Law on Tips(LOTS)India's Premier Legal News

⌘K

Home
The Bar Room
The Gazette
The Library
Legal League
Judgments
Careers

⚖

Loading…

Law on Tips.

A free Indian legal platform. Bringing you the latest judgments, legislative updates, and in-depth legal analysis from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and Tribunals.

© 2026 Law on Tips Media Pvt Ltd.

Explore

The Bar Room
The Gazette
The Library
Compare Acts
Legal League
Judgments
Careers

Trust & Standards

About Us
Editorial Policy
Fact-Checking
Corrections
Methodology
Ownership
Masthead
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Contact

Subscribe

Get the latest legal news delivered to your inbox daily.

Bar News Acts League

Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra | Judgment | Law on Tips

Judgment Library/Case record

Supreme Court of India

Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra

(2003) 1 SCC 557

Decision date: 2002
Text availability: Summary or case record only
Bench: 2-Judge Bench

Source: landmark_precedents seed

Case summary

For deciding an application under Order 7 Rule 11 (Rejection of Plaint), only the averments in the plaint are relevant; pleas taken in written statement cannot be considered.

Advertisement

Principle

For deciding an application under Order 7 Rule 11 (Rejection of Plaint), only the averments in the plaint are relevant; pleas taken in written statement cannot be considered.

Connected provisions and cases

interpretsThe Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Order VII Rule 11 · Order 7 Rule 11 Other decisions on this provision →

Related judgments

Dahiben v. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali · (2020) 7 SCC 366 · 2020 · 1 shared provision
T. Arivandandam v. T.V. Satyapal · (1977) 4 SCC 467 · 1977 · 1 shared provision

Judgment text

Full judgment text is not available in this record.

Judgment Library/Case record

Supreme Court of India

Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra

(2003) 1 SCC 557

Decision date: 2002
Text availability: Summary or case record only
Bench: 2-Judge Bench

Source: landmark_precedents seed

Case summary

For deciding an application under Order 7 Rule 11 (Rejection of Plaint), only the averments in the plaint are relevant; pleas taken in written statement cannot be considered.

Advertisement

Principle

For deciding an application under Order 7 Rule 11 (Rejection of Plaint), only the averments in the plaint are relevant; pleas taken in written statement cannot be considered.

Connected provisions and cases

interpretsThe Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Order VII Rule 11 · Order 7 Rule 11 Other decisions on this provision →

Related judgments

Dahiben v. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali · (2020) 7 SCC 366 · 2020 · 1 shared provision
T. Arivandandam v. T.V. Satyapal · (1977) 4 SCC 467 · 1977 · 1 shared provision

Judgment text

Full judgment text is not available in this record.