Principle

Lord Atkin: Scope of Section 32(1); statements as to cause of death or circumstances of the transaction resulting in death; statement made before injury arose is admissible. | Scope of statements as to cause of death applied to Section 26 BSA (corresponding to Section 32(1) IEA).

Connected provisions and cases

• interpretsThe Indian Evidence Act, 1872 · Section 32Other decisions on this provision →
• interpretsThe Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 · Section 26Other decisions on this provision →

Related judgments

• Atbir v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi · (2010) 9 SCC 1 · 2010 · 2 shared provisions
• Lakhan v. State of M.P. · (2010) 10 SCC 643 · 2010 · 1 shared provision
• Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay · AIR 1958 SC 22 · 1957 · 1 shared provision

Judgment text

Full judgment text is not available in this record.

Principle

Lord Atkin: Scope of Section 32(1); statements as to cause of death or circumstances of the transaction resulting in death; statement made before injury arose is admissible. | Scope of statements as to cause of death applied to Section 26 BSA (corresponding to Section 32(1) IEA).

Connected provisions and cases

• interpretsThe Indian Evidence Act, 1872 · Section 32Other decisions on this provision →
• interpretsThe Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 · Section 26Other decisions on this provision →

Related judgments

• Atbir v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi · (2010) 9 SCC 1 · 2010 · 2 shared provisions
• Lakhan v. State of M.P. · (2010) 10 SCC 643 · 2010 · 1 shared provision
• Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay · AIR 1958 SC 22 · 1957 · 1 shared provision

Judgment text

Full judgment text is not available in this record.