistol license. The said application, if filed, shall be considered in accordance with law. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|2