Law on Tips(LOTS)India's Premier Legal News

⌘K

Home
The Bar Room
The Gazette
The Library
Legal League
Judgments
Careers

⚖

Loading…

Law on Tips.

A free Indian legal platform. Bringing you the latest judgments, legislative updates, and in-depth legal analysis from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and Tribunals.

© 2026 Law on Tips Media Pvt Ltd.

Explore

The Bar Room
The Gazette
The Library
Compare Acts
Legal League
Judgments
Careers

Trust & Standards

About Us
Editorial Policy
Fact-Checking
Corrections
Methodology
Ownership
Masthead
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Contact

Subscribe

Get the latest legal news delivered to your inbox daily.

Bar News Acts League

Dahiben v. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali | Judgment | Law on Tips

Judgment Library/Case record

Supreme Court of India

Dahiben v. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali

(2020) 7 SCC 366

Decision date: 2020
Text availability: Summary or case record only
Bench: 2-Judge Bench

Source: landmark_precedents seed

Case summary

Plaint must be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 where the suit is manifestly vexatious, barred by limitation, or discloses no genuine cause of action on a reading of the plaint.

Advertisement

Principle

Plaint must be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 where the suit is manifestly vexatious, barred by limitation, or discloses no genuine cause of action on a reading of the plaint.

Connected provisions and cases

interpretsThe Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Order VII Rule 11 · Order 7 Rule 11 Other decisions on this provision →

Related judgments

Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra · (2003) 1 SCC 557 · 2002 · 1 shared provision
T. Arivandandam v. T.V. Satyapal · (1977) 4 SCC 467 · 1977 · 1 shared provision

Judgment text

Full judgment text is not available in this record.

Judgment Library/Case record

Supreme Court of India

Dahiben v. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali

(2020) 7 SCC 366

Decision date: 2020
Text availability: Summary or case record only
Bench: 2-Judge Bench

Source: landmark_precedents seed

Case summary

Plaint must be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 where the suit is manifestly vexatious, barred by limitation, or discloses no genuine cause of action on a reading of the plaint.

Advertisement

Principle

Plaint must be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 where the suit is manifestly vexatious, barred by limitation, or discloses no genuine cause of action on a reading of the plaint.

Connected provisions and cases

interpretsThe Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Order VII Rule 11 · Order 7 Rule 11 Other decisions on this provision →

Related judgments

Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra · (2003) 1 SCC 557 · 2002 · 1 shared provision
T. Arivandandam v. T.V. Satyapal · (1977) 4 SCC 467 · 1977 · 1 shared provision

Judgment text

Full judgment text is not available in this record.